A Woman’s Rights: By the Editorial Board
This article seriously try’s to argue that women who inadvertently kill their baby by harming themselves aren’t responsible for killing the baby? Even more than that - that its a womens rights issue?
It's literally goes as far to defend a woman who gave birth to twins and shoved them in a suitcase and left them on the side of the highway.
The NYT editorial board is void of all morality.
it is a woman right to abort, at ANY stage
"womens rights"
as in remove all consequence and responsibility from women's lives
they just want a care free life, stop placating these ass hats and make them be adults that have to deal with their actions
Fuck all that shit. I used to believe that ‘good women’ existed, all the bullshit about ‘taming’ one. The more I think about it, the more absurd talking with and respecting a hole seems. Roasties are the knife that killed us, who cares if the Jews pointed it in our direction. No knife, no wound, and the Jews would be much easier to hunt without women holding us back.
Women shouldn't have rights.
Reminder that this was written collectivey by the editorial board, of which an open anti white racist, Sarah Jeong, is a member.
They are void of any morality and are truly the enemy of the people.
The question isn’t what we do with them - it’s what we do with the people that believe their garbage as if it were the word of God.
Of course there is no morality, these are women we're talking about. They never evolved to develop morals, but only to blend in and play along. Also do they thrive and profit from the weaknesses of men, destroying families in the process. Let them suffer for what they are, in the future it will no longer be the job of men to babysit these parasites and put up with their ceaseless empty words. May they and the men who follow them into the abyss stay there to never return to act as dead weight to the ambitions of man and to the growth of his intellect.
I’m looking forward to the day we can finally replace these cunts with robots. Women have been championing the seeds of their own obsolescence for a long time now, I say it’s time to make that flower finally bloom
Maybe you should check the next stage being prepared
>Post birth abortion
jme.bmj.com
slate.com
Personally, I'd like to burn them all alive and have a hotdog roast on their corpses to celebrate. Roasting the roasties, as it were.
What the fuck dude.
Women can’t be seriously pushing for that. I mean, I guess the NYT article amounts to it after it defends the woman who gave birth in her tub and instead of receiving medical attention, threw them on the side of the highway in a suitcase.
But if the fetus dies by the hand of the man they want it charged as a homicide l.
Or just beat them within and inch of their lives if any one of them steps out of line. Making them fear men again is about the only thing that cunts have any shred of respect for. It's also why they go after "bad boys", even if they're complete scum. They like monsters because they are monsters and would like to fill the world with more of their monstrous kind. If it was not for their one utility of birthing children, they would have been abandoned ages ago.
Do you expect women to be forced to deal with the consequences of their actions?
I have bad news for you.
Women are the Jews of genders. They can't be blamed for shit.
Yes. That is the double standard they paint in the article.
I don’t even know how they can justify this. Like I said - they are the enemy of the people - but what do we do about the people who are so stupid they are persuaded by this?
she should do that
i dont want to fucking pay alimony if condom breaks
It is at this point that you realize that when women are put in the same place as men to make decisions and exercise freedom they reveal themselves to be what they were all along, men's very fucking ANTITHESIS.
> by the NYT editorial board
This would be a lot more convincing if it hadn't come from the same people pounding the table for WWIII in Syria and babbling incoherently about an fictional Russian conspiracy for the last three years.
Except that’s the wrong direction.
If we want to make a deal about abortion, they need to be two-party consent abortions in cases of consensual sexual. It would still mean lots of blacks get aborted and far less whites.
>They can't be blamed for shit.
Then let's make every woman and fucking white knight suffer and burn alive for it, for the scum that they are.
Unironically this
>But muh future presidents and doctors
Most abortions are carried out on young, unmarried women, generally from poorer and minority backgrounds. The spawn of these women are not the cream of the crop, you aren't aborting future doctors, you are aborting future felons.
>But muh white race
Most abortions are performed on non-whites.
Good luck with that.
Just live your life the way you think a life should be lived. Give the right example and simply say what you think.
Never try to argue.
They are animals. You are human.
Never forget that.
A human doesn't have to argue with an insect.
>A human doesn't have to argue with an insect.
Maybe, but an ant has no quarrel with a boot. Similarly, sexbots and artificial wombs have no quarrel with their biological counterparts.
Times almost up kikes.
I see your Marvel reference but it is wrong.
When a bullet ant or a snake goes by, do you try to explain to them you do not wish to be bitten. You know if you let them touch you, they will hurt. Either you pass above them and decide to ignore them or you decide to kill them.
But if you kill them, their kind will try and hurt you as well.
Just ignore the degenerates when they do not attack you. And if they do, respond.
Fair point. I was referring to the inevitable rise of certain technology and how it has the chance to render women obsolete, or at least force them to compete. I look at the prospects of obsolescence and competition as being the boot which has no real quarrel with women.
Yeah, but I'm not sure it will come soon enough.
We will have sexbots but that's about it.
Remember that your women have the right to kill babies at any time goys
Also remember that you must take in millions of africans and muslims into your countries
What will take for whitecucks to chimp out?
Someday, whether in our lifetimes or beyond, it will come and it will be good.
I'm all for women's rights desu. specifically the right to remain silent.
I'm okay with non-Muslims aborting their future-degenerate bastards. Nothing else is helping the human race as much as Jewish abortion doctors.
Amen to that, friend.
Amen brother. May all that is good in men triumph against those who would hinder the bringing of this blessing into the world.
I think most women fight for their babies like bear moms for their cubs and even dies for them if needed.
Abortion i think is a womans right, had men had babies it would have been a man right.
Its up to us men to show we can provide for a family.
Though at some point in pregnancy the babies rights overtake the mothers rights and i think that cutoff point is when the baby can survive outside the womb with medical aid.
Soon enough "abortion" is going to become mandatory, scientists are going to create methods that predict baby's future personalty, and if the baby happens to have personality traits that might go again the leftist agenda, the baby is going to get killed before birth, whether the women wants it or not, in order to insure "safe and equal society".
All the right wing people that support such an immoral thing just because it's mostly blacks killing their own babies are going to pay for it dearly.
>"The Pre-persons" is a science fiction short story by American writer Philip K. Dick. It was first published in Fantasy and Science Fiction magazine, October 1974.
>The story was a pro-life response to Roe v. Wade. Dick imagines a future where the United States Congress has decided that abortion is legal until the soul enters the body. The specific instant is defined by the administration, at present the moment a person has the ability to perform simple algebraic calculations (around the age of 12).
en.wikipedia.org
Guess what. A baby can’t survive on its own without a parent for years.
What difference does it make if the baby needs the mother to survive inside or out?
>this is the point you are arguing.
Also it is the mans sperm that enters the egg. The baby originated from the father. The mother just provides nourishment. The man should have say in the abortion (consensual sex only of course).
Thank you will read.
A Scanner Darkly is one of my favorite books.