What are the reasons England (without London) voted for Brexit?

>There has never been majority popular support for any non white migration or migration in general into the country.

Didn’t you vote for your MPs when you let in all the Commonwealthers?

Attached: CDDC4525-CF78-4DC6-B4DB-91DE0A0E9DF3.jpg (634x390, 88K)

That kid died.

Freedom and sovereignty - something a Kraut would never be able to value

I've never been able to confirm this.
Source?

is that how the toy is supposed to work?

We needed the workers because you cunts kept starting wars and our people were stupid enough to go and fight in them.
Letting people in doesn't equal liking them.

You don't understand our unitary FPTP political system, clearly an if you did you wouldn't say such silly things as splitting the right wing vote in the 70s and 80s. Examine the opinion polling data and see for yourself.

There is no political solution that will present itself in time via the ballot box and that was the case even 40 years ago. Our system is extremely vulnerable to even low % of foreigners.

gravity maze

he didnt. and im pretty sure hes not able to (die) since hes a child, their rag doll physics arent as harmful as a full adult. also kids are very flexible their bones arent hardened. he lived.

Yes. I did that as a kid all the time. It’s about 5 meter (15feet) deep. Pretty cool to fall to the bottom.

working class defiance against the political and corporate elite

Yet you say all Germans think Merkel was right to let in 2 million asylum seekers from Syria, Iraq etc. Most say it was a catastropic decision.

However, most Germans are ok with Latvians, Poles, Russians, Czech, Austrians, Hungarians and other Eastern white-skinned people coming in. This is why we are trying to attract 1 million Ukrainians now. It seems our leaders want to keep white people above 90%.

Best answer I have seen by a Britbong. Kudos to you.

Why would anyone want a government above the nation? Only someone as retarded as the average German would want more bureaucracy.

The fact that national democratic sovereignty is lost to any member of the European Union

What is that contraption called? Is the little boy ok?

You'll be non white in a generation.

youtu.be/dF9V8POmuxg

It is called the kiddie shaker.

Pic related is the kiddie graveyard.

Attached: 11F69DE3-52D7-427F-B2FD-D15B4C5C62AF.jpg (1600x1037, 146K)

They never wanted to be part of the EU in the first place.
They felt forced to join.
It was acceptable to them as long as it was just Western Europe but now it has grown way too big with too many corrupt Eastern European shitholes.

We have an agenda to import 7 million white people from Eastern Europe until 2030. Meanwhile, non-white immigration is falling to 100k per year.

That looks fun.

Most exciting thing we had was doing a 360 on a regular swing.
You could only do two before the ropes became too short.

because they didn't want to be governed from Brussels by corrupt faggots?

Democracy works when the elected officials are local.

Why do you want to be ruled by Brussels? Are you retarded?

Press X to Doubt

Complete her sentence

Attached: AF890F5C-3491-42B9-BDB9-78C4AC9FEB0F.jpg (1280x720, 45K)

Because we have to live with the consequences of the EUs actions while most of you don't.

You're just acting like it's "muh polish" or "muh fish" and it's an insignificant thing. But that is peoples livelihoods you're talking about. These things are making people poorer because you've either made it harder to get even a minimum wage job, or you've changed the rules and put people out of work who only know one thing and have been doing it their entire life (like fishermen).

You act like it's nothing and people are making a big fuss out of small things. But to the people effected you have ruined their lives. This is what you are unable to see and what the EU in general is unable to see because the people making and voting on these laws not once have to confront the people they effect so badly.

You ruin peoples lives, are you surprised they voted to leave?

A lot of people have shit lives, no money, no jobs, no hope of getting a job and read low brow scare mongering newspapers like the sun.

The vote was largely, in my opinion, a combination of being a protest vote against the migrants they perceived as taking their jobs and also because they thought "well my situation can't get much worse than it already is"

T. remainer Scouser

that kid fucking died.

Read a book, nigga. Preferably David Goodhardt's The Road to Somewhere, which encapsulates it perfectly

Nope, I did the same thing many times when I was 5. Nothing happened. It was fun.

Attached: 9C0DA0BD-E565-4BAD-ABB9-4242852F1E63.gif (400x263, 3.29M)

It was mostly "we don't like having unelected goblins in the EU making our laws" and "a European superstate will never work so count us out of it"

But the golbins were elected by Brits too. Most of the overreaching regulation was written by Brits (because you guys can into native English).

Evidence?

The eu has asset stripped the uk of its manufacturing and skills base over the last 40 years by awarding companies subsidies and grants to take their business abroad, whilst also increasing cost through petty legislation and high business tax legislation. Its no wonder great british companies have moved to places without minimum wage and tax rates. Most remainers think brexit is about immigration, but thats a media pushed meme to engulf the real issues we have suffered at the hands of the eu.

I want my kid to experience that but since all our play areas are infested with somalis and their diseases we stick to the park and the woods.

he is still falling

Breathing does not require research. You stop breathing - you die. Sames goes for Brexit - either you quit the EU or the EU quits you. Not everything in life requires in-depth research.

Sovereignity, immigration, islam and independance.
Blood and soil basically

why are german posters so subhuman

Because the EU parliment does nothing. Literally nothing.

The unelected commissioners set EU laws and interest rates and they're put in place by who?... let's just say Jow Forums was right

It's a corrupt system that we never wanted and never signed uup to. It's a plan to have an EU country of free roaming migrants looking for work, with one currency and one rule of law.

Despite constantly delaying the vote, having the support of every political party and TV channel, rigging tv audiences and street interviews, having all the popular celebs shilling, having 80 of print news media and 100 percent of broadcast media in support, and making anyone who wanted to leve look like a small minded racist anti-semite... Remain still lost

Originally I was going to vote remain but he way remain conducted themselves (including now with their lies and propaganda such as people changing their minds) has disgusted me and made me look into what the EU is, does and what the future aims are.

Try and talk to a remainer, they just parrot the Guardian. Not one person I have talked to had any idea what the EU is or how it works. real ignorance
>many of them are seeing voting remain as some sort of virtue signalling - Look at me I love everyone and hate racism

because the EU is fucking garbage and everyone with an IQ above 120 can see this

London is 44% white and every non-white in every country votes left.

because theyre retarded drones, the biggest bootlicking traitor faggots in all of Europe

To piss off normies.
And it worked perfectly.

How could anyone survive that?

The reason I voted to leave was because I believe our country should be able to make it's own laws. Thinking in terms of things like trade deals, the impact on the economy, immigration etc is small time.

Do you think an independence of greater london+some coast and a population exchange from might be a solution?
Should there ever be physical confrontation.

Because London was seen as the centre of the universe by the British government and the rest of the country can rot. That's been their unofficial policy for decades. The referendum vote was a chance to stick two fingers up to a government who was perceived as not caring about them.

The irony of course being many of the deprived areas who were most keen to Leave got quite a bit of support from the EU. So they voted to leave the people supporting them to spite the people who ignore them.

>it seems our leaders want to keep white people above 90%
You are deluded.
They suck brain and brawn from wherever to keep this snowball system of a welfarestate going. Ucrainians are simply easy to sway and they stay put.

>The irony of course being many of the deprived areas who were most keen to Leave got quite a bit of support from the EU

I think there are more important things than material goods. I would much rather be poor and homeless than a slave in a mansion.

Article 50 itself was written by a British diplomat.

That's nice dear. You can go up and tell them that when the next round of austerity happens.

Well given that you're clearly fishing for an economic argument here, let's start with trade balance and exposure to risk.

The fundamental economic argument underlying the EU is the notion that the "four freedoms" (freedom of goods, services, capital and labour) in conjunction with a series of schemes to ensure economic tethering will magically pull the more destitute states up and equilibriate the eurozone.

In reality we instead see it as an excuse by businesses that operate across these borders to functionally union bust and apply downwards pressure on wages for workers (Excepting 2017 which still didn't break the inflation rate), leaving them to suffer in real terms. Corporations now have the option to simply shift jobs to a cheaper country and unions and governments have no recourse under the four freedoms due to the supposed equality and frictionless transport of services and labour. I can't tell someone supporting a family in the UK to up and move to Poland to work while making payments back home and expecting it to cover UK rent.

Nominally this would apply negative pressure to the markets of the larger nations in the EU, we instead see endless checks and measures to counteract this; the famous paying farming subsidies as an example.

A secondary issue is the hyper-specialisation of economies within the EU. When the UK entered the EEC it produced enough food to sustain its population, had its own industrial centers and drug production and fished its own waters. Now that the industry has mostly moved to poland, the drug production to italy and the fishing is run by the germans the UK has been forced into a position where it virtually only deals in finance. As any basic financial strategy would indicate, focusing on a single asset is a terrible idea, but on the scale of the EU each nation is an asset and so the EU itself is protected against this risk.

Attached: eurozone.png (1024x576, 221K)

>but on the scale of the EU each nation is an asset
hahahahha

your bananas arent bent enough
your apples are the wrong size
your cucumbers are too bent
you dont separate your trash into 5 bins
why arent your staff paying thousands of Pounds to watch a power point every year
you cant buy a lb of strawberries use grammes
you shouldn't be buying 4 pints of milk
You can't do a job you've done for 30 years unless you pay this man for your iso 9000 qualification
your vaccum cleaner picks up too much dirt
your lightbulbs dont give people migraine it won't do
refillable olive oil bottles are illegal now
you cant say 'Jam' say fruit spread
they aren't your fish
throw those fish away you have the wrong passport
we have to feed French farmers like it's 1946
The future European man will be a nigger asiatic hybrid then our sky fairy will come back

Europe could have been awesome & they fucked it up so spectacularly I can't even get my head around why. When I was a teenager taking a gap year & fucking off around Europe fruit picking & bartending tourist spots was the most normal thing in the world.
I went from Sheffield to Stuttgart on my own when I was 12, In 1990. Buses & ferries. I'm not sure I'd dare to it on my own now, as a 40year old 6'3 steelworker, carrying a smartphone.
Why would anyone want to be part of an organisation that is clearly, blatantly, trying to harm its citizens & destroy them & their way of life.

Attached: 1478274821951.jpg (705x513, 249K)

>next round of austerity

Who actually gives a shit? We're in a permanent state of austerity as it is.

> I believe our country should be able to make it's own laws
How will Brexit accomplish that? For instance banking laws are based on Basel 3, an internationally drawn up accord implemented globally. Or car safety standards... if you produce for the US market, you have to follow their rules. Or fishing, ... you negotiate treaties because fishing is done in open waters mostly.

Pole out, Pakis in.

Attached: isnt it.jpg (615x923, 57K)

Asked the mutt

Okay THAT is comedy

Ok research glownigger, here it is:
This was the closest to a vote on immigration we've ever had.
That's it. Now fuck off

>80% of laws passed by the UK parliament in 2015 were just rubber stamping EU laws
>UK courts are required to allow appeals to the ECJ
>UK courts have the ability to overturn legislation under the parliamentary system
>How will leaving the EU and the ECJ let the UK make their own laws???
Come on mate, you know exactly what is being discussed here.

They mistakenly believed it was a real vote and they would no longer be vassals to ultra-left wing authoritarians in Germany, but they under-estimated the level of corruption in their own government.

He didn't die. He's still in the nexus between dimensions.

Attached: m.c.-escher-cubic-space-division-386.jpg (471x470, 97K)

% of laws passed by the UK parliament in 2015 were just rubber stamping EU laws
Based on what measure? Number of words in a law? Number of laws? Impact of laws? What is this “rubber stamping, directives? How much is the impact of these laws?

See the problem with a massive statement like this? I could equally argue only 5% of UK law is based on EU law, just be defining the metrics differently.

>UK courts are required to allow appeals to the ECJ
For matters of EU law. Of course. Just imagine a UK law saying “German cars cannot be sold in the UK and that’s final”. And there would be nothing BMW could do to appeal such a false judgment.

>UK courts have the ability to overturn legislation under the parliamentary system
Yes, so?

>How will leaving the EU and the ECJ let the UK make their own laws???
Yes, that is my question. How will leaving the EU but implementing all existing and future EU law into UK law make any difference?

Based quite literally on number of acts of parliament passed. 80% were simply compliance with bills passed in Brussels. At which point the majority of parliamentary time is just doing paperwork for the EU, not actually running the UK.

>Just imagine a UK law saying “German cars cannot be sold in the UK and that’s final”. And there would be nothing BMW could do to appeal such a false judgment.
>False judgement
And why not? German car manufactures are not the elected government of the UK. If a party in the UK campaigns on the promise to ban BMW and wins, why can't they then pass a law as democratically decided by the people of the UK, no matter how inane it might be, to ban a particular car? Instead you start rolling out the "False Judgement" card.

So yes, getting out of the EU will stop the UK parliament from implementing arbitrary EU laws, and will remove the ability of the ECJ to overwrite existing UK laws. Both of these clearly make a difference in what laws are passed in the UK, and the former governs the majority of the laws passed in the UK.

So in clear and concise english for you: The EU will no longer be passing laws on behalf of the UK. That is what it means to let the UK make their own laws; not have them dictated by the EU.

I don't like having a bunch of unelected and incompetent mainland europeans having a say in how my country is ruled.