NonWhites prefer to deal with Whites.
NonWhites affirm White superiority by giving Whites their privilege.
White Privilege is Real- it's given to Whites by nonWhites
Jackson Perez
Lucas Jones
unattractive women prefer to date attractive men
unattractive women affirm the patriarchy by giving attractive men the majority of attention, ergo chad privilege
Liam Ross
>unattractive women affirm the patriarchy by giving attractive men the majority of attention, ergo chad privilege
That is not what the patriarchy is.
The patriarchy is that men are in charge of government and social institutions.
Parker Hall
Palestinian girls are unironically better looking than the inbred spawn you kikes keep producing.
Jose Moore
Palestinian women are as sexually pure as they are genetically.
Christopher King
Classical patriarchy is more a mean to allocate and control reproductive capability either based on merit or virtue (depending which of these is held in higher regard in a society).
Kek! ;)
Anthony Evans
>
>Classical patriarchy is more a mean to allocate and control reproductive capability either based on merit or virtue (depending which of these is held in higher regard in a society).
I agree, except I'd say that institutions have never been designed- thus I'd say "patriarchy does" instead of "patriarchy was designed."
Institutions can evolve as well- and they often do much more than we know.
Remember those 'designer downtowns'- turns out that a pure economic district is ripe for crime at night.
Robert Williams
Every time i see a girl with this face my immediate thought is to just hit it
Alexander Robinson
Of course. The fact alone that no tenants means nobody has a stake in keeping that thing peaceful outside working hours ... always loved the 'broken window' theory btw, again shows how fickle groupthink/bellyfeel can be. The human nature is governed by pressure, mostly from outside (with the attached desire for periodic release/absolution). Some of us are simply masochistic enough to first detach from the outside pressure only to then determine some crushing standard for themselves.
>tfw I am just using this as an excuse not to work on that stupid Powerpoint presentation
Btw ... patriarchy only aligned along virtue leads to a society of incels who do not know what is best in life. The reason I see for the failure of a certain culture and the imminent failure of ours...
Liam Carter
>
> shows how fickle groupthink/bellyfeel can be
"Mankind is tending more and more to regulate the whole of its social life, although it has never attempted to create a second nature."
-Mannheim
The human nature is governed by pressure, mostly from outside (with the attached desire for periodic release/absolution). Some of us are simply masochistic enough to first detach from the outside pressure only to then determine some crushing standard for themselves.
It's not mascoshism, but rather that our premises are objective- whereas for most people their premises are "what are others doing?"
"You are a productive, reasonable man... it's strengh."
-Bert Cooper, Mad Men
>Btw ... patriarchy only aligned along virtue leads to a society of incels who do not know what is best in life.
Virtue is life-affirming action imo. The common libertarian (lolbertarian) is wrong that virtue necessarily requires avoiding collateral damage.
"Calmy and impersnoally, she, who would have hesitate to fire at an animal, pulled the trigger and fired straight at the heart of a man who had wanted to [impede her by order of authority]."
-Atlas Shrugged
Books in pic related, properly interpreted, are similar in that they're guides to affirming life.
Jonathan Lewis
>affirmation of life
Yes, I think this is the point. 'Virtue' nowadays is as poisoned a word as 'liberal'. We're not in the old Roman republic ... we're in bat country today! The 'virtue' I see today negates life as it negates the fear attached to it. It is the incel's guilty pleasure. Rand would be the next point on my reading list (currently stuck with Spengler, yes, I know ... cliché, but need it for citation in my magnum opus). Though I assume if the Atlas truly shrugged all that would happen is that he is swept away by the tide. We are shapers, not muscle wizards. We rely on our tools, not the other way around. Now back to population genetics: what I am referring to with 'we' is just an emergent phenotype from the depths of the gene pool. This is why direct bloodlines often fail. We appear, our pattern imposes shape and direction, then it dilutes back into the abyss. The only important parameter is the statistical rate of this occurence. Chaos theory ... pattern from randomness. Myriad gene variants which have to align in a tightly defined arrangment for the phenotype to emerge ... and even then usually a tiny puzzle piece misses and all you end up with is dysfunctionality.
Jaxson Wilson
>
>>affirmation of life
>Yes, I think this is the point. 'Virtue' nowadays is as poisoned a word as 'liberal'. We're not in the old Roman republic ... we're in bat
You're right in that virtue is poisoined- and often requires one to sacrifice oneself in order to be virtuous. People are too afraid to endure societal pressure by sticking up for themselves.
> I assume if the Atlas truly shrugged all that would happen is that he is swept away by the tide.
"Atlas Shrugging" is what Fransisco tells Hank to do if people are unwilling to reciprocate virtue. Atlas symbolizes those who keep the world running- and who can continue to do so if they leave society...but society can't continue without its Atlas-types.
>The only important parameter is the statistical rate of this occurence. Chaos theory ... pattern from randomness. Myriad gene variants which have to align in a tightly defined arrangment for the phenotype to emerge ... and even then usually a tiny puzzle piece misses and all you end up with is dysfunctionality.
Fucking with nature yields unexpected results.
So much we don't know- but just because we don't know the mechanics doesn't mean we can't act according to the results we observe.
Are you studying/working in genetics, or just a hobby?
Isaiah Gonzalez
>Are you studying/working in genetics?
Did/was. Grew tired about the lack of perspective though. Academia today is poking a corpse with a stick ... repeatedly. Switched to project engineering + sales ... a problem solver now so to speak. Kinda fun when you once did chem in the lab in ml scale and now do similar shit with batches of a few thousand liters.
But it is still not enough I fear. It does not fully satisfy me. I am hungry ... this place here is a testbed.
Mason Cooper
Universities are corrupt. Being government funded, which most are, albeit indirectly, they teach what the government wishes- which is information that vindicates government action.
---------------
Psychology- the study of emotion and cognition, is a fake science (no objective
units, no reproducibility, no theories based on first principles).
The science you're looking for is Praxeology- the consideration and persuit of means & ends, using the fact that a man acts as the most basic datum. Praxeology is the study of HUMAN behaviour, whereas psychology is limited to the study of other animals.
>but they gave me a degree
Nice appeal to authority you got there.
>but how else are we supposed to run society
You aren't. Humans are free animals.
-------------
>Poking corpse with stick
At least half of those at universities are also dead, albeit only upstairs.
Parker Wright
If you take the Jewish component out of the white statistics, you'll find that white christians have no privilege.
The whole concept of "White Privilege" turns out to be anti-Semitism.
Brayden Peterson
But women make up a majority of the voters.
Brandon Moore
>how can patriarchy exist if most women are voters
Patriarchy exists, but only by desire of voters, combined with non-desire of women to rule.
Parker Murphy
NJW (non Jewish Whites)
>JES AREN'T WHITE
It's just an exact term that I'll use.
NJW are preferred by nonWhites and Whites, because Whites are most trustworthy and competant. NJW. are priviledged- it's given to them by others, who proceed to complain abou tit.
Brody Harris
>Being government funded, which most are, albeit indirectly, they teach what the government wishes- which is information that vindicates government action.
This. Also, even where government has no inherent stake it is culturally depleted. Asking questions is not the aim anymore. Psychology ... agree with your verdict. Was in neurology for a while, fascinating as long as you move outside the constraints the field has set for itself (God forbid you point out gene variant/behaviour correlation and evolutionary pressures acting on them!!). My aim would be "neuro-philosophy" ... society as an expression of the wetware.
Dominic James
You are wrong
America is still ruled by Christians
Only Democratic party and mainstream media is against Christian rule of America
We must abolish Christianity
It is a fight between Christians/religious Jews and everyone else
Henry Brooks
> My aim would be "neuro-philosophy" ... society as an expression of the wetware.
I've pointed this out before- that sociology (culture) is an extension of psychology- which is an extension of neurophysiology and neurochemistry...all loosely, ofc. But I get pushback on the first connection- psychology/sociology.
Seeing those who come out of Universities.... the lack of creativity combined with the blind AND ARROGANT trust in authority...horrifies me.
Sad thing is that people severly limit their achievement when they spend SO MUCH EFFORT rationalizing away their emotions- which are irrepressible.
White Guilt is people calling their cowardice (allowing oneself to be extorted) a virtue (paying extortion).
Grayson Ortiz
Sage this thread :)
Isaac Morgan
>White Guilt is people calling their cowardice (allowing oneself to be extorted) a virtue (paying extortion).
I like that. To the point. Lack of creativity combined with arrogance ... the arrogance is just covering up deep insecurity. They have learned the methods, they have learned abandoning part of their human nature ... but they have not learned the way to think, that is not taught. Give a small child a gun and it will sure be capable of killing someone ... but it will not be able to wage a war (a bit broken analogy but think you get my point).dawn.
Isaiah Cruz
> the arrogance is just covering up deep insecurity
I actually never connected those- but seems right.
>abandoning their human nature
Thing is they can't abandon their subconscious- which produces emotions (fear, happiness) in reaction to reality.
More than anything I hate Jordan Peterson- a Canadian psychologist, who is a lunatic Jewish-psychology-believer (Carl Jung) on drugs, whose mantra, as the teacher of our best and brightest, is "drugs are the answer." Pic related.
>They have learned the methods, they have learned abandoning part of their human nature ... but they have not learned the way to think, that is not taught. Give a small child a gun and it will sure be capable of killing someone ... but it will not be able to wage a war (a bit broken analogy but think you get my point).dawn.
They have the confidence to wield power, but not the expertise nor wisdom... what happens when they fail to achieve their governance goals, and have unlimited power?...dangerous times ahead..
"The statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals, would not only load himself with a most unncessary attention, but assume an authority which could safely be trusted to no council and senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man ho had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to excercise it."
-Adam Smith
Lucas Thomas
Are there nudes of her yet? I remember a close looking match of Laci sucking dick but no nudes?
Cooper Murphy
Laci said she won't do nudes until she loses her V card
Tyler Ramirez
>Jordan Peterson
I've read his name several times here but failed to investigate. "Drugs are the answer" ... two thoughts on that: there is a select few people (with a special place reserved in hell) who barely scratch the threshold of neurological activity for true understanding. Now if you skew those people's brain chemistry with drugs at the right dosage they may pass the threshold and for a while feel and actually BE 'enlightened'. But this is a mere illusion, they cannot uphold this state of mind. Worse, maybe some could actually reach 'enlightenment' naturally but the shortcut they take ruins their chances forever. Second, fugg antidepressants, they don't even act directly on the chemical circuit they are supposed to (oh and personal experience: paradoxical effect of SSRIs is NOT funny!)
Concerning statesmanship: I just had the idea that maybe the agriculturalist/pastoralist split led to differing view on how those capable of 'leadership' (understanding of the masses) perceive those they intend to 'control'. Was about to dig up Cain and Abel here but soon saw the threads lead nowhere or where long ago severed by time's oblivion.
Aaron Walker
Look she can coop colors of Royalsto mean trannies. How cute, for a kike.
Blake Miller
Thank you for not hiding your flag
Andrew Lewis
Patriarchy is a female construct, not male. Women compete amongst themselves for male attention in an endless slut race.
Benjamin Hughes
>Thank you for not hiding your flag
Does it bring you vindication?
John Hernandez
Fertility above quality ... a tradeoff. Red Queen.
Zachary Gomez
Laci is the absolute definition of a slampig.
Isaiah Perez
What makes you think a lady working in Quantico cares what you have to say?
You're aware the Red Queen is an operation ran out of there.
Benjamin Foster
You forgot to hide your flag Schlomo, get back into the oven.
Ayden Powell
>tfw we have ultimately crossed over into bat territory now
Hunter Allen
Show a little bit of patience :D
William Perez
>SSRIs
They work in that they have an effect. And even if they did operate directly on the correct circuit, depression stems from consciousness- depression (non chemically caused) is to be treated by acting based on the results of introspection.
I wasn't referencing enlightenment- haven't studied it- but expect it's the stage when one can ignore their subconscious through conscious focus.
>statesmanship and control
This is where projection and NPC theory come. Given that NPCs are programmed by the state, and their projection is them assuming others are like them, NPCs as politicians fail by assuming others conform to their value-judgements (specific cost/benefit calculations).
Statesmanship means planning for competition (creating a framework of society's living and working(rules, infrastructure) rather than competing for planning (competing to direct personal actions).
>Agricultural/pastoral split
Do you mean that pastoral workers gained knowledge/confidence that people could be governed as you govern animals?
(Off to sleep, catch you later, will read tomorrow.)
Ethan Robinson
RESPECT THE LADY!
Justin Martin
What are you cucks going to do about it?
Isaiah Gray
>America is still ruled by Christians
No it isn't, not by a long shot.
>We must abolish Christianity
Good luck. It has outlasted entire empires and languages and is still here. You of course can abolish the practice of Christianity, but you cannot abolish a belief.
Brody Turner
>enlightenment
I don't even myself have an idea what it truly means, term can be bent quite well :P
Maybe wanted to describe a certain amount of complexity you are required to mentally handle to get a glimpse of the 'whole picture'. Mental RAM available to run the program of Erkenntnis.
>NPCs as politicians
The disease of our times. Like the rotten noble lineages of late monarchies our stable democracy can only lead to this outcome. This is were I play with accelerationist ideas as I see the necessity for hitting the reset button (while avoiding too much collateral, especially in regards to collective knowledge ... sic transit mundus!). Anyway, yes, the art of statesmanship is all about setting a framework (mostly see tradeoff efficiency vs resilience), then letting it loose on the 'competition', on the world. Although again, I would have higher aims than just that ... competition for the sake of it. From competition you can derive adaptability. Now such a system will invariably at one point 'monopolize' too much, leave the balance. Then the field has to be levelled again else everything comes to a grinding halt. The concept of a world government would only work as not-1984 with an outside competing agency (space colonies???).
>Do you mean that pastoral workers gained knowledge/confidence that people could be governed as you govern animals?
Yes, something like that. It is a thought fragment right now, I usually used agri/pastoralist to explain subtle differences in behaviour on a genetic level as environments were very different (especially if we see pastoralist as semi-nomadic). Back to point above, maybe it is about how the framework is set. Have a blockade in my brain right now, have to think about this later...
We'll continue this, last post goes to my archive ... see ya and good night!
Christian Bell
>but you cannot abolish a belief
Beliefs can only ever be swallowed whole.
SOL INVICTVS TENEBRIS
Kevin Thompson
I'd say they are. You may say the jews, but if the christians decided that the jews are the Gods chosen people no longer, who would protect this middle man minority and their tribalism? After all, for a left winger, the best jew is a dead one.