Ayn Rand wasn't Base-

"Calmly and impersonally, she, who would have hesitated to fire at an animal, pulled the trigger and fired straight at the heart of a man who had wanted to [impede her by order of authority]."
-Atlas Shrugged

Donahue: Would you guys for a female president?
Rand: Only if we had fallen that far.

Face it pol, Rand was based. Facts are facts.

Attached: Ayn-Rand-9451526-1-402.jpg (402x402, 58K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/yTK_xAUd7IE?t=801
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>lolbertarianism
Okay haha

Attached: 1541242531702.png (579x579, 119K)

Also stop spamming slide threads thanks

Yes, Kike. She was a based ugly Kike. She wasn't a based human. Happy Hanukkah.

Rand is a based human

Rand is a true libertarian

Hello shallom,how are you doing today my Jewish friend?

Another day, another dollar.

She was an egotistical atheist who didn't know her place

>Jews are violent sociopaths
thanks for the redpill schlomo

Where's your criticism?

stupid ugly kike bitch with a lame ass book

Attached: aaa340335eae464a14646fff0e14e3fd.png (677x492, 510K)

atlas shrugged? more like i shrugged cause I don't care what some ugly bucktooth jewess has to say when she's clearly mentally deficient

Attached: we know.jpg (640x360, 14K)

Listening to a women. No

Have you fucking read it. It's nauseating trash, boring, forced. It made me want to die..

Thanks me later

youtu.be/yTK_xAUd7IE?t=801

Rand. Bad.

All her lolbertarian bullshit went out the window when she got lung cancer and immediately jumped on Medicare. Typical kike.

Intellectual Atheism's war on tradition purely because said tradition was promoted by faith has contributed to the decline of American society

The founding fathers were secular deists, if anything, faith is what ruined american society.

Rand was so stupid she didn't even realize her bad guys had no need for the patent they were torturing the lead character for.

Moly is confused oftenThe motor is a metaphor for consciousness

Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, and Jefferson were all secular deists, yes. But they promoted faith nonetheless because of the morality and unity it promoted. Just read any of Franklin's writing.

Rand belittled those who believed in God, even fellow conservatives like William Buckley Jr

I still think its a good book to get commies or lefties thinking. What i took from it is that i have to take responsibility for myself and not wait for the state to gibsmedat.

she's a pseudo intellectual trying to sound deep
only famous because her "philosophy" suited american propaganda machine against soviet union

Socialism is part of human nature. Wanting to help someone when they're down. Of course Jews like Friedman and Rand tell us it's evil.

>I still think its a good book to get commies or lefties thinking.

It will only get them thinking that libertarians are idiots. She presents her own side so badly that it will only drive people away from whatever point she thinks she is making.

America is founded in opposition to that tradition.

Values are not facts.

Wrong. Wanting to help someone when they're down is called charity. Socialism is forcing someone else to help them while taking credit for it anyway

A kike and a plagiarist who took Max Stirner's ideas and embellished them with her unique Judaic twist and manifested her own Judaic spooks.

SPIT ON THIS BITCH!

Attached: flat,900x900,070,f.u2.jpg (900x900, 67K)

No it's not. Having a sense of brotherhood and wanting them to progress is a socialism. Ask Ayn Rand yourself.

If your yard stick for being a proper intellectual is how many other intellectuals consider you a proper intellectual you’ve built a floating abstraction that means nothing. You might as well say she wasn’t a real free mason.

how did you understand that from what i wrote

>who were the Puritans
>Who were the Quakers
>Who were the Pilgrims
Faith has always been ingrained in American society.

Attached: 8d6.jpg (645x729, 48K)

fpbp
/thread
sage

Wrong.
Also not sure why it's relevant.

>I'm dense, nothing gets through to me
ftfy

Socialism is about graft.

Aiding the disenfranchised is not selfless- one can find happiness in another's.

While her philosophy suited the time, it's was valid nonetheless.

There's Objectivism, and there's Randism. Her opinions are the latter.

>Rand's fellow conservative Buckley
Oh mate, I am laughing.

Check your premises. They're not the same between Rand and Max.

This
You missed the most important part user you may as well view the shitty movies to see if you can get it even if they are the worse movies ever they still show the point.

Attached: 1545994046482.png (1024x1011, 161K)