present, to the supreme revolutionary council, the pros and cons of genociding those who refuse to acknowledge there is no god in public.
Pros: more resources for everyone, average intelligence goes up, humanity will not be distracted by thoughts of the afterlife, humanity has just taken a huge step towards the future, liberal tears, it attracts many young angsty oppressed youth to the cause
Cons: time making mass graves, guillotine sharpening, some cuties who would make good sex slaves may get executed(though it is extremely reactionary and not Marxists to keep sex slaves)
There is a strong historical precedent for genocide, why should communist deny this tool?
(1/2)
Comrades
Charles Watson
Josiah Peterson
Let's face it communism is the most advanced creation mankind has ever created.
In this world Muslims are killing Muslims because they have a dispute over who of two dead guys was the prophet's successor. In the past Christian killed Christians because of minor doctrinal differences. Man has killed man for simply speaking another language or having the wrong last name.
Why do such minor unimportant reactionary ideas get to use brutal tactics while the communist tie their hands behind their back.
If you are a reactionary communism is you enemy. Communism isn't to be concealed and kept in the dark to supposedly fester and grow. Communism isn't a virus that kills you. Communism is beast that sinks it fangs into your neck, the beast does not care whether you see it or not, it only wants you dead.
If ye comrades be apprehensive about implementing effective techniques remember all the common people who rose up and fought for communism and died horrible deaths, lost family, lost years in order to achieve communism. How frustrated would they be to see their sacrifice was for naught. 60 years after the Greek comrades rose up, Greece is still oppressed. 60 years after Mao declared the Chinese people have stood up, the Chinese people are forgotten and exploited by the rulers. 80 years after the may 15th incident in Japan, Japan still lives under an emperor. 60 years after the Soviets defeated the fascists, there are no Soviets.
You may disagree with the leaders of the movements, but I don't ask you to take into consideration what they did. I ask you to think about the young man who walked away from the family house not knowing whether he would come back alive. Guided by the desire to liberate his fellow proletariat. What was his death for? And why has so little changed since then?(2/2)
Kayden Roberts
>average intelligence goes up
Intelligence is genetic. The only way to "raise the average" is to kill off the stupid and stop them from breeding.
Elijah Perry
That is exactly what I proposed, killing of those who refuse to acknowledge there is no god in public.
Daniel Roberts
>communism is the most advanced creation mankind has ever created
>An ideology that has barely evolved from caveman ideals is more advanced than market economies
Asher Garcia
id like to propose an alliance against liberal democracy
Dylan Jones
Communist kill noncommunist for... for what ? For nothing.
Yeah that's really superior. You sodomite communists are responsible for the biggest bloodshed of all of history.
Caleb Gomez
Who put the first satellite to space, market economy or raw power of socialism?
Its not for "nothing", its for the sake of improving the general populations intelligence and to remove attachment from reactionary values. We are willing to use violence to achieve our goals there is nothing wrong with that. You need to brake few skulls to create literal paradise on earth.
Xavier Morris
>Cherry-picked achievement
Why didn't the USSR use it's technology to prevent mass starvation?
Justin Campbell
Well, its kinda hard to stop mass starvation when your 2nd largest city is under siege by the nazies.
Levi Richardson
>Who put the first satellite to space, market economy or raw power of socialism?
Germans.
Also
>archive.org
Cooper Jones
Nice research of Soviet Propaganda
Ryder Nelson
>Map starts after ww2
Really made me think
Cooper Brown
Russia is doing a good job at decreasing the population. Theres nothing wrong with that.
Carter Watson
>Empirical Conclusions: 1945- 1965
In the immediate postwar period the Soviets transferred a large proportion of German industry to the Soviet Union—at least two-thirds of the German aircraft industry, the major part of the rocket production industry, probably two-thirds of the elec-trical industry, several automobile plants, several hundred large ships, and specialized plants to pro-duce instruments, military equipment, armaments, and weapons systems. The stripping of East Germa-ny was supplemented by a U.S. program (Operation RAP) to give the Soviets dismantled plants in the U.S. Zone. By the end of 1946 about 95 percent of dis-mantling in the U.S. Zone was for the U.S.S.R. (including the aircraft plants of Daimler-Benz, ball bearings facilities, and several munitions plants).
Manchuria and Rumania also supplied numerous plants. And as we have seen, Finnish reparations which supplemented the pulp and paper industries and ship construction were made possible by U.S. Export-Import Bank credits to Finland.
In the late 1950s all this industrial capacity had been absorbed and the Soviets turned their attention to the deficient chemical, computer, shipbuilding, and consumer industries, for which German acquisitions had been relatively slight.2 A massive complete-plant purchasing program was begun in the late 1950s—for example, the Soviets bought at least 50 complete chemical plants between 1959 and 1963 for chemicals not previously produced in the U.S.S.R. A gigantic ship-purchasing program was then instituted, so that by 1967 about two-thirds of the Soviet merchant fleet had been built in the West. More difficulty was met in the acquisition of computers and similar advanced technologies, but a gradual weakening of Western export control under persistent Western business and political pressures produced a situation by the end of the sixties whereby the Soviets were able to purchase almost the very largest and fastest of Western computers.
Brody Thomas
>Germans
Are you sure of that?
Brayden Phillips
If you truly believed in heaven then you would have no problem being killed
Brody Bennett
Ha, look this shit. You can't debunk the cegnity. Read this, pussy faggot ()
Austin Wright
Central argument*
Kek
Jackson Turner
That is retarded. That is like skipping sex just to get straight to the orgasm.
Daniel Wilson
Well only the soviets could have effectively build enough factories for that, them being the industrial giant of the times.
Thomas Cox
fuck off commie
Henry Bailey
Again, Soviet Propaganda.
Nothing serious to see here
Andrew Lee
Says the anti-communist propaganda poster.
Xavier Hughes
Ha, fuck off commie
The image you posted, are debunked in this two books
()
Julian Perry
>Empirical Conclusions: 1930 to 1945
Most of the 350 foreign concessions of the 1920s had been liquidated by 1930. Only those entre-preneurs with political significance for the Soviets received compensation, but for those few that did (for example, Hammer and Harriman), the compen-sation was reasonable.
The concession was replaced by the technical-assistance agreement, which together with imports of foreign equipment and its subsequent standar-dization and duplication, constituted the principal means of development during the period 1930 to 1945.
Kayden Anderson
>hoover institution
>not anticommunist propaganda press
WeW
Kevin Walker
>Literally an historical research with sources
>NO NO NO NO IZZ PROPAGANDA
Cameron Stewart
Published data on the Soviet “Plans” neglect to mention a fundamental feature of the Soviet indus-trial structure in this period: the giant units were built by foreign companies at the very beginning of the 1930s, and the remainder of the decade was devoted to bringing these giants into full production and building satellite assembly and input-supply plants. In sectors such as oil refining and aircraft, where further construction was undertaken at the end of the decade, we find a dozen top U.S. companies (McKee, Lummus, Universal Oil Products, etc.) aiding in the oil-refining sector and other top U.S. aircraft builders in the aircraft sector (Douglas, Vultee, Curtiss-Wright, etc.).
Only relatively insignificant Soviet innovation occurred in this period: SK-B synthetic rubber, dropped in favor of more useful foreign types after World War II; the Ramzin once-through boiler, con-fined to small sizes; the turbodrill; and a few aircraft and machine gun designs.
Logan Mitchell
So what if its research? That does not mean its not biased&CIA propaganda piece.
Ethan Roberts
Again, what is your point? Sure soviets did not have the luxury of investing in education when their primary focus was heavy industry at the time. At the later periods however, especially post-war they made some major things in terms of science. Radial keratotomy being a good example.
Luis Wood
The point is explained for himself, I don't have to explain anything.
Tyler Wilson
Shut the fuck up liberal.
Juan Parker
based and REDpilled