Is the Earth flat?

>evidence
Is not proof.

the closest you got to science in that sentence was using the word lift, try again and do the math.

>BS
>Math not English

Fag.

>but I'm willing to here the other side of the argument.

there isn't another side to the argument, only shills pretending that there is.

and just incase you think im fucking around

Attached: HorizonDistance.png (1005x546, 71K)

Dont worry. flatties are 99% LARPers and one retard who bought the LARP.

If you engage with this kind of discussion long enough you will eventually LARP yourself just because it gets boring. Especially with your professional background which allows you to skew science in your favor against normie retards(there are a lot of normies who tries to discuss with flat earthers but have very vague concept of science; especially globe-arguments which does not directly disproof flat earth hypothesis).

t. naval officer.

>A stable aircraft will naturally follow the curvature of the Earth given the properties of the surrounding air.
If you fly East at 100mph you will be travelling with the air current and in the same direction as the rotation so at least 1000mph according to 'science'. But if you fly West at 100mph the Earth should spin underneath you at 1000mph so it would only take a slow plane 4 hours to fly from the UK to America.

No, the air isn't so powerful that it stops the plane from moving so fast.

Go and sit outside when it's quiet and watch the butterflies and other insects flying around. Is the atmosphere really moving at 1000mph next to the Earth?

>argues against air density
>links calculation for visible horizon
nice try.

I was going to respond to your earlier statements but that is absolutely the most retarded thing you could have said. You just ruined any credibility you have in this thread.

Lift equation is freshman level calculations. Educate yourself you fucking retard.

Attached: lift.png (472x130, 7K)

Visibility link was -for- air density, "nice try" isnt doing an experiment to confirm or disprove something
t. dad works at nintendo and im the pope

If the Earth were flat, what would that change? Such as, how is that relevant to your life? If the Earth were flat, would you stop coming to Jow Forums? No.You would still be doing the same shit as usual, which your behavior would be the same.

I've seen some crazy shit in my life. Even then, I find the idea of a flat Earth irrelevant information if true.

Attached: round earth.webm (1920x1080, 1.97M)

>muh 1000mph spin
You fags are worse than jews with this shit

You cant argue with them user, you will make 100% rock solid points and they wont even acknowledge them or retort. Its madness. Otherwise they would show proofs that the Foucault pendulum doesnt work as predicted.
Www.hooktube.com/watch?v=rTbunV7nSas

24 hours = 24000 mile circumference

1 hour spin = 1000 miles

is this maths too complicated for me?

Stop worshiping CGI pictures, goy.

Attached: math.jpg (954x661, 71K)

Use the same example for a satellite and explain me the difference

inb4 satellites dont exist

Interesting to note that these earth photos are easily faked.
Most people did not know until this year that the iphone earth background was just CGI.

Earth is an ovoid in the vacuum of space. You koreanjewfagnignog flat earthers have a flat perspective because you are trapped inside a Jew Qabbalah Cube. Stop staring at flat screens and realize... You are all bitches falling for nonsense psyops. Like Child molester Aquino and Anderson laughing at UFO believers. Because Aliens are a Joke.. The crown changing H to Haytch and Z to fucking Zed. Know that the flat earth fakery exists because you niggerz arent magnetic.

But muh refraction of light.

thought experiment:

1) imagine 100mx100m perfectly flat area on the earth.
2) your task is to walk from point A (north west corner) to B (south east corner) at 1 metre per second (which you accomplish with the magick of science)
3) record the time it takes you

now it's time to repeat the experiment

1) the "earth" (100m x 100m area) is now rotating at 1000mph
2) your task is to jump from point A (north west corner) to B (south east corner) at 1 metre per second (which you accomplish with the magick of science)
3) record the time it takes you
4) you win the argument because you did college maths, those retarded autistic christcucks dont even know kindergarten maths, hahaha that air resistence in front of you wasn't even strong enough to slow you down, but it was amazingly strong and compensated for the spin by carrying your body at 1000mph without you noticing it

Drooling_brainlets.jpg

satellites are real, attached to balloons at high altitude stuck on the underside of the firmament

stop watching sci-fi tbqh

casually evaded the actual question
you must be the 1%

At this point I'm convinced you're LARPing. No one is this retarded.

Do some research on orbital mechanics before arguing the validity of satellites.

also
>attached
>stuck

which is it?

do you think they actually believe the flat earth bullshit they are spewing?

The Earth is round, but it has expanded over time. Every one of the continents fit together perfectly on a smaller sphere. Plate techtonics and subdiction is a myth.
youtu.be/tiCMFzpMnZM

Attached: expandingearth.gif (400x300, 2.23M)

>What is relativity

You can physically board an airplane and while traveling at 500 +mph feel as if you aren't moving at all, you can also walk back and forth and even jump as if you were on the ground

>casually evaded the actual question
not really, i will address it.

>satellite has to counter-spin against the earth at 1000mph to be geostationary

ok, so what am i supposed to address? satellites aren't going to be effected by wind resistence, are they?

uh oh, you run in to the problem that the earth isn't just 'rotating' at 1000mph, it's actually hurtling through space at "67,000 miles per hour"

oh shit....how do you make a satellite compensate at mach 88?
>don't worry, goyim, gravity automatically does that for you

oh wait, shit, we're actually expanding at an exponential rate, we're going even faster than mach 88..... shit, the laws of physics don't even real at this point

i like how you skipped the thought experiment because it makes you look stupid but instead focus on satellites

>>On clear days, Tel Aviv's skyline is visible from the Carmel mountains
>mountains
really frongles my plintlers

Earth Chan isn't flat, she's petite.

I want to believe that flat earthers have some credibility but this guy alone is ruining it for them.
This is a book every genuine believer in a flat earth should read and understand before publicly debating it.

Attached: Astrodynamics.jpg (179x282, 10K)

>You can physically board an airplane and while traveling at 500 +mph feel as if you aren't moving at all
no you can't, because the wind would literally blow you away while you were crossing the space between the 2 doors. wind? yes the stationary wind that the 2 aircraft were pushing through.

wind debunks globe theory. sorry, kid.

I wouldn't be surprised.

Ringwoodite depressurizes into pure water, which it is estimated the amount of ringwoodite contained in the Earth's crust can produce more than 3 times the current amount of Earth's oceans combined.

>Noah's flood

99% of real world applications treat earth as flat.
The other 1% happen in space.
Space curves. Earth doesn't.

Yep. When commercial ships leave port, and disappear over the horizon...

Different set of stars are viewable, above and below the equator.
/thread

>satellite has to counter-spin against the earth at 1000mph to be geostationary

So how do they do this while being attached to a balloon and stuck to the firmament?
The rest of your post is nonsense too; your thought experiment included which is just an extension of your original statement and doesnt need direct attention.

>the wind would literally blow you away while you were crossing the space between the 2 doors. wind? yes the stationary wind that the 2 aircraft were pushing through
that makes absolutely zero sense and has nothing to do with the statement posted

"The sun and the solar system appear to be moving at 200 kilometers per second, or at an average speed of 448,000 mph (720,000 km/h)"

Attached: lol.png (996x192, 16K)

99% of real world applications aren't large enough for curvature to matter.

oh, you mean you can board an aircraft while it moves at 500mph, without there being any wind, and you are not moving, oh right.

Curvature=0 isn't large enough to affect applications.

What the fuck do you think wind is, are you honestly under the impression that wind is the result of the earth spinning?

Nah.

>So how do they do this while being attached to a balloon and stuck to the firmament?
the earth is flat. it doesn't move.
the balloon goes up in the air and just stays there until the balloon pops.

if any of this is too difficult for you just say so, and i will try to rewind for you

>99% of real world applications aren't large enough for curvature to matter.

high frequency radio is one of the few that it actually matters with.

I've sailed around it. It's round, by inspection.
By using simple tests a 12 year old can figure out, it's round.
You shouldn't need to ask, what's your "BS" mean? Bullshit?

Neither is 8 inches per mile.

>are you honestly under the impression that wind is the result of the earth spinning
you mock me for not taking college maths but seem to be clueless about what is taught in high school geography.

yes, scientists want me to believe that wind is caused by a globe earth spinning.

Attached: coriolis.png (704x355, 55K)

>It's round
yes but not a globe/sphere

Disregard anything this guy is saying. Either he's LARPing or a near brain dead vegetable.

For anyone wondering, wind is caused from the temperature differences within the atmosphere.

Concave

Ignoring your idea of how they connect to the firmament you really have no idea what satellites are or do.

It frustrates me when flat earthers say it can't be proven that the Earth is round. We'll, yes it can.
Get the square root of your height of eye (line of sight) times 1.15, gives you the approximate distance in miles to the horizon.
So all of these faggots on here can actually do the math.

The earth is an electromagnetic field with a solid magnetic core. The EMF waves are what give the earth its round appearance.

Attached: 7821BA00-1979-4485-A285-FA3CD7EF6A16.jpg (299x168, 5K)

Those second hand embarrassment feels. Lurk more newfag.

it's a communication device with solar cells for power, it's essentially a server attached to a balloon to remain in geostationary position

>I'm willing to here the other side of the argument.
You will become dumber reading some of the "facts" they present....most of which have been discounted for thousands of years.

You can literally observe satellites with the naked eye moving across the sky.

no i can't, and even if i could, that doesn't mean they are in (((space)))

im still lurking right now, everyone regurgitating their version of science at eachother if frankly embarrassing to watch and ill have no part in this, I just wanted to know how come things like pointing a laser over michigan lake work when the earth is curved, not...-this-.

saying a bunch of shit like "a stable plane follows the curvature of the earth naturally" is just as much bunk as the rest.

best post in thread.
/larp

I dont know why you cant. Everyone else is quite able to.

Why didnt you say so
youtube.com/watch?v=QVa2UmgdTM4&index=2&t=0s&list=LLvBTJ7_WK6lTutXSqv0olew

Nice cgi lol, I could do that in 10 mins

the kikes are a big fan of obscurity. overpopulation, light pollution, etc. there's hardly any stars where i live.

rubbing_hands.jpg

Im sorry that you've been left in the dark.

Why can I see everest from my house then?

I'm just trying to keep this here so they won't start trolling other places or spamming threads. We all know the earth can't possibly be anything but a globe and that there isn't a single shred of real scientific evidence for the earth being flat. We all know that the 1000mph spin doesn't effect what's on the earth and that the 8in per mile nonsense was misrepresented by early flat-earth fools.

>8 inches per mile.
That's just hills and shit. Everyone knows they exist.

Yea you bet it's BS alright a while load of it

Now this is 100% false. People see bright lights in the sky that are not identifiable at all and simply claim it’s a satellite. If all you see is a shining bright light how the hell do you know what it is. To see something means to actually see it, not to see a light thousands of miles away and just say “oh, there’s a satellite”. m.youtube.com/watch?v=cV5LYeRl5ZM

No they are not.

How can we see the same stars every night every year for 10,000 years if earth is hurling through space as fast as they say? Surely moving fast implies changing position right?

>"a stable plane follows the curvature of the earth naturally" is just as much bunk as the rest.

Do any amount of research on how lift works and you can figure it out yourself. It's not just some unprovable conjecture. It's proven with indisputable mathematical evidence. If you can mathematically prove it wrong I will believe what ever you have to say - until then it will be treated as fact.

>clear days

fucking atrocious, good god

Attached: 62BBB4D5-BF6F-4B33-96A5-EC9AA9E65255.jpg (640x117, 9K)

Stars move too.

>when ur gravity game is not strong enough to stop a butterfly from flying but ur strong enough to make air cling to you as you hurtle through a vacuum at 448,000 miles per hour

Stars move too. They're just so incomprehensibly far away that it's impossible to see with the naked eye

So I guess you never learned about the solar system or galaxies in kindergarten?

Nice LARP.
They do change positions. We had this discussion before. As the universe expands so does the distance between all visible objects in the sky.

Attached: true shape of earth.jpg (743x719, 216K)

Is gravity your only argument left?

A butterfly is light enough to sit on top of air currents in a phenomenon known as "flying"

When you drive your car down a road with trees to the side of it, you can see that the trees closest to you appear to move faster in your field of vision than the ones further away. The movement of the stars is not observable with human eyes for essentially the same reason; the stars are literally astronomically far away, so the apparent movement is astronomically small.

is sarcasm your only argument left?

i accept your gracious forfeit

You faggots need to watch some nu-male bill nye for fucks sake.
Ol' kike strangler Vsauce himself debunks this argument in the most nu-male way. Easy for Jow Forums to understand

youtu.be/VNqNnUJVcVs

Attached: FA7C66FC-E73B-4DF8-876B-D78A4F5386F1.png (1280x950, 810K)