Can we have an honest objective discussion around homosexuality and it's legality...

Can we have an honest objective discussion around homosexuality and it's legality? Give genuine rebuttals to gay rights with actual evidence and don't pander solely ton religious text?

Attached: FB_IMG_1546477380914.jpg (540x960, 72K)

gay=bad

FPBP

Attached: 1509581278690.jpg (818x960, 121K)

It's bad but tolerable in a society where it's a fetish or something someone otherwise raising a family participates in. It's an absolute cancer when people are allowed to live their lives out based on their fetish.

Bless you Australia

>Give genuine rebuttals to gay rights with actual evidence and don't pander solely ton religious text?
LGBTQ+ movement is a POLITICAL movement and has POLITCAL aspirations.

People can be faggots in their own home without pestering others with sexuality, its not like heterosexual people go around and celebrate their sexuality in the streets, is it?

Personally i think gays should be allowed to be gays mainly because i think gay is a genetic thing. However i think the whole thing with gays went too far, they are having degenerate marches in public , and teaching kids about queer shits. so I m for gay marriage but i think they should be allowed behind the curtain

Attached: AFter The Ball - pg184 - NAMBLA.jpg (471x407, 126K)

Attached: After The Ball - pg366-367 - Greek Romance.png (1047x833, 1.27M)

Attached: After The Ball - principle 5.jpg (318x512, 147K)

Attached: After The Ball xvii.png (1269x2009, 2.59M)

pol, being virgins, denounce people who have sex

And since gays have the most sex, pol hates them the most

It's simple once you understand it.

Dont ask, dont fucking tell, you sickos

Oy Vey, basement dwelling virgins and Sigmund Freud (((psychology))).

Michael Vanunu was pussytrapped.

>science is jewish
You'll never rule yourself with that attitude

It should be legal behind closed doors, because how could you even prevent this without spying on people inside of their homes? It should just be treated as a deviance that isn't acceptable to bring up in public, in the media, or around children. In fact, it shouldn't be acceptable for anyone, regardless of what they are attracted to, to bring up their sex life in public.

>pol, being virgins
I guess we can safely conclude that blissful introspectivity is endemic to the leftypol

Attached: 1389908858609.jpg (655x669, 61K)

I think its just plain healthy to point out the logical fallacies in all of their arguments. Point out complications from Gay Bowel Syndrome and the role which the Fecal Oral route plays in the spreading of HIV. There are new and fast acting cancers rapidly affecting the homosexual community. For this we can have some peace. Women typically don't like a penis in their crack either. Just ask em.

Don't ask don't tell.

I think some people are born gay, and they are the ones who you don’t notice, although the poofs who do mardigra and act like a bunch of fucking degenerates are mentally ill.

Anal ruptures and pink socks are now considered sex!
Thanks Schlomo!

>Can we have an honest objective discussion around homosexuality and it's legality?
>No.

too much of a high correlation between homoerotism and:
>pedophilia
>antisocial behavior
>violence in the act itself that reflects on those around them, see the statistic about violence and abuse between homoerotic partners
>mental disorders usually leading to suicide
>political agendas revolving around destabilization of the social foundations
>child abuse victims turning gay at some point or another
>spreading of stds, particularly fatal ones
plus, and this just by logic and non faith related
>gay rights are not human rights, they sit on top of them, creating someone who has more rights than you bc he likes his ass being destroyed and you don't
>marriage is something that has a societal utility as long as the fundamental components of a family, a man and a woman, are not altered, to not recognize this is to be possessed ideologically
>historically has never worked well and it actually marks the decadence of a culture
>homosexuality has been removed from the list of mental disorders bc of political pressure, not bc there's been a solid and sincere scientific debate about it
>peer pressure and political harassment towards those homosexuals who speak against the political and cultural problems in the lgbt community, which would like to see every component comply and act as they want them to.

Out of love for human beings in general i would argue about the destructive consequences of the homoerotic behavior, because i want to see everyone being a strong character that can help better the human condition, each in his/her own culture, which are to remain separate to actually better each other.
To conclude nobody having these tendencies didn't suffer from them, not because "muh feels" but because you're harming yourself and others by indulging in said tendencies.

Piles

Fistulas

reminder that any laws surrounding homosexuality are purely subjective in nature, founded in nothing more than cultural norms and arbitrary moral standards, and that thriving civilizations have existed throughout history and today where homosexaul relations are the norm.

reminder that the same exact thing is true about pedophilia. now what?

Attached: [1]R.O.D The TV - 06 (BD 960x720 10bit HEVC).mkv_snapshot_08.30_[2018.11.04_18.48.54].jpg (960x720, 93K)

fucking read a history book not wrote by marxists maybe?

>Can we have an honest objective discussion around homosexuality and it's legality?
>and it is legality

can you kill yourself you fucking redditor

my friends and family would laugh at you for saying this to me, I mean holy shit the shelf sitting behind me. I'm pretty sure primary Greek, Roman, and Chinese sources from antiquity are "marxist", you've got a point. the monastic tradition sure was full of commie bastards. herodotus and thucydides are basically lenin and mao.

Natural

Attached: prolapse.png (934x372, 370K)

cringe
>guys i totally read a lot of books look at how smart i am

shame about the flag

he brought it up. I don't mind flexing my swole brain on learnlets.

its pretty normal for guys to have a period in their early 20s when they read outdated literature

you will get over it

if the early 20s are your boogeyman you should be ashamed of your copypaste banter.

GOD
HATES
FAGS

Attached: aids.jpg (566x670, 95K)

No

Sage and hide faggot threads

The point of laws which provide things like tax exemptions and clear lines of inheritance to married people exist to help encourage a man and a women to create and raise a child together knowing that our nation wants them to do their best for the child. Marriage laws exist so that new families can be created and supported by their nation.

Now let's move to faggots. Two faggots who make a decision about who makes them cum are not some intrinsic part of our society. They can butt fuck all they want and will never produce a child. Being a faggot is not some major right that needs to be protected by our laws. It is a sexual decision made by a degenerate. Like an above user stated, if two faggots want to fuck behind close doors then what can anyone do? I'll even say that if two queers decided they are going to move in together, and hire a lawyer so that if one queer dies the other queer gets all his shit and that they own a home together then there is nothing we can do to stop them. Now if two faggots want to adopt a child and raise it to think being a faggot is normal that should not be allowed. If a man wants to leave his wife and child to go suck dick; then it should be taken into account that he is a sexual deviant when determined what amount of access he should be given to his child.

So in summary. The simplicity of a man and woman having a marriage recognized by the state is a system designed for the well-being of new families and sexual degenerates should not get this right just because some kikes think it is fair. Being a faggot is not some brave decision you make that everyone should respect and the kikes who push that view should be exterminated. While the state should not waste its time chasing down cock-sucking men, we should not provide them with the sanctity of marriage.

Attached: THIS IS WHAT MARRIAGE LOOKS LIKE... AND ITS BEAUTIFUL.png (906x1254, 1.74M)

This. People need to be made aware that these movements don't represent anyone besides interests of political groups, and are entirely self appointed. The whole "gay culture" is an artificial subculture which follows a prescribed political narrative. It's all about hijacking minds and fragmenting the population. In fact of these groups have nothing to do with the interests of the people they claim to represent.

Attached: 15615615.jpg (800x800, 41K)

Good post

Rights is for mentally sane people.

From a utilitarian perspective, there's nothing necessarily wrong with it.

The jews wanted to different themselves from their tribal neighbors, no tattoos, no shaved heads, and do not be like those faggy greeks, who promoted homosexuality as a form of population control.

Rectal prolapse isn't a common issue in gays, despite what far right propaganda wants people to believe.

>the role which the Fecal Oral route plays in the spreading of HIV

Attached: b90.png (645x729, 127K)

based I'm a virgin

Gays already had civil unions, which gave them the right to live together without being technically "married"

"marriage" is important because it grants certain social benefits, such as lower taxes, immunity from testimony in court, inheritance, and other such things. Civil unions addressed most of this.

We want a society that values marriage between a man and a woman as a sacred bond, pretending that gays are the same undermines the social fabric. Gays raising kids is even worse, because these kids are often raped and exploited.