Circumcision denies a male the natural right to experience sex as they were born to. It denies you the actual feeling of sex before you can say no. Throw out all other reasoning. It doesn't matter as much as the fact that after circumcision, you will never experience sex as it's supposed to feel.
>bu-but it's cleaner! This only applies if you shower once a week. All studies that show cleanliness as a factor were done in Africa where cleanliness is an all around issue, not just with the genitals.
>s----STDs! I don't want my baby boy to get AIDS! If you are having enough unprotected sex with infected people so that the tiny percent chance that a circumcised penis is your best chance, then the problem isn't with uncircumcision, it's with life choices.
Please stop mutilating baby boys. All the benefits for male circumcision apply also to female circumcision, yet one is illegal and considered barbaric.
Oh hey a 'proper' thread got made. Well forward unto the abyss then I suppose. Any chance you've got some saved data from the previous threads that all 404d last night? >you wouldn't declaw a cat right user?
I'm not too worried about stats. I was pro circumcision until I started thinking about what I'm missing out on. That turned into despair as I realized they do it to children specifically so they can't say no. It's disgusting.
Lucas Collins
Thread relevant to topic that hasn't 404d yet. Sadly I do not have the threads from last night. Did manage to keep this link though. www foreskinrestore com/manual.html
I believe this was when I realized something was wrong. That's the sick cruelty of the act, you don't figure it out for awhile. >transfixed by the statue the boy stares >he realises something is amiss but cannot put his finger on what it is >he was always good at playing 'what's different'
What scares me as well is if the child's brain truly does reprogram a bit after circumcision due to the pain. I've read that the brain never goes back to the way it was immediately prior to circumcision. So not only is your dick different, but you as a person is as well.
Owen Williams
>indelible in the hippocampus is the trauma inflicted by the brand of circumcision Kukuku right you are, I am not normal. Did the cat ears give it away? Perhaps there are some statistics to gather and publish surrounding: >pornography addiction >autism >gender dysphoria >homosexuality >acts of violence and rage (murder/mass murder)
foreskin is a gay man's fetish. the best argument against circumcision is that the new testament forbids it, or else you just start sounding like a male feminist.
>foreskin is a gay man's fetish. the best argument against circumcision is that the new testament forbids it, or else you just start sounding like a male feminist. No the best argument is that it is ritualistic torture for fun and profit. If you christcuck here you attach way more baggage than most people can swallow, adding an extra step. >cat ears makes this so much easier to combat the taboo
Circusmision should be outlawed until the child reaches the age of adulthood when they can make the decision for themselves. My parents decided to get me cut and its horrible. Sex isn't very enjoyable; specifically vaginal, oral feels much better. It's on the same level as parents making the decision that their kid is trans even though they can't even walk. This earth needs a cleansing.
considering how crusty my ex-gf's pussy always was, I wished there was some form of female genital modification that reduced smegma in girls. When she didn't shave her pussy, she'd have all this dried smegma encrusted in her hair that was impossible to get out without soap and water. When she shaved it, she'd still have all the yellow white chunks in her folds and hanging off her lips. Very gross.
Christian Evans
Continuing to post eyebleach/allegorical images and bumping the thread.
circumcision is good, you don't need the tip of your penis goys
Jackson Anderson
Wow holy shit that's disgusting. I recommend she BATHE or WASH. For males [I've heard] it isn't any different to wash behind the foreskin anymore than to wash behind the ears. Females are likely similar; there is no justification for genital mutilation.
You know what sucks? Being circumcised, enjoying sex very much, and realizing that it could be better. I spent most of my life not giving a shit about circumcision because sex already felt good. But slowly it sets in: It could be ever better. But that was taken from me before I was able to fight back.
Nolan Sanders
It may be possible to regrow following this blog, but it does speak of it taking a minimum of 2 years and extensive stretching everyday to get the shaft skin to divide by mitosis. >80-90% regain of function and sensation is possible
Just have to get over fear of medical devices in close proximity to your junk, doctors, and undergo daily training to regrow what was stolen. >I imagine it is worth it, I am determined to try; and yet I am afraid.
Gynocentric Matriarchical societies chop off dick tips (Jewry) , Patriarchical ones to the extreme (Sunni Dogs) chop off female clits. Neither is a healthy system
Landon Cooper
>>ban dual citizens from holding congressional office >>ban circumcision and all gential mutilation >>ban/restrict pornography and TAX the producers heavily >All rationally good and just things to do, with the affect of saving your country in 2 generations or less.
Circumcision is done because if the goys feel good, they are less productive. If sex feels good, people will want to work less and spend more time experiencing pleasure
Bad goyim! No pleasure! 40 hour work weeks are bad! Work 60 hours with no paid overtime. Its not like you have anything pleasurable to experience when you get home to wifey Heheh... Good goy
Reminder that anti-circumcision fags are actually Jews. It's a well known fact that 99% of women prefer cut dicks and the Jews want us to keep our children uncut so that they never procreate when women see their dicks and dump them for circumcised bulls.
Circumcision means that Jews lose their penile aesthetic superiority.
Dominic Baker
my logical mind says that not being circumciced would protect more against STDS right?
that skin is there to protect your peen-head
cut it off and its less protected, you get STD ffaster.
Jordan Sanchez
Foreskin means that the glans is more moist and warmer, which makes it more ideal for bacteria to breed. A drier penis is actually safer and the nerve ending fallacy has been proven false time and time again.
On the off chance that you are not trolling, you could not even be more wrong.
The skin containing nerve endings is not a fallacy, but rather is the thesis you are spouting: Bacteria bad, therefor less bacteria good.
The fact remains, there are parts on the body where bacteria is natural and needed. The inside of the mouth and nostrils. Inside the gut. On the skin. Inside the vagina. And under the foreskin as well.
Every single argument in favor of circumcision has been debunked over and over again. People like you just drag it out of the dirt time and time again, like feminists do with the wage gap.
The studies that supposedly prove that circumcision reduces the risk for STDs are extremely flawed. Very small sample size, Intact control group was allowed to have sexual contact while circumcised control group was still recovering from surgery, circumcised control group received condoms, but intact group did not.
Cutting off a healthy body part will not prevent any STD infection. What does is a responsible choosing of ones sexual partners and safe sex, while only having unprotected sex after testing. We already do that now, since we learned that from the last generation. If we could learn it, so can the next generation. No need to amputate anything.
Caleb Wilson
American Circumcision is on NetFlix, it covers all of those. Watch it.
>decreased risk of UTIs Girls get 8 to 14 times as many UTIs as boys, and they get treated with antibiotics. Why do boys have to get a healthy body part cut off? Also, see ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119846/ >However, the low overall rate of UTIs in the infant population demonstrated in several large cohort studies, suggested that the number needed to circumcise to prevent one hospitalization for UTI was between 100 and 200.
>A reduced risk of STDs in men See my last post on this one.
>Protection of penile cancer Penile cancer is astronomically rare, as in 1 in 100000 men will ever get it. The unlucky men afflicted with it are well in the second half of their lifetime, so why do healthy children and young men have to live without this necessary body part? Also, breast cancer is a lot more common, yet would you support cutting off the breasts of little infant girls for cancer prevention? Should we cut off every single organ that could possibly get cancer at some point?
>Prevention of balanitis Why do we have to cut off healthy body parts of babys that have no problem? Why fix what is not broken? Why not try to get rid off the balanitis by some other means first? (Creams, proper care) >prevention of phimosis Only one in every 16700 men will ever need a circumcision during their lifetime. Some individuals get ingrown nails at some point in their life. Would you support the permanent removal of all nails (hands and feet) of all infants? Phimosis can be prevented, and even if one has it it can be treated by other means (stretching, steroid cream). Circumcision is the last resort and once again, it is not a good argument to fix something that is not broken.
>makes it easier to clean This is a meme that seriously needs to die. You brush your teeth twice to three times a day. That process takes a LOT longer than the few seconds for cleaning your cock. Since removing all 32 teeth at birth would make oral hygiene easier, would you support
Daniel Flores
2/2
...would you support this? I think not, because that's of course ridiculous.
I am a 45 year old uncircumcised male and can still masturbate 2-3 times a day. Can circumcised males do this at this age?
Liam Allen
Do you feel 20% is acceptable then?
Owen Peterson
Regular showers fix almost ALL of those points, which in non-3rd world countries, we take regular showers.
Here's my question to you: is it worth mutilating a baby boy at birth and changing his sexual experience just so he can take less showers?
Colton Lee
An uncut can masturbate without the need for lube, the foreskin glides over the shaft. Cut men simulate this feeling by using lube, because they have to.
>it's cleaner to cut off the foreskin Can someone explain this meme to me please? A foreskin can be retracted at any time for cleaning. A vagina is a hole that blood and piss come out off and you can't easily wash the inside of it, but no one suggests that surgery is needed to fix it.
>girls prefer cut I think I have only ever heard this from straight, circumcised guys. Cope harder
Eli Torres
Until recently babies where not given anaesthetic because doctors thought babies didn't feel pain. Imagine that, imagine the mental scars of that experience.
Easton Young
Most babies today aren’t even given proper anesthesia, I mean how would you even know? I guarantee 99% of them cry anyway.
Oh boy thanks for coming back. Thought if I could keep threads going you guys would come back with some of the links from the 404s. >time to wash up, and then watch some of these
Sort of what happened with me, except I was more apathetic, then came the time when one of my friend, who was apparently intact, make a joke about circumcision. I was confused and that led me to do research leading me to the discovery of something dire: a cultural disease of America
Eli Robinson
do you have links to the actual studies, some people in my life, particularly my parents still believe in the "oh it's ok because the baby doesn't remember"
Chase Cox
I'll hang until 404. Hope to see you in the next thread, friend.
Jaxon Cook
pathetic, if you want to talk about perverted fetishes, talk about the apparent need to cut an infant's penis I am a Christian, and actually that was one reason why I became an intactivist
Evan Cruz
while tlc tuggers and related devices do improve experience from what I heard, if you want the REAL experience, it would be more preferrable to patiently wait for foregen
I see this shit everyday. You got cut, it's never coming back. Deal with it.
Aiden Flores
source, probably using a proxy or shitposting, in nations such as the uk and the rest of europe, a majority are left intact, yet a majority are not incels. Plus, in America the opposite is happening, it appears women who have a relationship with intact men prefer them. Plus, mutilating yourself to appease another individual is the ultimate form of cuckery
Samuel Harris
this user is really gay. Not like in a bad way, he's just really gay. Show those Jow Forumstards what for user.
Lucas King
genital mutilation is worse than rape, it's like being permanently raped for your entire life
Tyler Rivera
yeah to back up 's comment, there is a doctor who does it with anesthesia, yet the baby still screams
Chase Perez
theres foregen which is hopefulyl on the way, and there are stretching devices, which though are not true foreskins, can help regain some functions
Eli Reyes
You're wasting your time tho, for something that will only work half as good as intended. But if you really feel like you're lacking the world, go for it.
Camden Hall
I would have to agree with all your points but on the other hand it's fucking hilarious that Americans proudly to this to themselves and I don't really want them to stop.
Aiden Sanchez
I am patiently waiting for foregen, I believe the only acceptable way to live life is to be whole, and the only way this can be accomplished to to regain all parts you are originally born with, so I will wait, though I will still be a functioning member of society and advocate against it being done to future generations
>More than foreskin: circumcision status, history of HIV/STI, and sexual risk in a clinic-based sample of men in Puerto Rico. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22897699/
Couldn't you insult me without forcing in how cool and racist you are? You know, mix it up a little.
Carter Miller
It is more pathetic than hilarious, how some parents do it because they think it "looks nice" and "girls will like it" and accuse intactivists of being pedos, while quite obviously being the ones enforcing their sexual beauty standards on their own children for their own benefit instead of their children. Leaving your child's body alone, unless there is an immediate medical necessity that cannot be treated any other way, should be the default
Henry Morales
Its a foreign culture that has been placed on them, slowly, over many years.
Logan Cook
Then why don't you fling protests against this? Surely you have likeminded people around you, do some meme magic. Instead you're just sulking.
Blake Lopez
Like I said I agree but still. It's funny.
Matthew Lewis
accusing you of having no empathy is not an insult, this is an insult - dumb snow nigger
Jonathan Green
every single male that was genitally mutilated by a doctor received brain damage during the procedure and the medical community has known about it since the dawn of medicine (over tens of thousands of years) but will defend it using bullshit statistics like those being used in this thread to support it
Yes, the insult was fine until you appended those epic slurs.
Angel Rivera
I have actually, changed the mind of people online and in person. However my main goal now, is truly changing the mind of my parents, hopefully the American Circumcision documentary can help, they can see why it is unnecessary, but they don't see why it is fundamentally wrong
Gavin Scott
Why is infant genital mutilation so important? It makes great religious followers who need to be a part of a group, also makes great opiate addicts since they never felt pleasure until taking the drug. >Male Genital Mutilation is Trauma Based Mind Control [45m] youtube.com/watch?v=NJ3HNcjr1WY
sorry I forgot to add the link too >Ritual circumcision and risk of autism spectrum disorder in 0- to 9-year-old boys: national cohort study in Denmark ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530408/
Joshua Jenkins
You need to start making people question it en masse. It's not like the people whos minds you changed are gonna go on a crusade against this. Remember, (((they))) are spreading their (((research))) too. You guys are gonna look like outcasts in a few decades.
Elijah Barnes
WHAT DO YOU MEAN? CUTTING THE TIP OF YOUR PENIS OFF IS LOGICALLY...B-B-BECAUSE...NOW DELETE THIS THREAD!
Samuel Collins
This is what jewish supremacy looks like. Iceland wanted to ban infant genital mutilation for their people but the ADL threatened their tourism by publishing that they are neo-Nazi. At their conference on the IGM ban the panel was manly pro-gential mutilation rabbi's and plastic surgeons who spouted more bullshit that it's "anti-jewish supremacy" and "less than 2% have any issues with it", all lies.
I have a different view, even many Jews are waking up to this, there has been a recent ritual where they just name the baby without cutting him, named brit shalom, these Jews tend to be more liberal and anti-zionist, and nationally, the rate is dropping, I think rn, it is below half for all newborn males, however I agree, sitting on ones hands is never a good idea. However, I will try to reach out to actual organizations in the near future, I have heard many supposed justifications for this barbarism, and I have found many reasons that counter them, I hope to share these reasons
Isaac Jackson
assigning a motive that does not exist, one of the oldest fallacies, even though the law was not aimed at jews in particular
Connor Brooks
Danes will be the next to attempt a ban on Infant Genital Mutilation and they need your help, the government is afraid of social media backlash from jewish supremacists and need your support
