OK anons. Time to pick. You have two options:

What kind of idiocy is that?
Neither anarchism nor communism

Basically you are saying the US is a failed state because it doesn’t manage to exploit and steal as much from the working class as our country does?

>working class
Anyone who doesn't sell his labor is not working class. American tax rates and other costs aren't actually that small for everyone with a middle-class income if you consider the shitty service they are receiving from their government and add costs for healthcare and education if you compare them to German rates. It's just that over there you are paying more in taxes as an average worker than your own CEOs who can easily influence the political process to give themselves tax breaks.

This

No border and no welfare.

I don't have a problem with people coming here if they can find a job. It's only a problem when they start leeching off the system. Without welfare they'd either not come or would find jobs that they can sustain themselves on.

As for people already here losing jobs, who cares? If you suck at life that much then you should be replaced.

Welfare state and borders. We already have welfare. May as well get borders. If it were the other way around we would be like every other 3rd world "shit hole"

With no welfare state the niggers wouldn't want to come in the first place. Any who did come would have to work hard or die.

Of course, they'd quickly vote for a welfare state, all paid for by whites, but assuming that the 'no welfare state' thing is permanent and the niggers can't vote to make one, then that would be the option.

anyone who is against welfare is a legit fucking retard. you think poor people are just going to die off? no. theyre going to rob, murder, and deal until they get theirs. enjoy massive increases in crime. oh, whats that? you want universal basic income to stop the crime? congratulations youre now a commie

The US runs on slaves, either in prisons, on picking fields, in the service industry, cleaners, everywhere. Plus lots of corporate welfare, war "against" drugs, allowing doctors to prescribe expensive highly addictive opioids and then dumping the expensive treatment on the public.
People are now slowly waking up to that shitshow.
They sold the dimwitted, that there is a way to make the ex-opioid overdosed miner a fruit picker. There isn't.

What if I want a wall AND to get rid of the welfare state?

This

This.

Attached: 1507440249730.png (612x432, 197K)

Either one works so long has having borders means keeping the rabble out

i also need to add that those same people who are against welfare are your "midwits". smarter than a cousin fucker but not bright enough to put together cause and effect.

tier 2 on pic

Attached: Expanding-Brain.jpg (857x1202, 138K)

Without broadens where do nations begin and end?

Without borders you dont have a country

Well no you can have borders with no welfare state.
You can't have welfare state with no borders though.

tier 1: welfare is needed because i need money but wont work

tier 2: abolish welfare because it gives incentive to be lazy

tier 3: keep welfare as containment for crime

tier 4:????

people on welfare don't need to live in the cities, don't need to choose their shed they live in, have only a limited amount of true cash (only store credit)
You can sour the milk a lot, but with based food stamps, controlled rent and stuff like that you make it too easy to live "like" a poor wagecuck

Attached: 1339019809205.jpg (400x352, 15K)

If there's no borders and no welfare, then the country has gone to utter shit and nobody even wants to be there in the first place.
If there's welfare and borders, then border are (a t least theoretically) stopping people from coming in and taking advantage of the welfare.

Seems pretty obvious.

what you just said made no sense, applied in no way shape or form to the original post, and was utter drivel. turn on airplane mode, throw away your keyboard, withdraw from society, and possibly kys so you never plague us with that plethora of shitty jargon ever again

Attached: 1545414945767.jpg (682x900, 112K)

So the us could save 50bil by simply refusing welfare and housing to people without ID?
If cities and states want to fund this by their own voliton, they can do this.

>so many words for kys
>has not answered the original question

So you want mass-ghettos of disgusting buildings in disrepair?

Sounds like a threat

Ridiculous

there was question are you high?

Attached: 2gpylg.jpg (326x523, 22K)

If there is too many (unskilled) humans in the input variable and the formula can deal with that, maybe the formula is weak, uninspired and has flaws.
If the only result is always slums and violence, then building walls and shit is a temporary solution.
The church tried it with the dark ages. It held for 400 years. After that, not so much.

...

Thw welfare state cosists of healthcare mental health social security, etc. the reason people who are crazy shit in the streets in third world countries is because they dont appl the welfare state. Because of welfare we maintain civilization and infrastructure. welfare is a way to balance the playing field so the poor and disabled dont die of outward starvation. What we need is checks in corruption of power, checks into nonprofit & NGA's. The regulators need to be checked & regulated. bring back bug business busters. When the banks and corporations are too big to fail the weight is felt by the people. Who needs a trump or an obama. We need a New Party.

This if you chose borders and it’s just whites then whites won’t use welfare

Or they could... ya know... get a fucking job! Believe it or not, just because one is poor doesn't make them automatically a criminal. You could argue that someone on welfare would be more likely to do dirt because they know they will lose their benefits if they get a real job. Getting rid of welfare would force most people to simply get a job. It would also decentivize people who come here and simply play the system. Because they know they will have to work. There can only be so many drug dealers. And before you start, I am not saying that we should simply cut everyone off. I think some kind of short-term welfare for people that genuinely need some help would be ok. But no longer that 3 - 6months. That is plenty of time to find a job. Similar to unemployment benefits where you have to prove you are actually trying to get a job to receive said benefits. There is no reason any able bodied person should get a free ride just because they continue to breed like a fucking rabbit. Welfare incentivizes this type of behavior.

Based. A family should take care of its own, and send strangers packing.

>That flag
>That statement

Attached: proxy.duckduckgo-2.jpg (249x386, 13K)

What happens when there are not enough jobs for everyone?

>Um sorry we have too many blacks and latinas, try somewhere else
>returns to selling drugs after getting turned down 100 times and doesn't want to work in the field or clean trash

The poor arent criminals! True! Sociologist since the beginning of the 18th century used psychological diagnosis to supress and divide the people. A symmptom of Antisocial personality disorder is breaking the Law. The Law has been made and laid down and enforced by (Aryan english British). Its systematic and a break in one of the industry's (Prison industry, Welfare Industry, Education Industry ) it challenges the status quo. Which is unacceptable.
Getting rid of welfare would force not into the labor market but into destitution. Losing welfare will cause people to die and or need protection. They will be vulnerable taken advantage of corrupted and ultimately have negative impacts. Dead body's on the way to school, Frozen dead body at the bustop bench in the morning. Etc. DrugDealing isnt the only problem - think about violent insane criminals, think about prostitutes, The border isnt going to cut out the most important issues AMERICAS IMPLOSION IS AN INSIDE JOB!!! Defer the masses to the exterior while the Aryan Regulators chauff away our America!
You are Soooo Dumbb!!!!