In an effort to go around the Constitutional requirement for an Electoral College, 10 states and DC have signed an agreement to award their Electoral College votes to the winner of the national vote. This would in effect end the Electoral College and only the national vote overall would matter.
>
Once the NPV compact gets signed by States with 270 total Electoral votes, the system will effectively be in place and the Electoral college will be over. The 10 states that have already signed on have a total of 165 Electoral votes. Only 105 votes left to go.
m.youtube.com
>will they succeed?
National Popular Vote - the end of the electoral college
The electoral college was put in place so that a state's representation in the vote was the same as their representation in congress.
also Prager U is run by crazy zionist radicals
Prager is a jew
If the electoral college doesn't matter what's even the fucking point of having different states
So leftists and jews want a system where a president can be elected by taking over a coulple cities and making fake votes in those cities, rather then convincing the country you are a good leader.
As I said in a previous thread the agreement is unenforceable. If one of the states don't like the outcome of the election they can change their vote and there would be nothing the other states could do.
Will take several more election cycles for Dems to take over the Senate, but the possibility is real.
Friendly reminder that the city of L.A. itself has a bigger population than all but 5 states, so we are all kinds of fucked if/when this happens.
Guess that means Trump is going to sweep in 2020.
It would still serve the purpose of the countrymen not having to suck the dick 3 different cities.
The more dumbed down society gets the more they want to end the electoral college. Don't they realize that every president that's ever been elected was elected because of the electoral college? Do they want two or three cities to dictate what happens in the entire country? Do they realize that Obama would not have been elected without it?
>Signing NPV
>Giving up your votes to NY and California's whims by default
why would you do this honestly?
I wonder how butthurt they will be when the popular vote goes against them and they lose a president they could have otherwise elected.
Because Democrats just want to win and dont give a shit how it happens
If this agreement ever gets passed, illegal immigration states/cities would go into overdrive registering illegal voters. Dems would never lose another election
Lawsuits unending and an eventual supreme court challenge would ensue, considering that every single eligible voter would have standing to sue. Unless they stack the court between now and then, I can't see such an egregious circumventing of the constitution being allowed, even if it is technically within the written word of the law.
the popular vote is the democrat stregh now, because of all the illegals
republicans might have a chance to win another election, maybe two. But they will almost certainly never win the popular vote ever again
Kek
So the states that are going to be blue... just gave more reason for the rep voters to turn out en mass.
Are they doing it on purpose? No one can be this stupid.
Prager FAGGOT
Dude this is just an obvious Talmudic trick to ensure the desired outcome.
>Desired candidate gets popular vote
>Doesn’t win your state though
>We’re going by this new agreement goy
>Undesirable candidate wins popular vote
>Doesn’t win your state though
>Oy Vey we can’t be held to this silly agreement goy
Gradually I began to hate them.
It doesn't bother them that a candidate could become president by winning only a plurality of the popular vote. If they want true democracy, why don't the demand a candidate receive an outright majority of the popular vote? This would have meant that Bill Clinton would never have become president as he never recieved an outright majority of the vote. He only recieved 43 percent in 1992. 57 percent of the voters did not vote for him. And Lincoln, whom many consider the greatest president received only 39 percent of the popular vote - 61 percent of voters did not vote for him. He then proceeded to declare war on his own country.
I think you may have a point here. States are Constitutionally required to have democratic elections for the Presidency. It wouldnt be very democratic to have someone win the vote in a State and award the Electoral votes to someone else.
LOL
This will not end well.
This is fake. Any posters who fall for this are beyond gullible.
I hope so, I didn't even bother to check. I just assumed states were able to do that.
It's fake and you answered why next to no states would ever consider it.
who are the 10 states?
this has to be challenged and beaten in court
this is something that is actually worth taking up arms about
lol I hAtE dEmOcRaCy
it'll never pass and you're all still losers
>import millions of spics to California
>give them voting rights
>destroy republic
Finally someone else gets it.
States do not have the same laws. The electoral college is made to give small states a leg to stand on.
Retards on the left only want it to go away because it made them lose to Trump. But they fail to understand the negative effects this would have on state rights. You would see politicians catering almost exclusively to New York / San Francisco politics, while the rest of the country experiences urban decay that easily mimics eastern Russian towns that time forgot.
You think you're being clever. Plz kys.
You're a dumbass. It's fake. Quit falling for shit trying to divide us. If you mobilize against this country, you're falling into the hands of foreign powers like a pawn.
This is why the EC system exists, otherwise presidential campaigns would only care about Texas, New York, California and Michigan as only the highest population states are needed to bag an election. Meanwhile the other 46 out of 50 states get to eat shit every election since they are stuck with whichever candidate wins in the 4 most populous states
I thought the whole point of EC was that even the smaller states have representation? Otherwise they'll simply get their interests overruled by bigger states every time, leading to them requesting independence. Abolishing EC seems like a road to civil war to me
And meanwhile in Sweden where there aren't really any big party election campaigns.
but muh equal representation
it doesn't matter what you do. your vote doesn't matter.
it has never mattered. it is the 'illusion' on choice. you are fucking fools.
the rich stay rich, the poor stay poor, your vote is MEANINGLESS, you are a slave to this ILLEGAL COUNTRY.
>fake
here are some links you fucking glowfag retard. This is very real and already more than halfway to the goal
washingtonexaminer.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
>your vote doesn't matter
>Trump 2016 happened
American democracy is mostly a meme but votes still do matter. Even the sneaky elites can't control millions of free voters.
Implementing NPV would change that.
ummmmm hillary won the popular vote. perfect example of how your vote means jack shit.
i dont care one way or the other. but this last election ostensibly proves that the popular vote is meaningless.
>ummmmm hillary won the popular vote
white south african here, dad was a Boer farmer. You Kaffas/niggers need to understand this has been done in many occasions in the past. Why do you think Hillary had most of the new york and major city votes? Because she focussed her advertising in give me dats to the minorities in order to gain power. Same shit happened in south africa (they literally use phone data plans made cheaper as political give me dat ploys to get the vote) and the same shit will happen in your country. Niggers and spics rarely look into depth why things are the way they are; and romanticise the rebellion fantasy against the government.
boer boi again.. allowing illegals to vote just create more democratic votes; as they will focus on gimme dat handouts. Pretty simple plan.