Does Jow Forums know propaganda when they see it?

Does Jow Forums know propaganda when they see it?

Attached: corporate_propaganda.jpg (967x692, 371K)

Let me get this straight: both the "left" and the "right" are kvetching over this, and you think it's propaganda to call it controversial?

Attached: 1537809939829.webm (606x480, 2.94M)

>end of the internet as we know it
Everything changed that day

Yeah, everything but RT.
Based Russians are the only ones still making credible news.

You forgot to circle the "intended to keep the internet open and fair" part by CNN. Also, it actually was controversial, still is.

Some ((guy)) at my work was shilling the horrors of net neutrality and how awful it would be. What should I ask him today now that NN repeal has been in effect for a while now ?

Yep. remeber: kill the chidlren of the left.

>IT'S THE END OF THE INTERNET AS WE KNOW IT
>AND I FEEL FIIIIIIIIIIIIIINE

I wonder if normalfags feel retarded for falling for the net neutrality scare. Alot of shills and bots were posting about it across all social media sites.

'Controversial' is neutral language
If anything CNN's language is intended to promote defense of the rule based on the headline alone

Im still waiting for the world to end over net neutrality
Bit disappointing really

Attached: t2aVQvv.jpg (1125x1095, 358K)

I know right it's 2019 and still no internet providing monopolies
>mfw Indian man no kill internet

...

Oh shit that get
It's a sign of kek

most of Jow Forums are trumptards which are nothing but the product of retarded hillbilly propaganda

Article 13 is coming soon.

saying 'controversial' in a headline (about something that is) is propaganda now. Gotcha faggot, got and rope?

Has that even been effective???
Wouldn't there be stories about people getting sued for memes in Europe??
Or are (((they))) not reporting it??

Wow, another retard leaf, shocking. Both are propaganda you moron.

This is a trick question, they're both propaganda. Fox are acting as corporate shills, while CNN is only defending net neutrality because it happened under Obama. If it ever come under attack by a democrat president, you'll likely see these same exact stories almost word for word just posted on the opposite sides. Don't trust the fucking MSM, no exceptions.

Except it was proven that the anti-net neutrality sentiment was due to astroturfing and tech-illiterate Jow Forumsfags. And only retards thought the ISPs would immediately start Jewing you right after it was repealed.

The fact is net neutrality was the "default" for decades, and the FCC constantly fought telecommunikikery, especially in the 2000s. The regulation was only put into place after a court deemed the FCC had no authority to do so unless ISPs were considered common carriers.

>1 post by this id
Day of the rake

shhh, just let babby have his slide thread

>calls CNN real news
>1 post by this ID

You surprise me every day leaf. Good job.

Attached: 1539656357408.png (900x495, 104K)

yes, you just posted liberal jewish propaganda. fuck off jew, sage.

Ironically those rules they were calling "net-neutrality" were keeping new ISPs from starting up

>Ironically those rules they were calling "net-neutrality" were keeping new ISPs from starting up
If that were true, telecoms wouldn't have spent hundreds of millions in lobbying trying to repeal the regulation.

Faggotry