9/11 Building 7 collapse

My first redpill. Everyone I've talked to regarding 9/11 see it from a cover up to a conspiracy

Yes user, world trade center 7, a tall building in itself although much smaller than the towers collapsed into its own footprint at freefall speed some hours after the first towers.

In the 2nd video I posted Barry Jennings reports what others said too, that before the collapse there had been explosions in the tower. Mr Jennings died mysteriously two days before the final NIST report was concluded.

Here's a video of the BBC news reporting WTC7 to have already fallen about a half hour before the collapse, WTC7 is visible in the background.

youtube.com/watch?v=0ZqP8moItcc

Attached: 911 wtc.jpg (960x720, 162K)

youtube.com/watch?v=t1bzqjoZyeQ

I find that most people are surprised to find out about the third building.

Israel did it

Attached: 274838.jpg (620x791, 110K)

Fire from what? There was no magic jet fuel in building 7

youtube.com/watch?v=9ScGZCqEyGM

youtube.com/watch?v=wJsEGgc5L2c

The third building collapsed due to an improperly designed building if you look closely you can see the pent house on the roof. This caused structural instability when rubble from the towers started fires in WTC 7. The building was damaged beyond repair so the fire department pulled the building, it would have been to structurally unsafe too send people in there. If you argue anything it is that WTC 7 was pulled because it had evidence of insider trading relating to the legislative measures introduced after 9/11

Jets can crash into buildings making them explode in a ball of fire, but jets cannot take off if someone is flying a drone near them..

Hmm..

It was splashed with Kerosene based jet fuel which burns hotter than the center of a large M class star.

Attached: SNcwgFqO_400x400.jpg (276x276, 17K)

>so the fire department pulled the building
"they pulled the building"
"no it was a fire"
"nah they pulled the building"
"no it was a fire"
"they fucking demo'd the building"
"no it was a fire, the fire department pulled the building because it was unsafe"
"WHAT I FUCKING SAID"
exactly by this logic only building sized drones should ground jets

So hot that the entire structure of steel loses any strength of resistance

Why do you anti schizophrenic douchebags always push this inside job horse shit, it was not an inside job. A building like that would have to be demolished with a special crew, and there was no such crew that day, it fell because of a fire which happens all the time, and you forget that the building tipped over, it didn't fall at free fall speed, end this nonsense at once.

if you want to actually learn something

youtube.com/watch?v=l_VRnQHqrRU

youtu.be/2WHlJsETJeY

I have done a complete 180 on this now. I now think that mossad, bushes Clinton’s and the saudis did 9/11

It's just unbelievably lucky that their wasn't enough jet fuel spilled to cause a complete meltdown of the area, as it was it was the longest building fire in human history with the twin towers sub basement levels burning for months after, dangerous shit the Kerosene.

Some say it's still burning to this day. I for one feel the flame flicker. Do you?

Despite all the wild theories and stuff pointing towards jews, I'm still inclined to believe it was the product of planes flying into the fucking building and damaging structural integrity, and the resulting flaming hole in the side of the building was subjected to strong winds common at such a height, essentially turning the flaming hell hole into a furnace hot enough to compromise structural rigidity. Steel doesn't have to melt into a pool of molten metal to stop being structurally sound...

youtube.com/watch?time_continue=127&v=FzF1KySHmUA

Larry Silverstein is the most honest man in America, possibly the world. He seems like a straight up no nonesense kind of guy. >and there was no such crew that day,
Search 'gelatin' 9/11
Nice art project, nothing to see here!

youtube.com/watch?v=huGNzqtLN0k

Attached: student02.jpg (703x849, 144K)

Joseph Goebbels Couldn’t imagine a more Jewy Jew.

youtu.be/hycank4AxBo
Yes the fire damaged the structural integrity so thoroughly that there was visually no resistance whatsoever.

Attached: 1545234684732.jpg (638x1000, 92K)

for one, no. Planes and jet fuel are going to do that to skyscrapers

secondly, OP posted building 7 which was never hit by a plane. Try not being a brainlet

Yeah the 911 NIST report is pretty much bullet proof as a scientific document , they nailed it with the, and global collapse ensued final finding which completely encapsulated the breadth and depth of their investigation.

>are going to do that to skyscrapers
aren't*

How come Rudy Giuliani gave the firefighters faulty radios for 9/11 and then later lied to the commission saying that they disobeyed orders to leave when in reality they didn't hear any order because the radios didn't work?

youtube.com/watch?v=vaCYEEO-58I

youtube.com/watch?v=arVPrp5OzVs

No plane hit building 7, and as I've posted already, there are many eyewitnesses who reported explosions.

How come the BBC news reported that WTC7 had collapsed 30minutes before it had, even visible in the background of the report?
As seen in this post

can't tell if this is sarcasm

We are such cucks that these Jews walk freely

WHERE WERE YOU

WHEN THEY NUKED THOSE TOWERS WITH CGI PLANES?

Only Boomers. But Boomers will buy literally anything. Especially if it has Israel slapped on it.

Attached: 1546655473404.jpg (571x618, 42K)

>jet fuel melts steel in the wind
>building 7 had a panic attack and fell after seeing the other 2 burn and fall

Attached: 5703E312-A22A-48BA-A271-5A7692FF0F70.jpg (645x729, 57K)

jannies did 9/11

>Does the American public really buy this one?
American public will buy anything.

I blame daylight savings.

What is that a pic of?

Attached: 911 plane.jpg (600x946, 69K)

I've actually came to the conclusion that Building 7, while important to the story of 9/11, was intentionally ran with by conspiracy theorists online in order to poison the well and ignore an actual investigation into the events on 9/11. The Pentagon """missile""" is an even bigger example of this happening.

I can only think of one 9/11 researcher that has talked about things like PNAC while also talking about FBI reports received via FOIA requests. Oddly enough, those researchers tend to avoid WTC7 and theories that anything other than a plane hit the Pentagon.

An 'art project' called gelatin who were in the towers a few months before 9/11

He's just testing his special Iphone.

Can you please explain what they were doing? Official cover story vs real malicious subversive operation?

Can you explain this picture too please

the vast majority of them don't know about it

Official story is they were an art project doing 'art'. Conspiracy is they were up to no good and setting the building up.

This is part of an engine found after 9/11 which doesn't match the engine of the plane it's supposed to be from.

Attached: wtc others.jpg (619x553, 95K)

It's probably worth mentioning that the FBI field office reports obtained via FOIA requests heavily indicate that FBI investigations into individuals potentially linked to the attacks were eventually stifled when they got "too close". Ryan Dawson's writings and documentaries on 9/11 are absolutely the most exhaustive, as he only references foreign policy papers, news reports and documents obtained FOIA. I tend to believe his conclusions, especially in regards to theories involving the Pentagon. Makes no sense to use a missile if we're already establishing that there's a cabal willing to use commercial airliners.

The X-Files had a spin-off show called The Lone Gunmen, which, in the X-Files, were a small group Mulder had ties with. The group believed that JFK's assassination was a government operation. Anyway, the pilot episode aired in early 2001 and the plot of the pilot was that rogue elements of the government were going to remotely hijack a commercial airliner and use it to crash into the WTC in order to start a war in the Middle East and cause a boom in the military-industrial complex. The story arch even included a fall-man that would eventually accept responsibility for the attack.

Probably worth noting that the comptroller of the USA on 9/11 was someone who worked with Boeing and oversaw the company while they were developing the technology to remotely pilot aircraft. Again, why is the idea that humans can't perform certain maneuvers so it must be a missile even part of conspiracy lore?

Thank you

One of the problems is that it fell down with a free fall which is possible only with controlled demolition.

ya but this argument doesnt hold up when we're talking about couple ton playing flying at high speeds directly into a building i know it doesnt account for WTC7. you can't compare the two twin towers to them building fires because they didnt have a plane fucking crash into them to weaken the supports.

The fact that architectural and engineering students aren't studying this collapse in college tells you everything you need to know.

probably because there are other structural failures successes that they can study without being an issue. im pretty sure most colleges would be aware of the fact that to bring up this topic in class could quickly turn into a politically contentious debate false flag etc.

and some professors have the foresight to realize things can cost them their job such as questioning a narrative as such. i think one engineer lost his job after going on the news and saying 9/11 story doesnt add up .

Friendly reminder that the Deutsche Bank Building also across the street from the World Trade Centers had a 24 story gash torn in the front of it from the World Trade Centers collapsing and stood for another 10 years in that condition until it was finally fully dismantled in 2011

Attached: Deutsche Bank Building.jpg (800x1214, 336K)

The structure beneath was blew out from the other buildings collapsing on top of the fire.

Why are boomers the most gullible American generation in this countries history? you think after the Vietnam War they wouldn't trust anything the US government has to say.

Hey Goy, there was a terrible loss of life and we had to go ahead and pull it. Stop with the kvetching

9/11 was obviously an inside job. The guy that owned the WTC took out 1 billion in insurance a few weeks before. The motivation to do it was for that 1 billion and to keep the US tied up in the Middle East for years to protect Israel from their enemies. Obviously.

After WW2 you mean. Muh holohoax.

You mean this guy?

Attached: 9_11_Lucky Larry.jpg (816x2880, 771K)

Start digging lads

Download the torrent. Open Layer 1 file using Veracrypt with this key

uS\gY(oY@(5e=#(8e2nXOZ:9.DqK#abx>v4YUPqlb*~`d$76?VFZPN0Bh2\6vT=N

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:4123c41c1040ff55f9fcc381ded2b0cfa44ba5f3&dn=911_Archive.zip&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.internetwarriors.net%3a1337%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.opentrackr.org%3a1337%2fannounce&tr=http%3a%2f%2ftracker.internetwarriors.net%3a1337%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f9.rarbg.to%3a2710%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2fexodus.desync.com%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2fexplodie.org%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=http%3a%2f%2fexplodie.org%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker2.itzmx.com%3a6961%2fannounce

Attached: leeks.jpg (295x171, 6K)

Is this the hacker group leaks?
Saw this on NYE, but nothing since then

Key for previw file
*CZ4=I{YZ456zGecgg9/cCz|zNP5bZ,nCvJqDZKrq@v?O5V$FezCNs26CD;e:%N^

yup

BAMP

especially this

and
keep them bumped
fight the slide

Did that guy leave America after or is he still eating dinner with goverment officials???

Burgers realise 9\11 was an inside job.
Most.
Kikes are not.

The WTC buildings were full of asbestos which was going to ve a logistical nightmare to remove and would probably have cost more then they were worth. Lucky Larry didn't get that nickname for no reason.
>theres going to be a lot of mesothemioma happening in NYC in the next 10 years from all the dust

* ALSO I DO NOT KNOW why the thing is in DISCUSSION

Attached: 1527051980334s.jpg (125x121, 3K)

If you talk to just about any WWII vet they went to war

1. to fight the Japs
2. to defend England and France from German invasion

they didn't know about the holohoax till after the war, the idea that the US when to war because Germany was killing Jews is our own propaganda taught to latter generations by Hollywood, the documentary Five Came Back talks about this and how after the war hollwood jews started making films about the holohoax and made the public think that was the main reason for us going to war.

Nah, it was foreign Mussies.
Here's why:
World Trade Center used to be the stock exchange, collapse the stock exchange you do real damage. But... The stock exchange moved out, silently, a few years before to an unmarked warehouse. The myth of the Hollywood-style trading floor persisted.

The move was never advertised. So foreigners still thought WTC is where it all happens but it's just shitty office space overfilled with tons of 150kg murkins.

Real stock exchange was unaffected.

Next election suddenly Hussein is winning the election.

Similar happened in South Africa.
Mandela terrorizes nation.
Becomes president. wtf

Build 7 fell because it was overfilled with burgers when it lit up, 5 murkins = 1 metric tonne. Add that to your calculations.

>i am subhuman
>i can not think by myself

>5 burgers is 1 metric ton
>a burger is 150 kilos
> 5 x 150 = 750
Africa math

That's really fucking stupid. Attacking a stock exchange would do very little. Besides, these people supposedly defeated the US Airforce and could not even have a proper target selection?

Attached: 911 coincidences.png (1150x498, 150K)

NOt only that but the entire building below the strike point was compromised, but not above it. Piledriver theory.

Building 7 didn't get hit.
The twin towers are the two buildings that got hit.
Building 7 was across the street over 50 feet away from the twin towers.

Building 7 was over 300 feet away from the towers.

metal loses strength when heat is applied to it but it doesn't turn into free-falling jello.

enron scandal files were in WTC 7 and implicated government officials like Feinstein, Bush, Chaney, Rumsfeld. It had to come down to save their asses

But building 7 wasn't on fire. It did not get hit by a plane. It was across the street from the twin towers.

Besides being an excellent symbolic target and a convenient way to demolish the towers and get an insurance payout there was also a much overlooked reason why the twin towers were targetted. How does one cover up the issue of $240 billion in fraudulent ten year government bonds? How would one go about clearing those bonds when on the maturation date? How does one conveniently destroy evidence of other massive financial crimes?
docdroid.net/XYU92yh/collateral-damage-911.pdf

817
247
1526

Just delete the files like Hillary.

the bush 43 administration did delete all their emails, which were on government servers too, and were never punished for it

How does one clear $240 billion in bonds? Normally checks are in place when bonds are cashed out. Banks will see they're fraudulent
Read .pdf linked here

Get off my fucking website larry

>How does one clear $240 billion in bonds?
they get signed with names like Adnan Sakli the former owner of the BIS ledger without his permission and then he gets murdered when he learned about it and tried to expose it

Attached: Bond Fraud 3.png (1024x768, 54K)

WTC was full of Asbestos

Think about the cost of cleaning up both buildings top to bottom

Also what you said

2 birds 1 stone

Attached: 1546376030281.jpg (497x765, 65K)

I called this phone number and asked if he had Battletoads

He was sleepy