Evolution does not exist

No proof exists regarding the transition of one species into another you fucking retard.

evolution is a two part word, evil action.

A good reason to treat today's scientific community as a bunch of dumb fucks. Claiming evolution as fact is about like claiming the Earth is flat.

>Wikipedia is not a reliable academic source
True, but you're ignoring all those reliable academic sources that article cites.

It has never been proven. There is 0 evidence of a transitional species. None whatsoever.

I remember being 13 too.

None of those sites provide any irrefuteable evidence of a transitional species. This is because transitional species do not exist.

>be me, first proto-human
>tfw first primate to have a fused chromosome 2
>tfw no gf

Evolution is a shamefully poor lie.

Evolution is not real.

^This is the correct assessment.

Short term adaptation leads to long term adjustment. Or in other words, Evolution.

Attached: dick head (you).jpg (111x125, 3K)

I used to think that then I did research. I compared the arguments for a against. The arguments against evolution are based on lies. Evolution is easily observable.

If evolution isn't real why is God a dick to black people? He didn't have to make them dumb.

Attached: Cunning autistic retard.png (657x539, 110K)

Evidence retard. That is like... a requirement you know? Oh a forgot, limey education is dumbed down.

You need to prove it, but you can't.

I'm curious, why do you even care? People believe all sorts of nonsense on any number of issues. Why do you care about evolution?

Thank you white American evangelical man for teaching me how God created all people equal and I should love niggers becaus of that. I bet your kids won't become atheistic leftists who will parrot the same shit from marxist positions.

My tax dollars are being used to lie to children.

>Limey

Nope, I'm Somali.

>Evidence

Can easily be observed with our domesticated cattle, whom of which have been noticeably changed over the course of their controlled selective breeding.

Attached: Democratic society.png (866x900, 95K)

>There is no evidence of species transition
OP has never seen a nigger

Black people are dumb. That's a scientific fact.

The Minnesota Transracial Adoption study shows the indelible nature of nature.
pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a2d7/85edd7aa61b7ba51355053cc61d8b924fe35.pdf
web.archive.org/web/20180111113325/https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a2d7/85edd7aa61b7ba51355053cc61d8b924fe35.pdf

Identical twins raised apart have very similar IQs. Generally IQ is 75% heritable.
arthurjensen.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/IQ’s-of-Identical-Twins-Reared-Apart-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen.pdf
web.archive.org/web/20180111113442/http://arthurjensen.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/IQ’s-of-Identical-Twins-Reared-Apart-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen.pdf

More on Race and IQ specific genes.
pastebin.com/KLSS62Y1
archive.fo/IUDcy

Now black people are genetically dumb. Did this happen because of evolutionary pressures or did God just feel like fucking with them? If you say God is a dick I'll respect you.

Attached: Race and IQ Genes.png (1280x720, 27K)

Multiply certain adaptation over the course of hundreds of millions of years.

You're welcome.

>Black people are dumb

*Generally dumb, as randomized gene expression does give some of their members the propensity to be intellectual.

Attached: Niggah please.png (2000x2000, 1.21M)

Black people aren’t a different species. Natural selection has been proven to exist, but the concept of species transition hasn’t. Black people weren’t selected for intelligence as much as white people or eastern asians, I think

>over the course of hundreds of millions of years
Not even that long.
Read The 10,000 Year Explosion, by Harpending and Cochran

This can't be ignored. The smartest africans are definitely smarter than the average european. Understanding that their average is lower is only so useful.

No proof of a cow becoming a horse is there? You dumb retrard, I am referring to species transition.

The theory of evolution is for the simple minded. The odds are against it. The reality is far more complex than originator a two hundred year old theory could possibly imagine. These same simple minded people who have actually made another religion out of it.

Attached: e18562328584b7700032184e12bf64dfe8e82eae92d7adb7f430c49198eee10e.jpg (600x600, 70K)

They are dumber by such a wide margin that I feel safe saying they're dumber. Women are shorter than men even though 6'6" women exist.

Blacks are a different subspecies. They also contain different hominid ancestors. Europeans and Asians have Denisovian and Neanderthal. Aborigines have Erectus. Africans are probably about 8% Habilis.

“The History and Geography of Human Genes" by Professor Cavali-Sforza was published by Princeton and finds 5 racial groups among humans.
friendsofpast.org/pdf/DOI/DOI02173.pdf
web.archive.org/web/20040302191811/http://www.friendsofpast.org/pdf/DOI/DOI02173.pdf

Human Subspecies and Genetic Diversity
pnas.org/content/94/9/4516
archive.li/1Ma6U

(1997) Barbujani et. al., find a human genetic distance of ,155. There are no recognized subspecies.

jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/92/5/398.long
archive.li/7TFnr

(2001) Kim et. al., find an Asian dog genetic distance of ,154. There are eleven recognized subspecies.

tau.ac.il/~geffene/PDFs/15-Mol_Biol_Evol_1994.pdf
web.archive.org/web/20161114180503/http://www.tau.ac.il/~geffene/PDFs/15-Mol_Biol_Evol_1994.pdf

(1994) Roy et. al., find a North American coyote genetic distance of ,107. There are nineteen recognized subspecies.

nature.com/nature/journal/v415/n6871/full/415520a.html
web.archive.org/web/20090620233339/http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v415/n6871/full/415520a.html

(2002) Schwartz et. al., find a Canadian lynx genetic distance of ,033. There are three recognized subspecies.

Attached: NAXALT Medium.png (640x480, 36K)

rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/281/1786/20133222
archive.li/0zgPu

(2014) Jackson et. al., find a humpback whale genetic distance of ,12. There are three recognized subspecies.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18466230
archive.li/9XdVJ

(2008) Lorenzen, Arctander & Siegismund find a plains zebra genetic distance of ,11. There are five recognized subspecies.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12969463?dopt=Abstract
archive.li/aG9R4

(2003) Pierpaoli et. al., find a European wildcat genetic distance of ,11. There are three recognized subspecies and five biogeographic groups according to (Mattucci et. al., 2016).

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03382.x/abstract
archive.li/sI78d

(2007) Lorenzen et. al., find a Kob antelope genetic distance of ,11. There are two to three recognized subspecies.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1439-0388.2003.00384.x/abstract
web.archive.org/web/20161114180208/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1439-0388.2003.00384.x/abstract

(2003) Jordana et. al., find a south European beef cattle genetic distance of ,068. There are eighteen recognized subspecies.

digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1393&context=icwdm_usdanwrc
archive.li/uvI5f

(2004) Williams et. al., find a red winged blackbird genetic distance of ,01. There are twenty-two recognized subspecies.

Attached: US Population Race and IQ.jpg (6268x2752, 2.17M)

>partial limbs
Whales and dolphins got pelvic bones that are slowly going away.

>The smartest africans
Are a statistically insignificant few

To demand proof of species transition is to misunderstand the nature of species and evolution. Species is a continuum as I have already said, no species ever transitions from one to another, they just diverge and become more different from their ancestor over time. So if you took a photo of one species today and its ancestor 1 million years ago, a naturalist would classify them as different species. As usual people who deny evolution demand evidence that isn't valid or necessary, the fossil record, and observing living nature shows the way evolution works through blind mutation sometimes working and encouraging propagation. There are flaws in animal engineering which only make sense if is the product of blind evolution rather than intelligent design. We humans have high infant mortality because women's pelvises are narrower than our ape ancestors would have been, but our pelvises had to become narrower so we could walk bipedaly which was an adaptation necessary to survive after the jungle receded and our ape ancestors were forced to live in grassland.

Attached: nation founded by hysterical christians deny reality.jpg (1524x940, 329K)

>No proof of a cow becoming a horse is there?
Why would there be?

Yup.

Well if you compare and contrast the wild ancestor of most cattle, to their modern domesticated descendants. Then an argument can be made that they are different species, and thus a confirmation of the species transition "hypothesis" you mention in your post. But of course, I guess this assertion will fluctuate in validity, depending on how far back you go in terms of ancestry, to analyze the genetically subdued group of animals in question.

Attached: Double digit IQ (you).jpg (480x470, 23K)

gray beerd man made the world six thousend yars ago dont u no anything

The definition of a species is actually kind of loose. There is a biological and an evolutionary definition. By biological definition, wolves, jackals and dogs are tge same species and polar bears and brown bears are also the same species. They're quite obviously different enough and have followed their own (largely) independent path of evolution, that we describe them as separate species from an evolutionary standpoint.
We're developing better understanding of the evololution of the homo genus every year, and there's still no reason to describe sub-saharans and everyone else as separate species. An argument could be made to describe separate human subspecies by analogy with other animals, but it really wouldn't be helpful for anyone (in fact it would be socially harmful)
It's far more useful to talk about human genetics in terms of specific genetic relationships between human populations.

It’s the best idea we have based on evidence.
If you have a better one, they show it.
Science is about explaning

You can literally watch bacteria and viruses evolve in real-time.

They better not be, those bones are critical for reproduction.

>falling for jewish lies
Stop.

Actually we have personally witnessed a new species occur over only a few generations. The definition of a species is just when one animal cannot breed with another such that the offspring is fertile. If the genome changes by a certain amount then it is simply impossible to breed with an animal bearing the original genome.

get a load of this nigger.
remember: sage in all fields.

How can small mutations accumulate to create a new species, if a single or not strong enough mutation would be negative for survival.
E.g. bird ancestor gets mutation for tiny wings that are useless -> dies. To fly you need to have all the right combination of mutations and they need to be damn strong to create a new phenotype or else they are useless.
Why are these "big" mutations not occurring today in animals, where are the random new phenotypes with new skills?

Agreed, natural or unnatural selection for generational change is proven and can be reproduced a la scientifically.

Evolution is a theory that has not been proven and has not reproduced with any species.

You're absolutely right that applying the same standards of biology to humans would result in the description of multiple subspecies, but it's a complete waste of time.

This is the dumbest post I’ve ever read. First off, bipedalism isn’t necessary for surviving on plains and second animals aren’t geographically locked and the recession of the forest would not force animals to become plains-dwellers. Third, evolution isn’t a “because” process. You won’t evolve gills “because” you spend time in the water.

It evolved as a means to survive in the plains, I'm not saying it would happen or has to happen with all species, I'm just saying it happened with human ancestors.

No you fucking retard, that isn’t how anything works.

if you don't believe in evolution you also believe niggers are equal

Go back to Africa you microbrained homo erectus.

Attached: F601B3C1-9A1A-4C34-BD06-396C66F51FCA.jpg (300x225, 18K)

>scales branch out to be feathers to provide insulation
>suddenly the branched-scaled sauropsids can inhabit stretches of the earth that simple-scaled sauropsids could not
>the more branched these scales become, the better for temperature-variable regions
>branched scales develop into fully fledged feathers
>endothermia develops somewhere along the line
>small feathered sauropsids climb trees
>hop out of trees to avoid predators
>lighter bones and bigger streamlined forelimbs are selected for
>become better and better at gliding
>eventually able to achieve true flight

This is really not that complicated. Flight has evolved independently at least 4 times in the animal kingdom

>Go back to Africa

Already did last year during Ramadan, pajeet. For nearly five months. With that out of the way, show your flag you androgynous racoon faced Goofy Indian.

Attached: 1545925238176.png (420x420, 10K)

Mutations occur in your body every day. They occur during cell mitosis, which occurs in billions of cells at any given moment. Billions of small mutations accumlate over time, and the changes in DNA structure are passed on to the offspring, barely changing them but still changing them. If it's a GOOD mutation, the process continues. If it's a bad mutation they just die and it doesn't stick

Bipedal creatures likely evolved in several places on Earth for instance, but the evolutionary mutation such as long shins was only beneficial in Africa as the Sahara desert formed. The jungles dried up and trees became sparse, and the only proto humans that survived this climate change we're ones with longer shins who could run between those trees rather than surviving in the canopy most of our lives. Longer legs better for running with longer feet better for balance, small mutations that built up over hundreds and hundreds of years. In this instance it's important to look at who survived and evolved, but it's important to look at who died as well.

Troll thread. Reminder: the truth is a bit of both evolution AND "intelligent design" (not "Creationism"). Hominids and primates did indeed evolve here on Earth as theorized by Darwinian evolution, however humans are a special case. Our second chromosome is unlike any other animal's on the planet: it is spliced together from two different chromosomes. This is impossible by means of Darwinian evolution and implies that the Sumerian and Vedic stories of creation might be fairly accurate. We were engineered by a humanoid race, combing their genes with that of Earthly hominids. While there are countless examples of evidence for this being true, one I would like to point out is how humans suddenly appeared roughly 300,000 years ago.

So while OP may be onto something with an absence of transitional fossils between human and its nearest non-human ancestor, he is entirely incorrect in saying evolution, or macro-evolution, is false.

Please unkike your understanding of science and anthropology, please, for your own sake. The Bible is just a fallacious plagiarization and misinterpretation of the true history recorded by Sumer and the Aryans.

>combing
Combining
Nigger tits I am a nigger for phone posting.

It's true, evolution is not real. Darwin didn't even know molecular biology. It's always been a theory.

Until Mendellian genetics provided the mechanism by which natural selection functions.

why is it always americans

do americans even take science classes at school

Why would you need to 'evolve' brainpower when you can just walk around naked and pick fruit out of a tree.

Nigger, I'm still waiting for Professor Dayquon Jackson to invent the next version of electricity.

?
> dinosaurs had arms
> that grew feathers for some reason
> now they're wings
Where's the partial wing you're looking for?

>It's always been a theory.
Theories are hypotheses supported by trial and evidence. They are the closest you can get to "fact" in a scientific system where falsifiability is everything.

I believe the term you're looking for is hypothesis or conjecture. In any case, those are not bad words. Evolution is a sound theory that explains much about life on Earth, but does not account for genetic engineering or panspermia.

we are pond scum, we are fucking fungus clinging to the planet's surface

Hey Dumbass.

It's not fucking Caturday.
Put your toys away, promise not to be so stupid again.

>/pol means it.

Worse. We are crafted to be slaves inferior to our masters. On the bright side (I guess) the engineers of our race color coded us based on hierarchy. Fair skinned humans were the middle management of the "gods", while the darker skinned humans were strictly for labor.

The beautiful reprieve to this bitter truth is that the human brain's neo-cortex is almost entirely malleable, meaning we are capable of comprehending almost anything our creators were capable of comprehending. We needed such intellectual prowess to be able to entertain them, offer them companionship, and fulfill more mentally straining tasks. But again, it was the fairer humans coded for such tasks. The dark skinned humans have neocortexes like ours but 2-3 standard deviations inferior.

That said, individual prowess matters most, and 300,000 years is a long enough time for us to change considerably from when we were created. Sadly, our cranial capacities have only degraded (slightly) on average since that time.

There's a lot of good, bad, and ugly to the truth. Think normies can handle it? It's being disclosed already. Hence why I'm discussing it.

African Americans aren't really a good example since they're descended from the lower rungs of whay Africa had to offer

Assassin's Creed was right.

this

No proof adaptations ether you brainlet.

They use it to reproduce you retard. Nice job falling for jewish lies

>dinos turned into birds

Attached: 37BA06A1-6E93-4EDB-882E-9E8922EAA0C4.jpg (326x294, 34K)

>"dinosaurs grew feathers and wings for some reason"
brainlet

Have you thought of the idea of degeneration or de-evolution? Citrus trees can grow thorns if they go sour. "Faces of Meth". Lots of weeds in my yard look like nigger versions of other desirable plants. Cute babies growing up to be troll people and visa versa. It makes Biblical sense as far as I've read and fits well with "evolution" evidence.

Well "scales into feathers" is already a big mutation. Why does it not happen today? Where are the feathered snakes? Where are snakes with a "bit of feathers" (small mutation) If feathers are better then scales, why did scales survive? If they are not better, how did feathers or "half feathers" survive vs. scales in their original environment? So did this feather mutation have to happen at the right place (semi cold environment) in the right magnitude to be useful... kinda many coincidences.

Yeah it has. Look at the salamanders in the Pacific northwest.

Feels accurate, desu. Who are the 'gods' though?

Because evolution, along with the big bang hoax are Jewish lies from the kabbalah to destroy civilization and profit from it. I know, it sounds crazy.

What does have to do black people IQ with evolution?

>proof

Prove god exists, retard.

OH WAIT YOU CAN'T

Attached: 1539971650405.png (378x357, 81K)