Trump is going to reach a "deal" with the Dems before the SNAP runs out, rather than letting American gun owning patriots deal with the leech problem. If a deal is made before SNAP runs out - I will get on SNAP myself since it is evident that NOTHING can save this country.
More boomer half measure middle of the road bullshit.
Remember - weak men create hard times.
SNAP isn't even an issue.
The real issue is the FED, (((fiat))), and the Israel Lobby.
Everything else is just theater, and you fell for it.
He'll cuck out and say it's a great deal we got more money for border control agents or some shit
Would be great if Kushner didnt own an RFID company. Trump only wants to end the Fed so his son in law can chip us with a gold backed digital currency.
>Trump cucking out 3 years into his 4 year term is just 4d chess!!!
>chip us with a gold backed digital currency
This part is true.
Here's the plan.
They are going to introduce a gold backed digital currency as a solution to the fiat issue.
They will then allow everyone into this system and distribute what they have to people who don't have money.
Times will be good again for a bit, things will start to make economic sense, etc ,etc.
But then it'll start.
They'll start using this digital currency system to roll out more and more invasive tech, and they will start chipping people.
YOU HAVE TO REFUSE THIS CHIP.
Once everyone is chipped, they will activate the killswitch and proceed with their mass depopulation agenda.
Anyone who refused the chip will 'make it' and enter the 'brave new world' that is being planned.
THis is a 10-20 year plan.
Refuse the chip but here's what you can do: stockpile the new digital currency when ti comes out BUT REFUSE THE CHIP
When it appreciates to its peak value relative to Gold, trade it out for Gold , real estate, supplies, etc and become independent.
The real storm is decades away but you can make it if you heed this advice.
Good luck.
Trump won’t cuck.
>unironically shilling for this
Fuck you cunt. That's even more kiked than what we have now.
THIS is the Jewish takeover.
Fucking kill yourself
>he thinks im shilling for it
oh no user, i thought you had at least 3 brain cells
im simply a man who can see the tsunami headed our way, and gave a warning
you shot the messenger?
thats your retardation rearing its ugly head
that is why mass depop is planned on the books.
Good luck.
>brave new world
And what will this consist of? Will it be some artificial womb singularity AI nightmare?
Unless people revert to tribal society, then even the Brave New World isn't worth living under
THATS NOT TRUE, YOU GOT IT REVERSE
"FINANCIAL CONTROL
There was discussion of money and banking. One statement was, "Inflation is infinite. You can put an infinite number of zeros after any number and put the decimals points wherever you want", as an indication that inflation is a tool of the controllers. Money would become predominately credit. It was already ... money is primarily a credit thing but exchange of money would be not cash or palpable things but electronic credit signal. People would carry money only in very small amounts for things like chewing gum and candy bars. Just pocket sorts of things. Any purchase of any significant amount would be done electronically. Earnings would be electronically entered into your account. It would be a single banking system. May have the appearance of being more than one but ultimately and basically it would be one single banking system, so that when you got paid your pay would be entered for you into your account balance and then when you purchased anything at the point of purchase it would be deducted from your account balance and you would actually carry nothing with you. Also computer records can be kept on whatever it was you purchased so that if you were purchasing too much of any particular item and some official wanted to know what you were doing with your money they could go back and review your purchases and determine what you were buying. There was a statement that any purchase of significant size like an automobile, bicycle, a refrigerator, a radio or television or whatever might have some sort of identification on it so it could be traced, so that very quickly anything which was either given away or stolen - whatever - authorities would be able to establish who purchased it and when.
Computers would allow this to happen. The ability to save would be greatly curtailed. People would just not be able to save any considerable degree of wealth. There was some statement of recognition that wealth represents power and wealth in the hands of a lot of people is not good for the people in charge so if you save too much you might be taxed. The more you save the higher rate of tax on your savings so your savings really could never get very far. And also if you began to show a pattern of saving too much you might have your pay cut. We would say, "Well, your saving instead of spending. You really don't need all that money." That basically the idea being to prevent people from accumulating any wealth which might have long range disruptive influence on the system. People would be encouraged to use credit to borrow and then also be encouraged to renege on their debt so they would destroy their own credit. The idea here is that, again, if you're too stupid to handle credit wisely, this gives the authorities the opportunity to come down hard on you once you've shot your credit. Electronic payments initially would all be based on different kinds of credit cards ... these were already in use in 1969 to some extent. Not as much as now. But people would have credit cards with the electronic strip on it and once they got used to that then it would be pointed out the advantage of having all of that combined into a single credit card, serving a single monetary system and then they won't have to carry around all that plastic."
SURVEILLANCE, IMPLANTS, AND TELEVISIONS THAT WATCH YOU
So the next step would be the single card and then the next step would be to replace the single card with a skin implant. The single card could be lost or stolen, give rise to problems; could be exchanged with somebody else to confuse identify. The skin implant on the other hand would be not losable or counterfeitable or transferrable to another person so you and your accounts would be identified without any possibility of error. And the skin implants would have to be put some place that would be convenient to the skin; for example your right hand or your forehead. At that time when I heard this I was unfamiliar with the statements in the Book of Revelation. The speaker went on to say, "Now some of you people who read the Bible will attach significance to this to the Bible," but he went on to disclaim any Biblical significance at all. This is just common sense of how the system could work and should work and there's no need to read any superstitious Biblical principals into it. As I say, at the time I was not very familiar with the words of Revelations. Shortly after I became familiar with it and the significance of what he said really was striking. I'll never forget it. There was some mention, also, of implants that would lend themselves to surveillance by providing radio signals. This could be under the skin or a dental implant ... put in like a filling so that either fugitives or possibly other citizens could be identified by a certain frequency from his personal transmitter and could be located at any time or any place by any authority who wanted to find him. This would be particularly useful for somebody who broke out of prison.
THEN TOGETHER WITH THE MONEY
HOME OWNERSHIP A THING OF THE PAST
Privately owned housing would become a thing of the past. The cost of housing and financing housing would gradually be made so high that most people couldn't afford it. People who already owned their houses would be allowed to keep them but as years go by it would be more and more difficult for young people to buy a house. Young people would more and more become renters, particularly in apartments or condominiums. More and more unsold houses would stand vacant. People just couldn't buy them. But the cost of housing would not come down. You'd right away think, well the vacant house, the price would come down, the people would buy it. But there was some statement to the effect that the price would be held high even though there were many available so that free market places would not operate. People would not be able to buy these and gradually more and more of the population would be forced into small apartments. Small apartments which would not accommodate very many children. Then as the number of real home-owners diminished they would become a minority. There would be no sympathy for them from the majority who dwelled in the apartments and then these homes could be taken by increased taxes or other regulations that would be detrimental to home ownership and would be acceptable to the majority. Ultimately, people would be assigned where they would live and it would be common to have non-family members living with you. This by way of your not knowing just how far you could trust anybody. This would all be under the control of a central housing authority. Have this in mind in 1990 when they ask, "How many bedrooms in your house? How many bathrooms in your house? Do you have a finished game room?." This information is personal and is of no national interest to government under our existing Constitution.
There are currently two factions of elites fighting right now for their vision of the future.
BUT MAKE NO MISTAKE, these elites that fight each other have more in common with themselves than they do with you.
One side wants the AI transhuman gene editing lifestyle and the other wants a return to nature and tribal style living but with super technology carefully balanced alongside it.
As a single person, like you or like me, I don't think there is much that can be done.. just prove that you are smart and adaptable and weather the storm.
Even elites value pawns that are smart.
Make the right moves and you will be ok, i think.
lol look at this slider
good luck anons im done here
ALSO THIS STEP IS NEEDED
"FOOD CONTROL
Food supplies would come under tight control. If population growth didn't slow down, food shortages could be created in a hurry and people would realize the dangers of overpopulation. Ultimately, whether the population slows down or not the food supply is to be brought under centralized control so that people would have enough to be well-nourished but they would not have enough to support any fugitive from the new system. In other words, if you had a friend or relative who didn't sign on, and growing ones own food would be outlawed. This would be done under some sort of pretext. In the beginning I mentioned there were two purposes for everything - one the ostensible purpose and one the real purpose, and the ostensible purpose here would be that growing your own vegetables was unsafe, it would spread disease or something like that. So the acceptable idea was to protect the consumer but the real idea was to limit the food supply and growing your own food would be illegal. And if you persist in illegal activities like growing your own food, then you're a criminal."
>Remember - weak men create hard times
and trump is the weakest and most cucked president in american history
Right attitude. speed up the collapse.
Fag
AND FINALLY
"THE ARRIVAL OF THE TOTALITARIAN GLOBAL SYSTEM
When the new system takes over people will be expected to sign allegiance to it, indicating that they don't have any reservations or holding back to the old system. "There just won't be any room", he said, "for people who won't go along. We can't have such people cluttering up the place so such people would be taken to special places", and here I don't remember the exact words, but the inference I drew was that at these special places where they were taken, then they would not live very long. He may have said something like, "disposed of humanely", but I don't remember very precisely ... just the impression the system was not going to support them when they would not go along with the system. That would leave death as the only alternative. Somewhere in this vein he said there would not be any martyrs. When I first heard this I thought it meant the people would not be killed, but as the presentation developed what he meant was they would not be killed in such a way or disposed of in such a way that they could serve as inspiration to other people the way martyrs do. Rather he said something like this. "People will just disappear." Just a few additional items sort of thrown in here in the end which I failed to include where they belong more perfectly."
> Jow Forums told me to buy Bitcoin back in 2008
> And now this
...Donny?
Trump will cuck hard he will say a picket fence is a win and then give back the stamps.
bump
Womp Womp
