Redpill me on Ted Kaczynski/The Unabomber

wonder if I can just post the manifesto on this thread

>Introduction

>1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries.

>2. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy.

>3. If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.

>4. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence; it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can’t predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society.

>5. In this article we give attention to only some of the negative developments that have grown out of the industrial-technological system. Other such developments we mention only briefly or ignore altogether. This does not mean that we regard these other developments as unimportant. For practical reasons we have to confine our discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which we have something new to say. For example, since there are well-developed environmental and wilderness movements, we have written very little about environmental degradation or the destruction of wild nature, even though we consider these to be highly important.

>THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MODERN LEFTISM

>6. Almost everyone will agree that we live in a deeply troubled society. One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern society in general.

>7. But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th century leftism could have been practically identified with socialism. Today the movement is fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be called a leftist. When we speak of leftists in this article we have in mind mainly socialists, collectivists, “politically correct” types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like. But not everyone who is associated with one of these movements is a leftist. What we are trying to get at in discussing leftism is not so much movement or an ideology as a psychological type, or rather a collection of related types. Thus, what we mean by “leftism” will emerge more clearly in the course of our discussion of leftist psychology. (Also, see paragraphs 227-230.)

Called it all. Snapped from the madness of (((society)))

>8. Even so, our conception of leftism will remain a good deal less clear than we would wish, but there doesn’t seem to be any remedy for this. All we are trying to do here is indicate in a rough and approximate way the two psychological tendencies that we believe are the main driving force of modern leftism. We by no means claim to be telling the WHOLE truth about leftist psychology. Also, our discussion is meant to apply to modern leftism only. We leave open the question of the extent to which our discussion could be applied to the leftists of the 19th and early 20th centuries.

>9. The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern leftism we call “feelings of inferiority” and “oversocialization.” Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of modern leftism as a whole, while oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of modern leftism; but this segment is highly influential.

he is a hero

>FEELINGS OF INFERIORITY

>10. By “feelings of inferiority” we mean not only inferiority feelings in the strict sense but a whole spectrum of related traits; low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self- hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists tend to have some such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism.

>11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among minority rights activists, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities and about anything that is said concerning minorities. The terms “negro,” “oriental,” “handicapped” or “chick” for an African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory connotation. “Broad” and “chick” were merely the feminine equivalents of “guy,” “dude” or “fellow.” The negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal rights activists have gone so far as to reject the word “pet” and insist on its replacement by “animal companion.” Leftish anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the world “primitive” by “nonliterate.” They seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We merely point out the hypersensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)

His manifesto is eerily accurate at times, especially the part on leftists. He poisoned his message by killing people though.

>12. Those who are most sensitive about “politically incorrect” terminology are not the average black ghetto- dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any “oppressed” group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual white males from middle- to upper-middle-class families.

>13. Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals) or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not mean to suggest that women, Indians, etc. ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology.)

>14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.

15. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.

>16. Words like “self-confidence,” “self-reliance,” “initiative,” “enterprise,” “optimism,” etc., play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone’s problems for them, satisfy everyone’s needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.

>17. Art forms that appeal to modern leftish intellectuals tend to focus on sordidness, defeat and despair, or else they take an orgiastic tone, throwing off rational control as if there were no hope of accomplishing anything through rational calculation and all that was left was to immerse oneself in the sensations of the moment.

>18. Modern leftish philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science, objective reality and to insist that everything is culturally relative. It is true that one can ask serious questions about the foundations of scientific knowledge and about how, if at all, the concept of objective reality can be defined. But it is obvious that modern leftish philosophers are not simply cool-headed logicians systematically analyzing the foundations of knowledge. They are deeply involved emotionally in their attack on truth and reality. They attack these concepts because of their own psychological needs. For one thing, their attack is an outlet for hostility, and, to the extent that it is successful, it satisfies the drive for power. More importantly, the leftist hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e., failed, inferior). The leftist’s feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is “inferior” it is not his fault, but society’s, because he has not been brought up properly.

>19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter, a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, but he can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be strong, and his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant behavior. [1] But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization or a mass movement with which he identifies himself.

>20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often be effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist trait.

NPCs aren't people

>21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion or by moral principles, and moral principle does play a role for the leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help. For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for black people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs. Helping black people is not their real goal. Instead, race problems serve as an excuse for them to express their own hostility and frustrated need for power. In doing so they actually harm black people, because the activists’ hostile attitude toward the white majority tends to intensify race hatred.

>22. If our society had no social problems at all, the leftists would have to INVENT problems in order to provide themselves with an excuse for making a fuss.

Based guy. His story is basically a David vs Goliath scenario where David loses. So its a decent melancholic look on our shitty way of life

Attached: 1541529718763.jpg (468x895, 215K)

>23. We emphasize that the foregoing does not pretend to be an accurate description of everyone who might be considered a leftist. It is only a rough indication of a general tendency of leftism.

>OVERSOCIALIZATION

>24. Psychologists use the term “socialization” to designate the process by which children are trained to think and act as society demands. A person is said to be well socialized if he believes in and obeys the moral code of his society and fits in well as a functioning part of that society. It may seem senseless to say that many leftists are oversocialized, since the leftist is perceived as a rebel. Nevertheless, the position can be defended. Many leftists are not such rebels as they seem.

>25. The moral code of our society is so demanding that no one can think, feel and act in a completely moral way. For example, we are not supposed to hate anyone, yet almost everyone hates somebody at some time or other, whether he admits it to himself or not. Some people are so highly socialized that the attempt to think, feel and act morally imposes a severe burden on them. In order to avoid feelings of guilt, they continually have to deceive themselves about their own motives and find moral explanations for feelings and actions that in reality have a non-moral origin. We use the term “oversocialized” to describe such people. [2]

>26. Oversocialization can lead to low self-esteem, a sense of powerlessness, defeatism, guilt, etc. One of the most important means by which our society socializes children is by making them feel ashamed of behavior or speech that is contrary to society’s expectations. If this is overdone, or if a particular child is especially susceptible to such feelings, he ends by feeling ashamed of HIMSELF. Moreover the thought and the behavior of the oversocialized person are more restricted by society’s expectations than are those of the lightly socialized person. The majority of people engage in a significant amount of naughty behavior. They lie, they commit petty thefts, they break traffic laws, they goof off at work, they hate someone, they say spiteful things or they use some underhanded trick to get ahead of the other guy. The oversocialized person cannot do these things, or if he does do them he generates in himself a sense of shame and self-hatred. The oversocialized person cannot even experience, without guilt, thoughts or feelings that are contrary to the accepted morality; he cannot think “unclean” thoughts. And socialization is not just a matter of morality; we are socialized to conform to many norms of behavior that do not fall under the heading of morality. Thus the oversocialized person is kept on a psychological leash and spends his life running on rails that society has laid down for him. In many oversocialized people this results in a sense of constraint and powerlessness that can be a severe hardship. We suggest that oversocialization is among the more serious cruelties that human beings inflict on one another.

Take the Ancaprim pill

Attached: ACP.png (1200x800, 7K)

>he poisoned his message by [using political power]

What else was he supposed to do? Speak about his ideas in the marketplace of ideas? The bombings are the only reason you even know his name. Ya cant make an omlette without breaking a few eggs friend.

>28. The leftist of the oversocialized type tries to get off his psychological leash and assert his autonomy by rebelling. But usually he is not strong enough to rebel against the most basic values of society. Generally speaking, the goals of today’s leftists are NOT in conflict with the accepted morality. On the contrary, the left takes an accepted moral principle, adopts it as its own, and then accuses mainstream society of violating that principle. Examples: racial equality, equality of the sexes, helping poor people, peace as opposed to war, nonviolence generally, freedom of expression, kindness to animals. More fundamentally, the duty of the individual to serve society and the duty of society to take care of the individual. All these have been deeply rooted values of our society (or at least of its middle and upper classes [4] for a long time. These values are explicitly or implicitly expressed or presupposed in most of the material presented to us by the mainstream communications media and the educational system. Leftists, especially those of the oversocialized type, usually do not rebel against these principles but justify their hostility to society by claiming (with some degree of truth) that society is not living up to these principles.

>29. Here is an illustration of the way in which the oversocialized leftist shows his real attachment to the conventional attitudes of our society while pretending to be in rebellion against it. Many leftists push for affirmative action, for moving black people into high-prestige jobs, for improved education in black schools and more money for such schools; the way of life of the black “underclass” they regard as a social disgrace. They want to integrate the black man into the system, make him a business executive, a lawyer, a scientist just like upper-middle-class white people. The leftists will reply that the last thing they want is to make the black man into a copy of the white man; instead, they want to preserve African American culture. But in what does this preservation of African American culture consist? It can hardly consist in anything more than eating black-style food, listening to black-style music, wearing black-style clothing and going to a black- style church or mosque. In other words, it can express itself only in superficial matters. In all ESSENTIAL respects most leftists of the oversocialized type want to make the black man conform to white, middle-class ideals. They want to make him study technical subjects, become an executive or a scientist, spend his life climbing the status ladder to prove that black people are as good as white. They want to make black fathers “responsible,” they want black gangs to become nonviolent, etc. But these are exactly the values of the industrial-technological system. The system couldn’t care less what kind of music a man listens to, what kind of clothes he wears or what religion he believes in as long as he studies in school, holds a respectable job, climbs the status ladder, is a “responsible” parent, is nonviolent and so forth. In effect, however much he may deny it, the oversocialized leftist wants to integrate the black man into the system and make him adopt its values.

>30. We certainly do not claim that leftists, even of the oversocialized type, NEVER rebel against the fundamental values of our society. Clearly they sometimes do. Some oversocialized leftists have gone so far as to rebel against one of modern society’s most important principles by engaging in physical violence. By their own account, violence is for them a form of “liberation.” In other words, by committing violence they break through the psychological restraints that have been trained into them. Because they are oversocialized these restraints have been more confining for them than for others; hence their need to break free of them. But they usually justify their rebellion in terms of mainstream values. If they engage in violence they claim to be fighting against racism or the like.

>31. We realize that many objections could be raised to the foregoing thumbnail sketch of leftist psychology. The real situation is complex, and anything like a complete description of it would take several volumes even if the necessary data were available. We claim only to have indicated very roughly the two most important tendencies in the psychology of modern leftism.

>32. The problems of the leftist are indicative of the problems of our society as a whole. Low self-esteem, depressive tendencies and defeatism are not restricted to the left. Though they are especially noticeable in the left, they are widespread in our society. And today’s society tries to socialize us to a greater extent than any previous society. We are even told by experts how to eat, how to exercise, how to make love, how to raise our kids and so forth.

Link?

According to Ted that isn't really an option. We can't tame it and either we kill it or it kill us. Is that true? I don't know. Nick Land's position on this is that is already too late and the best solution is to accelerate and position to end up on top. Industrial capital ultimately wants to be free of human and earthly restraints. It needs more resources. I am not sure how you contain such a thing.

>washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm

the whole manifesto

Not sure if retarded or..
You think each one of those lines is an inch? So his entire head is 2 inches up from the 5' mark at his neck?

capital is the purifier, the promise of total automation is something we can all strive for

absolute an hero

He got rejected by a coworker and spazzed so hard his own brother had to fire him. Basically incel rage with a with a shit manifesto just like all the other virgin killers.

>radaronline.com/exclusives/2017/08/ted-kaczynski-writes-love-letters-sex-celibate/

Attached: 1546791590238.jpg (431x427, 137K)

Attached: 1542501151500.jpg (960x752, 114K)

>we kill it or it kill us. Is that true? I don't know.
While I of course don't know either, I think I'm going to bet on that the technological system (and it's owners) will not systematically hunt down every breathing man that's in the woods by themselves. I see about as much reason to go after the grizzly bears and kill them. There's of course the possibility too that the people in charge fuck up, ending their own lives and the lives of all living beings on this Earth.

>Nick Land's position on this is that is already too late and the best solution is to accelerate and position to end up on top
If I had the brains, money and connections, this is certainly what I'd do. Strive to launch the first transhumanist project in secret and with its help wipe out the competition. Pic related. Unfortunately, I have none of those qualities.

>I am not sure how you contain such a thing.
My feel of technology is that it's centralizing power, not decentralizing, if I get what you're saying. The people in charge have more levers of intelligence, spying, control and destruction at their hands than absolute monarchs in middle ages.

Attached: transprimitivism.png (682x674, 143K)

You guys post this all the time, but Jordan Peterson is not a good example for the type of professor Ted is talking about.

He is talking about SJW professors that want social revolution. Not eccentric, left leaning centrists professors.

read the manifesto you lazy kike!

>slander

Both he and Timothy McVeigh are two of the greatest heroes of modern American life and their only shortcomings, frankly, were that they were too far ahead of their time.

doing God's work user. This is Jow Forums at its best.

bumperino

tell me more

He still doesn't admit to doing the bombings for that very reason, but he'll most likely die in prison.

>read the manifesto
just give me the tl;dr

Technology and leftism will ultimately be humanities downfall.

so what, go back to before we learned to use tools? what's his rationale for hating technology?

The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries.

Big Hero

yes i know what he says but where does he prove it. Oh hey, living past the age of 40 is bad for the human race, being able to communicate with anyone around the world instantaneously is so fucking bad and unfulfilling. Where does he explain exactly what the problem with technology is?

And he seems to give a shit about the third world. fuck the third world. who gives a shit.

thanks chief, never got to read this before

Attached: Trips.jpg (560x560, 291K)

They’re keeping you occupied with your trivial grievances about blankets and wages and the dog being kicked so that you won’t think about what is really wrong with this ship — that it’s getting farther and farther to the north and we’re all going to be drowned. If just a few of you would come to your senses, get together, and charge the poop deck, we could turn this ship around and save ourselves. But all you do is whine about petty little issues like working conditions and crap games and the right to suck cocks.”

The passengers and the crew were incensed.

“Petty!!” cried the Mexican, “Do you think it’s reasonable that I get only three-fourths the wages of an Anglo sailor? Is that petty?”

“How can you call my grievance trivial? shouted the bosun. “Don’t you know how humiliating it is to be called a fruit?”

“Kicking the dog is not a ‘petty little issue!’” screamed the animal-lover. “It’s heartless, cruel, and brutal!”

“Alright then,” answered the cabin boy. “These issues are not petty and trivial. Kicking the dog is cruel and brutal and it is humiliating to be called a fruit. But in comparison to our real problem — in comparison to the fact that the ship is still heading north — your grievances are petty and trivial, because if we don’t get this ship turned around soon, we’re all going to drown.”

“Fascist!” said the professor.

“Counterrevolutionary!” said the lady passenger. And all of the passengers and crew chimed in one after another, calling the cabin boy a fascist and a counterrevolutionary. They pushed him away and went back to grumbling about wages, and about blankets for women, and about the right to suck cocks, and about how the dog was treated. The ship kept sailing north, and after a while it was crushed between two icebergs and everyone drowned.

theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ted-kaczynski-ship-of-fools

Attached: 764.jpg (498x400, 61K)

>Damn, was he only 5'2?
that's in centimeters...

His point is that technology is not natural. What goes against nature is bound to have negative effects especially with humans. Keep in mind he wrote this in the 90's

>technology is not natural
Yes it is. That is what makes us humans, the ability to use fucking tools. We create tools, we form societies, and that's why we're the apex predator on this planet.

Is there a full PDF of his manifesto? Though people need to also post his criticism of conservatives. It is 100% accurate as well.

Where can I learn about his criticism of conservatives? He does the left like a boss, I am intrigued as to what he has to say about conservatives.

>2" head

There are 7 billion people on this planet and all of them are useless except for a select few. Technology will replace you.

It's in the same manifesto
Most people on Jow Forums don't post it

Accurate. All these fucking plebs actually thinking the elites will take them along for the ride once automation has made their labor and thus them obsolete are incredibly naive. The elites are almost certainly building and planning a breakaway civilization for once automation and AI are sufficiently developed. They don't fucking care about this and consider us to be useless eaters and breeders and we WILL be culled when the time is right for them. I wish more shortsighted faggots would get this through their head.

So what do a the solution

The truth is that he hates freedom and did everything to get into supermax

Basically a vast majority of the current world population needs to die and civilization has to be restructured in a much wiser and efficient manner. Inevitably the system will likely collapse on its own and all we can do is try to kick the can further down the road until the death-rebirth cycle can finally occur civilization.

Attached: Georgia Guidestones.jpg (1010x1337, 216K)

>Did he do anything wrong?
He used gunpowder instead of high explosive.

Theres a 5'0 line, then a 5'6 line, then a 6'0 line. I swear, the absolute state of this board. Yeah his whole fucking head is two inches. Get off this board, you bring shame to all amerifats.

iam reading the whole thing user thanks ... this man was really ahead of his time with the npc meme thing

He should've married and made multiple children instead of the bombings

This. He was a high IQ dude who predicted what were are living right now.

How does one with viewpoints so ahead of their times communicate with normies? How do you convince demoralized people without being thrown in the loony bin?

Its a solid read, user. Make sure to tell all your friends about Uncle Ted and his fun ideas.

Attached: 1542509515036.jpg (750x717, 92K)

see

Attached: JPred.jpg (981x819, 203K)

Kaczynski has written two full length books while in prison. "Anti-Tech Revolution" and "Technological Slavery"

Both books are extraordinary must-reads.

Attached: Anti-Tech Revolution 101.jpg (4800x7200, 3.76M)

He's not the most obvious example but Jordan Peterson is certainly controlled opposition. His role was to act as a pressure release valve and scoop up a certain demographic of young mostly white males in order to redirect their energy towards ideas and pursuits that are non-threatening to the elites and the system. He specifically pushes individualism for whites over collectivism because that is a big part of what makes white nations so easy to subvert and infiltrate. He wants whites to go on competing as individuals in a system that is rigged against them while millions of foreigners a years are shipped into our countries who then easily out-compete because they act as a cohesive group.

thank you user

i few days ago here in my country there was a bombing by an ecoterrorist group ,5 injured ..this may be worth the read

eturbonews.com/242188/five-people-wounded-in-santiago-bus-stop-terrorist-bombing

His points about surrogate activities and how modern society interrupts the power process were dead on. I hope someday we can get back to a more natural way of life.

Attached: 1542474069835.jpg (500x512, 52K)

In the onset of 'occupy' movement there were some competent people with the capability to make a difference and see things through. They were quickly flushed out by the fools and the shitty movement fizzled out because there was no common vision or leadership.

hes the fuckin hero of white people !

Attached: 1446517311258.jpg (1004x988, 73K)

>There are 7 billion people on this planet and all of them are useless except for a select few. Technology will replace you.
Human life span is maximum 118 years currently. Mostly thanks to technology. I don't give a shit about technology replacing me. I don't give a shit about the elites and their plan to cull humanity. Technology in and of itself is not bad. You sound like anti-gun faggots. Take away the guns, they're bad. Take away technology. smartphones bad. Tools are neither good nor bad, just how they're used. And yes, most of humanity is retarded and uses Faceberg and other bullshit, and maybe those people deserve to be weeded out. But calling me shortsighted while worshipping some luddite bomberman and his nonsensical tirade against human progress is just ridiculous. All while hypocritically using a computer to communicate.

Attached: commie meme.jpg (680x489, 95K)

The point is that our current trajectory of human and technological progress is unsustainable and will very likely collapse in the not to distant future.

>Tools are neither good nor bad, just how they're used.
This my primary complaint. I don't hate technology I just hate how it is being implemented. The industrialization of agriculture was poorly implemented and has caused the human population to skyrocket to unforseen, unsustainable levels that will likely result in billions of people dying all within a very short time frame as our economies eventually collapse. Social medias are being deliberately used as a form of mind control, social conditioning, and data collection on users. Television was used near flawlessly as a tool to indoctrinate almost the entire boomer generation into being the perfect subservient consumer slaves that most of them are. We are seeing increasingly Orwellian crackdowns on the internet as it becomes more and more censored and you can be banned from most discussion websites for engaging in wrong think publicly. All my life I have loved, appreciated, and utilized these tools but I have also HATED how they have been implemented.

thats the most jewish thing ive ever seen

>The point is that our current trajectory of human and technological progress is unsustainable and will very likely collapse in the not to distant future.
It was unsustainable regardless of technology. Humanity (and any other group or hierarchy) historically goes through checks and balances to remove the dead weight, sometimes its a war, sometimes its a plague, sometimes they work in tandem. Sometimes it's a revolution. Regardless, technology being abused doesn't make technology good or bad.
> All my life I have loved, appreciated, and utilized these tools but I have also HATED how they have been implemented.
We have only been using this advanced technology for a small period of human history. All technology is abused mostly by we know who, Hell I wouldn't be surprised if human history goes back farther than we know and those same groups are responsible for erasing the knowledge we may have once had to cover up their crimes.
shitty comic that starts with a reasonable point and then degenerates into nonsense.

Some of it doesn't sound too bad but if I had to guess that world court is going to be located in Israel. "Protecting people and nations with fair laws and just courts" will be similar to the corrupt humanitarian organizations being used to further agendas that we have today, and "let all nations rule internally" will amount to illusory self rule where the real rulers are all actually members of international secret societies and international finance bowing to the world oligarchs much like things are now.

I am quite fond of "Avoid petty laws and useless officials", however.

absolute brainlet

>METAL THINGS BAD!

Attached: npc.jpg (800x800, 71K)

>It was unsustainable regardless of technology.
True for most technology, omitting industrial agriculture which is the primary reason for this unsustainability coupled with fractional reserve banking and usurious practices.
>Regardless, technology being abused doesn't make technology good or bad
I don't think I have ever said that technology is inherently bad my complaint is with its poor and often nefarious implementation. So we don't actually seem to be at a disagreement here.
>Hell I wouldn't be surprised if human history goes back farther than we know and those same groups are responsible for erasing the knowledge we may have once had to cover up their crimes.
My research into this matters isn't entirely comprehensive but I find myself fairly open to this conclusion as well. I listened to most of Bill Cooper's Mystery Babylon and it was very compelling. The problem with these secret societies and cults is it can be difficult to differentiate the true history and beliefs from the misdirection and LARPing that they use for obfuscation and mind control purposes. I personally believe that this is atleast our second go around of high civilization but I definitely couldn't provide the evidence to prove it to anyone. It does seem entirely possible that an advanced intelligent tribe or lost civilization traveled the globe and seeded knowledge and societal practices creating religions and cults wherever they went, this would explain the prevalence of ancient pyramid structures around the world.

Nope. Peterson is an excellent example.

Really?
Do you understand how terrified the elite were over Unabomber? The Feds had no fucking clue who it was (they were dealing with a mathematical genius after all), bombs were being sent to members of the elite (political lobbyists, bankers, academics) instead of plebs, and the bombs were getting ever more sophisticated and deadly. On top of that when the manifesto came out, it made complete sense to anyone who read it. He was a real threat to them.

No, he is never going to get out. The elite wanted to kill him but came up with the much crueler torture of keeping him in a cement box for the rest of his life, which is hell for a man who loves nature.

Attached: 1541027383494.png (638x1000, 209K)

>Jordan Peterson is not a good example for the type of professor Ted is talking about.
Yeah, he's even worse. Unabomber was writing about useful idiots, while Peterson is a straight-up conscious shill for the UN/Trilateral.

Attached: 64KQkRz2BaV6LkEN.png (760x749, 494K)

He’s a true hero and a great man

I think he describes perfectly what is happening. My problem is with the telos of humanity. Say it goes exactly how he wants and we revert to a more wholesome, fulfilling life living as a more sustainable but primitive people. What happens when the planet eventually dies, either from some cataclysm or the Sun simply swallows the Earth when it starts to die? It may well have been as if humans never existed after that, surely. Wouldn't that render anything we do ultimately pointless?

You got there before me.