Catholism vs christianity

>How are they different from each other?
Catholicism is Babylonian mysticism. Babylonian mysticism is satan worship and since Satan's main trait is deception, that Babylonian system always hides behind, and pretends to be, some other religion. For instance, Judaism isn't the religion of the Jews that's written of in the bible, it's an Satanic created while the Jews were in exile in Babylon. Judaism superficially claims the Torah as their holy book, but if you look into it you'll find that Jews don't believe in the Torah, they think it's just a collection of stories. The Jews actual scripture is the Babylonian talmud.

Christianity is an attempt to save the religion of Jesus Christ from that satanic perversion. However, organized Christianity hasn't fully succeeded.

Attached: trump pope hat.jpg (540x517, 35K)

stop letting them pit us against each other you dumb faggots

This. Imagine if everyone flinging crap at each other on Jow Forums actually decided to put some effort into living the gospel. The world would change if just 100 of us organized and did that.

messianic judaism = desert cult, worships cow god, sacrifices babies by throwing them into the fire
catholicism = amalgamation of all religions/belief systems before its creation, dagon woship aka fish god, nimrod the central character that gets eaten by a fish and resurrected into a deity
christianity = roman caesar myth created using the kings torah with the help of josephus the jew
islam = messianic judaism 2.0

>How are they different
Both middle eastern religion .
I don't see any diff

Never thought of it like that.

imagine if 2000 years have passed and people are still trying to make a corrupt system work. No, you don't have to imagine because we're still living it

Listen to me very closely. Look at the cross necklace the Pope is wearing. Which board on the cross is longer: the top board.. or the bottom?

He’s wearing a low key upside down fucking cross. This is a satanist symbol.

There hasn't been a true pope since 1956
Theirs a whole redpilled sect of Catholics who see the kikery of Rome

>Doesn't want to fuck kids
>reforms church

How dare you leave our satanist cult!

>people are still trying to make a corrupt system work
It has contained corruption for as long as sinful human beings have been a part of it. We just live in an era where that sin is amplified and enthroned in our hearts above the Truth.

You're a pretty shitty former lay Catholic if you can't even get the history correct.

This is a bitter red pill to swallow.
But if you think about the most powerful families currently secretly ruling the world- they are most certainly pesos and satanists.

With unlimited resources- why would they NOT be able to infiltrate the most powerful religious organization on earth?

Sigh
See how it works is, if you declare someone is wrong, you then follow up by demonstrating HOW THEY'RE WRONG!

There is no "Vs".

Catholicism IS Christianity.

Orthodox = The original form of the Christian faith
Catholic = The altered version of the Orthodox church with one church leader rather than the original 5 of the Pentarchy
Protestant = Christian fan fiction

I encourage you to look up early church history. The main seats of power in the early church were the 3 Petrine sees of Antioch, Alexandria and of course Rome. All other seats were beneath those 3 and came much later, ie Constantinople.

The schism didn't occur due to 'papal infallibility', Constantinople was in a power struggle with Rome for centuries and this culminated in the schism, it was more politics then religious in terms of reasoning for excommicating each other.

Keep in mind Constantinople actually reunited with Rome once they realise they were going to get dicked down by Moslems.

In terms of salvation, Catholics don't believe your works save you. This is a common misconception. Catholic church merely states that works are part of faith. Difference here is that protestants believe that by just 'believing' they are saved. The word 'alone' consequently makes a huge difference here

M8 fuck right off with your semantics!
There's also the alteration of the apostles Creed so it wasn't just only politics!

Tryna score very minor points in what was, as declared an easily digestible run-down. Bit petty m8 I must say.

FYI Protestant sects like the Methodists, Baptist's & Amish etc have heavy emphasis on works...

One elevates an elected man to the word of God due to his geographic location and twisting of scripture, the other doesn’t.

The larger point is, as someone who comes from place that in the past has had no shortage of sectarianism, the differences between the limbs of the body of Christ are so minor, it's retarded that people get bent out of shape about, "my church is the true church."

This.

The difference between catholocism and protestantism is thus

Catholicism is like an Opera, it is lavish, grandiose and beautiful, but to watch the opera you have to break your back working and suffering and you have to put in an effort to learn about the whole culture the play is set.
You need to be familiar with some previous plays, some stories this one builds upon only then does the way the actors play make sense.

Then we have Protestantism, it's more like a sports event, you know the tactics and the rules of the sport, but after you have seen the game you argue with a companion about the decisions of the referee, you have different opinions on what the outcome of the game should have been though you have watched the same game, John from the other side of the stadium saw a foul, the others didn't believe him.
On the upside it was a small game, the cards were inexpensive, the stadium was plain and crowded, but it was only the event you wanted to watch anyway.

The alteration to the creed wasn't a theological dispute. It was a dispute over authority, Constantinople basically said you can't change that without a council, but of course the pope of Rome was exercising his authority. The change "through the father AND the son" isn't actually heretical. You can ask any orthodox who knows his shit. So I he dispute was 100% on of such authority.

Keep in mind the change to the creed was actually made to combat Arianism.

>How are they different from each other?
No matter how thin you slice it, it's still baloney.

Attached: R (32).jpg (343x413, 32K)

protestantism was an excuse to steal church property

how do you interpret peter being the rock and holding the keys to the kingdom?

Except the Pope was vassalizaed by Byzantine for 200 hundred years and still calls himself infailable. Re-unnion never happened merely a plead for help. Which was returned by murder and theft, as expected when asking help from Satanists who claim to be superior to the reat of Christendom.

I also lived in northern Ireland. But the truth is the truth

best post in thread, Jesuit Internet Defense Force (the Real JIDF, the jewish one is a smokescreen) won't even reply to this because it would make people actually look at the link

oh wait, they're here already.

Love seeing the atheist, papist, neo-pagan ALL gang up on actual Bible believers. It's how I can tell what the Truth is.

What do you mean the truth is the truth?
Bottom line, the difference are minor!
If you think more Catholics are gonna be in heaven than Methodists or Baptist's or Amish or vice versa, well, all the history in the world has done you no good because I think you've missed the point of the Gospel...

>Cerry picking bantz
Whatever heaven you're going to, I'll pass..

Having a correct understanding of how salvation works is a pretty important part about whether you'll be saved in the end yeah.

It's important to draw a line on what is right and true and what is heresy. Otherwise sects like Mormonism would be considered fine and a true way to everlasting life. Standing up for what is true is important

Catholicism is a power structure built on top of Christianity.

Would Christ support the Vatican at any point in its existence?

Who said anything about Mormonism?
So you mean to tell me, that devout Methodists or Baptist's who accept Christ took the mantle of their sin an accepted G-ds rightious justice by being a perfect sacrifice, all the while acknowledging how one knows one is saved is because the holy Spirit will be constantly in the process of refashioning said individual closer to the image of Christ, which will manifest itself in holy works, is not going to partake in salvation?

Yes, for it's first 1000 years.
Also, the Vatican is an institution.
The practice of the average devout Catholic is scripturally sound

Jesus established a power structure with the commission of his disciples at Pentecost. The Catholic Church is the continuation of that structure. See apostolic succession

Attached: reli.jpg (1045x736, 88K)

I think you missed my point about Mormonism. The point was it is important to point out heresy no matter how small otherwise there is no line and any crazy belief, ie Mormonism, is acceptable.

I don't claimed anyone to be saved or unsaved. Merely that God revealed his wishes for us to be saved and how, and that was passed down through the ages by his church, then compiled by his church into the Bible (the full Bible, not the one missing 7 books). And that church is the Catholic church.

Okay let's look at this from a different tangent.
The Orthodox Church can make the same claim of succession, how do you reconcile that?
Also, what about the book of Enoch?
That's referenced throughout the new testament, indeed if I'm not mistaken, Jesus himself quoted it.
That's not included in either Bible.
Do you not think you're splitting hairs or being a bit of a legalist?

Catholics see Orthodoxy as part of the body of the church. Hence the term schism, they are akin to rebels. This is why there is no orthodox bishop of Rome for example, both 'churches' accept their respective legitimacy. They just see eachother as in schism with the one true church, which they both claim to be.

Maybe I'm being too legalistic, depends on how much value one places on such matters