The human eye disproves atheist fairytale writer, Darwin

Attached: dc052709b7fe733cc8ad06fb93961eca.jpg (564x564, 51K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euglena
youtube.com/watch?v=s32v0rTkey4
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synesthesia
theverge.com/2014/8/27/6074855/this-is-what-happens-when-you-raise-fish-to-walk-on-land
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory
youtube.com/watch?v=2X1iwLqM2t0
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Attached: ec4ed25b93d151a85f90033133089035.jpg (320x320, 27K)

The conclusion makes no sense

please elaborate

Attached: cap.png (399x521, 260K)

But we know how the eye evolved... nice try JIDF

Darwin was not an atheist.

Amazing conclusion
You must tell the biologist!

Attached: 1482361564237.jpg (225x225, 9K)

Eye evolution started literally millions of years ago.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euglena


You start simple, throw a lot of time and more complicated, specialized system will emerge which looks barely similar to the precursor.
Just the way modern cars look "impossibly" complicated compared to the slightly round rock used as a wheel for the first time ages ago.

Dawkins proved you were a fag

Eyes are more complicated than chevys, you stupid pollack.