What is the ideal age for a women to bare children to her husband?

What is the ideal age for a women to bare children to her husband?

God provided that women may bare children as soon as their first ovulation, around the age of 12-13. Until recently, it was commonplace for a father to find a suitable husband for his daughter around the age of his first period.

Do you think it's up to the government to mandate an (((age of consent)))?

Attached: chloe.jpg (960x1353, 1.23M)

35.
before that they are too stupid.
after that they are too at risk of death.

>God
Didn't read further.

roasties and the left would say 30+ but it's actually teens to early 20's

Humans will always be animals, look at how many problems it's causing us trying not to be.

So what you are saying is that women belong in the kitchen or the bedroom, should be barefoot and pregnant, that we should lower the age of consent, and engage in a little domestic discipline when required?

That we should vote for far right christian fringe groups that have no chance of winning, so that the mainstream parties (conservative / republicans) politicians will start to represent the above values and people like you? (moving the needle)

stop bitching and do something about it

>(((age of consent)))?
Stopped reading right there

18 retard. We don't live in biblical times.

>18
why?

Because somebody told you it should be?

Giving birth at such a young age puts the women at risk. 17 is the healthiest age according to studies.

Attached: vscodl_5b69af10cf45f076080f742b.jpg (1152x2048, 787K)

>studies.
(((studies)))

>something of a scientist himself

Attached: yeah.jpg (474x315, 26K)

OH LAWD JEEBUS HELP US SAVE THOSE VIRGINS

Women are in their prime in 40s
35 is the ultimate minimum line for me

Attached: milf.jpg (800x1200, 95K)

20-21 years old is optimal for healthy babby and mother
(Mentioning this to women gets them mad for some reason)

forgot wearing a damn flag
sage

Attached: lSdjouah.jpg (640x640, 34K)

Nature tells us when. Our ideology should be based on the natural order of things and hierarchy, thus no artificial age constraints. Marriage after puberty, and all that comes with it, is fine and should be encouraged. This would set up a proper male led dynamic in the home, keep women from wasting their most fertile years running up a college debt and lower the number of dicks they ride before marriage. Because the fact of the matter is that they are sexual beings in their teens and they WILL fuck. Do we want them to learn that sex is just something that feels good and doesn't require commitment? If no, let them marry.

evolution has got a thumb in every pie

>consent depends on historical context

Attached: image.jpg (812x332, 62K)

>bare

I would say based on the way an average girl looks, and this is totally anecdotal, 16 is the right age.

It’s like we’ve decided we’re an animal-god hybrid, but picked all the worst aspects of both of the dichotomy rather than the best parts. We’ve gone way past the deep end.

it really depends on their bodies. but i believe in general it's between 16-32yo.

Holy shit I had a 1 in 200 chance of being a downie?

This. Funny how when the AOC was introduced the cock carousel started. Funny how the argument to introduce higher AOC was because when it was lower it turned women into "whores".

But it's never going to change.

She's a big girl

Attached: me helpful.jpg (1280x1120, 728K)

Why do the numbers go down and then up and then down again as the women age? This graph doesn't seem legit.

>sage goes in all fields
>hide the thread

I actually think the more critical cultural issue is what form families should take. We need extended family, specifically aunts, older sisters, and grandmothers living in the home or very nearby to help young mothers and prevent the pathology of mothers single handedly raising children, ie. (((nuclear families))).

Is this an absolute? Isn't this talking about the first child? Doesn't the fact that the women had already had a child alters these statistics?

Attached: 1546978910659.jpg (500x646, 55K)

Attached: 1526956434194.png (500x689, 156K)

bois, always look at the future mother-in-law before getting too involved.

When economic stability is ensured. The government should play no role other than punishing cases of rape unrelated to age.

16-18 anything over is risky and in this day in age they have taken many dicks by 20

>bare
>bare
when even English proves to be too complicated.

Another pedo thread.
17-18 minimum. before that they will be unprepared for motherhood.

thats because life expectancy was 30yrs. No society was thriving like today.

we now know that birthing at age 13 is dangerous for the girls body. Her pelvis is not wide enough for a baby to pass through and shes likely to die in childbirth.

we also dont pimp our daughters off to older men as that is illegal. Remember, bible was written by men, for men.

14

14 is the perfect age for a woman to bare children.

To quote, "If she bleeds, she breeds."

Women should not be marrying so old, 20+. Your most fertile years are left behind by then. On top of that, the co-ed public school system encourages young girls to give up their virginity by 'dating' everyone instead of becoming devoted to one man. The marriage-able age has been so far pushed out because of college and age-of-consent to 25-30+, that women are almost at the very end of their childbearing years before they even had their first. The whole college meme is telling unwitting women that it's perfectly fine to sleep with everyone "before settling down". It's not fair for parents and mentors to pretend to young women that they will be qt's like they were at 16 forever. After 25, your looks go in the trash and your start getting wrinkles. No one wants to marry a used-up 30yrold whore.

You now see an entire generation of 30+ women who partied their entire life and are now finding themselves in low-end jobs they hate without any children or husband. Women are now miserable and hate themselves, but they don't know why. They want to have everything, the career job, the husband, and the children. You can only pick two. A woman is happiest in the home, making food for her family and raising her children. The Jews have pushed for the 19th Amendment, for women in the workforce, for feminism, for giving up virginity, for co-ed education, for public schools, for racemixing, for porn, for homosexuality, for transgenderism, for every evil thing that destroys the family. The Jews want to turn people away from the message of God, from all that is good.

IF you are a woman, find yourself a good husband, be loyal, have his children, support him in his work, and teach his children well. If you do these things, you will be happy.
If you are a man, control your women for they are like children and need guidance. A strong and firm hand, but gentle also.

Attached: Feminism Quote- Turning Women Into Men.png (635x289, 121K)

Attached: train_wreck.jpg (474x474, 27K)

Thirty-five is when the odds of down syndrome triple, my dude. Anything above 30 is in the danger zone.

Late teens early 20s is the ideal time from a biological perspective. That's why there used to be less autism because women used to have babies when they were biologically primed to do so. Now they're not mature enough at those ages and they have them later with more birth defects. We need to start maturing our women sooner and get them ready for their primary purpose at a younger age.

All women should be married off at 16 and kept in dark basements

You could have shortened your message by saying only :" I wanna be allowed to fuck little girls"

Attached: 1547228084340s.jpg (124x105, 3K)

Show flag turkroach

This.
17 is when the hips are fully wide enough to pass a baby, and hormones are stable enough to keep the baby healthy through gestation. 17-27 are the best breeding years for your woman, popping out up to 10 kids healtily per couple. What a dream.

15

I can see that many men especially losers more experienced women would shy away from who are ready for a family would try to just knock a teenager up so she'll marry him, then finish raising her as his wife. She wouldn't be able to leave because she can't fend for herself since she's not done schooling. Her parents could take her back but she'd come saddled with google babies and aids.

That applies to 18 year old girls too, but they are more able to take responsibility for their own actions. Maybe having girls not being preyed upon until some age older than when they can first make a baby is for the best.

These girls would want to explore and play not too seriously and the adults would be looking to slap the chains on before she knows what hit her.

Maybe a culture could evolve where girls that age would know to expect and repel that kind of behavior and there would be tombstones all around to warn them but maybe the problems would overwhelm the ability for that to happen.

The way to lower the age of consent if it needs lowering is very slowly over a century so culture has time to adapt.

There is no way that the risk of getting down syndrome is 1 in 2000 at the age of 20.

Attached: Prevalencia-de-nacimientos-con-sindrome-de-Down-por-grupos-quinquenales-de-edad-de-la.png.jpg (581x332, 37K)

Of course the welfare state has done everything possible to make those chains as weak as possible and to chain the men. Also taxpayers. Only the indigent can breed as they will. Everyone else is taxed to pay for it.

15 then

Based