>nasa image
>no stars
Really makes you think
Where are the stars?
Jose Barnes
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtube.com
bbc.com
twitter.com
John Morgan
Space isn't real. The Earth is flat. Every single image from space agencies of what the moon's surface looks like is fake.
Samuel Clark
>in direct sunight
>no atmosphere whatsoever to scatter the light
>somehow this retard thinks NASA should use a large enough aperture or long enough exposure time to make stars visible
do you even breathe without 3rd party support?
Jaxon Williams
yeah, it's all bullshit.
Brandon Ortiz
Apollo11/12 : Polanski
Apollo14-17 : Kubrick
any questions ?
Easton Sanders
>Le daily wacky conspiracy threads by JIDF
Kikes like to push irrational conspiracies like faked moon landings, le Illuminati/Masons, flat earth, absurd 9/11 theories (there were no planes), le lizard people etc. etc. to do one thing... to make people that discuss information outside of what the (((MSM))) gives us look retarded and to cover up for jews.
This is called well-poisoning and gas-lighting. Jews do this to keep normie goyim from looking into or thinking about legitimate non-MSM information too much, e.g. the jew subversion of our media and government or the exaggerations and outright lies surrounding the holohoax made for political gain.
9/11 is a good example... Israel had a big role in 9/11. How to well-poison this subject manner? Make sure any threads about 9/11 include discussion of "there were no planes", "it was CGI", "a nuke brought it down", "a energy weapon brought it down" etc. and other absurdities. This will get any normies to reject ALL non-MSM information about 9/11, including what they want to cover-up (Israel's role).
Fuck these threads and fuck JIDF.
Jose Lee
I wonder if China faked a moon landing right before Israel's satellite bullshit just to that when Israel lands we'll have 3 different sets of images that look nothing alike.
Sebastian Jackson
Fucking fjeldabe.
Angel Ramirez
If the moon landing was faked, why didn't the Soviets deny it?
Zachary Hill
Shouldn't it strike you odd they had this level of camera quality back then? Much less able to transmit data wirelessly via radio without it being scattered by atmospheric or spacial factors.
Jonathan Walker
>If the moon landing was faked, why didn't the Soviets deny it?
SOVIET UNION WAS RUN BY JEWS TOO MORON.
Dylan Anderson
Real answer is that the Moon is an artificial satellite built by (((them))) to keep mankind under controll. Russia and America are both controlled opposition.
Liam Smith
It is literally one giant worldwide conspiracy.
Nathaniel Carter
>Real answer is that the Moon is an artificial satellite built by (((them))) to keep mankind under controll. Russia and America are both controlled opposition.
Fuck off retard.
Genesis 1:16
Verse Concepts
God made the two great lights, the greater light to govern the day, and the lesser light to govern the night; He made the stars also.
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
Lucas Sullivan
i dont see stars. never saw em for real..
Adrian Lewis
Liam Miller
Jonathan Parker
We all know NASA hired Kubrick to make the moon landing movies, but for the sake of authenticity he required to record them there
Cameron Howard
Get off the VPN, Owen. You're drunk.
Cameron Gonzalez
I was driving around on Friday and I actually saw a Flat Earther's House.
You could tell, because he had painted all over it about Earth being Flat. He had a globe in the hard with a sign pointing at it that said "Stupid Model".
His Truck also had things about the Earth being Flat painted all over the windows.
The best part was mounted on the back of his pickup truck, he had a Telescope with a Level glued or tied on top of it.
The entire thing was hilarious.
Evan Butler
They used parts of the old real Moon to build the fake one. It's not impossible for someone that can warp Space and Time.
Charles Howard
they rig sports with golems so why not rig space agencies too?
its actually so easy, when you've seen the evidence, it's like, majority of humans are just literal wi-fi controlled robots
Blake Foster
>We all know NASA hired Kubrick to make the moon landing movies
How did he fake lunar gravity?
youtube.com
Nolan Nelson
Nigga did you even read his full post
Retard
Nothing impressive about UHF communications you stupid nigger
Jacob Bailey
that pic wasnt transmitted. Look at all the footage from it, its grainy as fuck. Most of what you see today in terms of moon footage was shot on film and physically brought back, not transmitted.
on a semi-related note:
>talking about 9/11
>younger guy says "if the Pentagon was really hit by a plane why isnt there any video of it?"
>explain that security cameras look down and blah blah blah
>he then says "they why didnt anyone get it on their cell phone?"
>he then proceeds to do a fake mic drop
>explain to him that in 2001 cell phones were still growing in popularity and they had neither cameras nor video capabilities.
>he says I am wrong and that cell phones always had cameras
Andrew Roberts
flat earther know something, i don´t think the earth is flat but something is odd.
Camden Peterson
Damn how could they forget to add in the stars!?!
Robert White
Nolan Barnes
>Gangster Computer God worldwide SECRET CONTAINMENT POLICY, made possible SOLY by worldwide Computer God Frankenstein Controls, especially LIFELONG CONSTANT THRESHOLD BRAIN WASH RADIO ( quiet and motionless, I can slightly hear it; repeatedly this has saved my life on the streets ). FOUR BILLION worldwide population ALL living have a Computer God CONTAINMENT POLICY BRAIN BANK BRAIN, A REAL BRAIN, in the Brain Bank Cities on the far side of the Moon, we never see.
Lincoln Bennett
>Shouldn't it strike you odd they had this level of camera quality back then?
no you fucking idiot
David Morales
Do why was the flag waving if there is no wind on the moon?
Ryan Adams
It would require a longer exposure to show the stars, then the objects in the foreground would be over exposed, so obviously they set the exposure on the camera to actually capture what they intended to capture, which wasn't the sky, it's not rocket science, just use your common sense, if you've got any, which it's clear you haven't, or you wouldn't have posted in the first place.
William Bailey
thats because your country (and western/central europe in general) are basically one huge urban area. Background light from cities does the same thing as bright ground in moon pics, it drowns out the light of the stars. Put a flashlight up to your eye, you won't be able to see anything but the light, your pupils adapt to the bright light source, thus making it very hard to impossible to see comparatively darker light. Same principle as stars/moon pics. Urbanization was a mistake, I can't even marvel at nature anymore, instead I can look at asphalt and apartment blocks. How great
Jose White
He didn't
Parker Perez
Any camera would have picked up billions of stars shining in the background
Camden Rivera
Can you enlighten us who at NASA is lying and who at NASA is telling the truth? Thanks!
Cooper Diaz
no
James Ward
FACT: China land on dark side of the moon with HD video and photo tech, huge international press and attention .... and suddenly stops releasing any imagery.
Also: no stars. This isn’t the 60s.
Luke Johnson
Zachary Long
ITS ABSOLUTELY HAPPENING NEW IMAGE BOARD DITCH 4KEK
Lincoln Morales
>DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
>rover has to have light on it
>points light in front of it to be able to see the ground
>suddenly camera readjusts and doesn't see stars anymore
imagine being stupid
Jayden Gutierrez
stop shilling this shit
Ethan Turner
why isnt there a full moon every night
why is the moon visible at all if the sunlight doesnt even touch it
Carson Lee
It’s called “the dark side” because that side doesn’t face earth. It’s not actually dark. It still revieves sunlight. And even if it didn’t modern ccd and optics are not limited by physical film and have the sensitivity and apertures to capture everything (visible and invisible wavelengths). Imagine being this naive.
Henry Martin
The moon is an artificial light and not a physical body. The phases of this artificial light are dictated by something unseen.
Camden Gomez
ye I kinda had the feeling I said something stupid but wasn't sure you'd realize. But if the Sun is visible from the dark side, doesnt that explain why stars can't be seen? I can't see stars here either when the suns up, and in the pic you posted there's an obvious shadow, so the sun is up. Which means everything else is too bright to pick up stars.
Noah Hughes
When the moon faces away from the sun, does the rover pick up stars?
Xavier Garcia
Sure, this is the initial landing photo, quick and simple. but why hasn’t China released more imagery since ... especially given the probe is equipped with instrumentation that can capture everything regardless of exposure. It can easily do HDR.
It went silent.
And this is China, which always trumpets its successes.
Camden Murphy
It found a corpse
Nathan Morris
Checked
Aaron Wood
bbc.com
according to this they recently landed another one
Alexander Peterson
That’s not a second landing. China sent two crafts .. one that landed, and another in orbit. since the landing probe isn’t in direct sight of the earth it needs to relay its data to the orbiter, which then passes data to earth. Still .. almost total image blackout and secrecy for what is publicly called a scientific, not military, mission.
Josiah Wilson
If the lander is on the far side of the moon, how are the pictures transmitted back to Earth?
Kayden Richardson
yea but its china and we know they're lying assholes, so its nothing strange really
Kevin Jones
As I said, China also launched an orbiter that has sightline to earth. Probe transmits to moon orbitor, orbitor relays to earth station. That’s a lot of effort for ((suddenly nothing to see))