Was it Typhus or Gas Chambers?

Was it Typhus or Gas Chambers?

Attached: stonetoss.png (1000x1000, 93K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/HhyDsbz4AN4
youtu.be/tdu459VCJiM
apnews.com/9764d9bef773d2587e6ef26aba13d587
phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/iffr/report.shtml
youtube.com/watch?v=CvI4zvMSWlY
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Does this guy live from his comic strip? If so, America is the most epic success in human history.
I want a green card.

>every pic of piles of bodies has obvious starvation death
Hmmmm...
>all supply lines cut upon liberation of belgium and Brussels in Early February '45
>all population and especially prisoners starve until May '45 v-day
Will 3 months of starvation kill a man?

You can live off water for like a month.

No it won't. That's why there were survivors.

What starvation can and does do is severely weaken the immune system. It doesn't help that they are all living in close proximity.

no

I know. So the busted supply line problem began in early February. ...at which point soldiers were the only ones with food, and it was the cause for most German citizens going into refuge mode for lack of food. So why aren't historical facts allowed? Why are supply lines being cut by allies not given as reason for no food? Instead of an industrial extermination that never occured?

Sorry we don’t accept your kind

Attached: DBA12555-113B-4CD0-A554-D6D38D51E130.jpg (267x189, 19K)

Typhus chambers

Industrial scale extermination = guilt & gibs

Starving POWs because of strangulation by air power = oopsie.

You sick fuck do you know how many died in the shekel pools ?

Attached: The Shekel Pool.jpg (500x666, 170K)

Neither. Nothing happened at Auschwitz. And it will not happen again. And again.

Literally millions!!

I am over 20 years old and I was there I remember it like it was yesterday. Oh the horrors they're all coming back to me now.

So if you imprison people but they die of disease, neglect, and starvation as a direct result of that imprisonment you're absolved of murdering them according to you?

Attached: 81111240.jpg (575x364, 20K)

Either way, it was planned while Hitler was in diapers.

Attached: six_million_jews.png (1080x1920, 2.3M)

So, based on your logic, the story didn't happen the way it's told? How anti-semitic

What

It was tape decks that smashed the jews together per Otto Diesel.

Attached: Holohoax-2.jpg (668x864, 119K)

Attached: 1547406219613.png (391x537, 225K)

100% typhus and malnutrition due to lack of food. gassing doesn't make you skinny.

Attached: Scan-New-York-Times-Six-Million-Since-1869-Composite.jpg (1096x1600, 1.45M)

Typhus and no food.

How bout the fact that they lied about how many died AND about how many of them were Jews? And they didn't die as a direct result of their imprisonment. They were treated just fine in the camps. It's the fact that the Germans ran out of supplies as they were AT WAR and millions of Germans were dying too.
youtu.be/HhyDsbz4AN4

Attached: B8coZ-kCYAAt_Y2.jpg (601x537, 81K)

Attached: 1407077576396.jpg (3816x3464, 2.35M)

youtu.be/tdu459VCJiM

Here's a JEWISH Holocaust denier who was driven into exile in the 1990s for speaking the truth about the Holohoax.

Attached: ukipHolocaustDenial.jpg (396x198, 25K)

Attached: 95159.jpg (719x694, 305K)

Attached: 159dc33c76f45916b67bbec8dd760d7b0d301c72af08656051ef8a6029793acc_1.jpg (800x520, 45K)

Historical Evidence/Eye wittiness Accounts/Thousands of US/UK soldiers testimony/100s of Hours and 1000s of Documents

>Vs 1 stupid meme.

I know it wasn't 6 million, but denying everything is just embarrassing.

Attached: e8rf2wd4zvxy.png (510x500, 156K)

>1 post by this id
so are you going to do this every day or what

it didnt.

but anyway

>The term holocaust comes from the Greek ὁλόkαυστος holókaustos: hólos, "whole" and kaustós, "burnt offering".

we got a holocaust denier boys! lock him up, I'd say 5 years outta do it.

Attached: Holocaust %22deniers%22.jpg (565x502, 153K)

Attached: anne frank.jpg (731x1024, 134K)

what historical evidence? there's almost no physical evidence, just millions of american jewish "survivors" who told their holocaust survival stories for shekels

> and then luckily I escaped the gas chamber for the 5th time and was finally saved, thank god i wasn't turned into a human lampshade or thrown into the pit of acid or killed by tickling or the masturbation machine or the giant electric chair

Attached: nuremberg rules of evidence.png (1237x160, 21K)

how's it goin' rabbi?

whoa this is a pretty anti-semetic post

Attached: zyklon b.jpg (1576x599, 347K)

My Grandfather (UK) saw it first hand.
My Baltic Grandfather saw it first hand.

>6 million DIDNT die
>Many people have cashed in on fake stories

doesnt mean the rest didnt happen.

>thats just 1 example (there are many) I understand, but you are doing a broad stroke of "NONE of it happened".

and thats the problem.

good luck with your research.

what exactly did they see first hand? be specific. did they see jews being gassed in chambers?

It was gas chambers. Also shooting. Lots and lots of shooting. And illness and starvation brought on by illegal kidnapping, imprisonment, and slave labor. I mean, that's the best case scenario for Holocaust deniers, right? "It was tyhpus, brought on by inhumane conditions in slave camps where kidnapped people were forced to work for the Nazis until they dropped dead." At that point, why bother being a Holocaust denier? You're just quibbling over the means of killing.

it does if those people were a legitimate threat and needed to be quarantine.
After WWI there was the German Revolution of 1918-19, where German Socialists (who happened to all be Jewish) attempted to take over Germany with the aid of the newly formed Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic.

If WWII didn't go our way and Japan invaded mainland US, what condition do you think they would have found the Japanese Internment camps to be in? Would political prisoners be allotted nutritious food, medicine, and other amenities that are near impossible to acquire in a war torn nation?

Oh vey, shut it down

masturbation machines

> You're just quibbling over the means of killing.
Uh oh we have another holocaust denier in the thread! Time for prison for questioning the Official Narrative that 6 million Jews were all gassed deliberately in a Singular Holocaust that lives above all other genocides.

Attached: moshe 6 time survivor.jpg (640x782, 279K)

No. It was giant electricution chairs.

Attached: giant electric chair.jpg (1022x760, 268K)

Or was a rollercoaster of death?

Attached: holocoaster.jpg (1548x1696, 401K)

Or was it a spanking robot and death by tickling?

Attached: spanking robot.jpg (471x813, 229K)

WOW LOOK AT ALL THIS EVIDENCE FOR THE HOLOCAUST HOW CAN YOU DENIERS BE SO RETARDED LOL

broke: the holocaust happened
woke: the holocaust didn't happen
bespoke: the holocaust happened... in Dresden.

Attached: dresden.png (1037x657, 535K)

>muh poor dresden
>it's not like we bombed london

Attached: military-ban-comic.png (593x574, 175K)

>Re-capped
Noice breakdown. Gotta say it's pretty satisfying when I see one of the caps I've made getting used. That was an excellent thread with the 1930 encyclopedia.

Attached: The REAL Holocasut - Dresden (Re-capped).png (1120x800, 552K)

Oy vey I remember being forcefed bagels in a manner similar to pic related from the Simpsons. The evil nazis hooked me up to this machine with the intent of making my stomach literally explode. Those were terrify times.

Attached: Homer-Donuthell.jpg (477x358, 29K)

Is this supposed to be a subversion of our expectation that the tranny would kill itself, but inbstead, it makes other people want to kill themselves? If so, it doesn't seem quite right.

The original had the tranny kill itself, I think the implication in this edit is that the tranny murdered the military man (because trannies are insane and aggressive).

because
and
are the same people posting derail images

Lies is what it was.

I like how the left keeps pushing this six million died in auschwitz theory while Jow Forums keeps claiming they're jewish shills when the official israeli jewish holocaust museum doesn't even make these retarded claims

apnews.com/9764d9bef773d2587e6ef26aba13d587

"An Israeli historian today welcomed Poland’s decision to lower the official death toll at the Auschwitz-Birkenau death camp from 4 million to under 2 million and acknowledge that most of the victims were Jews."

the official claim is that a million jews died at auschwitz.

most died from being denied food, water, and other necessities while being enslaved in labor camps, as well as being summarily executed by SS soldiers during the invasion of eastern europe.

The narrative is genius because it's now culturally accepted that 6 million jews died at auschwitz with "Schindler's list" , so disputing that automatically makes you a holocaust denier even though you're right. So now you spend all this time "disproving the official story" when there's nothing to even disprove. It's a sleight of hand trick that makes you waste your time on disproving an "official story" that doesn't actually exist in any tangible form, thereby actually making it impossible to disprove. Since the official story doesn't exist, the left can just adapt the holocaust to criticize anything it doesn't like.

e.g. Sean Spicer claiming Hitler "didn't use chemical weapons" was meant to state that Hitler never used nerve agents like Assad did, despite actually having nerve gas that could've decimated the british civilian population more than nuclear weapons technology at the time. The gas chambers on the other hand used cyanide like Assad used without penalty. The left immediately started trying to use the holocaust despite it being totally different chemicals.

Nazi in 1945: yes, it was our fault. I'm sorry, a lot of us just weren't high enough in rank to do anything about it
Incel in 2019: duuuyyyy, it didn't happen because some guy on the internet told me so! Durrrrrrr

Lol

According to the Nuremberg trials, masturbation machines and roller coasters.

Both?
Doesn't excuse the fact that the G*rmans ran a straight up extermination and interment campaign for anyone they didn't like.
>Religious Christians (both protestant and catholic) that objected to Nazi Brutality
>Political Prisoners, ranging from your garden variety moderate conservative to your card carrying communist
>Artists
>Slavs
>Gypsies
>Resistance fighters or Partisans
>Prisoners of war that according to nazi racial doctrine deserved to die

Basically the goal of Nazi expansionism under Lebensraum was the subjugation and/or extermination of all peoples who were not considered aryan, which is retarded, if not autistic, because G*rmanic haplogroups are hopelessly diluted due to the fact that for the four previous centuries any nation that actually mattered marched through G*rmany and sowed their seeds in all too accepting fields.

Fuck G*rmans. You're the phillistines of Europe. The only thing you've ever contributed to mankind is suffering and death.

Attached: 0x2t5hklw6j11.png (637x565, 321K)

Allies bombed the shit out of their supply train rails. Can't deliver supplies if there isn't any. Commanding officers then have to make choice between keeping their soldiers alive or their prisoners, and the war is still going on at this time. A lack of supplies and poor conditions led to typhus outbreaks among the prisoners, which of those who did die, died from it.
Fuck every single person who denies this.

Die kike.

Attached: inclusive nazis.jpg (1600x1200, 544K)

Yes, but why intern them in the first place?

Why is there so much gas at these camps that you can still find traces of cyanide if it's only purpose is just to serve as a labor camp?

>citation

phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/iffr/report.shtml

>Jan Markiewicz, Wojciech Gubala, Jerzy Labedz
>Jews reporting that jews were right
>implying this is credible
Somehow I am not surprised...

He's polish, I believe. Also, this paper was already in another impartial journal.

You're just living up to your name and denying any evidence that doesn't agree with you for no apparent reason.

Tell me, how do you know the researcher is Jewish?

He's polish, I believe. Also, this paper was already in another impartial journal.

You're just living up to your name and denying any evidence that doesn't agree with you

Tell me, how do you know the researcher is Jewish?

No.

Attached: mG3mQ-b4cX__RCdxOZp_pBaAIIETJUKI5cUF4IOpCfk.jpg (498x498, 36K)

>kvetching intensifies

Attached: 1509490103002.png (282x200, 60K)

What do I have to kvetch about?

The Nazis are losers.

>start war to conquer people
>end up being balkanized and literally raped by the very people you wanted to exterminate

kekkles

>gets proven wrong
>resorts to using ad hominems

Like clockwork

If everybody else was dying of starvation and disease too because of Allied bombing then yeah it does absolve you of blame.

If you want to exterminate a group of people, why imprison them in far away places when you can shoot them on the spot? Why waste the resources of feeding them and clothing them if you plan to gas them?

>implied I was proven wrong
>implying those last names aren't jewish as fuck
>implying the war wasn't started because Hitler demanding the Poles to let his people go
>implying the Poles didn't listen to him and continued to discriminate and persecute the Germans in Poland which forced the hand of Hitler
You are very quickly running out of time to be honest. When that happens, you will have made your choice.

nicely checked
here are the bombing stats for just Dresden:
In one day UK dropped a total of:
1,400 tons of high-explosive bombs
1,100 tons of incendiaries
In two days US dropped a total of :
3,750 tons of high-explosive bombs
more than 290 tons of incendiaries

Typhus is the biggest proof that Germans weren't trying to exterminate the prisoners because they wouldn't have bothered to order Zyklon B from an American pesticide manufacturer.
Also:
>See: "Typhus Causes a Truce," Journal of the American Medical Association (May 19, 1945) p. 220. The JAMA story explained that the reason the Germans negotiated a transfer of Bergen Belsen to the British was because

>typhus is rampant in the camp and it is vital that no prisoners be released until the infection is checked. The advancing British agreed to refrain from bombing or shelling the area of the camp, and the Germans agreed to leave behind an armed guard which would be allowed to return to their own lines a week after the British arrival.... Two German officers presented themselves before the British outposts and explained that there were 9,000 sick in the camp and that all sanitation had failed. They proposed that the British should occupy the camp at once, as the responsibility was international in the interests of health. In return for the delay caused by the truce the Germans offered to surrender intact the bridges over the river Aller. After brief consideration the British senior officer rejected the German proposals, saying it was necessary that the British should occupy an area of ten kilometers round the camp in order to be sure of keeping their troops and lines of communication away from the disease. The British eventually took over the camp.

>If you want to exterminate a group of people, why imprison them in far away places when you can shoot them on the spot?
The nazis did do this. We believe some 2 million Jews were killed by these groups called "einsatzgruppen"

>Why waste the resources of feeding them and clothing them if you plan to gas them?
Slave labor to help with the war effort, after they finished their work they were subsequently gassed or left to be starved.

Your ignorance is not an argument

Fake image. And hilter faught in world war 1, he was not in diapers in the 20s and 10s

>fake image
here's a video of someone going through 10 newspapers between 1915 and 1938:
youtube.com/watch?v=CvI4zvMSWlY

>implying those last names aren't jewish as fuck
Conjecture. Do you have any real proof besides "they sound Jewish" and "their beliefs don't align with my so I'm going to reject the shit out of it" ?

It was justified.

>We believe
who is "we"?

>who is "we"?
Literally, any credible historian or non-schizophrenic person

(((credible historian)))

A "credible historian" named Raul Hilberg was present at the Ernst Zundel defamation trial and admitted there is no autopsy reports of anyone dying form gas poisoning in the camps, he also admitted that people were resettled, that the "Jewish problem was solved" but the word "killing" was not used
Here is the article

>all the posters coming here to "un-debunk" the holobunga dont post any sources and just try to rationalize the inconsistencies

as a fencesitter you guys arent very convincing

>(((credible historian)))
Because everybody knows that science and historical facts are Jewish constructs and therefore need to be ignored.

I guess I found the mantra that keeps reality deniers going

Does the comic guy realise that the 6 million figure doesnt refer to how many jews were gassed, but how many were killed overall with any method?

Attached: 4XTFNGL.png (370x320, 10K)

Is the credible historian Raul Hilberg a considered a denier by your standards too?

Question for Jow Forums, but this is a big boy one for big boy brains so dont answer if you're a brainlet

If you kidnap someone and deprive them of food, hygiene and medicine, and this leads to them getting sick and dying. Are you responsible for their death?

over 80 million people died in WW2 yet propaganda in the media wants to focus on a genocide happening in the camps that was perpetuated by Germans, yet no orders of genocide exist (British cracked the Enigma code and spied on all transmissions), and records show resettlement to Palestine did occur (Haavara Agreement)

no doubt

If the rail lines supplying the food were destroyed by bombing runs preventing food, pesticide and medical supplies from reaching the camps are you responsible for the prisoners deaths?

>and admitted there is no autopsy reports of anyone dying form gas poisoning in the camps
I don't know about the correctness of this statement. I know that the red army hadn't reached these camps until several days after they were retired. They might've also brought in coroners to investigate the bodies. I would make an argument that there does exist autopsy reports butI know better than to bring up soviet evidence because I know deniers are not fond of it.

>he also admitted that people were resettled
That they were. Nobody denies this

>"Jewish problem was solved" but the word "killing" was not used
Himmler explained in a speech at Poznan they were indeed killing jews. This has been debu ked several times.

If you give access to 9000 sick people to the British yet they refuse to help, are you at fault too?

>Is the credible historian Raul Hilberg a considered a denier by your standards too?
It really depends on what kind of statements he made or was tricked into making by overly deceitful nazis. Based on the statements I saw on just that infographic alone I would say no.

>I don't know about the correctness of this statement.
Then you are at fault for not understanding what was said in a court of law, that's your issue and has nothing to do with what transpired.
>That they were. Nobody denies this
yes, you have by trying prove that the exterminations happened, you're floundering
>Himmler explained in a speech at Poznan they were indeed killing jews. This has been debu ked several times.
never said "killing" not even once.
You've been debunked and your credibility is at 0

The story is that 6 million were gassed. Why would the Jews lie about this? There was murder either way, but the circumstances and number f deaths may have been lied about for some reason.