Friend sent me this. How would you reply?
Explain this Jow Forums
Hudson Cox
Other urls found in this thread:
nytimes.com
twitter.com
Jayden Wood
8,000 self proclaimed geneticists.
Adam Price
Ask him to name all 8,000 of them. Burden of proof falls on him after all
Owen Myers
>Phoneposting
Would rather kill a horde of Jews.
Jayden Gomez
They'd be fired if they said anything else, so of course they say that. You can make the scientific consensus say absolutely anything you like if you control who gets considered a real scientist.
Cooper Baker
(((geneticists)))
Ethan Foster
By that logic dog breeds are meaningless also, fuck it a chihuahua and a wiener dog are the same thing
Cameron Gutierrez
Respond with this
nytimes.com
If the man WHO FUCKING DISCOVERED DNA can get blow back for suggesting something similar, why would these 8,000 geneticists dare go against the grain and risk their livelihoods?
Gabriel Russell
8,000,000*
Noah Cook
I wonder how much funding one can get by asking to explore racial differences.
Grayson Powell
im pretty sure most people can tell the difference between a white guy and a nigger and even some of the other mud races. who are you going to believe, (((scientists))) or your own eyes?
Xavier Sanders
8 billion years of the universe beats 8000 nu self proclaimed geneticists
Jose Hill
All races are equal
Lincoln Flores
>>purple exists, therefore red and blue dont exist, and its meaningless to ever classify something as either red or blue
QED
Landon Ward
>8 gorrilion
Juan Morris
No longer be friends and beat the living shit outta the traitor.
Josiah Lee
LOL
Anthony Ramirez
>Rat
Jaxon Rodriguez
>> you can guage opinion with the scientific method
>> what is the meaning of meaninglessness?
Complete double speak from the media yet again
Camden Sanders
It's meaningless because liberals only pick and choose the bits that affirm their ideology.
Isaac Taylor
*genitals
Ryder Morgan
They're right. It's significance has nothing to do with science. It's about the right to exist.
Easton Taylor
James Watson.
Jace Peterson
How many of them are jewish?
Isaac Brooks
Two fallacious arguments here.
An appeal to authority and an appeal to popular belief.
Why are they so desperate to make this point?
Matthew Cruz
Empirical evidence shows otherwise.
Tell me why should I believe words of some faggots over empirical evidence, just because those faggots proclaimed each other "scientists" (despite completely disregarding scientific method)?
Blake Gray
it's okay to be a golden retriever
Bentley James
>so meaningless they have to bring up how little meaning it has because their research must prove that it has no meaning, right?
Christopher Stewart
SAYS 70000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 LAWYERS
Jace Mitchell
James Watson. the guy who made it possible for those 8,000 people to have jobs says they are wrong
Justin Flores
You and everyone else is right it is obvious, but you need to learn to be more articulate for your own sake and for the sake of these views. The more depth and more elaborate you can challenge your own views to be stronger and thorough, the more powerful and nuanced your discussions can be. The purpose of this is dissemination of the information in the real world. Nuance and rhetoric is key to the furtive, necessary, and effective spreading of these views.
Christian Diaz
John Brown
This is true to some extent. Every ancestry test I ever saw of an English person, they were at most 60% English and the rest was Irish, Scottish and Welsh. I don't think that racial purity is particularly important among very similar people. Remember, our Royal families would always mix with other national princesses, they were by far the most mixed people around while the peasants were the most racially pure.
But I'm sure what they're trying to do is encourage race mixing among very different races.