I‘m starting to oppose democracy

i‘m starting to oppose democracy

Attached: 3DD7BB6B-EE67-4BB6-B489-F58C52AE1044.jpg (660x574, 31K)

Other urls found in this thread:

vice.com/en_ca/article/7bmwgq/jesus-christ-king-of-poland-876
jacobitemag.com/2017/08/04/why-liechtenstein-works-self-determination-and-market-governance/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

good

Attached: buttjfbr9ccy.png (736x951, 395K)

>starting to
That's usually the first step to becoming redpilled.

no i think monarchy is better

I think giving women the vote was the biggest mistake.

Democracy as practiced in this country is a joke. Americans never voted for gay marriage or open borders. Didn’t stop them from shoving the shit through the courts. They will most likely steal Brexit from the bongs as well.

You are living in a totalitarian society.

>babbys first redpill
it gets worse/better user

Good.
Literally why?

Democracy isn't a real thing. Consent is manufactured.

Did you know Poland has a King?

vice.com/en_ca/article/7bmwgq/jesus-christ-king-of-poland-876

Attached: 1547484678720s.jpg (125x122, 2K)

DEMOCRACY SUCKS

what we need is people with skin in the game to vote. not welfare niggers and imported banana boat ali's.

You must be new here.

the united states isnt a democracy.
its a democratic republic.
we elect people to make policy decisions on our behalf.

This desu

>thinks OP wants communism

Attached: 1521949732170.jpg (738x960, 78K)

Wow no shit.
No matter what kind of a political system you implement, power always tends to concentrate somewhere. In democracy it's just hidden behind politicians, who are parts of parties, which are parts of coalitions, which are funded by third parties, which decide how the establishment looks like. A political party that can cause actual change doesn't exist, because it simply won't be allowed to participate, or won't get enough donations for campaigning, or won't get news coverage. Because after all, the people who own the media are the richest, and they're the people who have such large sums of money they can donate them to parties they support in their own interest.
Democracy is an absolute fucking joke, at this point voting is like choosing if you want to die by being shot, hanged or decapitated. And when you say you don't want to die, depending on the country, you can get arrested for being a "threat" to democracy, read: threat to the interests of people who pay for this massive theatre.

same. USA needs to give people like Trump more power to have a chance at survival

The problem isn't democracy it's universal suffrage.

>Consent is manufactured
fucking this.
However, narcissist manipulators, astroturfing campaigns and mediatic propaganda don't cut it anymore (in the west). Not as it once was, at least.

>people like Trump
No, cryptokikes don't need anymore power.

bla bla bla
go away europe
in a direct democracy there is no concentration of power
which is why cucks like eu parlementarians oppose it

You are on the right path.
Monarchy by divine right is the only possible way.

jacobitemag.com/2017/08/04/why-liechtenstein-works-self-determination-and-market-governance/

It does, the problem is that it requires an intelligent and educated populace. Both of which are incredibly lacking in modern humans.

Yeah I’m there with you, I thought the monarchist autists on Jow Forums were retarded and now here I am.

Attached: 2573C7A5-E71F-4FDB-98AA-6EDCA4A3A24F.jpg (730x973, 60K)

Monarchy is literally the worst system.
Leads to brutal fascism for the proles and unimaginable degeneracy for the ruling class. The worst of both worlds.
Also leads to autistic wars.
What's worse, dying in the sandbox for corporate interests or dying for some retard's megalomanic delusions of grandeur.

>muh direct democracy
Never gonna fucking exist.

>implying democracy doesn't do the same thing

It’s like that, friend. Merely a shedding of old useless skin.

>i‘m starting to oppose democracy
The purpose of democracy is to prevent change.

Good. Democracy is terrible. The only way it was every any good was when it was limited to a small knowledgeable electorate. Even then, it was better if that electorate was only able to elect representatives.

Attached: 74b.jpg (252x291, 17K)

Why? Sounds retarded desu.

Monarchy are horseshit. There’s nothing to prevent the line of succession ending up with a retarded fuck that ascends.

Kill the whatever feelings you have left for democracy by reading “democracy: the god that failed” by hans Hoppe. Democracy is shit tier governance and gets less solvent with increased scale.

Democracy has created the worst dystopian societies the world has ever seen. It is a religion of pure evil, which is exactly why the Jew promotes it so much. Hitler saw democracy as being an even bigger threat than communism.


...That under the cloak of social virtue and love of one's neighbor a veritable pestilence was spreading abroad and that if this pestilence were not stamped out without delay it might eventually succeed in exterminating the human race.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf.

It’s not women or non-whites, it’s stupid people. And stupid people often come with dicks. The way to fix it is to bring back poll tests. In fact, let’s go further and require a voting license that has to be renewed every year. The renewal process is taking a test covering civics and current events/issues.

That’s why in the US it was originally white land owning men.

It has issues definitely.

At least under democracy they have to spend a modicum of effort to keep up the charade, which is better than nothing.
You guys think monarchy is going to bring some massively redpilled white daddy who's going to ride around with a sword beheading liberals and fags.
Like holy shit close the internet and open a history book for once.

The greatest casulty of Black Suffrage and Women’s Suffrage was the idea that one needs to be qualified to be part of the electorate.

>monarchy leads to fascism
You couldn’t possibly be more retarded if you tried you mushy-brained vaccuous pile of goat shit.

Democracy is fine if its in an ethnostate.
Once you start mixing in other races, it just becomes a headcount.

Nah.
Ask yourself why they worked so hard to destroy empires and kings in Europe.
To neutralize them to be just empty symbols.

Catholic?

Democracy can work on small scales with homogenous culture. Democracy gets increasingly worse as you increase scale and cultural differentiation.

user, monarchs were the ones that kicked out the jews every time in history.
>but Hitler!
He couldn't even do it in the public eye, not even those in Berlin knew.
The big difference between monarchies and "democracies" is that democracies elect puppets with puppet masters hidden from the public eye. While monarchs are the puppet master himself.
'Tis better to be ruled by the puppeteer than the puppets, no? When a revolt happens in a democracy, only the puppets change, whilst in monarchies the puppeteer changes.

How does monarchy lead to fascism when every fascist country in Europe arose from a democracy?

He’s right though

Bullshit. Why? Because any stick of stupid fuck that says “ethnostate” is just another white trash scumfuck.

Show your flag Schlomo

Neither does. Fascist became popular in areas where Marxists and Socialists were actively and often violently attempting revolutions and an overthrow of the government.

>Land-owning white men
It's funny that so many strict "constitutionalists" that I encounter never seem to acknowledge this crucial piece of why our system worked as well as it did back then.

It isn't fine. Democracy is underpinned by filthy liberalism, which will inevitably destroy the culture. Read some Evola ffs

Democracy does not work in a multicultural society, instead the voting process is used as a racial headcount.

Good. Retards replying with 'why' because they legitimately don't understand. They've never studied the topic.

Monarchy is good, but it cant be a traditional familial primogeniture. It needs to be rigorous testing, and a larger elite clan that represents the genetics of the founding stock.

Retard.

Attached: 1513495703349.png (418x370, 24K)

Because when a person can no longer identify with his common man, he can no longer identify with his country, which means that he'll no longer seek to do good for the sake of it. Individualism is the greatest evil

>duh haw haw, retard mutt
good job leaf, you showed me
Feel free to come back when you have some legitimate argument.

>wanting to be ruled by a woman
Patriarchy is better.

...

Caligula

>with his common man
Bull-fucking-shit. The fact that I’m a blue-eyed white guy doesn’t automatically mean that I have kinship with other blue-eyed white guys. Especially ones who have no accomplishments of their own to be proud of. Sure individualism causes problems, but commonality and community comes from culture, ideology, and a vision of the future. Not what your fucking ethnicity is. I’ll take a fucking black guy who thinks like I do over a screeching stormfag every time.

Go fuck yourself Olaf. I use memeflags so I don’t have to explain to somali blowing lutefisk licking faggots what an expat is. I’ll wait while you look that word up you cheese faced penis fish.

>starting

Strict ain’t so strict no mo’.

Cuck.

Attached: 1512678374806.png (436x478, 54K)

>leaf
no more (you)s for you

Attached: 1538527687897.jpg (1200x675, 159K)

The first paragraph of 'propaganda' by Edward Bernays.

Attached: Capture+_2019-01-16-12-15-28.png (822x370, 103K)

Culture is influenced by genes. And there are no examples of sustainable and high-functioning multi-ethnic states. It doesn't work, never has and never will.

Bullshit. Behavior is influenced by genetics you mong.
>no examples
How about the first 200 years of the US you brainfucked dickshit? The only fucking requirement is a strong ideology that everyone accepts and follows. This ideology must also encompass all aspects of life: economic, social, political, and spiritual.

>Behavior is influenced by genetics you mong.
And thus so is culture. Where do you think culture comes from? Unicorns?

>How about the first 200 years of the US you brainfucked dickshit?
The US did great in spite of the non-Whites, because there was so few of them compared to Whites. And that success is coming to an end.

You seem like another clueless civicnationalist.

Yeah it is fucking dumb.

It cannot work if the population only thinks the way the media tells them too.

Democracy might work if it’s just the men of a single ethnicity voting.

But once you throw in a bunch of outsiders, it is just a game of divide and conquer. Both sides make the elites more powerful in their persuit of destruction of the opposite side.

In the end it’s all a worthless pile of shit and collapses, with the elites laughing on their way to the bank.

>starting to oppose democracy
so why didn't you do so sooner user?

faith

>monarchy
ebin

Attached: monarchism.jpg (718x351, 54K)