Why are women more often to be marxists?

why are women more often to be marxists?

Attached: large.jpg (500x624, 97K)

Other urls found in this thread:

instagram.com/alicelk/?hl=en
twitter.com/AnonBabble

They see the type of men the right has to offer.

Marxists are betas and women know they can get free shit

Women are whatever others tell them to be.

Marxism currently has its grip over cultural life. Once that changes weak minded trend following women will revert back to being the most ardent right wingers.

Only when they are unmarried. Women with husbands and children are much more conservative on average.

more easily manipulated and brainwashed cause they are fucking stupid. you should know this already faggot

Because the uterus produces an excess of heat, which attracts evil spirits.

women dont think logically, they let emotions control their thinking

>why are women more often to be marxists?

Because they are less often to be in the work force. When you don't earn shit you don't value it, plain and simple.

Attached: 1536473906808.png (533x628, 295K)

Women will always choose security. They want to be taken care without lifting a finger. Socialism makes the false promises of security for everyone, so it's appealing to women and low test men. Black men are cursed with elevated estradiol levels and they have testosterone levels on par with white men, so their hormones make them lefty faggots, too.

> Women face thousands of years of evolutionary pressures to become good at securing resources from external sources (men)
> Women generally support a political system that helps them secure resources from external sources (taxpayers)
Dunno op, it's a mystery.

Attached: 7r39z7559q621.jpg (652x815, 61K)

Smaller brains, mate . Quite unfortunate

Toxic femininity

Because tradition, honor, morality, spirituality and meritocracy are fundamentally masculine concepts.
On the other hand, equality, egalitarianism, materialism and lack of morality are fundamentally feminine.

decent nice guys who give girls flowers and kisses

Attached: flat,550x550,075,f.u3.jpg (550x550, 46K)

Differing expectations. Women expect support men expect to pay for it

You mean women who breed are dumb

Women want to be catered to. They want all the privileges and none of the responsibilities. They believe Marxism will lead to them being endlessly pampered.
Look at the old propaganda where they promoted women in the workplace: it's always showing working men as relaxing and chatting on the phone. Women never wanted to earn more money and support their families; they wanted adulation and fuckloads of money.

more free shit from hardworking betabucks she doesnt need to spread the legs to.

The percentage of Marxists in the general population in the West is less than 1%. Supporting Bernie means you're not a Marxist.
Women are not Marxists, because to be a Marxist you have to study difficult books and women are usually lazy.
Women basically support what they perceive to be the dominant ideology.

They are weak minded and easy to control.

Marxism doesn't promise free shit until the stage of communism, i.e. the end times. Until then, Marxism promises hard labour. Of course, the stupid fanbois and fangulrz are not aware of that. But, historically, it was the intellectuals that had to undergo forced labour in the fields and the factories, after the marxist ravolution was over kek.

women are more socially conformist and they hate to rock the boat more than men do, but this doesn't necessarily make them left wing, it makes them firm supporters of whatever the community or tribe believes.

This wasn't really an issue until mass-media, especially the entertainment industry, became so dominant because the brain can't tell the difference between what the people around them think and believe and what (((television and movie producers))) are telling them that the people around them think and believe. Women will always have the values of whoever controls the media and entertainment industry.

Because biologically they're used to being given things for free.

Why do you care about what women think?

Women believe that they are entitled to be supported by other people. Our society and legal system are pretty much designed to funnel money into cunts which the cunts did not earn.

Attached: 1514915093727.jpg (867x1000, 375K)

>Daddy issues
This is the root of everything user. Vermin with Daddy issues (((subverted))) our legal system to destroy fatherhood and now they're doing it with media. We live in a neutered, systemically chemically castrated society, and this is the price.

Attached: 1546983374629.png (500x734, 203K)

citation? nigger

Because women are nurturing by nature, they dont think in terms of "whats best for the tribe" they think in terms of "whats best for me/my kids"

So while men will say "Its terrible that these people are hungry but we do not have the resources to feed everyone"

A woman would say "This is horrible give them what they need"

Exactly what makes women cringe.
Because women have been getting shit for free for all of existence.

Survival

Easy to manipulate because they are right brain dominant, and or logic retarded.

>weak
>dependent
>dumb
>their only way to generate wealth is to steal it from their husband's

Think about it

Because women get everything for free anyways. For them it just means they want a system for others that resembles what they have.

Coz women r stupid

>they think in terms of "whats best for...my kids"
If that were true then why do so many women divorce or have kids out of wedlock?
Why do they so often have kids with abusive scumbags?
Why is arranged marriage the norm even among people as primitive as San bushmen? Maybe because women can't be trusted to look out for their own kids' interests.

Forgot who GOD is

Attached: 35252552.jpg (1920x1061, 956K)

men are independent creatures. women are dependent creatures. this is reflected in their politics

because the state is available to take care of the kids

Abusive scumbags have traits that naturally trigger female attraction IE they are capable of defending you

Marrige arises out of any early human civilization as a way to control human sexual behavior and give all people a stake in the society (a family and thus a future)

Without monogamous marriage civilization ceases to function which is why liberated women always arise just before and during a civilizations decline

so like everyone else then

Because they will still get money every month, the government will either give them money stolen from the taxpayers, or stolen from the father. If the cunts are made responsible for the children they produce, illegitimate births would immediately disappear. Subsidize a particular behavior, and you get more of it. If I received a check every month for being a father, I would knock up as many bitches as possible.

Exactly. From my experience I have realized that there is nothing original or unique in human beings. We are just a product of our environment. And you can see the same thoughts, problems, ideas, etc. in different human beings that live similar conditions. For me the brain is very overrated. We only receive stimulus from the outside and then our brain interprets it with the program that have been already installed (our culture and mindset) and that's all.

depends on the size of the check but this

That is true but a more simple point that anons like the one I replied to don't seem to understand is that under different circumstances they would not be "red pilled" and even possibly might be marxists themselves. Somehow women are inferior because they require outside stimulus to adopt political ideologies, but the fact is we all do.

>Somehow women are inferior because they require outside stimulus to adopt political ideologies, but the fact is we all do.
Then if you are saying that we are all the same why do you say that women are inferior?

We are all a product of our circumstances. Mostly. I think there is a little of free will but even that has to be influenced by something. I don't know. It's the eternal question of: if you were born in Nazi Germany, would you had been a Nazi or not? My opinion is that there is a 90% of possibilities that you would had been a Nazi.

For me the problem with women is that they have always been treated like adult children. Women should be treated like men since they are little. Not always trying to protect them and creating the typical princess. Also, there is the degenerated culture of nowadays that sells to women that they have been to be liberated and brave and many think that means been a whore and been proud of it.

>Then if you are saying that we are all the same why do you say that women are inferior?
You misunderstood, I mean't this is what the user I replied to assumed. I don't have much of an opinion on whether they are inferior, superior or exact same to men.
>For me the problem with women is that they have always been treated like adult children. Women should be treated like men since they are little. Not always trying to protect them and creating the typical princess. Also, there is the degenerated culture of nowadays that sells to women that they have been to be liberated and brave and many think that means been a whore and been proud of it.
I actually agree with you on this one. Men and women would have more in common if they were not raised with opposite values and expectations. At least probably.

They know they are weak and flock to a protector. Modern dumb cunts have no fathers so they made the state their new father

Attached: Who_Bitch_This_Is.jpg (460x360, 25K)

Women are parasitic by nature. They are basically the kikes of gender.

Attached: 1536193806543m.jpg (380x1024, 80K)

This roastie is Alice Kristiansen.
She is a loose whore that allegedly really really enjoys her coke parties.

instagram.com/alicelk/?hl=en

Attached: 1537354409220.jpg (1200x675, 133K)

Marxisms entire ideology relies on pathos arguments
women are highly emotional

put 2 and 2 together, user.

Didn't Hitler tried to brainwashed first the women or at least made a particular section for them because he knew that they were the key for the future because they would be raise the next men?

They are weak, emotional and not very intelligent. Isn’t it obvious?