Is Jow Forums for or against safe injection sites?

Is Jow Forums for or against safe injection sites?

Attached: 00638308-1024x706.jpg (1024x706, 73K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5685449/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

So I guess you're watching Tucker Carlson right now?

How about safe injection sites but every time you go there's a 1% chance you get black bagged and taken to a re-education facility

Against
Die in the street like the piece of shit you are.

Depends on whether the syringes contain poison or not.

Attached: tyu765edk0k.jpg (1305x864, 119K)

if it means they aren't dumping sharps all over the street im for it. Then again the trashier ones will do it anyways

boring, should be 50% chance that you get shot in the head every time you visit the place

this. All this does is prolong the part of the addiction where they are mantianing

yes. lure them in. they never come out.

Attached: med_1482840814_image.jpg (640x465, 64K)

against. if i catch you injecting illegal shit for 20 mins good feel and 2 hours sick and miserable, you can sit and shake it out in a prison cell for a few weeks

I am absolutely for, just insert a small detail that half the needles have fatal doses of fentanol in them.

There is no such thing as safe injection. Rename them Degenerate Dens and I will support them only because I'm a pragmatist and would rather contain them and have facial recognition on all junkies if it's going to happen anyways.

As someone who lives in a shitty neighborhood in a major city and has to step over unresponsive human-shaped pieces of shit and discarded needles every day on the way to work, I don't favor anything that keeps these things alive any longer. No "safe" injection sites. Stop giving them narcan. Stop showing up in ambulances to revive them. Stop taking them to the ER on my dime. This is a self-resolving problem if you let it be.

For, but it should also be legal to go in and bean whomever you please with some sort of blunt implement.

Checked
And we have to pay for this with taxes.

Safe injection sites seem pointless.
Just give out free needles so diseases don't spread as much.

I'm for legalization of everything and safe buying.

Is Jow Forums for or against giving morbidly obese people or diabetics medicine? Maybe we should let all sick people die instead of wasting resources. After all, your decisions lead you to illness so man up.

Stores what sell drugs should offer babysitting services. But honestly just do it home, damn.
Also all prohibition is immoral, you should be able to buy any drugs, with proper labeling and dosage information, in stores. Prohibition is only good for LEAs, drug dealers and other scum who profit off it.

It's not like it's going to stop some junkie with a backback riding his bike up to the grocery store and putting a needle in his arm in the bathroom.

Against. Drugs are degenerate and people who use them should be segregated from society, forced to undergo detox and put to work in labor camps until such a time as they are able to responsibly support themselves.

Does Jow Forums support keeping elderly people alive? They're gonna die anyway, so what's the point? waste of resources

only if we get to watch and they are required to inject their junk into their eye ball...and we can place bets

For, get them off the fucking streets so my kids don't have to risk getting aids every time they trip over in a public park.

even child pornography ?

yes, the government has been trying to figure out how to profit as much as possible off this and make it as big of a s shitshow as possible and grow it. because it creates cycles of $$$$.
they also flood the black communities with heavy bags of fents/hard and illegal firearms etc. all of them are death cells.

this

I’m for ‘safe injection sites’ as long as they are rehab centers. Everyone who quits smoking tries taking nicotine and then lowering the dose until they’re off. Why that isn’t legal for other drugs idk.

On where druggies can just shoot up and it’s sponsored by the government, that’s absolutely degenerate

If we do have government funded safe injection sites, then there should be a requirement to have the druggies sign a consent form to have themselves detained for a period of time. Or not even a form but a sign that says "if you use the facility/service you will not be allowed to leave for X months". So one free drug / safe supervised injection results in being detained without further access to drugs for some period of months. I think a lot of addicts would fall for this since they are so high time preference, and thus they would be forced rehab would give them the opportunity to kick the addiction. There needs to be a stick involved, free access to drugs is just giving out carrots and enabling their addiction. Absent some kind of significant "stick" then I think these facilities are pretty naive, heinous, and detrimental to society.

Mmmmmmmmmm heroin........! And yes injecting rooms are good

elderly people who have led productive lives and worked hard deserve at least basic care once they can no longer take care of themselves. Drug users are usually able bodied young people who voluntarily choose to worthless piles of shit who sponge off the system. Not even a remotely reasonable comparison.

Our boy here is wearing his FIRE hat for shooting up because Daniel is all about SPEED.

>Here's a safe place to break the law
Are there 'safe baby rape zones'? Are there 'safe zones for automatic weapons'? No? Then fuck safe zones for degenerate druggies. We need to spike all heroin with clorox and let it sort itself out.

If they made them take anti-opiates beforehand, I would be fine with giving them the drugs because those pills chemically alter the addiction response and eventually they don't get pleasure from doing drugs.

I didn't even know these existed. Druggies should all be killed.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5685449/
>Supervised injection sites are associated with:
>lower overdose mortality (88 fewer overdose deaths per 100 000 person-years [PYs]),
>67% fewer ambulance calls for treating overdoses, and a
>decrease in HIV infections.

Attached: 1490324006759.jpg (655x527, 59K)

What justification is there for pictures being illegal?

desu that's not a positive thing wrt society in general, it just allows them to continue being pieces of shit that have to kids steal bikes to get high

>Why that isn’t legal for other drugs idk.
Drug addicts don't just do drugs for fun.
Comedowns are not fun.
Drug addicts do drugs because they want to escape whatever cruel and hopeless reality they're perceiving.

When your options are suicide or drugs, you usually choose drugs.

Not saying it's good or bad, just posting some results to get the discussion started.

It's interesting of note that all the fascist and communist leaders were druggies.

The harm being done to those in the picture

>in the picture
Your current argument has expired.
Please purchase a new one.

For it. Junkies cost more to our healthcare when they get Hep c or HIV so let them slowly kill themselves with dope

Not to mention kings and queens.

But hey, us lowly degenerate peasants can't do it, only the non-degenerate leaders.

This supposed it was harmful(usually it isn't, girls like it). But how does that justify owning a picture being illegal?
The real reason child pornography is illegal is because if you saw a toddler girl happily sucking dick and giggling as she gets ate out you wouldn't believe the lie that its harmful.

Agreed, being an addict should suck balls. Not have a nice place to shoot up.

Then perhaps it saves money relative to letting them sponge off the system getting treatment for HIV and using ambulances, but they should still be forced into rehab the monent they use these facilites if that can proven to be cheaper since the cost of running the rehab would be cheaper than offering other medical services they would use in enabling their addiction. The rehab needs to reinforce to them that society will not tolerate their addiction, so it's either beat it or die. Enabling is not compassionate.

fuck off pedofag

welcome to the "first world" where you get a room, clean needles and love LOL
as you leave the clean room, safe space, they will provide you wish a pamphlet when you are stoned as fuck...telling you that you can get help

most of the people that leave will use the pamphlet to wipe their ass but no matter...the first world has money to burn

I like those odds

I am entirely for putting them all in California, building a wall and letting it burn

*with a pamphlet

t. destiny
Tell us your name and address so you may be illuminated.

>REEEEEE STOP BEING RIGHT
Okay, how do you justify having a picture being illegal?

This. I don’t care apart from safe injection sites coming from tax money. They’re going to do heroin, let them contain the aids as much as possible. It’s degenerate but you have to pick your battles

you just dismissed the first point with the "oh they like it" argument, I have spent time in a psych ward and can tell you those there did not like it

>1% chance you get black bagged and taken to a re-education facility
The risk is big

Attached: 1542600536867.png (208x243, 9K)

Meth heads and neo nazis go hand in hand

Kill all junkies.

for, but only if we fill the needles with cyanide

these don't make sense unless you can also strip some of their rights for the sake of rehabilitation. like I guess dying on the streets is less tax payer dollars but is it? the drug activity has to come off the streets somehow if there is biting that can be done about the drugs themselves (prohibition doesn't work)

Attached: 1547374111628.jpg (1200x949, 87K)

depends on who's paying for it

Against. Drug usage shouldn't be tolerated. Put them in jail for 2 months and let them detox.

As long as the injections are lethal. Other than that I am against because liberals like stupid degenerate shit like this. Liberals make miserable people worse.

As a former opiate addict that would have been my preferred way to go and welcome