Does she have a point with the 70% tax on the super rich?

There has never been a 90% effective tax rate. At it's height, the ultra-wealthy were never taxed more than about 62%.

Before 1913 there was no income tax, period. I for one like that idea.

Reminder to sage the daily AOC shills.

>(((super rich))) want to replace us and turn our kids into a cultureless genderblob
>TAXING THEM IS BAD WHAT IF THEY LEAVE
Fuck them, they hate us, let's hit them where it hurts the most

Attached: pic_of_crab_smoking.png (663x498, 628K)

This mentality disgust me so much.

It only worked in the past because the world wasn't overrun with literal roach-like shitspawn. The rich felt empathy and community with the masses back then. Now they feel nothing because the masses are brown.

>doesnt understand that whites are the only group to not be a net drain on the tax system
Get off this site you cancerous piece of fucking nigger shit

what percentage of the nigger population are oprah and apehoopers?

Look up effective tax rate retard

Probably why so many boomers are dead broke in retirement.

Just put a limit on executive salaries that is x times the median salary in their company and everyone wins.

She would if 70% were collectable. It's not, if the taxes are that high it's worth their time to just hide the money and use the loopholes.
That's what they did in the 1950s, and that's why JFK slashed taxes while eliminating the loopholes. He didn't actually cut taxes really, he just decided everyone should stop bullshitting each other.
I would be all for taxing 70% on the "super rich" because they're all pretty much virtue-signalling liberals. The problem is last time you let these commies define super rich they settled at about 220K a year (Obama).

what percentage of white people make over 10 million dollars? You realize there are more white people on foodstamps than there are blacks? Redistribution means poor people get money, not just brown people. That money from the rich would be going to more white people than black

fucking idiot

>You realize there are more white people on foodstamps than there are blacks?
Do you not know what the difference is per capita or are you just pretending to be retarded

>Apparently it was 90% in the 50’s

Nobody actually paid it in the 1950s.

There was a ton of loopholes to get around it (because it's fucking retarded and would implode the economy).

Attached: 1451351895061.jpg (229x220, 4K)

so are you upset about black people, or about a tax rate? These are separate issues. More welfare money goes to white people than black people, so your argument that its a trick to transfer money to black people makes no sense.

Attached: nannystate.jpg (604x559, 115K)

>black people

no, i said brown people. spics and niggers taken together are a much larger group.

than just niggers. also how many of those "whites" are hispanics? The governent identifies spics as whites unless they're pure indio.

>Jews earn
Sorry, no

Nearly all the economists say it would be a very bad thing.

Yes. The point of the high tax rate is to force companies to reinvest the money into R&D, expansion, etc. The companies will do anything to drive themselves into a lower bracket. It's sickening that this policy has to be brought up by the far left when it was originally, post-WW2, a conservative initiative based on responsible economics. That's how fucked up the conservative party is right now.

Not one person on this board gives even the slightest fuck about cleetus on welfare. He can get fucked too right along with the darkies. Fix your life instead of begging for money

Jews aren't white

arent mexican people part spanish? Doesn't that make them European?

>rich get taxed heavily
>rich move their money off shore or move out of country completely
>$ amount to be considered "rich" decreases
>$100 million = rich
>$1 million = rich
>$100k = rich
>$20k = rich
>any amount of money is now heavily taxed
>everyone lives in poverty

BUT AT LEAST I CAN GO TO A SCHOOL OR GET HEALTH CARE FOR FREE
Doesn't matter if kids die before they are 20 due to crime and illnesses and never get that chance for free college or that you die waiting for a doctor that is overly worked and 1:1000 patients. Doesn't matter at all because the "RICH" are Taxed

Attached: 1495216828657.jpg (650x807, 113K)

Yeah you're right I should have said steal

>Doesn't that make them European?
no, it makes some of them part european and certainly not white.

THIS

Most black in the US are mixed with white, does that make them European? R u retarded

The 70% tax doesn’t even kick in until like 10 million+ or something, so anything below that is taxed at a significantly lower rate. It’s pretty standard social-democratic shit, FDR did the same and was elected 4 times. Scandinavia does the same except theirs kicks in as low as 1 million

Literally no reason why any non multi millionaire should give a fuck. Those poor investors and shareholders :(

dont white people make up like.. 75% of the US? if only 9 mill white people are on food stamps then thoes numbers are ridiculously small compared to the black statistic.

sage

Attached: 1sage.png (1156x2031, 290K)

It was 90 percent but deductions were even more retarded than now so it worked out to around 20 net

But blacks are 14% of the population and take 6.9M total. Meaning they are 1/7 of pop but take 1/2 of welfare total.

Hmmm I wonder why that is *rubs hands* definitely has nothing to do with them having a stake in multiple millions of dollars.

Reminder, if the establishment attacks Trump it’s because he’s based and scares them (despite being one of them). But when the establishment attacks AOC, it’s because she’s stupid and the establishment is good. Faggots

I was born into a super rich family. If this happened in Aus we would sell everything we own to an international conglomerate (who wouldn't pay taxes) and move to a different country.

On one hand she might have a point. But why does the government need that much money? On the other hand rich people and companies are leaving NY in droves. So you decide.

>trusting government to properly handle this much tax revenue

newfags should lurk more

so part european is bad? How can you draw the line. Is a mixed-race person who looks white okay? What about a white person who is very tan and looks hispanic?

Oh and for the last time White Celts invented dreads.

But this is income tax not corporate tax

>rich move their money off shore or move out of country completely
They are already doing this as much as they can, but at the end of the day they still rely on the USA economy to a significant extent. Ironically, you're getting played by the wealthy against your own interests.

absolutely based poster

leafs who do not agree are scum

Attached: 1546479409943.png (418x359, 13K)

Look up the effective tax rate they paid back in those days. You might be disappointed.

we need to remove all the gibs except for wic

So lets tax them.

The government doesn't identify them, they do when they have to check off a little list of what they are at the DMV

>We should tax the rich at 70%.
It's a successful white male tax. She wants to give niggers and illegals money. Working class whites won't see a single penny of the redistributed wealth.

The elites are content with shitting on whites in the media and airdropping opioids into our communities.

i think she should do it in order to completely fuck up the district and prove that socialism ruins everything

>so part european is bad?
Not really bad. You were just asking if they are european and I clarified that they are not.
>How can you draw the line.
whether they're european or not.
>Is a mixed-race person who looks white okay?
no
>What about a white person who is very tan and looks hispanic?
yes

hope this helped.

Literally the opposite of nationalism, patriotism etc you fucking parasitic cunt

The rich deserve to be dragged from their homes and fucking lynched

Why not 100% come on, stop voting against your own economic interests!!

Working class whites are already under a great strain.

This is not a new idea and only an idiot believes it would work, hence why it's AOC's policy. Poor people live hearing the politics of "hey, lets all get free shit by stealing rich cracka money!" The reason it doesn't work is because the rich will always find a way not to pay a dime. And if they can't find a way they'll dump US citizenship and fuck off to the next country that isn't trying to rob them blind.

Attached: 75%.jpg (642x702, 70K)

>Does she have a point with the 70% tax on the super rich?
No, because the super rich aren't making their money through wages that are subject to the income tax. Investment bankers, hedge fund and private equity bros, and the CEOs of major corporations, tend to declare most of their earnings as capital gains, carried interest, etc.

Raising the income tax just punishes honest owner-operators of mid sized businesses, the sort of people who are what keep capitalism working, while doing nothing to extract wealth from the sinister globalist financial sector.

Move to Venezuela or Cuba, there are no rich there.

>let’s not tax the rich bastards because they’ll scurry off to the next host to leech off of

And what if they have nowhere else to scurry huh? Boot licking cuck

it helps me see that you don't get laid, if that's what you mean

Do it and we can become like Africa. No one will have a job and no one will have any money to buy anything.

The real problem is that at any tax rate at all, the wealthy can pay gigajews to hide, lie, and deceive and pay less taxes. Muh job creation. Muh investment. Muh losses. It's a gigantic scam.

Apparently Americans liked it when they elected FDR four fucking times, and Republicans had to force a term limit because people realized social democratic economics works.

is my penis tiny too?

>Apparently it was 90% in the 50’s and it worked out well
Real numbers here for brainlets:
>1950
>average family income: $3,300
>average car cost: $1,510
>The median home price: $7,354
Now, look at more recent time:
>2014
>average family income: $51,017
>average car cost: $31,252
>median home price: $188,900
home is now 3.7x yearly income, a dramatic increase. In the 1950's you could pay for a college education in cash, try that nowadays. No one came close to paying a 90% tax rate back then, it's a meme.

Attached: questioned.jpg (210x230, 7K)

Nope, this shit won't work and besides you got to be an idiot for supporting more government control over your lives.

Fucking faggots.

>just bend over and let him rape you
>he’ll be satisfied for a little while and you can go on with your day before he gets horny again

Fucking fat fuck Betty isn't an accomplishment, cleetus. Like I said earlier, fix your life, and you will have actual accomplishments to talk about.

Attached: (m=e-yaaGqaa)(mh=JaVrlP2LobnIu4Lz)original_34741052.jpg (575x864, 156K)

I'm a successful person because I have knowledge. You have obviously felt raped. Maybe it's your attitude.

The point is to promise free shit to get votes.

The reality is the rich, the business, the talent, the jobs will leave the country with policies like that. If you think life is bad with the rich, just try it without them.

Trump doesn't respond to her comments and all she has done is divide the Democratic party.

Are we sure she isn't control op?

Not really, the point is to redistribute the wealth from white business owners who make millions and millions monthly to the tax systems they use along with people who make shit and can't attribute as much. Its a decent way of making socialism work on a national level. Don't worry about it being a feed the nigger scheme, they are are well payed for before this question comes up

This of course doesn't apply to any 56% or less countries rendering my entire argument invalid. But still though

but they do shitforbrains, and all your commie policy is going to do is make your country more poor.

This

All in the name of social justice and "Equality"

Attached: economics.jpg (621x204, 38K)

I have no idea. Most of these ideas come from your own sense of frustration and insecurity rather than any material flaw

>but what if
Why can't poor people make any kind of argument that exists in this reality? We aren't living in star wars or Harry Potter you fucking leech.

We were also like 90% white in the 50s too.

Just saying.

No one paid it in the 50s~
Why do you think le swiss bank account meme became a thing?

It’s literally socdem economics retard. Nothing radical or “commie” about it

Why would we give ignorant people more money to waste? It doesn't make sense. They already have all they need. If I create something and then you take it I will have no more motivation at that point to create anymore.

so if rich people are so scared of giving up money they don't need to help their countrymen, why should I want them in the country at all? What do they actually do that can't be replaced?

Eat shit, Nanzi

>no motivation
Because you’re a selfish, individualist, anti-nationalist piece of trash. You should be advocating for borderless, stateless society with this attitude

If the democrats really wanted to tax the fuck out of the super rich, then why are the super rich all democrats?

Hmmmm....

t. Retard Who Doesn't Realize Rich Don't Pay Taxes

You shouldn’t. They’re literal parasites. You have more in common with the steel worker down the road than some suit living in a gated community. But Jow Forums will defend the latter to the fucking death like good little cucks

Yes you are right. I should live a shitty life because other people are ignorant. I should give up most of what I work for. That makes me a slave. Fuck that. I'd rather die.

1. Nobody actually paid that rate. Writers and tax loopholes weren't something that came about during the Reagan years.
2. The federal government was like 1/5 the size in the 50s it is now.

The absolute state of white trash. Every time I read about an accidental opioid overdose, I'll be thinking of you.