Why is inheritance allowed?

It clearly stops social darwinism

Feeds a lot of useless people by unfairly giving money to them

Keeps (((mega capitalists))) in dinastic power forever

Makes capitalism look like a stupid system where there is no merit at all

So to sum up it is a form of tribal communism where you spoil your descendant with easy money because muh fee fees and stop human evolution

Attached: 1312312313.jpg (728x546, 19K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/16i1WNmXn5Y?t=26
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Fuck
I never thought about this but makes sense!

Okay let’s say the state collects everything a person owns upon death.
Rich and middle class people deposit into bank accounts what would have been inherited while they’re still alive.
Poor blacks are thrown out on the street when mama’s house gets repossessed.

Actually I really like this OP, let’s do it!

>he doesn’t know how IDs work

Because inheritances are an extension of private property rights of the deceased. That is, the right to do with their capital whatsoever they please.

Ahahaha go back to whatever shit hole website you came from and tell your handlers your shill thread didn't work.

>samefagging
gas yourself newfaggot
>in all fields

This is your mind on communism.
Not even once.

why cant it just be progressively taxed like everything else?

if you have an average house you can give it to your kids, but if you have a big ass motherfucking mansion it gets sold and your kids can still buy a regular house

would make a much better society if you think about it

nigger if your going to post how about not glowing and learn how the id works that way next time you don't look like a glow in the dark nigger retard that responds to their own post.

Attached: CIAniggers.jpg (866x1280, 107K)

get out you reddit spacing nigger

Attached: backyougo1.png (717x880, 853K)

nice

People work hard to pass on wealth to their kids. Are you retarded

Because you cant srop it
Hippie faggits
Sage and hide

they are stupid or it is just an excuse for having greedy behavior
>I work for muh sons so they don't have to work ever, capitalism fuck yeah, merit!!! fuck jews

youtu.be/16i1WNmXn5Y?t=26

Nice reasoning skills, retard
Sorry your parents didnt give a shit about you.

It is allowed because I can do whatever I want with my stuff. I can give it all away today, next week, next month, next year, or when I am on my deathbed. A necessary part of banning inheritance is that it also bans what I may do with my property BEFORE death. How high was that building from which you were dropped on your head?

nice non argument retard
be glad for being a societal leak that lives of someone else's work

Hey hey rabbi whatcha doing?

You mean by eliminating all rights of inheritance? Sage this shit.

If it wasn’t for it, I would be in an even bigger mess than I am now.

because it's normal to want to give your children advantages and it's your private property to do with as you please.

What's the fucking point of doing anything if you can't leave your kids cool shit

You're not retiring on an inheritance.

Based and redpilled

>he says as he tries to justify why he should get other peoples money.

>Those pitytrips

Attached: samefag-shills-72.png (1355x308, 42K)

I dont think you're really in a position to be throwing the word retard around after that samefagging you did at the start

OP, your view of sociaI darwinism seems to onIy account for r-seIected peopIe. PeopIe who do get-rich-quick schemes. Not k-seIected peopIe. PeopIe who do keep-creating-weaIth-for-severaI-generations schemes.

Which one is more beneficiaI to society?

>muh private property
nothing is yours retard
you owe society everything and your bank account should be confiscated after your death

He doesn't know how reality works.
IDs are unreachable to these people

no, its for k-selected people, r-selected people would be in bottom pyramid since they actually work less and are not entitled to anything

Dear OP. you can do whatever the fuck you want with YOUR property, you can give it to your children (commendable if they were properly raised) or you can start a foundation for charity
What other people do with THEIR PROPERTY its NOT YOUR FUCKING THING TO DECIDE.
you're a thief, the solution for you is lead-based.

This is already a thing in germany. The result was that the "honest" middle-class citizen that has attained some wealth in his time and wants to pass it on to his children gets screwed over big time (has to pay taxes twice on his income). Meanwhile people that are willing to play the system get to pass on their wealth via lots of tax exemptions (just hire competent tax lawyers and start "gifting" your wealth while you are still alive).

To give you an example: Imagine your father has built a small company and suddenly dies in an accident. The state then appraises the company at a theoretical value of 250k, while the actual value is less than half of that. You now have to pay 20% of that theoretical value as inheritance tax from the coffers of a company that probably can't even provide the owner with an above average salary and has practically zero financial reserves. Thus the only way to get your inheritance is to sell off the company massively under value and then give a big cut of that money to the state. The result is a minor tax income that cannot even compensate for the loss of income tax and VAT due to the company ceasing to exist and all staff now being laid off and likely getting welfare (at least for a time).

it's not your money.

he doesn't have kids. he doesn't know
this leftists are dangerous.
God bless the 2A

Successful people work harder and save in order to provide for next generation. Delayed consumption and saving are the only way to create value outside debt bullshit.

Because I'm allowed to decide who gets my stuff.

"confiscated" by whom?
are you coming to get my property?
be prepared

This
>Muh merit
Is a fallacy when wealth gives you a million miles head start
In b4
>Muh taxed twice even after death hurr durr hurr

Because inheritance serves as another incentive for people to produce. If I can't leave resources/property for my children or whoever, then why accumulate it in the first place? Why not give in to my impulses and live a degenerate hedonistic life? Fuck you commie fag.

Attached: alpha.png (837x901, 1.41M)

checked and based
KEK approves
when will you take control of your own country?

Attached: fucking checkem.jpg (300x221, 17K)

There's some of this in the US also. the trick is to start giving it away as smaller gifts before you die. There's an upper limit of something like (I believe) 20k/year allowed as non-taxable gifts to spouses and children.

What a faggot country. Just another sign of your decline. Fuck you guys. Hurry up and die off already, Germany. I'm embarrassed for you.

Attached: Itsallsotiresome.gif (500x500, 1.65M)

Sorry, just to add: 20k/year per family member.

Because people should be allowed to do what they want with their money which includes giving it to lazy undeserving assholes. It’s their money and their choice.

Worst shill ever.

Attached: c11.png (847x633, 601K)

I think that ending all trusts and foundation money would make sense.

You're stupid.

>Why is inheritance allowed?
Because people don't really work for themselves?
They work for their children. Hell I have millions.
But I live a middle class lifestyle.
Because I want to leave them a future when I'm gone. That's the whole reason I work.
That's the whole reason men build anything. For the future.
Real men I mean. Unlike the Jew OP.

Tekashi is a tranny after jail now and removed tats

Attached: Screenshot_20190109-145028~2.png (566x430, 241K)

inheritance stops people from working


why work hard when the other guy is just getting huge amount of free cash?

why work when you just got huge amounts of free cash?

why work for a business that is part owned by a trust fund kid thereby allowing him to keep fucking hookers

Are you a retard? Not everybody is rich because they are selfish sociopaths - some built their wealth over generations so their families could live happy and secure lives.

We do. Inheritance tax kicks in at about 5 million.

Wouldn’t the redistribution of said wealth creat nog leaches instead? Fag.

if You can't give stuff to your next generation, why have stuff at all? I would just burn everything

>Why work hard when the other guy is just getting huge amount of free cash?
Because maybe if you work hard enough yourself, you'll be in a position to leave a huge amount of cash for someone else.

>Why work when you just got huge amounts of free cash?
This only happens to a very small percentage of people. Most people inherit a modest amount of cash or property which they have to invest or lose.

>Why work for a business that is part owned by a trust fund kid thereby allowing him to keep fucking hookers?
You don't have to. In a free market you can work for whoever you want.

BTFO KYS

Attached: 1541349857178.jpg (900x593, 46K)

>why work hard when the other guy is just getting huge amount of free cash?
given by whom?
>why work when you just got huge amounts of free cash?
correct
>why work for a business that is part owned by a trust fund kid thereby allowing him to keep fucking hookers
Don't. Start your own. Get another job.

>Property rights bad
Sounds like communism to me.

There is literally nothing in the world more important than my own children. I would rather burn all my wealth than allow the state to take if from my family.

Based and redpilled

I would rather let my money rot into oblivion than allow the government to take everything I've worked for

>if You can't give stuff to your next generation, why have stuff at all? I would just burn everything
Me too.
Anything is better than giving the money to the state.
Heck, I would donate it to Putin out of spite if I can't find a way to pass it on to my kids.

if you redistribute wealth then people will go from amassing wealth for a few children to amassing children for redistributed wealth

you'd be encouraging the worst kinds of subhumans to do nothing but create more subhumans

I salute you sir. You have your priorities in order. BASED AND RED PILLED.

Attached: beararms.jpg (619x1024, 118K)

It is not only allowed by my Christian faith...but it is encouraged.

Paris Hilton is surely more successful than Tesla then lol

>I want free money therefore merit doesn't exist
yes it exists idiot
did you ever watch any sport?

why not contribute with your society rather than a few people?

>It clearly stops social darwinism
No it doesn't. It's an important step in social darwinism because if you're unable to amass wealth to help your children, they are put at a disadvantage. A person who leaves their children with nothing is a less fit parent than a non-boomer
>Feeds a lot of useless people by unfairly giving money to them
Life is not fair
>Keeps (((mega capitalists))) in dinastic power forever
No, insider trading, currency manipulation, and private sector collusion with government does that
>Makes capitalism look like a stupid system where there is no merit at all
No idea where you got this, but it makes capitalism look like an excellent system where if you work hard enough, when you die you can die comfortably knowing you've set your children up for a good life.
>So to sum up it is a form of tribal communism where you spoil your descendant with easy money because muh fee fees and stop human evolution
Human evolution still continues on, and in fact the inverse of what you're saying is happening: poor people have eight children because they're supported by gibs from the government, while white collar whites have one child at 45 because they've stressed themselves to hell about setting up the perfect life for your child. Kill entitlement programs and eliminate death and inheritance taxes and you'll start to see the people who SHOULD be procreating procreating in numbers you'd expect.

Why is it always people who don't have children writing policy for those who do? Gavin McInnes was right - only people with two or more children should be allowed to hold office.

then you are a literal cancer
cancer are individualistic cells that don't care about the whole body, guess what, you always die in the end

Because human beings are inherently selfish and tribal, and there is very little anyone or anything can do to incentivise us to behave productively other than self interest. There is also no reason to believe that the state would be able to contribute to society in a more efficient manner than free enterprise.

Attached: 1540391266511.jpg (614x767, 57K)

>spoiling your children in an important step in social darwinism
why are you afraid of equal starting conditions?

> only people with two or more children should be allowed to hold office.

and property owners

Because we've been forced to accept people who don't have similar values, genes, and ethics into our society. There is no incentive to contribute to society when it's been subverted, and people notice.
Let's put it this way:
When you walk through your house and see trash lying on the floor, I bet you pick it up and throw it away, regardless of whether or not you left it there because you want to live in a nice place and assume your sister, son, father, or spouse would do the same if they saw trash lying there.
Now, say you were forced to move to Baltimore right off of MLK drive: I bet you wouldn't pick up the mountains of trash lying on the streets because there'd just be more lying there tomorrow because no one you share the community with gives a shit about it, just themselves.

don't worry, you can't inherit anything.

Attached: 2q1x9h2.gif (420x330, 95K)

>It clearly stops social darwinism

You think planning for your future generations is bad?

The entirety of human civilization is built on inheritance you brainlet incel.

Attached: gV7Rn2QRh.jpg (2000x1333, 774K)

It doesn't stop social darwinism as long as the children are biological children and not adopted ones, darwinism is about genes, not individuals

I have to agree with you, civilizations will go in infinite cycles of rise and fall until AI takes over and makes the correct societal rules

then why are you afraid of letting your superior offspring to compete in equal conditions?

Because equal starting positions are impossible. Some people are born stupid, some smart, some tall, some short.
Wasting money on someone born to do nothing more than consume is an insane policy.
Do you have your child's legs surgically shortened because you're afraid their height advantage might cause inequity?

By your argument, people shouldn't be allowed to live anywhere with a different climate or topography, as that would give them an unfair advantage over people living in places like New Orleans or Detroit

$14K per year to anybody, family or not, with no tax implications. Also subject to a lifetime giving rule. Simple rule of thumb is no need to file anything as long as each gift is under that threshold.

Same as for estates, as long as the estate was under $11.4MM (as of 2019). That exclusion has doubled since the Trump admin (thanks!).

Holy shit I'm with her now thanks

They're not correct if they go against human nature

thats biological equality not societal
everyone just need to get the same amount of money, housing and education in the start of the race, nothing wrong with that, inferior peple will still be inferior but won't have unfairly advantages like they have in capitalism

I wouldn't be afraid, I would just feel less incentived to completely fullfill my potential and to spare money, and it would hurt competition and social darwinism

>everyone just need to get the same amount of money, housing and education in the start of the race
Why? This has never been true throughout the entirety of human history. Are you advocating just taking children away from their parents to raise them in camps? Because that is the only way to ensure equity of education, housing and money. That's the only way to prevent parents from passing down nuggets of esoteric wisdom that make their offspring more fit, feeding them out of their own rations, giving them materiel resource, and helping them with work.
The only way to accomplish the sort of equity you're describing is to wholesale separate children from their parents to raise them in a camp.

And anything over that is seen by the government as giving it's rightfully deserved inheritance away. There should be no limits. As long as someone earned the money, and paid income tax, he should be able to give it away to whomever he likes, at any time he likes. It is none of the government's business.

>work really hard to try and give your children an advantage in life
>nope, that's not allowed!
>no reason to ever work hard
yea, brilliant. fucking communists are retards.

good point
I guess it will not be unfair since the state would properly teach the kid to be successful
or people can just be born from artificial wombs and have no parents

You'd never be able to enforce it. I could just as easily liquidate all assets, including my home, and clean out all my accounts, and leave a giant stockpile of cash behind for my children. I could also gift them things that they wanted and they could just say they bought it themselves.

You act like people don't work around this idea to avoid inheritance tax.

work to achieve the most society progress

Which is what scumbags like you should do, instead of demanding that other people be robbed to support you.

Inheritance should be outlawed
>Feeds a lot of useless people by unfairly giving money to them
We should give it to the gubmint instead!
You really aren't even listening to yourself are you?

>It clearly stops social darwinism
No it doesn't. Wealth only stays with a family for 3 generations usually. Unless its a monarch.

You’re obviously a professional student or 15 years old... the only dynasty that exists are corrupt political ones. 99% of the time when a younger generation takes over a business, it’s either sold or it dies

no, you want progress only to your selected few, this creates conflict and not progress

Oh wait, you're just a dumbass.

Attached: ejY1vi3.png (752x495, 135K)

Because the entire point of building wealth through hard work is to leave something for your kids so they have a better life.