Was Tucker “cuck” Carlson saying “capitalism = bad” all it took for you commies to come out of the closet?

Was Tucker “cuck” Carlson saying “capitalism = bad” all it took for you commies to come out of the closet?

When you tards moan about how bad it is yet you act like private ownership and being allowed to make your own decisions on your own property is the worst thing in the world.

Care to clairfy? Where you all always communists, or is having one guy say something enough to program you?

Attached: AB80DC69-6DB8-4C17-AFEA-66F3E6A83069.jpg (800x420, 142K)

Attached: 1519589857045.jpg (900x1024, 245K)

>if you aren’t an autistic libertarian then you’re a jewloving commie

it's "capitalism == bad"

(checked)
This.

>Carlson saying “capitalism = bad”
This did not happen. You're a hyperbolic retard.

why is 'capitalism' so important ?

Stop troll-shilling Ancapitalism you fucking divisive cunt

Nah. I just noticed the number of anti-capitalism threads on Jow Forums increased by a factor of 10 after carlson did that paticular broadcast. Most likely it is Jow Forums that is hyperbole.

Not exactly. But giving up capitalsim, (private ownership) is essentially surrendering all of your freedoms. Which leads to totalitarian states like the USSR and PRC.

Capitalism is a creation of Marx, no different than Communism. I do not care for capitalism if it means my countrymen suffer so some kike can become rich via usury.

I am not shilling for Anarcho Capitalism, or even laissez faire capitalsim. I am shilling only for the right of private property.

Fundamentally capitalsim can exist in even fascist systems, so long as people are allowed to own property.

Marx coined the term “capitalism” but he didn’t invent it.

Attached: E941A841-CB4C-4865-A73C-07A7FF7BCCE1.jpg (288x216, 18K)

we definitaly want to fight for some individual freedom in the face of collectovive insanity, but open borders is really way out there

private property
I wear cloathes, I have a toothbrush

vs I'm sitting on this water well

communism, which has no link to bernie or occasio, wonders, who the fuck are you to own this river spring ?

>2019
>still cares about theoretical models of economics

Sage. Lying sack of shit he never said that.

National socialism is clearly the only answer. Capitalism is for cucks who only care about money, communism is for cucks who hate their own people.

National socialism allows for private ownership in the economy, provided that you only ever act in a way that benefits your country or people.

you guys want me to Augustus Kennedy this whole joint?

You are right. I concur.

>Capitalism is better than race and nation and family
I don't care about $200 televisions, Ben.

Anything can be considered as useful as a water well depending on the circumstances.

Your missing the bigger picture. Your necessities like a tooth brush at a first glance seem to have little value. But given innovation and creativity can be used to make anything into a buisness.

Your body, your car, your house, a garden, a garage shop, a pc, home appliances all have the potential to be used in a service on way or another. But what if you want to refund your toothbrush for any reason? You want your money back, so you sell it. It may not have much value for wealth generation, but it still has value. Or lets say it is a special collectors toothbrush and it becomes desired over time and you sell it off to someone who wants it more than you.

This in essence is what makes private property important.

we all know the next question, don't we ?

Are you trying to argue with me or your self?

how the fuck am I going to steal his living on a random resource

whilest pretending I'm all about indidual stuff

so you

Well “satan” I don’t know. Seems like you missunderstand what capitalism is I guess. The point of it is private ownership and making choices by your self. not to exploit some random proletariat who can’t use his head for anything.

>Most likely it is Jow Forums that is hyperbole.
Hey new faggot. First day jitters huh.
You never take pole seriously.

You shills are seething.
Tucker is right.

Attached: 1547809060402.jpg (480x669, 36K)

>National socialism is clearly the only answer. Capitalism is for cucks who only care about money, communism is for cucks who hate their own people.
Based but people confuse Marxism socialism with national socialism.

I like ron paul though

Attached: 1546990101303.png (504x864, 619K)

>commies to come out of the closet?
Look here, another commie!

Attached: uk boric uncucking.png (1024x576, 662K)

so long as its limited to his private property through concent.

What do you agree with him on then?

fuck you mods

fuck niggers

fuck gays

Libertarianism has always been a useless meme ideology

fuck womenz

Are you okay dude?

fuck off

AHEM
FUCK JANNIES

Its not that Capitalism is bad its that the Free Market shit is bad.Adam Smith "invisible hand" "little government intervention" cant be applied today as people have no principles/scruples anymore.

Whats the difference between Big Coprorations owning the media and shaping preferences compared to the Government doing so?

enjoy living in your know it all dream world, bopplll

Dude, did I trigger you or something?

Well the biggest difference is that companies don’t have an army of millions of people and millions more tax payers to back them up.

In our current state of things either directly or indirectly our media, banks, and IT companies are involved in government either directly such as being explicitly nationalized like CCTV and BBC or subvertly interviened like CNN, Google, and FOX. I wouldn’t use the current world as an example of what libertarians or ancaps want.

>provided you act in a way that benefits your country or people

And herein lies the paradox of authoritarianism.

As a matter of fact, The invisible hand of the market allows for people acting in their own interest to benefit the general interest. Name me a great human achievement, and I'll name you a specific group of people whose selfish interest it was in to carry out said achievement. In contrast, when people act for the general interest, there is another invisible hand that benefits private, elite interest.

The reason behind this paradox is that the "general will/interest" is a weasel word- will/interests are a property of individuals, families, and tiny dedicated social groups, but not society as a whole.