Was Tucker “cuck” Carlson saying “capitalism = bad” all it took for you commies to come out of the closet?
When you tards moan about how bad it is yet you act like private ownership and being allowed to make your own decisions on your own property is the worst thing in the world.
Care to clairfy? Where you all always communists, or is having one guy say something enough to program you?
>if you aren’t an autistic libertarian then you’re a jewloving commie
Anthony Rodriguez
it's "capitalism == bad"
Eli Walker
(checked) This.
David Perry
>Carlson saying “capitalism = bad” This did not happen. You're a hyperbolic retard.
Connor Long
why is 'capitalism' so important ?
Charles Brown
Stop troll-shilling Ancapitalism you fucking divisive cunt
Brayden Watson
Nah. I just noticed the number of anti-capitalism threads on Jow Forums increased by a factor of 10 after carlson did that paticular broadcast. Most likely it is Jow Forums that is hyperbole.
Not exactly. But giving up capitalsim, (private ownership) is essentially surrendering all of your freedoms. Which leads to totalitarian states like the USSR and PRC.
Leo Harris
Capitalism is a creation of Marx, no different than Communism. I do not care for capitalism if it means my countrymen suffer so some kike can become rich via usury.
Nolan Bennett
I am not shilling for Anarcho Capitalism, or even laissez faire capitalsim. I am shilling only for the right of private property.
Fundamentally capitalsim can exist in even fascist systems, so long as people are allowed to own property.
Marx coined the term “capitalism” but he didn’t invent it.
we definitaly want to fight for some individual freedom in the face of collectovive insanity, but open borders is really way out there
John Richardson
private property I wear cloathes, I have a toothbrush
Colton Foster
vs I'm sitting on this water well
Ian Martinez
communism, which has no link to bernie or occasio, wonders, who the fuck are you to own this river spring ?
Adam Martin
>2019 >still cares about theoretical models of economics
Cooper Russell
Sage. Lying sack of shit he never said that.
Ethan Howard
National socialism is clearly the only answer. Capitalism is for cucks who only care about money, communism is for cucks who hate their own people.
National socialism allows for private ownership in the economy, provided that you only ever act in a way that benefits your country or people.
Brayden Williams
you guys want me to Augustus Kennedy this whole joint?
Liam Thompson
You are right. I concur.
Cameron Gonzalez
>Capitalism is better than race and nation and family I don't care about $200 televisions, Ben.
Benjamin Jackson
Anything can be considered as useful as a water well depending on the circumstances.
Your missing the bigger picture. Your necessities like a tooth brush at a first glance seem to have little value. But given innovation and creativity can be used to make anything into a buisness.
Your body, your car, your house, a garden, a garage shop, a pc, home appliances all have the potential to be used in a service on way or another. But what if you want to refund your toothbrush for any reason? You want your money back, so you sell it. It may not have much value for wealth generation, but it still has value. Or lets say it is a special collectors toothbrush and it becomes desired over time and you sell it off to someone who wants it more than you.
This in essence is what makes private property important.
Noah Wilson
we all know the next question, don't we ?
Easton Lee
Are you trying to argue with me or your self?
Brayden James
how the fuck am I going to steal his living on a random resource
Angel Morris
whilest pretending I'm all about indidual stuff
Jacob Barnes
so you
Jeremiah Clark
Well “satan” I don’t know. Seems like you missunderstand what capitalism is I guess. The point of it is private ownership and making choices by your self. not to exploit some random proletariat who can’t use his head for anything.
Sebastian Collins
>Most likely it is Jow Forums that is hyperbole. Hey new faggot. First day jitters huh. You never take pole seriously.
>National socialism is clearly the only answer. Capitalism is for cucks who only care about money, communism is for cucks who hate their own people. Based but people confuse Marxism socialism with national socialism.
so long as its limited to his private property through concent.
Austin Adams
What do you agree with him on then?
Hudson Turner
fuck you mods
Juan Nguyen
fuck niggers
Ryder Rivera
fuck gays
Leo Bell
Libertarianism has always been a useless meme ideology
Juan Mitchell
fuck womenz
Andrew Hall
Are you okay dude?
Kayden Gonzalez
fuck off
Joseph Fisher
AHEM FUCK JANNIES
Wyatt Ramirez
Its not that Capitalism is bad its that the Free Market shit is bad.Adam Smith "invisible hand" "little government intervention" cant be applied today as people have no principles/scruples anymore.
Whats the difference between Big Coprorations owning the media and shaping preferences compared to the Government doing so?
Gabriel Jenkins
enjoy living in your know it all dream world, bopplll
Bentley Martinez
Dude, did I trigger you or something?
Well the biggest difference is that companies don’t have an army of millions of people and millions more tax payers to back them up.
In our current state of things either directly or indirectly our media, banks, and IT companies are involved in government either directly such as being explicitly nationalized like CCTV and BBC or subvertly interviened like CNN, Google, and FOX. I wouldn’t use the current world as an example of what libertarians or ancaps want.
Jackson Rivera
>provided you act in a way that benefits your country or people
And herein lies the paradox of authoritarianism.
As a matter of fact, The invisible hand of the market allows for people acting in their own interest to benefit the general interest. Name me a great human achievement, and I'll name you a specific group of people whose selfish interest it was in to carry out said achievement. In contrast, when people act for the general interest, there is another invisible hand that benefits private, elite interest.
The reason behind this paradox is that the "general will/interest" is a weasel word- will/interests are a property of individuals, families, and tiny dedicated social groups, but not society as a whole.