>I am wondering if anyone can give me hard evidence, not bullshit conspiracies that Trump is innocent >This is on the onset of the Buzzfeed article claiming Trump told Cohen to lie for him.
I mean, I am kind of a Trump guy myself, I truly thought this Russia thing was a hoax, and I know the FISA court and the Steele Dossier is bullshit, I am aware of the DNC hacking and Seth rich, but I mean how can you explain the people in his campaign with ties to Russia, the Trump tower moscow deal, his lies that implicate himself(I gave him the benefit of the doubt because sometimes he's incoherent and does slip, plus he's a busy man), anyhow, explain the Russian laundering, or the NRA- Russia connection.
Trump dares Russia to hack Hillary's emails and shortly after they were hacked. I just want to believe this is some conspiracy against Trump by delusional leftists, but it's becoming more apparent that Trump is possibly at the behest of Russia.
>please prove to me that a man who will be going to prison for lying, isn’t still lying. Did you eat a bunch of lead paint chips as a child? Show me one single poll that trump was ahead on.
Brayden Walker
You prove he did anything faggot. Like the legal system tells you.
Nicholas Green
Kek I thought I saw the other day that people close to Mueller believed the evidence gathered is very anti climactic and not what they were hoping for Also didn't buzzfeed run the peice on yellow showers which they had to back track on hard because it was a memè Anywho, this shit happens every week with no follow ups "THE DAMNING EVIDENCE THAT PROVES TRUMP DID X"
Josiah Clark
I don't believe Cohen and I know for a fact the polls were in Hillary's favor so I have a hard time believing he directed him to help him polls when he was out campaigning(which was how he beat Hillary).
Jayden Cook
you're the faggot for religiously defending him, but I don't believe the Russia bullshit, I made bets with my friends and don't want to make an ass of myself to them.
Chase Miller
Quiet faggot
Carter Stewart
The burden of proof is on those who aim to prove guilt. One is legally innocent until proven guilty.
Pretty sure Buzzfeed said they have no sources to substantiate their claims, which means it's pure opinion and speculation, misleadingly presented as fact by the MSM.
Leo Wood
Collusion isn't a crime and literally no one ever thought to use that word or ever heard it their life until 2 years ago.
Adrian Ramirez
Yeah, I agree, I know the guy who did the report has lied many times, said he hasn't read the evidence and it's an anonymous report by two federal investigators, so it could just be heresay, but if it's true, he's pretty much fucked.
Eli Hughes
I know Collusion isn't a crime and I think it's quite xenophobic of the left to put this negative label on Russians, it's just if it is true, and if he were to testify under threat of perjury he would be fucked, I know the Mueller report won't bring shit, and god knows if someone is planting fake evidence on Trump.
Julian Sullivan
Are you not aware of how the presumption of innocence works? The burden of proof is on the accuser. And it's not based on some bureaucratic horseshit, but on a fundamental rule of basic principle and logic that nobody should have to prove their innocence before a determination of guilt is made. Otherwise, how can anyone prove they're innocent of anything they're accused of? How do you prove something didn't happen when the accuser doesn't have to provide any evidence?
David Murphy
Ok user. Sounds like you have everything wrapped up. We know the reporter was fired for lying. We know Cohen is going to jail for lying. So, no issues.
Elijah Moore
Exonerate him of what?
Charles Sanchez
I agree, I think that it's a bunch of bullshit, but if and IF is a big IF they are telling the truth it's bad, but knowing Buzzfeed and the reporter, it's probably just heresay.
Joshua Collins
I mean because the media and my left wing peers automatically assumes he's guilty so using their bullshit narrative I would like to exonerate him because in their eyes he's already guilty.
How may I convince them he's innocent?
Adam Torres
Oh yeah, Cohen is a liar so I don't trust him.
Hudson Brown
>give me facts that exonerate Trump.
That's not the way it works, you larping faggot. YOU prove to us that he Trump is "at the behest of Russia"
Jaxson Harris
Only a faggot would defend another man so vehemently, look, I am just saying it looks keyword is looks like it's a possibility, I do not buy the Russia narrative however.
Jayden Morales
I'm just going to tell you to fuck off, you aren't worth my time.
Jaxson Thomas
see me in my office after your shift
Cameron Russell
Feeling is mutual.
Brandon Johnson
Okay, daddy.
Cameron Brooks
You can't exonerate anyone to people that do not believe in presumption of innocence. You can't argue with people that don't abide by a basic, and elementary point of logic. Their bias is too strong. It's a waste of time and energy. Your peers are the liberal equivalent of 16th century puritans hunting witches.
Joshua Fisher
Right but what exactly is he guilty of, that's what I'm asking you.
Samuel Hill
Innocent until proven guilty
Joseph Davis
>if it's true he's fucked
Trump is literally God.
I'm an anonymous source, I have proof but you can't see it. My statement is literally just as valid as Buzzfeed's so it better be reported as 'possibly true' by the media and 'seem plausible' by people like OP as well.
If it isn't, if it is dismissed as rubbish, then why is the other claim supported when it is no more credible than mine?
Grayson Hill
What do you want? If you cant understand law then get the fuck out of here kid.
Thomas Bell
>he thinks a mongolian finger-painting picture board is the rule of law
Luke Gray
Kill yourself shareblue
Isaac Martin
I don't think he's guilty of anything right now, but if he's ever subpoenaed, he would go to prison under penalty of perjury because he can't keep his mouth shut, right?
Jaxon Perry
>I am kind of a Trump guy myself
Charles Jones
Cohen=jew=liar
Charles Baker
If what were "true"? Collusion literally has no LEGAL definition and there fore cant be "proven" with any amount of any kind of "evidence". Do you understand that? Why do you think they chose that word to use, and not "conspiracy". Conspiracy carries a legal definition.
Anthony Nguyen
The burden of proof rests on the accuser, not the defender. Prove he is guilty.
Jace Martinez
>This website that has been proven to be bullshit before is saying they have evidence of a flying spaghetti monster that lives in the clouds. >They say this with a high level of confidence. >I mean, how else can you explain the existence of clouds, the existence of spaghetti, or the fact that when you throw spaghetti in the air or drop it from an aircraft it can be in the sky? >Can anyone prove to me that there is no spaghetti monster residing in the clouds? >Please cite airtight unbiased sources even though the article that sounded my alarm bells did not
If this Buzzfeed article is true, why were numerous reporters (including ABC's Johnathan Karl) saying a mere few days ago that the Mueller report was going to be a big nothingburger? How did Buzzfeed get the jump on this story and not ABC fucking news?
Anthony Fisher
>Trump dares Russia to hack Hillary's emails and shortly after they were hacked.
Do you often remember things in reverse?
Charles Jones
You're a pedophile, prove you're not.
Cameron Sanchez
Tfw your thread sucks so hard you have to bump it yourself.
You can't be "exonerated" from fake claims because there's nothing to be exonerated from, you fucking retard. The (((BuzzFeed))) lies are already unraveling, oh how the salt will soon flow freely once again from leftist retards.
Trump did not invite Russia to hack e-mails, idiot. Early in 2016, it was widely speculated that Russia had stolen the e-mails. When Trump, at the debate, said ask Russia where the e-mails were - it was 6 months after the speculation that Russia had stolen the e-mails, and a year after Hillary's server had been wiped clean "with a cloth". Stop flashing your low IQ, you are making yourself look bad.
Camden Perry
Trump and his people were first to use the word collusion and say it was "not a crime". First it was "no communication with Russians", but then there was, so they had to go with "no collusion". And saying both "no collusion" and "collusion is not a crime" at the same time makes you look like a criminal colluder.
Brody Robinson
Leaked by two federal prosecutors sworn to secrecy? Due to the leak, even if it WAS true, the evidence is now inadmissible. And surely, federal prosecutors would know this.
Hey guys OP is a pedo says so which means this pedo has to prove he isn't as per his rules.
Juan Thompson
It doesn't matter. The whole damage has been done as was aimed. It was designed to give ammunition to Dems so they could screech impeach orange man. No one will every mention the retraction except for Trump. Honestly, even if we can't have libel laws, there do need to be severe compensation for retractions.
Jack Cox
there's absolutely 0 evidence that trump did anything illegal or wrong and if there was we would hear about it, all we see is left wing media post fakenews about "leaks" or "bombshell" bullshit that hasn't been verified, why do you think the democrats haven't signed for a wall? it's not because trump did anything illegal, its because they're blinded by there own affection for interference on matters that should be behind closed doors.
national security weapons programs meetings etc
these are things that shant be shared with anyone, especially not your enemies.
so why do all these news media feel like they're entitled to hear or listen in on private meetings between President trump and anyone else?
the news media is owned mostly by rupert murdoch and jewish legacy members, they're the ones manipulating everything.
if you view the news from the whitehouse directly it isn't bad because it doesn't have a spin on it and you can hold them accountable.
now would you kindly fuck off please?
Jordan Gomez
There is no damage, the Dems have been screeching since day 1 and will probably continue until they are all proven to be corrupt faggots.
Meuller issued a statement saying that that report was "not accurate".
Turned out Buzzfeed was fake news... yet again.
Asher Green
>It was designed to give ammunition to Dems so they could screech impeach orange man.
Because this is the first time they've called to impeach Trump? Trump should tweet about it, it will get even more attention because of TDS
Evan Rivera
Mueller's office just denied the Buzzfeed report.
Elijah Carter
The damage is "the appearance of legitimacy." Impeachment isn't a process of legality, it's a political process. The whole purpose is to give "impeachment" and stupid investigations a "reason" for existing for the dumb sheep. Most Americans don't actually look into shit so all they see is "orange man did bad stuff, orange man impeach." And they think "orange man did bad stuff? Impeach" because they don't really care and it's been legitimized.
James Ortiz
>I mean I am kind of a Trump guy myself. Are the shekels worth it OP. Or do you just like sucking David Brock's cock.
Liam Thompson
I am the OP, and holy shit, the left wingers that support Buzzfeed are trying to spin this hard saying that "not accurate doesn't mean it's not true".
yeah well, the point is the media is trying to gleam into the periods between statements from the whitehouse, in essence filling in the blank periods of no coverage with fake news opinion pieces of interpretations of what was said, you can literly go and watch everything live from the whitehouse instead of having it filtered by jewish conglomerate media powerhouse celebrities...
i was once considering the American dream but no longer do i consider it a viable optionz stay strong my fellow humans.
