Attached: 1548046146072[1].png (572x511, 73K)
America needs at least 8 parties to accurately represent its people
Noah Hughes
Other urls found in this thread:
Alexander Adams
needs an Anarcho-Nationalist party
Ryan Torres
>Update
it is there, but it has no seats cause no one votes for it
Ryan Morgan
I don't see "Right Wing Death squads" as a political party
Gabriel White
>not Anarcho-Fascist
Jack Green
because the media gives it 0 publicity
tl;dr the media is the root cause of all problems in the US
Adam Gomez
Bullshit.
Anyone on the left is not American and is not our people they simply live here.
The USA is not a collectivist nation.
Andrew Hughes
>
in no country would an anarcho-nationalist country be big desu
well they can still vote and are still brainwashing the youth
Wyatt Jones
>Sees Italian and Greek govts.
Nope. All that means is an increased political graft and pull and a decreasing of political responsibility.
Liam Adams
>wanting to give the retard brigades of both parties structural power
It only barely works in Europe because landed elites are a very real thing over there. Over here, it'd be a fucking disaster.
Ethan Thompson
but the least corrupt countries on earth, the nordic ones, all have 6 parties or more
they already have power, it's just no transparent
the freedom caucus blocks shit up all the time
Blake Myers
Actually America would do well to follow the USSR model of a single party system; you're either dedicated to the principles of your nation's constitution or you're not.
Lincoln Edwards
which party tho?
Austin Howard
>tho?
FUCK YOU NIGGER
Dominic Barnes
And? The freedom caucus blocking shit would be worse if they had structural backing for their nonsense. And corruption has nothing to do with the number of parties; Brazil and Argentina both have like sixteen and are corrupt shitholes.
Isaiah Bell
>democracy
Jacob Robinson
Why does the US have two parties to begin with? I never understood this.
Isaiah Brooks
american party here, whats up lads?
Nolan Johnson
America's two parties can't even agree on the most basic things like keeping the government running.
How would they ever get things done when they'd need 3 or more to get a majority.
Daniel Gomez
Where is "primitive anarchism"
Where is "national anarchism"
???
Kevin Mitchell
And then the government becomes even more of a worthless clusterfuck.
Alexander Martin
This is stupid and divides America more. Look at the state of Europe. One party rule is the only way forward.
Brandon Cooper
America already has this. It's called a caucus.
Unlike Eurofags who invent some new party every 5 seconds, America has two parties with Caucuses inside them.
The whole party doesnt do shit unless all the Caucuses in the party agree. Thus the overall party gets what they want.
Thomas Young
you said the number of parties was connected to corruption tho, which is nonsense
and the freedom caucus should block shit, or do you prefer the permanent bureaucracy and the establishment elites doing what they want without votes mattering at all?
these parties are already factions of the current parties, if anything it'd be easier to govern since coalitions would be more flexible
Gabriel Russell
>you said the number of parties was connected to corruption tho, which is nonsense
I said no such thing, retard.
Parker Hall
FPTP voting makes two party system inevitable.
Colton Gutierrez
alright, you decided to reply to the reply to the leaf because you're a fucking retard
wrong, the electoral college and ballot access rules does this
several countries have FPTP and more than 2 parties
Jack Butler
>ZOG
>Represent anyone but the Jews
pick one.
That's right you gullible goyim. Keep thinking you can save the White race and White civilization by voting.
Wyatt Wood
yea and then they have to form coalitions to form government. It makes no difference.
In the US the voters decides which coalition to vote for with no surprises and the candidate decides which coalition he is apart of at the get go.
Many small parties allows the media to completely alienate any party they do not like and the population to agree. When there are 2 parties it is far harder to convince the whole populace that one of them is bad.
David Lee
What like the Lib-Dems in the UK? They're practically useless and will never be able to form a government on their own.
Bentley Brown
not if regional differences are great enough.
Jeremiah Morales
Larp elsewhere
Hunter Lee
Leo Green
the libdems, the NDP in Canada, India's fuckload of parties, which unite in coalitions, etc
the libdems used to be the major party when they were the liberals, then labour became bigger
pakistan also is multiparty with FPTP, and these are parliamentary countries
since the US is presidential, if it had runoffs for presidential elections, you could have candidates from eight parties and then a runoff between the progressive and american party for ex, and whoever won would govern in coalition with other parties
but this is hard because there's no instantaneous ballot access for third parties and since the electoral college has no possibility of a runoff, votes in third parties are spoiled votes
Christian Hill
Woosh
Eli Price
no we need the American party (as you depicted it) and the Degenerate Globalist party (whatever it chooses to call itself)
Thomas Peterson
half these parties fit the description you gave