Assuming Darwin's Theory of Evolution is correct and natural selection is, as well

Assuming Darwin's Theory of Evolution is correct and natural selection is, as well.

Why is race-mixing bad?

Attached: first-us-interracial-kiss.jpg (480x360, 27K)

Charming negress!

Why did country music become bad when they introduced hip hop into it?

Attached: really makes you think.jpg (160x160, 5K)

what is in-group loyalty?

Attached: 6A7F4F66-89BA-4A20-9562-E7147E4C7C63.png (1260x2168, 260K)

jews

>Why is race-mixing bad?
Non-Whites offer nothing positive to the White genome.

Why don't you mix shit with milk in a blender and let us know how it tastes?

>pic from a scene where he had to be mind-forced

Attached: kirkkiss443.gif (297x220, 3.89M)

They used that as the justification for the first on screen interracial kiss. Roddenberry was a Commie and of course we all know Shatner is a Jew (that parades as White).

Poor Charlton Heston

Attached: u mad.png (624x634, 768K)

>They used that as the justification for the first on screen interracial kiss.
this is true. it was the "cover"

>Poor Charlton Heston
Later Apes movies were blatant allegories for a black revolution.

it's not bad, it's good

Choosing who you mate with *is* natural selection

technologically we have subverted natural section. you would have a point 200 years ago.

Attached: 1525452884871.jpg (430x342, 21K)

>this is true. it was the "cover"
The (((media))) has been normalizing and pushing anti-White beliefs for decades. Imagine what they'll be doing in the next 2-6 years?

If Trump pulls off a miracle and wins re-election they'll feel they must accelerate their anti-White rhetoric to counter his perceived "racism".

And then after Trump they'll continue it to punish all the "racist Whites that votes for the racist Trump".

sure OP, I'll race mix but y-y-you first!

Attached: serenatotallyhumannotape.jpg (719x1024, 101K)

>Assuming that creatures spend hundreds of thousands of years developing particular features in order to adapt to their environments by naturally selectively breeding, what's wrong with randomly breeding until we can no longer recognize those features?

>something changes, therefore it's evolution and thus a positive change!

It's not necessarily bad. Whites have a much higher aversion towards it than other races in general and this is probably because many of our genetic complexes are recessive, so it stands to reason this mechanism would have to be developed for us to exist at all. So if a black and a white person have a child, that child will be more black than white. This is of course controversial politically, but everyone accepts it instinctively. Take for example someone like Obama, who is 50% of each, where everyone both black and white instinctively know he's primarily a black man. Likewise a white-asian hybrid will be perceived as an asian.

For most white people there is nothing malicious in this, it's just a natural process where we in 99% of cases do things like mate select for our own. One problem for here is that by this process, when race-mixing occurs, a caste system naturally forms with people who have a genetic claim to white society but in reality are excluded from most white mate selection and so on. This is a big part of the "hapa madness" you see cropping up now and again. Or as the supreme gentleman said it "why can't I have a blonde girlfriend?"

It's also why whites have been designated for forced mixing, because there can never be a one world government over a unified peasant monoculture as long as whites exist. So it's really a relative concept when it comes to good or bad. It all depends on what your worldview and goals are.

Nigger women are very fertile and white seed is very potent and virile, thus, Its perfectly natural and desirable for the negresse's wombs to succumb to white seed.

Attached: f5d80e28aa11c44e12cfd8150ec4ea75.jpg (401x637, 59K)

Except every race used to live separately at some point.

Chuck Norris and Chuck Connors did a snuff film?