101k likes and counting

>How is Nancy pelosi becoming popular?
Progressives have a large propaganda network (practically all media and social sites/apps) and there are a lot idiots that believe the lies. They also use bots, buy followers, etc., to make themselves and their 100% false and evil ideology look popular.

> Literally bots
Yea it's just gotta be. I'm seeing this type of thing too much on social media.

>How is Nancy pelosi becoming popular?

She's anti-trump. Anyone anti-trump is automatically part of the cult, and the cult is very supportive

Attached: 86pxmVx9k.jpg (600x400, 54K)

people like pelosi pay fortunes to have botnets retweet, like, and friend them
you're retarded if you think for a second that's organic

T.b.h it was pretty clever

bots unironically

Im cool wit dat

Yes Democrats. Make this crusty old bitch nobody likes the figurehead of your party. Please keep doing shit like this, Democrats.

>101k likes and counting.
Twitter would never manipulate metrics.

>you want to see someone fail simply because you resent their success
That’s the entire reason. These people are losers and hate that some are willing to put in the hard work.

fake scripted bullshit numbers, man. believe none of what you are told. she's about to be president they must have found a path to impeachment/assassination/some other shit and now her PR campaign is ramping up.

beat me to posting it

Attached: smuggy-harrypotter.png (878x699, 384K)

Click on a few profiles. Almost all of them are brand new

>and the cult is very supportive
Up until it's not which could happen at any moment. Let's hope for entertainment's sake it's sooner rather than later.

>101k likes

So? Trump can make a tweet that gets that many likes taking a shit on the oval office toilet, faggot

Attached: 1541908029652.png (550x600, 496K)

>rebroadcasting leftist propaganda
Shill.
>what the fuck
Shill.
>twitter followers must be real people
Were you in a coma for 2016?

Yeah. And get what "he" wants? How about all 9f the people and the electoral college?

This

Did Israel build their wall with the money we give them? Seems rather hypocritical.

She isn't it is her standard followers. The left are very good at closing ranks, and for the most part twitter is a leftist platform. I have been debating some of the dem government workers whining about being off, and how it is Trumps fault, and asking how is it his fault when he was willing to give them some of what they wanted. They always go back to its his fault because all over again. Reality is something these people do not grasp.

I mean, she's not wrong. Legislation by shut down threats is retarded and embarrassing.

Honestly, using defense funds to build the wall in a brief emergency period when the caravan was in the media would have been the best method.

People elected Trump because they want a fucking wall. This was his main campaign promise.

Never believe likes and replies on twitter. They are almost always manipulated with bots and paid responses.

Same goes for product reviews, news article comments, etc. nothing is authentic

She's not bruh, it's 101k millennial fags

>every like on the internet is real

this board requires mandatory Jow Forums reading

Can we make this the most liked tweet EVER?

bot accounts

>signs Tweet NP
>other people have access to her account
Interdasting.

Are you retarded?

Are you a bot? Or are you talking to your discord dick tuckers?

when will magatards admit they fell for a lying conman?

It's satire.

get fucked zoomer scum

>muh large propanganda network
>Jow Forums

She doesnt get that trump supporters WANT the government shut down. Trump has no actual reason to crack. If he kept the government shutdown till 2020 and didnt build the wall I'd vote for him again.

Based on the contortion going on in this thread, never ever

You realize you can't win elections with core support? You need independents.

And when he doesn't get his wall, will you realize you got played?

With emergency powers, Trump can convene Congress, but doesn't have the right to speak. Is this correct?

>Reopen the government or the nigger gets it!

Attached: getsit.png (274x288, 149K)

>Honestly, using defense funds to build the wall in a brief emergency period when the caravan was in the media would have been the best method.
Which is then instantly blocked by communists in the 9th circuit court under the guise of "unconstitutional racism", which is clear bullshit, but Trump has to go through the legal process of waiting for the SCOTUS to overturn the ruling, which takes years, since he's too much of a cuck to actually ignore the lower ruling. By the time the SCOTUS rules on it, it's already another million illegal shitskins inside the country.

>runs campaign on building wall
>digs heals in to get 5b for wall which wouldnt even finish it
>trumps holding country hostage to get what "HE" wants
You act like he shut the gov down to get funding for a new resort. Alot of people want the wall. Sorry you dont dictate what should and shoildnt happen

Because most pornstars are fucked up MK Ultra victims

Porn is very closely tied with Hollywood and the media.
They're much more connected than the average person realizes.
Attacking the media threatens the protections that porn has thrived under.

>digs heals in to get 5b for wall which wouldnt even finish it
>trumps holding country hostage to get what "HE" wants
is this supposed to be a pro-trump post? I can't even tell what level of retardation these people are on anymore

I dont think I am

Why is water wet and why is fire hot.

Attached: 1531554174632.jpg (774x1057, 931K)

>it's 101k millennial fags
Dude millennials are becoming more and more right wing.
Fucking Gen X is trying to play the "Oh we were anti establishment and apathetic first" card.
They forget that millennials can't afford shit because of boomers.

Yes it is. Are you dumb? Trump has offered 3 different offers to make a deal and the dems say no each time with NO concesions. They claim hes the one digging his heels in but he has tried to work with them. The dems are the ones who refuse to negociate. To them negociating is the other side giving in to exactly what they want

shutting down the government is doing vital damage to the leftwing cause. People addicted to welfare are getting detoxed, and when the time comes to take care of themselves they're going to start getting jobs or finding some other way to get by.

when you're standing on the gallows with a noose around your neck will you realize this isnt a game?

Lol it looks bad on Trump right now but the tide will turn.

Trump has literally no reason to budge. People will realize this and start getting mad at Democrats.

regardless if its legitimate, federal judges can stop construction while the case goes through. then just take 6 years

so why would they negotiate at all after Trump said he would personally take responsibility for the shutdown? I swear to god you guys are all just playing a 3 year prank, there's no way actual human beings are this dumb

They literally use bots

Why would they negociate? For the people THEY represent. If they gave 2 shits they would do what they can to come to an agreement ro end the standoff. Are you retarded?

101 k isn’t much when you think about America’s population the amount of twitter bots and all the people who will like it no matter what because orange man bad

>believing made up numbers on the home team's site
...

>For the people THEY represent
but the people Dems represent don't want a wall at all, regardless of cost. They don't even want trump to be president. The people they represent all saw Trump say he would take responsibility, they all blame him and think its his fault those federal workers aren't getting paid.

how much glue are you huffing?

Were you unaware that there are about 40 million Democrats in the USA?

Well then i guess the people they represent should stop bitching and look for new jons. Its their "sacrifice"

1) 100k is nothing.
2) Twitter recommends her and Obama if you visit a celebrity's page.

Attached: 1493737653226.png (714x744, 988K)

so what you're saying is you dont respect the will of American voters or the duty of politicians to serve the people that elected them? that's very sad, but also pretty much what I'd expect from a magatard.

So you are saying you dont respect the people who voted for trump? I mean you act like only democrat voters should get a say. You are a typical brain dead liberal. A "my way or the highway".

>How is Nancy pelosi becoming popular?

She's obviously got much bigger balls than Drumph.

Attached: fox_fns_trump_hillary_151213c-2-800x430.jpg (800x430, 40K)

If trump is smart he will give her small ego victories so she will get high on her popularity and try and run for president, and trump would destroy her with ease

if Trump is allowed to represent his voters (who I will remind you are a minority of the population) than why shouldn't dems be allowed to represent their voters wishes as well?

Well let me remind you, trump is the executive branch and the house and senate are the legislative. They are both equal to eachother. Also they can represent thejr people by being stubborn assholes, but i dont want to hear how sally joe lost her house because of mean old trump keeping her from getting a paycheck for her mortgage. 1) she should have had an emergency savings and 2) guess thats their sacrifice to nit have a wall that would have no effect on their life other then keeping lawbrekers out

Look at midterm turnout, more people than ever are involved politically. Involved being an appropriately vague word, since the overwhelming majority of people are sucking up their own filtered bias news, myself included. Which is why people are naive to the extreme if they think the average hog will be swayed from their current opinion the longer this goes on. You can sublimate the thought processes of huge swaths of people by saying "Wall good" or "Wall bad". As long as their politicians adhere to the correct binary choice, they don't really care much beyond that.

obi wan pelosi? yeah its clever maybe you don't like something you like compared to something you dislike but it is clever, not 200 IQ 360 underwater genius, just clever

Probably purchased Tweets.

>what are marketing shills for $500 Alex?

Came here to post this

lul

So let me get this straight. She's screaming that the President is shutting down the government, when she has the power to cave and bring the government back up.

The shutdown of the government can only exist if BOTH SIDES agree the government remains shut down. Hell, congress can even bring the government back online without the Presidents signature with a supermajority. So basically Nancy just doesn't wanna do any fucking work, cut a deal, or, you know, act like a politician. Makes perfect sense to me!

House rejects GOP measure to pay workers but not open government

thehill.com/homenews/house/425858-house-rejects-gop-measure-to-pay-workers-but-not-open-government

Ohhhhhhhhh... So NOW they understand that giving people what they want for bad behavior leads to more of it... Gee Wiz guys, I wonder why this argument didn't come out for the BLM protesters or lazy niggers collecting welfare or giving women a lucrative platform after false rape allegations? I just don't see the reason for being so gosh darned inconsistent...

because the dems are looking for anybody literally anybody that can hold their own in a public spat with trump which would lead to big voter turn outs. Pelosi is like their 5th attempt. Whoever they end up choosing, 100% Hillary as VP

Pelosi is giving Trump an absolute lesson in raw naked power politics on the shutdown.

This kind of politics is like a craft, or something you can learn, and improve on.

Pelosi knows how to run this game hard, and Trump has no idea.

They may well land the killer blow on Trump out of this, which I thought very unlikely even a few days ago.

No faggot, it's not witty or clever and you're a retarded cocksucker if you actually think it was

The Dem leadership is posting warnings saying, "if Trump gets away with this..."

Why would they do that, are they afraid of something?

Attached: scary-clown.gif (133x133, 54K)

the USA is FUBAR

But he wants to negotiate and come to the table, Schumer/Pelosi are the ones refusing to talk. It is their stubborn attitude and refusal to negotiate that is keeping the government shut down.

History of Government Shutdowns since 1976:

When did it take place? Sept. 30 to Oct. 11, 1976
How long did it last? 10 days
Who was president? Gerald Ford

When did it take place? Sept. 30 to Oct. 13, 1977
How long did it last? 12 days
Who was president? Jimmy Carter

When did it take place? Oct. 31 to Nov. 9, 1977
How long did it last? 8 days
Who was president? Jimmy Carter

When did it take place? Nov. 30 to Dec. 9, 1977
How long did it last? 8 days
Who was president? Jimmy Carter

When did it take place? Sept. 30 to Oct.18, 1978
How long did it last? 18 days
Who was president? Jimmy Carter

When did it take place? Sept. 30 to Oct. 12, 1979
How long did it last? 11 days
Who was president? Jimmy Carter

When did it take place? Nov. 20-23, 1981
How long did it last? 2 days
Who was president? Ronald Reagan

When did it take place? Sept. 30 to Oct. 2, 1982
How long did it last? 1 day
Who was president? Ronald Reagan

When did it take place? Dec.17-21, 1982
How long did it last? 3 days
Who was president? Ronald Reagan

When did it take place? Nov. 10-14, 1983
How long did it last? 3 days
Who was president? Ronald Reagan

When did it take place? Sept. 30 to Oct. 3, 1984
How long did it last? 2 days
Who was president? Ronald Reagan

When did it take place? Oct. 3-5, 1984
How long did it last? 1 day
Who was president? Ronald Reagan

When did it take place? Oct. 16-18, 1986
How long did it last? 1 day
Who was president? Ronald Reagan

When did it take place? Dec. 18-20, 1987
How long did it last? 1 day
Who was president? Ronald Reagan

When did it take place? Oct. 5-9, 1990
How long did it last? 3 days
Who was president? George H.W. Bush

When did it take place? Nov. 13-19, 1995
How long did it last? 5 days
Who was president? Bill Clinton

When did it take place? Dec. 5, 1995 to Jan. 6, 1996
How long did it last? 21 days
Who was president? Bill Clinton

I guess it's a decent argument for continuing not to crack on it, but she's also acting like if you try something once and it fails you can never try again, which I don't see as being true, especially with something like this based on brinksmanship.

It reads more like a pure justification for why she's not negotiating. She doesn't actually believe this too much; shutdowns have been used this way before and now that the cat's out of the bag, just like removing the filibuster, people will always consider it an option in the future; but she hopes you do.

Can he even decide to shut the whole thing down whenever he wants though, even if he has funding?

Attached: 1279973967221.jpg (356x264, 30K)