Here we have a mixed Egyptian-Greek around 100 BC, these people built wonders, made treatises on conic sections and came very close to calculating the size of the Earth.
If nordics are superior why did they lag behind for so long?
Other urls found in this thread:
nature.com
nature.com
en.wikipedia.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
tesi.luiss.it
unive.it
rac.org
auccaravan.com
allafrica.com
papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca
mendingthesoul.org
theculture.forharriet.com
twitter.com
Meanwhile Vikangz...
Climate
Nordics aren't superior by default. It depends what you compare them to. Perhaps that particular group of Greek-Egyptians was superior to the Nordics of their time. It could also just be a misconception. But in modern terms, when measurements can be real-time and accurate, who is superior? Nordics or whatever Med masterrace?
Paganism.
Kys kike shill.
We don’t need this infighting shit right now.
In all fields.
My question is not to fuel infighting but to shed light on the Hitlerian notion that nordics are superior to all, while history seems far more nuanced.
They are superior because they ain't butt fucking ugly like the ancient mutts you are displaying.
Look up growing seasons and compare them
Short growing season --> low harvest --> low population --> low labour specialization --> lower development combined with lack of natural resources.
If i remember correctly last 2,5K years have been relatively cold, exaberating nordicks problems.