Libertarian To Alt-right

What Libertarians have switch to being more racially aware or stopped being Libertarians for more racial politics.

Attached: 1525552985526.png (2000x1294, 1.3M)

I hope English isn't your first language.

Attached: 2598722727903.png (900x900, 297K)

Uh, what?

Display your flag ESL-kun!

There is no conflict between racial awareness and libertarian theory. Anyone who disagrees has not understood libertarianism.

Attached: il_fullxfull.1153018325_e74v.jpg (1069x1500, 280K)

Libertarian beliefs are products of Times Of Plenty, like all Liberal beliefs. Once one realizes that people are not going to play nicely with each other, it gets hard to justify letting a bunch of foreigners into your country or to let a bunch of mega corporations deliberately dumb down and control all avenues of communication and education.

Truth. Also an ignorance of group interests is an ignorance of nature because humans are naturally tribal. If you don't group up in self interest you will be trampled by those who do.

>libertarians
>countries
Pick one.

>libertarians
>corporations
Pick one.

Sounds like you know nothing of the US prison system, fucking meme flag.

In an absolute libertarian sense, yes, but you're talking about 0.05% who might understand that concept. Nearly all lolbertarians are racial egalitarians and attack anyone who is ethnocentrist, even though under a true libertarian system ethnocentrism would be perfectly acceptable.

It's like watching neopagans claim Asatruism is anti-racist and pro-LGBT. Meanwhile, the fucking Aesir regularly genocided giants and dwarves and elves and took them all as slaves, and Germanics drowned gay people in bogs.

You are bogging down in the "Real Communism Has Never Been Tried" fallacy. Libertarianism is similarly impossible to sustain in the pure form because humans refuse to keep it that way. It is one thing to recognize that the Libertarian philosophy has some interesting ideas about social organization. It is something stupid to pretend that you don't see the tribal nature of families, countries, corporations and races.

Humans are choosing to run their lives in these ways and they are not deviating in significant numbers to make a pure Libertarian (or Communist) society possible.

You can observe a similar wishful thinking phenomenon in the groups of people who think a particular President they hate is going to be taken down, "any day now!"

Various people kept waiting for Bill Clinton, George Bush, Barack Obama and now Donald Trump to be "taken down any day now." Just like with idealistic political ideologies, "this election we will get more votes." You are ignoring that a vast majority of the people knows they can not compete on fair terms and they also know they can win concessions by grouping up and organizing for their own interest.

With this new information, you need to reassess the chances of controlling such people without using deception and force to get your way. (This is why some version of Imperialism and Fascism tends to dominate on regular intervals through out history. This is also what a real Red Pill looks like.)

Went from
>State uses violence and its bad
To
>Everyone who has the capacity for violence uses it. Violence isnt inherently evil or bad, merely a tool required in life. Will to power.
Next
>Humans are unequal in the realm of economic ability and opportunity, free market/private property are equal though
To
>Humans are unequal in every facet of their being, some people do not deserve political opportunity or ability to own property/participate in the market.
Additionally
>Man is an economic unit
To
>Man is zoon politicon. His sense of self is created by the group, and his interactions with the broader societal structures around him, whether this is in lone or opposed to the group identity means little. The man who exists outside the polity is simply a beast.
And one thing I thought was funny
>Socialists/Communists claim it wasnt real Socialism/Communism
>Capitalists claim its not real capitalism
>Fascists say youre damn right it was fascism, and we got beat by the whole rest of the world who themselves had plenty of fascistic policies and structures already in place, or quickly enacted them.

I went down the pipeline in 2013. It's been a hell of a ride.

Attached: 15484302879239163210375669218696.jpg (2560x1440, 1.1M)

damn, that picture says so much about the absolute state of our society.

How do? I'd be humbled by interpretation.

Attached: 15484308387388332262238182737916.jpg (2560x1440, 961K)

even co-workers (i guess they are co-workers and that's their lunchroom) aren't talking to each other, hell they aren't even sitting on the same table. They go out of their way to sit as far away from each other as possible.

We are so separated by politics and race and sex that we can't make any friends anymore because we are too heterogeneous and too absorbed with our phones to have real human interactions and connections.

Attached: 41GPzFWjMgL.jpg (327x500, 28K)

This reads like a bot that is still learning English

Were at an odd time when the Left has won the ideologocal battle for now about the conflict between who and what people are vs. what they do. But in doing so, theyve ensured that their social battle has been or at least will be fully lost to the Rights view of what makes or breaks communities, tribes, and nations.

Well said. I miss the days around 2007 here when tables would be packed over games UNO or something. Fun times. All those people departed for either greener pastures and some are dead.

Attached: 15484315195504682544873647440699.jpg (2560x1440, 1.08M)

Damn, that's sad.

Why are you still there?

It's really too bad that the aut-right serves as a gatekeeper to potentially useful candidates. But they are destined to repeat the failures of their predecessors because they cannot grasp the most basic concepts like lemming theory and are stuck being a movementarian playing by kike rules.

Read Siege faggots.

I considered myself Libertarian for a long time. Liberty and Freedom to the individual, the efficiency of free markets, etc... But it took a long while to finally start to question some of the fundamental premises and the ignored assumptions of both libertarianism and capitalism.

None of it had anything to do with race.

But the issues were that the libertarians and free market folks simply assumed the moral goodness of their positions, or assumed that economic efficiency = moral outcomes. That corporations were not a government interference in the market. That technological advancement was a moral good in and of itself.

All in all, they divorce economics from its place as a subset of social policy and place it at the top of the heirarchy. Morality, family, culture, social stability, none of that matters more than the right to exercise personal property rights in whatever way one sees fit. And they often overlook negative externalities caused by the exercise of these rights.

Economic theory, social theory, government theories, etc should all be judged from a moral perspective first and foremost. The libertarians do not do this, and then conclude that highly immoral acts are moral simply because it was an exercise of free property rights.

I can't pass a GED exam. More importantly, it serves as a constant reminder of not being able to make something of myself and support my younger brother at the time, who grew up more homeless than not.

Attached: 1548432666211740900499961567343.jpg (2560x1440, 1.39M)

As somebody who has a PhD in molecular biology I always see things through an evolutionary biology and DNA lens. While I have libertarian values I think ultimately it all boils down to passing on and preserving your DNA. It is a biological arms race that is over a billion years old. All that matters at the end of the day is ensuring your offspring survive. Nothing else matters.
The blatant white genocide goals of the left are dangerous.

Excellent posts, fren.

>Meme-Right

You don't need to pay penance for a doing a good turn, friend.

Have you read the revolutionary phenotype?