France tests new tank gun which shall form the basis

of the German-French main battle tank for theEU army. Why would it be better, as argued here, that France and Germany both developed their own tanks/guns.

Attached: 6B5D8BD5-E356-4C48-B2E7-F0A6B86CAA66.jpg (1536x1536, 548K)

Other urls found in this thread:

military.com/defensetech/2018/10/16/army-moves-closer-70-kilometer-artillery-new-rocket-assisted-round.html
youtube.com/watch?v=W1PTq7bdQik
twitter.com/AnonBabble

It probably fires baguettes.

Attached: 1538816436841.png (298x260, 62K)

Baguettes made of steel and explosives.

WE WILL RETAKE MOSCOW HON HON HON

t. French died in 1914 alongside Germany

Meanwhile in Poland

Attached: 26_134369_71f0c27c5597289.jpg (1280x743, 270K)

>Leclerc

Attached: 6713618019_fb3f43c862_b.jpg (860x626, 87K)

Greater Francia today, the next roman empire tomorrow

Attached: 500px-Francia_814.svg.png (500x380, 81K)

Cool Story bro.

Attached: putin-laughing.jpg (644x467, 65K)

>pro-EU thread
>German flag

>mfw American drops another nuke on the Axis

Attached: Inuit_snow_goggles.jpg (768x1024, 280K)

I'm suprised it's not Rhinemetal

Attached: 1547762899697.gif (320x240, 1.99M)

>anti-German, anti-EU post
>British flag

It is my duty to pray for a Second Dresden every day.

Keep wasting your money on large targets, frankoids. We both know they won't even provide a challenge for our waves of mini killbots.

Attached: 1538632571913.jpg (736x490, 75K)

Oooooh it’s as small and cute as Estonia *-* :33

its not carrying a white flag
fake

Attached: 1532065562250.jpg (1171x936, 87K)

Why not just use a german tank?

Because most of our gear is made in France and Nexter is a big company

>Why would it be better, as argued here, that France and Germany both developed their own tanks/guns.
I don't know, why the fuck didn't you ask them?

that's actually a pretty based weapon good job little finland

>tfw france will invade germany in your lifetime

140mm. Can outrange the Yankee menace.

the future is so bright you dont need eyes

What's the range compared to a hellfire?

Attached: 1542825607881.jpg (960x720, 461K)

inb4 the rhine becomes our full border with germany

>implying they have better fire control systems

>euro militaries
military.com/defensetech/2018/10/16/army-moves-closer-70-kilometer-artillery-new-rocket-assisted-round.html

>tfw EU has larger pop and similar economy but is still babby-tier in so many ways.

It's like sloped armour doesn't exist

Attached: p1731907_main.jpg (752x423, 112K)

I don't get it. Whe have a perfectly fine homegrown 155mm howitzer, why don't they just try putting that on a tank and see what happens instead of outsourcing it to Germany?

Attached: CandidFatGrouper.webm (600x338, 510K)

that would be very nice, partition of Germany, when?

They made it look futuristic so you wont notice there is a horse underneath

Meaningless with the advent of chemical shells/sabot.

There is a reason artillery are bolted to the ground and the material needs special hydraulic dampings. Can’t do that on a tank.

modern apfsds travels at such high velocities that it ignores armor sloping for the most part. Sloping still helps a little but not by nearly as much as in days past. It's better to just have flat armor so the crew has more room now

kek'd first thing I thought of

China makes silent laser guns that can assassinate from miles away and you baguette assfucking fags are making loud ass tanks that give away location. Okay.

Good luck.

>sloped armor

Attached: 1472928871977.png (620x427, 298K)

>China makes silent laser guns that can assassinate from miles away
uhhh, no. that's what China is developing according to their propaganda outlets, but in actuality pic related is the kind of shit China is making. Very implessive

Attached: 1541788015836.jpg (960x640, 86K)

1 loud bang can make a 100 men stop firing and duck for cover, laser weapons can't do that

here is China's brand new domestic "we swear it's not a BMP ripoff please believe us"

Attached: 1541751443891.jpg (720x479, 48K)

I think it would be best if all white countries worked together to create the best tech to genocide Africa, India, and China.

tried and tested, not useful enough for the US because we get to use DU ammunition, although eurocucks and their last gen tungsten nerf darts might benefit from this

Attached: 1541081786579.jpg (1444x694, 109K)

I know what you're thinking, "That's literally a BMPT, an exact copy" but you would be wrong. This is China's new completely original, not copied design, which is in no way a copy of the BMPT. Xi Jinping be praised, this weapon system is very implessive.

Attached: 1541751360358.jpg (1000x667, 156K)

>>implying they have better fire control systems
>German
Do you think they won't be able to hit a tank size target at the maximum range? It's all going to be down to range.

kek

Attached: 1547945585328.gif (500x500, 44K)

Attached: 1533708453920.jpg (642x478, 40K)

Can it kill an abrams

>China makes silent laser guns that can assassinate from miles away and you baguette assfucking fags are making loud ass tanks that give away location.
They can't even effectively make this for ships, with a thousand tonnes of batteries.

it's a non-functioning mockup so no

Holy shit lol, underrated

big weapons as a coping mechanism in a time of economic decline, where have I seen that before...
>hint: 1980s USSR

What the fuck is the point in that

Mmmmmh delicious radiation

Attached: b89e1c40e08e39f3e475892d7ea513e6.jpg (1000x1000, 139K)

The Tiger helicopter was pretty good. I don't see why we wouldn't continue this.

To lower the costs by asking 2 countries to invest in new generation weaponry.

Weren't your 120mm DU shells shown to be ineffective against up-to-spec T-80 armor?

Attached: wjwpb0v2bfb21.jpg (960x1035, 120K)

radiation for our enemies, not us :^)

You guys make me laugh.

the "Polish stealth tank" was an idea and it never made it past the idea phase as far as I am aware

>not depleted uranium and tungsten

Neat.

Attached: tombstone_team2016-1140x602.jpg (1140x602, 50K)

kek

Attached: 1527108396107.jpg (608x402, 27K)

I don't think a US abrams has ever gone against an up-to-spec T-80, being that the Russians wouldn't sell up-to-spec T-80s to ragheads, in the same way that we don't sell up-to-spec abrams to anyone

Even a Tiger or a T-34 could kill an Abrams. It depends on where the Abrams gets hit. Every tank has vulnerable sides and back.

lol. doubtful.

>eviscerates crew with single shot

Attached: 73 Easting.png (370x752, 39K)

Fuck off G*rmans get your own tank

Good. The Germans will need newer hardware once their right wing party takes power.

Restoring France to her natural borders will also mean removing """"Belgium""" off the face of the map and (((Luxembourg)))

It's actually a CV-30 IFV beneath it.

>What is depleted uranium
>what is tungsten
>what is sabot
It's not WWII anymore, gramps

>why don't they just try putting that on a tank and see what happens instead of outsourcing it to Germany?
Politics.

>t-55 hull

Attached: 1530748785154.jpg (252x240, 7K)

It has been done. The CSSR army even did direct fire with truck-mounted artillery from entrenched positions. It was found to blow tank turrets clean off.
And tanks do have dampings on them.

I think the west did buy some T-memeys after the collapse of the USSR and tested them at firing ranges, though.

Who cares? If it's not a rail gun, they're still behind the U.S. military.

South Korea has some T-80U's (not the most up to date version), maybe Ukraine has some too.

Shit looks like it was made by africans

Attached: kantanka armored vehicle.png (980x551, 535K)

Looks like a vagina on treads.

I looked it up but I couldn't find any information on the Aberdeen T-80 tests, other than the fact that they occurred

fyi, Australia had the option of buying the DU kit but decided not to for political reasons

MBTs are waste of time. Cheap drones with hellfire missiles will pop them like they are balloons. Soldiers can carry weapons like the Javelin missile. Trucks can carry missiles like a TOW which is 50 year old tech at this point. Tanks are incredibly vulnerable these days.

Attached: image.jpg (400x300, 35K)

hopefully they'll test it in ukraine

lol no.
Without us

Its a time bomb btw. See you when total sync hits. For now we got a few more thousands of shit posts.

tbd

As if your non country has the choice.
You do as we tell you, bitch

Attached: IMG_6157.jpg (236x236, 14K)

Honestly can't wait for the UK-EU cold war.

difference between a mockup and a testbed:
mockup looks good, but doesn't function. testbed is the exact opposite.

you get most of Wallonia we get northern France (former Flemish area like Rijsel, Duinkerke) back and you have a deal

THICC

They went from panzer IV's, panthers, Tigers I's and II's, King Tigers and the mouse... to this shit?

youtube.com/watch?v=W1PTq7bdQik

Attached: 862.gif (330x187, 2.37M)

Have the French ever won war since Napoleon without the help of others? Now if Germany would make this threat ... literally no one is afraid of French faggots.

Yeah against a single MBT a meatbag witha javelin and a drone with a couple of hellfires is a threat, but what about a formation of mbts?

A mechanized battalion is still the best way to hold down/obliterate any ground objective.

does that make a 4'9" 110 guy as strong as a 5'9" 180 guy?
or smart? can that make an insect smart?

sure- how do you get them to do this?

They could get Africans and Arabs drive them.

Attached: master ruseman.jpg (1032x739, 191K)

The idea is that tanks need to drive around the battlefield. German tanks can't do that anymore.

CV90105 I believe, with some of the later-gen upgrade kits.