18 U.S. Code § 2381 is more appropriate for Trump.
Sebastian Adams
>be me >word breaks about Trump's partial govt reopen >waste time reading articles and comments about how "drumpf caved!" >HuffPo and CNN remind me "the internet is OUTRAGED!" >finally decide to hear it straight from the horse's mouth >listen to SOTU and read Trump tweets, he clearly states this is a partial government shutdown and then after i wake up from sleeping, i see >Trump doubles down on the fact that in 3 weeks we're gonna be in the exact same boat >80% of shills are nowhere to be found quite the exciting past few days. really makes you think, "wtf i hate trump now"
Now that the government is "open" again, does that mean Congress can resume trying to pass a bunch of retarded bills and continue to not even discuss border security? I'm sure Israel needs another 20 billion in military aid money
Owen Wright
Threadly reminder that february's gibs have already gone into the niggers pockets, March gibs have not; the chimpening is nigh!
Lets take a BLAST FROM THE PAST (of January 9th of 2019)
" Hallmark of a conspiracy theory is when every new data point, good or bad, furthers the supposed conspiracy; in this case, declaring the NE *3 weeks from now* when he failed to do it now, or in January 9th."
I heard from this general that the wall was already being built, so why did he shut down the government?
Mason Stewart
you are still awake? Im impressed slave
Zachary Cruz
So much winning. You didn't need to go to CNN and HuffPo to see that Drumpf caved. Go back to sleep and you can see a wall.(construction already started - march 2018)
Dems with the support of RINOs and whatever random excuses Mueller spout out will be used as evidence to impeach him or deny him access to presidential power.
Grayson Howard
>Declaring a SoE in 3 weeks is "conspiracy" Wew lad. Get out of my thread.
But you're married to a 2D trapfu Kev, why should anyone take your thoughts to be anything unlike your irl? Sad!
Luke Cook
>33 U.S. Code § 2293 EDITION What about law 85-804(50 US CODE 1431)? Are they redundant laws?
Aiden Roberts
>Look, the media found some pro-Trump person that's not 100% with Trump >This means you guys are losing so much >Because you all were Dobbs supporters, never Trump supporters Your logic is impeccable!
they are really pushing this D&C stuff left must be scared
Evan Bennett
That statute wouldn't apply even if he literally colluded with Russia and gave nuclear secrets to them on video tape in the Oval Office, it wouldn’t meet the definition of treason constitutionally Even the Rosenbergs, who provided nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War, were never charged formally with treason (executed for espionage instead).
Last person convicted of treason was WWII and the last person charged with it was an al-Qaeda propagandist in 2006. We need to be in a state of war against for it to meet the definition (the al-Qaeda propagandist meets it by the Congressional-authorized 2001 AUMF). It's the only constitutionally-defined crime and has the highest burden of proof as well.
much like what this user is getting at the wall is partially built. and if we wanna be literal, it's steel slats and roadway barriers. while it's possible to build a wall with bare minimum funding, it's hardly worth mentioning at all if it's gonna be built on such a minuscule budget. what's worse, Dems won't provide funding but mock the best-case-scenario with no funding.
They are 3 weeks away from being a pile of salt user smileandwaveboys.gif
Gavin Evans
We are still at war though Korean War has still not officially ended, it has simply been in a state of 'ceasefire' for many years.
We are still officially 'at war' and always will be until that war is formally ended, which means that all wartime laws are 110% applicable and enforceable.
You won't think it's so funny when the shooting starts.
Isaiah Collins
>We are still at war though not with Russia
>We are still officially 'at war' and always will be until that war is formally ended, which means that all wartime laws are 110% applicable and enforceable. not for matters of treason unless the country in question is one we have a formal declaration of war with. there is a big reason you will not find a single charge and/or conviction for treason during the entire cold war, and it's not because they were reserved to accuse defectors and spies of treasonous behavior.
Jordan Perez
I refuse to believe he isn't using his phone to do this, otherwise it means literally the only thing he does all day when on his computer is shitpost in this specific thread. And that he does that all day.
>unironically believing a wall is a good use of taxpayers' resources when all it takes is a mexican with a grinder to cut through >unironically believing border security can't be shored up elsewhere >unironically holding thousands of federal employees' wages hostage to push said wall
From my link: >The authority conferred by this section may not be utilized to obligate the United States in any amount in excess of $25,000,000 unless the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives have been notified in writing of such proposed obligation and 60 days of continuous session of Congress have expired following the date on which such notice was transmitted to such Committees.
Not really sure what I'm looking for in your link, but this doesn't describe during the State of Emergency. It also says that he'd need a period of 60 days after notifying congress in writing, but again, that's not taking into account the SoE.
I don't need Trump to win here because he'll win in 2020 regardless of blackpill attempts
Isaac Ross
>Explain to me what you saw happen? I certainly didn't see him losing. Faggots like you have claimed for 3 years now how he's losing, and each time you get more despearate.
>not understanding the very basics of hardening You could have just posted "I am a retard" and save everyone some fucking time.
Lincoln Foster
>Oh yeah, Trump REALLY hates the Military >See him raging all the time about them >Really nasty guy Anyone can see past your bullshit. Don't speak for those in service, you commie faggot.
>has been saying he will declare an emergency for months no, that was mostly just us and the media. Trump's been pretty consistent about not saying what he'll do either way. He repeats that all options are on the table and he has the legal rights to do things if he wanted, but hasn't definitively said exactly what he's gonna do. The only thing he's finally said for sure was that it'll shut down again in 3 weeks. He's been floating possibilities and letting everyone else latch onto the ones they like.
David Brooks
>british >having literally ANYTHING to say about how a country governs itself o im laffin now
>He lost by his own standard. No, he didn't. He's getting what he wants. That isn't "losing" at all, you gigaretard.
Brody Sanders
ATC left him no choice. The economy has to stay strong until negotiations with China are over. Unfortunately it was just poor timing. Shit happens.
Oliver Williams
Settle down lad, at best we'll see marines and SS gunning down bailiffs
Benjamin Bailey
Lmao I come from a nation that has an entire ocean for borders and it very clearly hasn't done much good in keeping immigrants out, you think an expensive 3000km steel fence is going to be worth the money spent on it? Whether it's a truck trailer a tunnel or a bloody ladder they will still come through.
Jayden Ross
>Will winning be back on the menu like it was in 2016? Honestly, if you haven't seen any winning since before he took office, then no. You will not see any. Those of us that wanted what he promised us, though, yes, thers is still winning.
>"THEY HAVE TO GO!" "Let's extend DACA for 800,000 people" (which ends up being everyone once the courts are done handing out 14th Amendment protection in class actions) >"WE'RE GONNA BUILD A WALL. A BIG BEAUTIFUL WALL" "Actually I meant a barrier-. -A steel barrier. -That you can see through. Not a fence. -Ok, call it a fence. Whatever." >"OR I WONT PASS THE BUDGET AND SHUT DOWN THE GOVERNMENT" "Okay, maybe not in December of 2017" Aww shucks. Now its 2018 and we lost the house. >BUT NOW ITS 2019 AND I'M SHUTTING DOWN THE GOVERNMENT "Okay, I was just bluffing. Re-open the government." >BUT I'LL DECLARE AN EMERGENCY! I'LL DO IT! I SWEAR!"
And what this does is PROVE once and for all that Trump is pro-LGBT, because the agenda is clearly to ass-fuck Americans and keep ass-fucking us until we learn to enjoy it.
You forgot the part where the government is closed again in 3 weeks. This is basically "opening the government without opening it" to pay the federal workers.
Luke Wright
>I am retard It's that easy.
Benjamin Bennett
t. literal Jow Forumsthe_donald tourist Please tell me how him opening the government isn't pussying out
Who was that fag that said- these wars weren't meant to be won; they were meant to be profitable? I don't think you win any war without killing every male and putting your seed in ever bird for at least 3 generations
Noah White
2017 shilling was so much better This is like a chinese copy of it, i mean they can't even mantain a shillcon 2 ffs
Aiden Martinez
He's not gonna do shit in 3 weeks. Nancy and Chuck have him by the balls. It's over.
Isaac Baker
>3d checkmate
He's getting what he wants, except money for a wall.
He timed this. Had two years and kicked the can.
Only took 2 and a half years, but we are off to the races on the wall.(in three weeks)
>My cucked nation has no wall (Hadrian's doesn't count) and it's getting overrun by immigrants, so that means that a wall won't work for you Your brain needs some readjustment.
Money could be better invested towards border security, patrols, increased funding cross-border cooperation with Mexico to nail the fucking cartels and deprive them of their profits. A 5billion dollar steel fence is just a waste of moneh and metal and it sure as shit wasn't worth fucking over thousands of federal employees as out of touch cunts lile Wilbur Ross point and grumble "b-but they can get loans"
>Mexico He shit all over that budget and threatened to veto it. "I'm not going to sign something like this again."
James Wilson
what i wanna know is, how does Anne intend to come crawling back to the GOP after all this bridge burning? The Dems don't want her. Come to think of it, nobody does. It certainly doesn't help your case when you put her in your posts, either.
PLEASE POST THIS IN EVERY BLACK PILLED SHILL THREAD
WALL IS BEING BUILT; Sarah Sanders: >In 21 days President Trump is moving forward building the wall with or without the Democrats. The only outstanding question is whether the Democrats want something or nothing twitter.com/breaking911/status/1088974576997097478?s=21
HAHAHAHAHA GET FUCKED SHILLS
ANN COULTER KYS MIKE THERNOVITCH KYS LEFTYPOL KYS HASBARA KYS PAKIS IN UK KYS ALL KIKES KYS LEAFS GET RAKED NANCY PELOSI KYS CHUCK SCHUMER KYS
>He's getting what he wants, except money for a wall Except that he's getting money for a wall. Or using the military budget. Or FEMA budget. Or both. Abort, Retry, Ignore?
> Money could be better invested towards border security, patrols, increased funding cross-border cooperation with Mexico to nail the fucking cartels and deprive them of their profits. counterpoint:
