Tulsi Gabbard should be running away with the Dem nomination. She would destroy Trump and has a lot of popular appeal...

(((the dems))) do
All of you Americans need to go vote in the Dem primaries

I don't think she'd destroy Trump, but she'd definitely take the wind out of the MAGA sails by making the choice of who to vote for inconsequential. She's basically the same exact type of democrat Trump was over a decade ago. The only question is if she'd be bullied into nominating activist judges to the SC.

Tulsi will build giant ovens. I hope she wins, they hater her so much.

I don't want a Democrat in office but Tulsi Gabbard is a moderate and the type of left-winger we used to be able to deal with. It would almost give some hope in a life after Trump if the DNC DIDN'T nominate a socialist dipshit-type.

I respect her for walking away from the DNC while they were in the bag for Hillary.
She's bad on immigration. Hawaii doesn't share a border with Mexico.
Also, Jews don't want peace with Syria.

The establishment hate her for supporting Sanders over Hillary in 2016. Notice CNN's power ranking. Anyone who's on Sanders' train are being screwed over. Ojeda, Yang, Gabbard, and Sanders himself.

Instead they're pushing for austerity lovers like Kamala, Beto, and Biden.

>Tulsi Gabbard is a moderate
Lol is your compass broken?

Medicare for all, free college, minimum wage, those are moderate positions to you? She's closer to Sanderes than anyone else.

>DNC DIDN'T nominate a socialist dipshit-type.
Beto, Kamala and Biden are the centrist fucks you're looking for.

Bernie will destroy all comers despite CNN rigged bullshit rankings

ojeda quit

Attached: kptne4xihjc21.jpg (750x719, 62K)

Fuck.

He was my favourite.

She’s fucking hot but for some fucked up reason I wanna fuck Kamalas pussy.

Attached: 1523018287979.png (1384x758, 163K)

Attached: 1546079658826.png (1386x706, 183K)

>Tulsi
>moderate
Fuck you, shill

Attached: 1526466291185.png (972x599, 111K)

Attached: 1517645763305.jpg (918x510, 64K)

No, she should not be.

Are you? You really think she's President material?
Hahahhahahhahahahhah

She's perfect.

>minimum wage

What kind of retarded cuck can possibly be against a minimum wage...

If there is a minimum wage it means a company can't replace you with cheaper third world hires you daft cunt.

In what fucking universe is ensuring people aren't paid slave wages considered unreasonable?

Republicunts are beyond help.

They're counting on Beto the meme to split the college-age progressive vote with Bernie, and they're probably right. He's a dipshit that's in way over his head but he thinks he can win. If he stays relevant long enough Bernie doesn't have a chance.

Kamala is clearly the establishment favorite. Biden is her only real competition, but I doubt he has the balls to hit her hard enough to win. If he did, he'd have to face the full wrath of the MSM. He'll probably end up soft-balling her like Bernie did to Hilldawg.

>Medicare for all,
Yeah that's pretty moderate
free college,
Quite out there, but not that crazy if there is college reform as well
>minimum wage
Moderate as fuck

>What kind of retarded cuck can possibly be against a minimum wage...
Republicans are hit in the head. They love screwing themselves over at every turn.

Wrong. It puts small businesses out of business because they cant affoed to pay you while big corps outsource. In the end corporate greed if left unchecked will fuck over American workers. Fuck minimum wage but also stop outsourcing. Companies wilk be forced.to hire local and train them which all skilled labor can negotiate wages.

>Medicare for all
>socialist bullshit policies
No, those are terrible. But I mean, aren't all the Dems nodding their heads to this shit at this point, though? I'm saying one that doesn't make it their main talking point in campaigning will be less likely to actually try to pull that shit but maybe I've not seen what you'e seen. You have a decent link to an interview or anything? I don't listen to the Democrats any more than I have to.

>If there is a minimum wage it means a company can't replace you with cheaper third world hires you daft cunt.
If a country is enforcing its border, and punishing people who employ 3rd world hires, there is no need for minimum wage. The workers can dictate their own wages, and eventually a company will be either forced to offer higher pay to entice better workers, or will fold from being employed by a bunch of high schoolers and low IQ baboons.

>No, those are terrible
medicare for all ranks the best healthcare system everywhere in the world

>aren't all the Dems nodding their heads to this shit at this point
They can nod to it, but they won't get it accomplished. They just say it so that they get votes from the isolated left.

She's a stand in until Michelle shows up.

I think more unions should be set up to negotiate wages, and that way you can leave the government out of it

Oh teh noes... They have to pay employees a living wage. THATS MARXIST OMG!!!

You realise your scenario is just a wage to the bottom, yeah?

If small business can't afford to pay their employees what they're worth because of what Company X is doing, are they just gonna expect them to work for free when Company X lays off thousands of workers and replaces them with robots?

Fucking Republicunts. Think the economy exists in a vacuum and can't see more than a single step ahead.

You'd bring back slavery to the USA if that would help some stock holders horde more money.

I would completely support getting rid of the minimum wage if paired with something like UBI. As it stands, the lack of social safety nets is a force of coercion that prevents employees from being able to simply walk away if wages are too low.

Alohanigger qt is the best choice by far among the dems, but expect more DNC fuckery to block her from even running.

>and eventually a company will be either forced to offer higher pay to entice better workers

Hey look, another retarded Republicunt.
You're fucking stupid, here's what ACTUALLY happens...
Company X and company Y both pay their employees $5 an hour.
One day company X decides to drop their pay to $4.50 an hour.
Oh shit, that means all the workers will leave for company Y, right?
Ummm, if you're fucking retarded that's what you think...
But instead what happens is now Company X is in a better position to sell their product at a cheaper cost.
So what ACTUALLY happens is now all the distributors now come to Company X to buy their widgets because at the end of the day people are usually gonna buy the cheaper product.
So now Company Y can either lower their staff wages or they go out of business because they can't compete with a company that can undercut them so high.
This shit is basic maths, but I guess they don't teach that to retarded kids in the rust belts.
What a minimum wage ACTUALLY does is makes sure companies don't just start slashing wages in a race to the bottom.
>Hurr durr it can't work... Except in every single country where it does work.

Since the Dems moved to Identity Politics as their central platform, they need to pick someone brown. It's why they lost in 2016. They chose two old white people as their candidate pairing.

POCs want to vote for POCs. They don't even pretend otherwise. Lefty whites want to vote for POCs too, because it makes them feel virtuous.

It will be Harris or Sharticus or some other combo. I am wondering is Sanders will be smart enough to chose AOC as his vo running mate. That would be very interesting.

Attached: 1547347063258.jpg (907x2351, 525K)

Because you're so good at running your own country. Who are you to tell people what to do?

>ubi
andrew yang is your guy

Attached: 105146633-Andrew-Yang-Techonomy-Speaker.jpg (2048x1365, 294K)

>It's why they lost in 2016
sanders would have trumped trump, nothing to do with POC

Yeah and here you are working for the people who screwed him out of it. How's it feel?

Attached: LookAtThisFaggot.png (1600x1600, 989K)

Do you really think the dems will be running against Trump?
His getting pegged by Pelosi on national TV makes a primary likely now.
Anyone kind of considering it moved to seriously considering it yesterday.

Yang + Gabbard ticket.
Who leads? I presume Gabbard because women

They won't let her. She should have waited until next time.

AOC isn't old enough to be Vice President for 6 more years. At that point her ship will have sailed and she'll be as much in the media as the guy she replaced.

The DNC nominee won't announce their run until after the impeachment fiasco this summer. They will be running what is known as the "splitter strategy", what the GOP tried to do last cycle when they tried to hand the nomination to Jeb!. So many candidates will be running, the DNC will unleash their chosen candidate, the primaries will start, no candidate will get more than 12-15% of the primary vote(all the while the pre-ordained candiate will always finish in the top 3 in each state), everyone else will drop out and back the pre-ordained candidate. Whomever launches their bid after the impeachment fiasco coming up will be the nominee. Probably the end of May sometime but definitely by July. It will be Clinton or Michael Bloomberg.

Running a minority candidate in 2020 is a win for Trump. People are fucking sick of identity politics, they're sick of being accused of prejudiced when they voice valid concerns, and they're sick of the minority over merit mentality.

She's the only candidate I've seen who would make me hesitate against betting money on Trump winning.

The Kamala Harris shilling is pathetic. At least when they shilled Hillary, it was really true that she was someone normies could passively just opt for, but too much of their base hates Harris, and she has no chance of cross-over appeal. The DNC should be pushing Klobuchar for the angle they seem to be pursuing.

Who gives a shit? America is fucking dead.

Who gives a shit? America is fucking dead...

She's not attractive enough to be president. There, I said it. When the debates start and she gets her close-up, the entire country will be revolted and go "no way am I looking at that for four years."
She not cute.

I doubt Americans are intelligent enough to elect a non interventionist level-headed person like Tusli. The American mainstream media is already demonizing her for the most ridiculous reasons like MUH ASSAD or MUH HOMOPHOBE.

Because you elect people based on how they look? If that's true then Trump would have never won in the first place.

Attached: 961577328732.jpg (2048x1536, 382K)

Uhh, Trump. That's all

Bring on the sweeping anarchy

Just figure out a way to survive and sabotage America anyway you can.

Attached: bernie 2020.png (625x479, 439K)

Implying primaries mean anything to the democrats

>these are the best candidates demorats have to offer
lmao why even waste time with 2020 election, they will get obliterated.

Tulsi can’t survive the primary because the Dem is just a bunch of useless low IQ commies

If you can't afford to pay your workers a wage that they can survive on you shouldn't be running a business, because you're clearly retarded.

Why should I, the taxpayer, subsidise your pathetic company while you line your pockets by paying an untenable wage and I have to pick up the slack and pay for their food stamps, housing, medical bills, etc.?

And you said it was hard to find a qt who also hates Jews.

>a low IQ niggeress mutt
>a low IQ irish cunt with a spic name
>an old pedo degenerate war criminal
That's the best ''democrats'' have to offer?

Winner winner chicken dinner. Entitlements shift wealth from the middle to lower classes to make up for lack of proper compensation. Keeps them just alive enough to continue slaving. Shareholders and execs of cette businesses are enriched by this subsidy that is laid on the backs of their own customers. Every WalMart should be burned to the ground and board meeting raided by machete-wielding Zulus.

>but muh Chinese slave labor made plastic injection molded bullshit would cost more

The cost savings is financial hocus pocus.

Please stop this, everyone knows Biden is what the DNC wants and they will sink everyone else to get it. Then this will make Trump win (even if he does fully cuck) simply because the DNC think the progressives have any real loyalty

There are two main issues with this line of argument. One is settling on a standard of living wage. People just pushed to double it, and now they're pushing to double it again. Was $33 always needed? Why didn't people say that before lawmakers spent hours and hours drafting laws around $15?

The other issue is differing ideas of what the goal should be. A high wage so a single primary earner can support a family while another parent raises the children sounds good to me, but too many people who want in theory a single parent (no partner in picture) to be able to be able to raise a family on one minimum wage job also think we should be pushing society and the economy toward two-income households. Many also think we should be opening up our borders and letting in as many unskilled foreigners as possible. How is this sustainable?

Attached: minimum wage.jpg (798x855, 188K)

Tulsi Gabbard is a fake faggot. Pocahontas should get the nomination so USA can get more MAGA and memes

>Tulsi Gabbard
>destroy Trump
Half of America doesn't even know who that dumb cunt is you spastic fucking nerdfaggot.

Attached: 1543863430878.png (702x704, 995K)

>Australian
>knowing burger politics