How can we make the Electoral College better?

Attached: Screenshot_2019-01-26 2016 United States presidential election in Illinois - Wikipedia.png (493x1257, 299K)

Bump

Remove California

remove big cities

For that particular state, the only solution would be a complete liquidation of the standing government.

As in, drop them all into a giant blender set to liquefy.

Push for the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact if you live in a state that hasn't signed up yet.

You look new here pal. The only way we can make the electoral college even better is if we didn't have a illlegals and other democrats vote twice.

Dumbest fucking thing ever. In my honest opinion, one thing that would make the Electoral College a million times better is that you win an electoral vote by each county the candidate wins, it would make things more challenging that way

make it by counties instead of states

Making only landlords with college degrees able to vote like in the old days

That's really stupid. All of the states who signed it so far are Dem states. And you can bet your last dollar that if the Republicans win the popular vote by actually campaigning in Cal, NY, IL, and MA, those states will suddenly find that they have the right to violate the agreement. Are you just stupid, or do you think we are?

majority of Illinois population lives in chicago.

those red areas are nothing but corn fields and 300 population towns.

Why should Chicago dictate how the farmers should live?

>give the 134 people in Loving County, Texas the exact same power as the five million people in Harris
Genius.

still a dumb idea because that means a rural county of 1000 people will have a greater vote impact than a county of 1000000 people

why should a single farmer have more power in his vote than 1000 people in chicago?

Electoral Colleges for states as well so that every state goes red

Within each state, each city has one vote determined by the people who live within that city. Then based on how all the cities voted, the state will go with the majority.

Stop having presidential election campaigns and go back to electing the electors and sending them off to washington as the founders intended.

Make senators state legislature appointees again too.

Because without the farmer those 1000 people don't last a day.

>that means a rural county of 1000 people will have a greater vote impact than a county of 1000000 people
Not necessarily
I'm not saying that, but it doesn't make any more sense for the majority to destroy the voice of the minority and vice versa

why should the masses of low IQ be allowed to vote, always out numbering the high IQ
There should be a required IQ test and a score of at least 110 to be allowed to vote.
If we're going with mob-rule I think we should at least stop the piles & piles of brainlets from voting
Just think about it user, a required IQ test to vote would instantly stop most mexicans, niggers, and women.
And anyone opposed to the idea, you could go
>THATS RACIST, ARE YOU SAYING WOMEN OR NIGGERS ARE STUPID? WHY WOULD AN IQ TEST HURT THEM?
perfect plan

Attached: 1548301027069.png (300x300, 85K)

Stupid nigger. Without the farmers of IL and the midwest your faggot nigger friends starve to death.

We wait for global warming to make coastal cities uninhabitable.
> They will just move into the country
No they will sit there waiting for someone to rescue them.
See hurricane Katrina.

We had that, it's banned now

we live in a society.

America imports a majority of the vegetables we eat. The only food America grows domestically is chicken and beef. those corn and onions fields go straight into cows and chickens.

If you abolish democracy and put an Emperor ypu no longer need electoral college

Here you go.

Attached: literacy test.png (1550x745, 255K)

IL has lost so many people the last decade that they are estimated to lose as few as 2 electors and as many as 4.

LEARN 2 KODE

Attached: dummies.png (250x316, 78K)

this is the only way to make it better

Attached: 1498487500773.jpg (1440x1419, 1.08M)

Get rid of pre-assigning all the votes, give all states their 3 guaranteed votes, then assign the remain 338 on election night based on the percent of the total popular vote your state actually turned out. That way the EC represents just the electorate and encourages people to vote if they actually care. The tiny states still will stay small with only 3 votes for the most part but the huge states will have their votes shifted to medium size states.

>>That means a rural county of 1000 people will have a greater vote impact than a county of 1000000 people
>Not necessarily

That's exactly what it means. A county with 12 people will count as much as say, LA county will hundreds of thousands.

Low population counties that are rural and exurban vastly outnumber urban and suburban ones. This idea of yours is electoral college times 10.

Also who even makes counties? Who decides how many there should be and how they're apportioned in each state?

Abolish it and use the popular vote.

LEARN

Attached: kode with karly.png (1357x1281, 1.49M)

We need to stop using the Electoral College as a measure of support and start using the popular vote. It's the 21st century for fuck's sake, why do Americans refuse to get on with the times?!

Attached: 1547864191695.png (768x1024, 987K)

Remove blacks

white land owning males are the only ones who should be allowed to vote

Removing all Blue states

well fuck, why

Attached: 1432526259390.png (665x662, 422K)

We can never return to the tried and true of only white, male landowners.(best interest in mind is the family unit)
It's not possible.

I fail to see the problem with that?

Attached: 1548309584315.jpg (640x640, 62K)