Redpilling my teacher

Hey Jow Forums, it's my senior year and I'm just about to start my research paper. I did the math and even if I do really badly on it I can still pass with an A. The paper must be about British literature and I'd like to use this opportunity to redpill my very liberal, feminist teacher. I was thinking about writing about 1984 but I don't know what my thesis would be. Any suggestions or different books?

Attached: 1984-1.jpg (1408x2142, 1.12M)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.org/details/TheNamelessWar_105
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Draw comparisons between 1984, Fahrenheit 451 and Brave New World with the liberal movement

switch books entirely to BNW and have your thesis be how society is moving ever closer to the nightmare drawn in the book.

Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut.

I guarantee you wasting your time on this isn't going to red pill her if you can get an A doing poorly on this use your time better and don't write one

New brave world is for the west
1984 is for countries like China Iran ksa

THIS. It burns them when uncanny references to these nightmare futures are correctly applied to their own philosophies. The truly believe evil only exists on the right hand path.

Harrison Bergeron is fantastic and addresses the problem with equality of outcome specifically, social hierarchy, etc, but it's probably too short to be the only work

This.

"Such, such were the days" by Orwell and "Murder Machine" by Pearse are a complete fuck you to the british style of education. Please read them, they're short essays.

Attached: 20181229_111910~2.jpg (2951x1082, 607K)

>Any suggestions or different books?

If you don't write about the democratically elected anti-war MPs who got imprisoned by Churchill during WWII without any charges you're a huge bellend.

archive.org/details/TheNamelessWar_105

Attached: 3.jpg (500x500, 141K)

THIS
Read BNW recently and its a 10/10 for anti progressive shit.
Did a speech on it too, lib instructor gave me a 100 because he was impressed

Double speak is common in English speaking countries only though. China and especially Iran has nothing to do with it.

1984 is an authoritarian dystopia where people are controlled through fear, violence and censorship, whereas BNW is about people being brainwashed through mass media, drugs and promiscuity. If you ask me, 1984 applies to China much more than it does the west.

Ok, thanks for clarification.

I remember an user explained that with an extra paragraph at the end of Brave New World, you turn 1984 into a sequel.

fitting, since 1984 left the events that lead up to it ambiguous.

It's not either 1984 or Brave New World for Europe. It's both at the same time.
Plebs, politicians, children, whamyn and boomers are controlled by media, easy pleasure and materialism.

While the few bright men of each generation, the few outliers, are mainly controlled by fear, violence and isolation through censorship of information. But also the standard materialism and of course.

Attached: Brave New World vs 1984.jpg (700x5531, 1004K)

no, it's the other way around

Was it?
Brave New World explains what happens before the book though...

note how the left is literally ingsoc

Attached: 1548244652026.jpg (698x871, 74K)

>Was it?
>Brave New World explains what happens before the book though...

Not at all, Brave New World is ultra-futuristic, and talks about a society that has been totally stabilized. No future, no past - just eternal stability enforced by limitless pleasure. 1984 on the other hand was just a few years ahead in time, and the stabilization process of society by the elites was still going on. There was still war between the three main factions of the world, and there were still parts of humanity that was not totally under control - some who even remembered the old days of freedom.

If anything is a sequel, it's Brave New World, which is several hundred years into the future - where the whole world has reached an eternal equilibrium (except for a few controlled human zoos). Brave New World uses much more refined, more futuristic methods of population control, while 1984 is basically just describing the Communist/Socialist-regimes in Eastern Europe at the time extrapolated a few years ahead into the future and applied to England.

Attached: 1984.png (792x549, 109K)

Fair enough.

Your post reminded me of Cats Cradle by Vonnegut for some reason.

Don't forget to draw this logo in the paper

Attached: nodflag2_big.png (880x411, 18K)

Peace through power my brother.

Attached: Kane.jpg (1000x1042, 60K)