Joe Rogan is fascinated by Bitcoin

The fact that Jow Forumsacks complain about censorship and wealth confiscation, the fed, the jews etc. but then also shit all over a form of money that is censorship resistant, non confiscateable, can't be devalue through Jewish trick (inflation), shows you how dumb this board is.

How is bitcoin controlled by chinks. Please explain.

You're comparing 2 different things here.
First of all cryptos are way too volatile to be considered a legit currency for trading goods
There's also no security. Yeah sure with fiat you get fucked by jews but your money is still "safe". They will also lend you money and protect you from scammers and people trying to fuck with you through cloned debit cards and shit.
There's also THOUSANDS of coins out there. That's a another problem for adoption. There should be one crypto and thats it.

youtu.be/6JsL3L6kQQE?t=618 (10:18)

Attached: p2p.jpg (1257x506, 87K)

Joe Rogan is too dumb to consistebtly listen to.
He's the epitome of the high school stoner that never grew up.

>There should be one crypto and thats it.
There is one crypto. It's called bitcoin. Every other coin is an imposter
>There's also no security.
There is no security in fiat. If the bank or the government decides to confiscate your money they can. You have no recourse. Bitcoin is the most secure form of money ever created, but you are responsible for securing your private keys. If you are too stupid and degenerate to secure your own money, you can use an insured custodial service, which is no different than having fiat in a bank.

Turns out massive amounts of DMT and being of low intelligence isn't a good combination after all.

I have a bitcoin that’s controlled by me

You shill crypto but I'd bet your employer pays you in fiat, you pay your rent in fiat, buy food in fiat, waste fiat in video games, alcohol, cell phone/internet bill etc...

Again one of the main problems with cryptos is that everyone in it is only interested for the money. You included. Deep down you don't give a shit about it. Crypto also uses a shitload of electricity for what it is, I can't imagine how much it would require for mass earthly adoption

>You shill crypto but I'd bet your employer pays you in fiat, you pay your rent in fiat, buy food in fiat, waste fiat in video games, alcohol, cell phone/internet bill etc...
Correct, and what a great world we live in. I'm sure you and Jow Forums are very happy with the status quo. No reason to try and free ourselves from our overlords.

>one of the main problems with cryptos is that everyone in it is only interested for the money
Those people sold long ago. The rest of us are doing something to take back our lives from our overlords, whereas you just shitpost on the internet and jerk off to trap porn.

>Crypto also uses a shitload of electricity for what it is
Small price to pay for freedom. Also, what is wrong with providing a real economic incentive for developing more efficient forms of energy other than government handouts and tax credits? And finally, do some research on lightning network.

So you own crypto but have you ever sold any? If so then again you're full of shit like everyone else that only wants to generate fiat.

If you believe in crypto so much, your best bet would be to develop an AWESOME video game and sell it against cryptos only. You could also open a store in your city that only accept crypto, but again you're a poser that only wants to generate fiat. In fact if you ever check the value of you BTC vs FIAT more than once or twice a year, you're a poser

There is literally nothing wrong with dropping a couple grand on bitcoin just in case.

You never know.

>So you own crypto
Where did I ever state that I owned crypto?

>If you believe in crypto so much, your best bet would be to develop an AWESOME video game and sell it against cryptos only. You could also open a store in your city that only accept crypto
I am a contractor and I gladly accept Bitcoin

Joe "the Washington Post can't lie" Rogan is a flip flopping faggot

So bitcoin has been here for what 8 years now? The whole world knows about it at this point. What's the next step for adoption according to you?

Realistically its only actual use right now is to buy illegal stuff on shady websites. You say you accept bitcoin as a contractor but I doubt anyone ever paid you in crypto beside maybe a close friend of yours

Imo crypto will never get adopted becausr the people that own the banks also own the TV channels, newspapers, social medias and US army. They'll never promote it which is required for mass adoption because people are too stupid. Now consider immigration and countries being more mixed (aka less united as a nation) and forget about it.

Crypto = pyramid scheme targeting stupid fucking millennials faggots.

So long as governments keep confiscating peoples money and financial institutions keep censoring transactions, there will be demand for bitcoin. As censorship and confiscation increases, so to will demand for bitcoin. The only way governments and banks and truly destroy bitcoin is if they stopped censoring transactions and confiscating money. This is unlikely. As far as adoption being hindered because govts and banks control the media, this is where Jow Forums can be useful. Jow Forumsacks just need to get on board.

youtu.be/NqxovpWcOJ4
youtu.be/kubGCSj5y3k
youtu.be/hYip_Vuv8J0
youtu.be/GSIDS_lvRv4

I just want voting to be on Blockchain

Attached: energy.jpg (1080x664, 130K)

Jow Forums here, eth is fucking aids. Also btc/link can't moon until there's a way of easily converting fiat money into cryptos.

Until that happens, nothing will happen. The benefits of 2017's moon mission was forcing the regulators and banks to shut it down by creating a futures market and enforcing KYC rules (know your customer)

They won't be able to use those same moves again during the next surge, now would be a good time to position yourself for the next bull run.

They own most of it. They manipulate the prices whenever they feel like it. They also work as a hive mind to take away money from everyone else. Rest in piss bitcoin 2009-2017

Blockchain voting would be a really sensible application, but what would be the economic model?

We desperately need decentralized fiat->crypto exchanges but I am not smart enough to figure out how that would work.

>99bitcoins.com/bitcoin-obituaries/

Attached: rip.png (542x437, 102K)

When you say 'they' are you referring to the Chinese government? Or Bitmain. If you mean the Chinese government I would need a source on that. If you are referring to Bitmain, I think you are vastly overestimated their power and influence. Also, neither of these scenarios make bitcoin either confiscatable or censorable, so they do not impact bitcoin's ability to fulfill its true purpose.

That's great and all, but what about LINK?

well you just can't, unless the exchange is KYC/AML compliant then mastercard/visa/amex and the banks won't allow fiat transfers to go through to the exchanges fiat bank account. The credit card companies were also quietly not processing payments to compliant exchanges like coinbase because they know that if crypto took hold then it's game over for them.

This stuff isn't discussed properly outside of crypto savvy people kvetching to their mates/the internet about this. The msm will call it "non complaint exchange shut down for safety" or words to that effect further muddying the waters of what's going on to casual observer and normie friend's who are still trying to figure out who this bitcoin guy is.

Attached: 1546002758931.jpg (720x960, 113K)

What ever happened to the Bitcoin ETF that was supposed to be coming?

SEC keep delaying their decision. I would be absolutely shocked if one was ever allowed in the US.

marketwatch.com/story/bitcoin-holds-firm-after-vaneck-and-solidx-pull-etf-proposal-2019-01-24

there have been multiple etf applications but this is the only one worth following.

it's ok not to post if you have no fucking idea what you're talking about

I guess if it was allowed, that would be a pretty strong indicator that the banks actually want Bitcoin to take over, for whatever reason.
Thanks

Also, adding to this, a bitcoin etf is very dumb in my opinion. Bitcoin is money. It is meant to be used as a non confiscatable store of wealth and a censorship resistant means of transaction. Holding bitcoin in an etf eliminates both of bitcoin primary features. I really don't see the point beyond allowing a new pool of degenerates to speculate.

BUY MY COINS

Attached: 5AE56061-B27B-43C2-AEE4-48A142998D92.jpg (808x805, 177K)

>Bitcoin is controlled by chinks
Nice meme, faggot.
>If they own most of it that means they control it right?
>What is a central bank that keeps printing the FIAT paper money I wanna use instead?
>What do you mean nobody can just print Bitcoins?

He didn't know what the fuck crypto was 2 episodes ago.

>what happened to the bitcoin ETF
I don't know what's going on there, last I saw the futures/options were being traded via that Chicago exchange that Andres guy was shilling for in 2017.

This is where it becomes really weird - because the BTC price should be an average of the trading price across the main exchanges, which is entirely separate to what the Chicago mercantile exchange or whoever is trading their BTC futures/options because they're operating outside of the online trading price.

The main crypto exchanges like binance and coinbase will be forcing the btc price down together by flooding sell orders on their exchanges at the request of the (((system))) - aka banks and regulators etc.

Because these exchanges control their sandbox they can force the price of BTC on their exchange up or down without anyone knowing if its market forces (supply and demand) or manipulation.

This was very interesting to watch in 2017 as the price on the western exchanges were always a few thousand dollars off what the chinese and koreans were trading at. A lot of people made a good amount of shekels by sending BTC from western exchanges over to the chinese exchanges and selling them there for an instant profit.

I think the reality is there's an unlimited amount of fiat money that can be used to manipulate any price, and (((they))) will do whatever it takes to stay in charge of issuing fiat currencies. Because BTC is valuation paired with fiat then BTC is by default being manipulated.

In conclusion; binance and coinbase etc will be working together to maintain an "acceptable" BTC price. This is extremely easy for them to do.

Then you have the futures market doing the same thing but outside of the crypto exchange system - and then you have the investment banks who can basically print fiat money to manipulate the price and on top of it all you have the fed who can do any kind of price manipulation they want via fiat printing. Ugh.. what a semitic mess.

Attached: 1548515240224.jpg (513x285, 105K)

big if true

(((Central authority)))

C H A I N L I N K

I get the impression he'd be fascinated by a jangling set of keys.

I've had the same discussions that is going on this thread a 100x.
In the end it all comes down to this:
As long as people are happy with government controlling the currency and paying taxes, Cryptos are only useful for black markets.
There is no scenario where everyone is happy with the status quo and suddenly start using BTC or whatever other Cryptos - why would they?
All this talk about volatility, BTC vs altcoins, backed by nothing mumbo-jumbo is just a symptom of current non public acceptance. The Cryptos eco system is so small that it is vulnerable to manipulation.
All these problems will be solved with public acceptance. Just like currently fiat money does.
But for public acceptance, something really big needs to happen - like hyperinflation of USD. Before that happens, Cryptos remain a Pipedream.

Joe Rogan's bidet has an ANUS-CAM so he can watch while he shits. Reasonable

>But for public acceptance, something really big needs to happen
This is why Jow Forums is so cucked and gay. You just want to sit around and wait for something to happen as opposed to making it happen. Bitcoin adoption will not occur until you adopt bitcoin

Not watching that liberal faggots video.

>Implying all money isn't imaginary
yikes

Attached: 1537726228633.jpg (720x617, 35K)