When will we fight? How do we organize?

Attached: 1548260544494.jpg (500x500, 54K)

Attached: Path of Escalation.png (712x1025, 1.54M)

I say.... when debt bubble pops. We all head to Minnesota. Go to the McDonald’s on 4th street in Minneapolis. Use the code phrase... “got any fries with that shake?”

Then we will proceed to make plans

You know what he means dumbass

most of us are not stormtarded

I think instead of doing violent actions we should all just be our best selves which is really easy to do if you actually care about your race. Any violent actions only gives the left something to whine about.

Like the Jewish murder riots of east Germany in the 30s making Germany more right wing, or like the Antifa riots waking so many young men up to the issues of diversity and women's rights.

no shit. just lay back and die and be happy bro!
no

Minnesota is too far away for me.

Why not something Chan like? We could have a contest where a bunch of tripfags debate each other live and at the end, all the regular Jow Forums posters vote on who aligns with their view for the future. After several trips have been selected, a new board is created where all political and ideological material goes. The Council of Trips could both post their own material, but also compile info from the various Chans but also other sources such as literature, history, and other websites.
Furthermore, theyd be tasked with designing books that coherently layout the information in an aesthetiically pleasing way.

And we expect them to do it for free?

Onig, seriously?

He was nothing as PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

You can bet he is nothing now.

every liberalist leftist policy and ideology is destroyed with simple facts. the only way they can win is to prohibit the debate because they will always lose. free speech must by at the forefront of all *protest* as it is under threat literally everywhere, ignore the shills they lie about this.

Attached: SlaveShips2.jpg (576x768, 60K)

I have to leave and go grocery shopping. When I come back I expect a plan
you might be clinically retarded

How do we reconcile "Free Speech!" and "Fake News!"?

Please be my fren. Because your already in my head.

Frens.

Attached: frens.png (565x547, 58K)

you'll be 65% FBI if you do

Said by who?
Calling fake news "fake news" is free speech, there's no contradiction there. The contradiction would be if the people advocating free speech made "fake news" illegal for being "fake". That's clearly not happening.

Yeah, i suppose. Bitcoin or something. I'm sure there are enough Jow Forums NEETS to make a sizeable pool. Not all NEETS NEET because they're lazy. Some do it because they want to fuck the system. Find a couple of those one

*gossip* was the original fake news, and we have always lived with it and warned of its dangers. It's part and parcel of a free society kek, although the media can be held to account in the courts on what they publish about people, it has to be truthful.

Attached: mel.png (1125x670, 567K)

Jews were murdering Germans in the streets until the Nazi party took power

What I mean is that you often see proponents of free speech also wanting something done about fake news. How does one reconcile those two points of view?

Checked.
Is anyone reading this that fits that bill?

>*gossip* was the original fake news, and we have always lived with it and warned of its dangers
I understand, but there's a big difference between the Jones's spreading rumors about the Smith's letting their dog on the dinner table and self-proclaimed trusted journalists giving biased and untrue accounts of national/world events. The average person isn't smart enough to root out the lies when it comes from MSM. We live that reality every day.

B A S E D

>collectivism
topkek enjoy slavery bootlicker statist cuck.
Libertarianism will always remain the better
and more realistic alternative than muh ethnostate.

People start degenerating even further? You reap what you sow, commie.
It's called natural selection.

Really, why's that?

You offered no explanation, and provided no evidence.

>if you even suggest collectivism has it's place you're a commie
>there is no strength in numbers
Enjoy that downward spiral, Hanz.

This only works once ALL non-whites are genocided. Too many people here ignore this very simple fact

Well then we will need different chapters around the country

>The average person isn't smart enough
This is true but it's not always about smarts. You may work long hours and just not have time to take in all the aspects of an issue so rely on headlines in your favourite news source. Journalism has never been a source of unbiased information, it's just not possible. Truly fake news is easily debunked and there are enthusiasts and courts for dealing with that, but subtle bias as exists in the BBC et al is something else but is constantly called out. Its up to people to know what the information quality really is, they are ultimately responsible for what they believe.

Attached: Annotation 2019-01-25 185620.png (548x556, 72K)

Nice try

Attached: D5AB875B-3A2B-4CA1-B100-C55E1A296C1B.jpg (225x225, 18K)

Modern journalism preys on those that are unintelligent and unaware. Those two demographics make up 99% of the United States. The industry colludes with secret agents of an unknown socio-political class, law enforcement, and government intelligence. The socio-political climate is not fostering awareness.

>Its up to people to know what the information quality really is, they are ultimately responsible for what they believe.
And that is being taken advantage of.

You can’t do anything, Jews/nwo have this timeline on lock and you can’t do a thing about it

Attached: 6071A39F-CE68-45CB-B94D-B64E15DE8413.png (800x799, 557K)

who are ((( we ))) ?
and what are ((( we ))) going to fight over?

The problem with most people is they want others to do the thinking. If everyone was responsible for their own arguments and beliefs, the world would be a much different place. You don't need information to make a judgement. People ignore this fact, and think "good" can come from only science or religion, when in reality it's one's own opinion that "good" is derived. If people woke up to this fact, egalitarianism would be among the first things to falter

The only "strength in numbers" I know is the number on my € bill.

topkek, whites are becoming a minority in America, how the fuck is fascism going to work over there?
Also, Libertarianism doesn't require people to not die to work.
If people will start stuffing themselves with an immense amount of recently legalized drugs, use all their rent money for 2d kiddie porn and get kicked out to the streets or get shot trying to break into someone's house at night, then in all of these scenarios these people REAPED what they SOWED.

Darwin called this process: Natural Selection.

>If people woke up to this fact
But like we already determined - the current socio-political climate doesn't allow for that. It's a fringe group that breaks the conditioning despite the conditions. There are still far to many people not just asleep but being suffocated with their own pillow.

>the only strength I know is money
Kike detected.

Jewish Trick Identified - Demoralization

Kikes not welcome.

Attached: 1548108826214.gif (640x360, 703K)

Yes, I know. I guess it was redundant. I'm in between things checking here so I'm not altogether here. That being said, there has to be something that we can do, apolitically, that will push more people to viewing things beyond the carrot dangling in front of them.
Well, you're not wrong in that there is a process called natural selection and that is generally how it works. Where we're not seeing eye to eye is that, utopian ideas, like libertarianism, cannot function without a utopian population, a pure white one.
Weaker governments lose to stronger ones. It's simple. That's what there are very few instances of anarchy around the world today

hahahaha idiot american I am not Jewish.

>there has to be something that we can do, apolitically, that will push more people to viewing things beyond the carrot dangling in front of them.
Lower the value of the carrot. How can we do that? There are some ways to do that already outlined in modern marketing (re: propaganda). The jews dismantled our society by paying women to act like men, then having their jew-owned publication make a national spectacle of it.

So a private publication would be key. One that is not governed by PC and the ADL.

You act enough like one. And if it looks like a kike and acts like a kike...

Check'd. In this day and age, information is key. We lack a way to disseminate reasonable sounding info and opinions beyond memes. I can't make a publication at the moment, but I've considered something similar before

youre just gonna call people who dont agree with you kikes, ebin simply ebin

Attached: 1546797346437.png (294x256, 197K)

kek

>How do we organize?
You don't. OMA all the way.

>I can't make a publication at the moment, but I've considered something similar before
That's alright - it's not up to just you to provide everything that's needed for success. All anyone can expect is that you do what you can. until recently, all i could do was shitpost to raise awareness on Jow Forums. Then I bought a Talmud to share with you all. Now I'm buying up some rural land. We do what we can, when we can. If it helps the cause it helps your brothers.

That said, none of that changes what is still needed and the message stands for anyone who agrees and is willing to do something about it. How do we create a publication? We need printers, we need to be able to bind books, we need to purchase ISBN numbers, and we need clients to fund it.

>you're going to call everyone who disagrees a kike
No, I'm going to call kikes kikes. German user explicitly stated money is his god. Demoralization user didn't just disagree he was intentionally spreading doubt.

Do you disagree? If so, why?

you can't win. scapegoating is for pussies

Kikes not welcome.