I was taught the lie that the Civil War was based solely on slavery, what’s the truth? Long live Jonny Reb

I was taught the lie that the Civil War was based solely on slavery, what’s the truth? Long live Jonny Reb

Attached: DF8F9DFF-D90D-4903-B85E-03C2454A44EB.jpg (615x914, 309K)

Other urls found in this thread:

civilwarhome.com/population1860.htm
civil-war.net/pages/1860_census.html
myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-and-the-african-slave-trade/
jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jewish-population-in-the-united-states-nationally
onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupid?key=olbp66186
youtube.com/watch?v=MzxVjBxjX-4
youtube.com/watch?v=sst5Z5_5akg
youtube.com/watch?v=_Aa3Wu6ocV0
youtube.com/watch?v=fUXoOiSXYDY
youtube.com/watch?v=j7VkQSb7JlI
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_myth
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Bunch of rich fags from the South tricked poor farmers to fight for the right for the rich to own slaves.

Basically this, then to conceal the fact that it was about rich people using their power to better themselves at the expense of the poor, they argued that it was a matter of states rights.

And then to further this you enact a law that if you own more than 20 slaves you are exempt from conscription.
"Rich man's war, poor man's fight"

Sounds like some Judaic shit

Most slave owners were ethnic jews

So find me the war letter, where the White Northern man marches off to war and a high likely hood of dying, where he says, "I will gladly sacrifice my life, so the negro slave can be free." Answer you can't. Slavery was a moral excuse to justify an illegal and brutal invasion of the CSA.

Attached: gardner-round-top.jpg (900x658, 151K)

I'm anti-slavery, but I'm also anti-nigger.

Slaves should have been rounded up and dumped in Liberia.

the souf wanted to trade with euros instead of the north. North didn’t like this. A bunch of states rights versus federalism stuff too. Lincoln needed something a bit more tangible than these things so slavery became the thing.

I know this is true but is there a reliable source to have on hand to prove the point when I need it

Agreed. What is that picture of?

Attached: DD9D8AB1-FC63-4DCC-98FA-81BD881E76B5.jpg (654x363, 448K)

Civil War would have been a non factor in history had the Union done this. They fucked up though, and now the US Civil War was nothing more than 1.2 million White American Men dying for nothing. Entire war was started by politicians on both sides who refused to cooperate or meet each other half way. Why give a fuck about a war if you're not the one fighting in it? Same deal with FDR.

Damn.

Wrong. Small to medium sized farmers who had no slaves were getting crushed by terrifs imposed by the feds. Rich people wanted cheap labor and the poor and middle class wanted free from terrifs. Just so happed all the above were pissed at the feds.

Jew media lies.

In 1860, the peak of slavery, the total free population of the United States and its territories was 27,489,561. A total of 393,975 people owned 3,953,760 slaves.

civilwarhome.com/population1860.htm

civil-war.net/pages/1860_census.html

That's just 1.4% of the total population that owned slaves.

While 40% of jews in the US owned slaves. Pic and link related. This is a jew source. Other sources have it MUCH higher.

myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-and-the-african-slave-trade/

There were 200,000 jews in the US in 1860.

jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jewish-population-in-the-united-states-nationally

40% of 200,000 = 80,000

So 80,000 jews owned slaves.

393,975 - 80,000 = 313,975 non-jews owned slaves.

80,000 jew slave owners

313,975 non-jew slave owners

Thus, at a minimum, 26% of all slave owners were jews, despite being just a minuscule 0.7% of the population. The actual percentage was likely much higher.

Attached: jew slave owners.jpg (609x228, 56K)

Reminder: Despite what is portrayed via jew controlled media, Billy Bob le evil white male on his 10 acre dirt farm did not own slaves. Slaves were *extremely expensive* along with other factors (white Christians typically being opposed to slavery etc).

Who bought slaves and had them imported to the US? The mega plantations. Who owned and ran the mega plantations? Pic related.

Attached: jews (((cotton trade))).jpg (1275x1632, 467K)

Fear among Southerners that the federal government was overreaching and that state sovereignty was thus being undermined was a large factor.
And lo and behold - their fear was COMPLETELY warranted.

After the exaggerations and outright lies surrounding the Holohoax, the biggest redpill jews desperately attempt to hide from the goyim is their role in the African slave trade.

90%+ of the Africa to North America slave trade was a jewish enterprise.

The bible on the subject: onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupid?key=olbp66186

youtube.com/watch?v=MzxVjBxjX-4

youtube.com/watch?v=sst5Z5_5akg

youtube.com/watch?v=_Aa3Wu6ocV0

youtube.com/watch?v=fUXoOiSXYDY

youtube.com/watch?v=j7VkQSb7JlI

Attached: slave trade examples.jpg (602x432, 104K)

>Despite what is portrayed via jew controlled media

Attached: Hollywood.jpg (475x502, 107K)

>jew controlled media

Attached: 2014_media.jpg (1600x1244, 665K)

Oh, it was about state's rights.

...Southern states's rights to own slaves, that is. You know, that thing which had been an obvious and constant point of tension up until that point, so much so that admissions of states to the Union were organized around keeping slave/free states roughly equal.

the truth is you went broke and argued on how to pay or keep your cunt afloat

>jew controlled media

Attached: mainstream media.jpg (3755x5759, 2.48M)

I think it had more to do with the fact that the North wanted complete imperial governmental control on every state, and southern states wanted their sovereignty

Shelby Foote's "The Civil war" is a very good read

That being said the south is now dead and the North continues to do what they always do of short term pillage

America would have been a much better place if the south won

Attached: Nathan_Bedford_Forrest_Statue.jpg (800x1071, 168K)

>rights to own slaves
Oy vey, this. That's what it was all about.

Also, fuck white people.

Never forget the holohoax or slavery.

Evil goyim.

Attached: so sorry.jpg (604x478, 86K)

>what is the truth
confederalism versus federalism. usa was actually a confederation in its initial liberty. this was founded in the articles of confederation but these got rejected, however, because of Common Law, the precedence had been laid down that the states didn't really need to obey a central authority. Then an economic rift formed over the next century and a half. The north industrialized while the jews used the southern weather to grow cotton crops with niggers. So the South depended on slavery ya da ya da ya da. Now, the north held most political power and they said 'fuck slaver, it's done'
The South said 'fuck off, we have confederational precedence kikes'
And the North, to show its big sloppy dick through enforcing federation and eliminating confederationalism, invaded. Slavery wasn't why it was fought, it was merely the spark of a constitutional issue that had been brewing since the USA had half-assedly said 'we are a federation but kind of a confederation' a century earlier

the truth is that no one officialty went to war for slavery.
The union officially went to war to put down a rebellion. The confederacy went to war to protect against northern agression.

But in the end the root causes for the divide can pretty much all be traced back to the slavery issue. So yes, slavery.

Bump
Fuck niggers.

ITS

ALWAYS

ABOUT

MONEY

Attached: 1530593908410.jpg (1539x1022, 1.01M)

>Never forget the holohoax or slavery.
Much like the Holohoax, slavery has become part of our foundation myth thanks to our friends, the jews.

What is a foundation myth?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_myth

It fulfills three functions.

1) It explains the origin and structure of the world (and society).

2) It defines ultimate good and evil (and from those definitions are derived the values that are used to justify the holding of power).

3) It determines what is held sacred in that society.

For modern Westerners the story of WWII has become their foundation myth. It fulfils all three functions.

1) We live in the ‘Post-War World’. The lines on the map, the institutions, the sense of what era we live in, all arise from the starting point of WWII.

2) "Ultimate evil" is Nazis. "Ultimate good" is opposing Nazis. The values derived from these definitions are anti-racism, equality, diversity, anti-nationalism and so on.

3) The only thing that is held sacred, that cannot be denied or mocked in the contemporary West, is the Holocaust.

The problem is that all three functions are backwards or negative.

Instead of the origin event being one of fertility and new life, it was a conflagration of death and destruction.

Instead of ultimate good taking the central position in the story that slot is occupied by ultimate evil. Everyone knows that Adolf Hitler, the "personification of evil", holds the center point of the WWII story.

Instead of that which is held sacred being something mysterious and sublime it (the Holocaust) is an obscenity.

**Having a negative foundation myth means the tree of life for Westerners is poisoned**

This is by jew design.

Wow. Were the politicians white are Jews? Sounds like modern day white Americans dying in the Middle East

Attached: EBB210C4-E11A-42AC-A6E3-360BEB8BE583.jpg (664x531, 383K)

Jewtube won’t let me watch any of those videos...

What do the Jews gain from this?

Attached: B47BEFA1-6CAA-44C2-B997-9E0C6FA787A1.jpg (672x995, 429K)

Clicks.

Lol they’ll let me watch the nog videos but not David Duke’s

Attached: A5F1B839-A0FF-4A1F-9117-B2A673E5CBA0.jpg (669x963, 665K)