White people didn't evolve from niggers, the opposite happened. Niggers have archaic DNA which whites DO NOT have.
This implies that : White people spreading out to Africa 40.000 years ago matted with Homo Erectus and created the hybrid which is know today as subsaharan African or Nigger in Jow Forums speak.
Now the question still remains where did white people come from?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
en.wiktionary.org
twitter.com
This BTFO the Out of Africa Theory
>Now the question still remains where did white people come from?
God
>RH- blood
You know the answer.
I believe this to be true. There is no other explanation. We come from the stars.
Who here knows any smart people? White, black, brown, yellow? Exactly. Most people are fucking stupid. All stupid people must fucking hang. Window-lickers, mouth breathers, oxygen thieves, all need to go. Mandatory IQ and physical tests. Spartan style. The (((jewish shitstain))) has pollutes the gene pool. Let's drain ans refill.
Varg says we come from Neanderthals
But non-whites are ugly and either are physically pathetic or dont have personality traits for civilization.
After Homo Sapiens left Africa 70,000 years ago, they interbred with archaic human species everywhere. African homo sapiens interbred with the archaic human species already living in Africa. Asian homo sapiens interbred with archaic Denisovans. European homo sapiens interbred with archaic Neanderthals.
Africans don't have Neanderthal or Denisovan DNA. Europeans don't have Denisovan or African DNA. Asians don't have Neanderthal or African DNA.
Europeans didn't evolve from modern Africans the same way modern Africans didn't evolve from Europeans. Both share a common ancestor, and evolved separately.
So I'm an ayy lmao? Wat
Some RH- people are. An average of 1-2% of white people are gray hybrids.
Out of Africa theory is the most likely scenario. However this only proves the superiority of Europeans. We evolved from niggers, proving our builds, intellects and survival skills were better. The out of Africa theory is a redpill.
I have a skinhead friend who's really into the blood type conspiracy who told me that rh- blood types are descendants of the reptile people or whatever. Do you people really believe stuff like that?
we never evolved from africans. They have archaic DNA which no European has. Like I said, the opposite happened. Europeans genocided Homo Erectus and matted with them. The result was a hybrid which is what we call niggers today
>because there is no explanation Iwill take, its god
Argument from ignorance? Why?
I think the Out of India Theory holds more credibility than the Out of Africa Theory.
>They have archaic DNA which no European has
What does this even mean?
>Who here knows any smart people?
I actually know a lot. Stop hanging out with retards and connect with people who know what they are doing with their lives.
This does not match up with fossil records. Homo Sapiens (african version) were around before Homo Sapiens came into contact with Neanderthals in Europe, unless some remains are found in Europe pre-dating those found within Africa, the theory stands.
>rh- blood types are descendants of the reptile people
RH- probably came from neanderthals. Most people who are alien hybrids are with grays. So don't think so? What do you mean by you people
show me another 'mammal' that sheds skin :^)
>topic
its more like out of the middle east, and im not arguing this with people who still believe the africa theory is legit.
Imagine if blacks could create viable offspring with a gorrila. A thousand years from now there would be people with gorrila dna that isn't found in humans. Now imagine that gorrilas are extinct and we dont have any evidence of them so nothing to compare the anomalous dna too.
The Out Of Africa theory is not entirely bullshit though, as African tribes some 60,000 years ago did leave and spread out across parts of Asia (India, Sentinel, Andaman, Papua, Australia (of course the Abbos picked up some weird DNA along the way)
Now, what is 100% bullshit is 1. The majority understanding of the O.O.A theory, for example, people for some reason thinking it suggests Africans as they exist today magically transformed into everyone else. And 2. The theory in regards to European who clearly have nothing in common for starters with the African tribes who were migrating 60,000 years ago.
My own personal theory is this, the ancestor of the Neanderthals (and Denisovans) had been living outside of Africa for a very long time, and the humans who would eventually mix with the Neanderthals had also been living separately from other tribes, now it's possible if you assume this that the early human tribe in question MAY have also lived in Africa but was already at the time they left genetically distinct from all the other tribes on the continent, combine their genetic distinction with the fact that they would go on to mix with Neanderthals and you can see how the O.O.A theory may still have some truth to it without suggesting that a bunch of proto-zulus are our ancestors.
What evidence do you have to suggest this is the case?
God created us whites,
the creation of niggers is one of our greatest failings, niggers are the way they are as a punishment from Heaven for the sins of our ancestors.
please see this im interested in having the discussion
Africans have the dna of ancestors who are not currently in the fossil records OR are being hidden from us because of PC supported corrupt ((((scientists)))
People that are into the blod type conspiracies, to me blood type seems just a form of adaptation. I've seen Jow Forumsaks post pictures where it says that Rh- is actually the factor of the cromagnoms. I'm really confused as to what importance blood type and factor would have.
Is that Travis Scott?
Black skin is a evolutionary trait you could say it's not something original. Developed to help survive the equatorial sun.
So yea out of Africa theory to me makes no sense. If I had to guess I would say maybe some form of early human that evolved in Asia migrated across the middle east & ended up getting cooked in the sun. And when they eventually multiplied to the point they began spreading back north and retained their original skin colors.
Asians have the most neanderthal dna, though.
What is: speculation
We are not native to this planet. Our skin burns when we stay too long in the sun. We come from somewhere else
>Rh- is actually the factor of the cromagnoms
This may be the case as well. Blood type is typically attributed to genetics represented in general geological areas.
it means the common ancestor doesnt match up so the theory is bunk, or as has been described above, essentially backwards.
I wonder how many people ITT know what "zygote" means out of curiosity. im guessing not the parrots.
Asians have Denisovan DNA. The Denisovans and Neanderthals have a common ancestor.
what do you mean ?
Gods from space.
>and matted with them
who would fuck a monkey and it's not like monkeys wouldn't rip your hand/dick off
Thats because for thousands of years our ancestors were living in the gloomy forests at the very north of the world.
Indeed. And any of you cultural Marxist, race denialists out there who are screaming silently to yourself "OUT OF AFRICA! OUT OF AFRICA! WE'RE ALL THE SAME", get with the fucking program and go read some of the latest science articles about this shit, you'll learn "Out of Africa" theory has been discredited, and they've now moved onto other theories, all based on humanoid ancestral discoveries made in Europe and Asian in the last couple of decades.
Blood type affect the type of disease peoples are prone to, like African are especially prone to sickle cell disease, which isn't a thing in healthy european population.
>White people didn't evolve from niggers, the opposite happened.
Both evolved from your pic
that doesn't make sense. We are not either adapted to live in the cold. The only thing which allows us to live in the cold is our superior technology.
Why don't chinks which live thousands of years in the north pol not evolve to europeans? See inuits
it is bullshit , earlier finds have been found in eastern europe and that's not the earliest either - just normal-ish science accepted
youtu.be
The north. Correct. Adaptation occurs.
the thing in the OP is homo Erectus
>We are not either adapted to live in the cold. The only thing which allows us to live in the cold is our superior technology.
Thats bullshit
>Why don't chinks which live thousands of years in the north pol not evolve to europeans? See inuits
Speaking english, you do not, right am I?
neither from the north. We only lived in the north because of our technology
Most proof of people living in the past would have been obliterated by recurring Ice Ages. Especially near to the poles which is why Middle East and the surrounding area is so rich in remains and ruins of ancient civilizations (Egyptians, Sumerians, Babylonians etc.)
Should also take in to account that during Ice Ages the seas are significantly lower as the ice builds up and civilizations usually develop next to oceans or plentiful rivers. So most likely there's untold number of lost civilizations under hudred meters of water.
you know what I meant
I mean he's black, but not exactly modern nigger
Blacks, whites, all evolved from that thing
>it means the common ancestor doesnt match up
According to who?
What evidence do you have to suggest either of those ideas are actually true?
All this speculation. At this point pray the ayys have been here for at least hundreds of thousands of years and recorded everything from outer space.
Imagine watching 100% accurate Earth history.
Modern humans are not indigenous to subsaharan Africa. They evolved in Europe and then spread to Asia. Negroids are a primitive hominid species.
homo erectus was known to be a lazy fuck. Its not exactly new knowledge. Its common knowledge. And yeah the europeans fucked it. Its exactly how Europeans fucked africans a few hundred years ago during colonial times
Either way I don't think it's possible for a being as advanced as humans to evolve in Africa. There's not enough reason for it to happen.
There's plenty of food, water and trees to hide away from predators.
Meanwhile in the north where there's snow monkeys like in Asia
These types of creatures would need to push their minds to stay alive and nothing is going to evolve to the next level without that need to survive.
youtube.com
DNA, did you forget your own comment?
the missing link is unironically niggers
>Imagine watching 100% accurate Earth history.
sounds depressing, and boring
>We are not either adapted to live in the cold.
It has nothing to do specifically with the cold, after 1,000+ years of living in a gloomy climate the body will begin to produce less and less melanin and the skin will get lighter. And of course, the Neanderthals who our early human ancestors mixed with were already rather light skinned.
I know about those finds, but like I said... the O.O.A theory is not complete bullshit as niggers did leave Africa 60,000 years ago. Also i'm not watching a 2 hour long video lol.
>technology
Wearing warmer clothes, and building fires is technology? That's all that is needed. I dont know why you think living in northern regions require "technology"
chinks (inuits) have been living since thousands of years in the north pol, and they never evolved to europeans, so you can kill yourself
>White people didn't evolve from niggers
Correct. We share a common ancestor. Blacks also evolved, from that ancestor.
What comment? I'm not following you
common ancestor? Niggers have archaic DNA which whites don't have
see here
>what does archaic DNA mean
>comment tree
kys
>Wearing warmer clothes, and building fires is technology?
yes it is
does that mean Inuits will evolve into europeans? Wait that never happened. Inuits have been living in the cold since thousand of years
The “common ancestor” is one white retard who stuck his dick in a monkey. White people aleays been white.
We have archaic DNA, we evolved from something archaic. I dont know why you keep going back to this vague assertion of us not being archaic at one point. Its baseless and nonsensical
If human life evolved in Africa, and modern day Africans have been in Africa mixing with each other the longest, then of course they have inside them genetic leftovers of ancestors who we do not have in our fossil records.
Compare that to Europeans, who people ITT are suggesting evolved separately to the majority of Africans and therefore are not carrying the DNA of these lost ancestors, just like how Africans are not carrying the DNA of Neanderthals.
>We have archaic DNA
which one?
> we evolved from something archaic
no we didn't
>does that mean Inuits will evolve into europeans?
No it doesn't. I'm not even sure how you think that's an argument against what i'm saying lol. There is more to race than skin colour. If Africans lost all their melanin they wouldnt become European either.
So? Our common ancestor or its descendants that remained in Africa bred with other early hominids in Africa, just as ours did with Neanderthals (and Denisovians for Asians) when they got to Europe.
it means old for fuck sake
en.wiktionary.org
it means there is a sequence of DNA present in one and not the other
now fuck off from this genetics discussion.
It wasnt answered, that's why I'm asking. Its vague nonsense that has zero evidence to suggest this is actually the case. All im seeing is people upset they share a common ancestor with blacks, so they decide to do some mental gymnastics and just make assertions without any proof. This is what I'm saying. Give me something to substantiate your claim.
That may be the stupidest thing ever read.
I wont ask you again
Do you think they didnt learn these things at that time?
there is no evidence for what you're suggesting. besides the Out of Africa theory has been debunked. What I am saying is that whites fucked Homo Erectus not a long time and the hybrid is what we call niggers nowadays
just look at niggers today.. do you seriously believe they're able to make clothes or discover fire?
We share a common ancestor. Our group branched off and went north. We evolved from there throughout time. That's all. This isnt difficult to understand.
>If Africans lost all their melanin they wouldnt become European either.
doesn't that basically prove that africans never evolved into europeans?
>where did white people come from
Andromeda. we were put here to rule over the savages and we were doing a great job of it up until recently.
that never happened. An archaic human (homo erectus for example) doesn't just magically evolve into an European just because he moves to another region of the world. The Cold doesn't magically turn a nigger into an European. Race is more than skin
Varg is a brainlet tho. His understanding of christianity is literally fedora-tier. You actually need a pretty deep understanding of history and culture to "get" christianity, if you werent raised by a good family. This should explain why christian zionists are only found in the uninformed, myopic masses of north america.
fuckin anglo
> Not taking the "Gap Theory" pill.
I dont even know you anymore, /pol.
ye ooa is genuine, they're leaving it right now
Argument from ignorance. What you think and what actually happened are clearly two different things. Substantiate your claim, please.
Couldn't Africans have picked up this DNA after what became the European/Asians populations left Africa? Especially since this archaic DNA is most heavily present in West Africans and the European/Asian population left through east Africa? It would take a while for the archaic DNA to spread after interbreeding.
and the american negroid christcuck barges in again, lmao
>doesn't that basically prove that africans never evolved into europeans?
of course, africans did not evolve into europeans, i never said they did.
I agree, but that ancestor had nothing in common with modern africans, which is what many people seem to think the OOA theory is suggesting.
This is a subjective term that doesnt say anything about DNA. Your link is an empty page. What does this mean in DNA terms, and why do you think it matters in any way?
Kek put a source on there and it is meme gold.
imo africans are the left overs that didn't bother leaving africa, hence why everyone else made civilizations and the 'culture' there didn't blossom into anything further than survival, which fine that's cool, they're good at surviving in small villages uncontacted by the advanced world. but lets not delude them any further into thinking they can have advanced cities or even handle modern tech. and its not from a bigoted, hateful place i say this, its from a pragmatic perspective after reviewing the absolute disaster that continent is.
Don't you have semen to drink LARPagan? I mean, you want to worship Odin don't you?
>but that ancestor had nothing in common with modern africans
It does, it's the ancestor you just agreed to being shared. The variation between us is due to evolution.