TRUMP PULLING OUT OF NUKE TREATY

Can confirm, my pants have been full of poopies since 2016.

WE SHOULD OF LISTENED

Attached: 1415770862661.jpg (5000x5000, 1.31M)

WE DIDN'T LISTEN!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!

Attached: 1540666542796.gif (400x243, 2M)

Whats the idea here -why would this be necessary?

Bargaining chip?

Putin already violates it. That's why Trump is pulling out. No sense holding us to terms Putin ignores.

Based

Attached: 1543641433862.webm (480x360, 2.92M)

This.
Putin does it all the time, Trump finally said quid pro quo.
Media: REEEEEEEE TRUMP

Why do people believe this fucking channel? They have no credibility

Based, now we can nuke mexico

the main reason isn't that Russia is violating it or that the US is violating it the problem is that China is not signed into it at all so it's meaningless in the current scheme of things the nuclear powers of earth need to make a new joint agreement

He’s going full neo-cohen in response to his entire domestic agenda being BTFO, Obama did the same thing and do did Bill Clinton after they were defeated in the mid-term elections in their first term in office.

Israel isn't party to it and Russia has violated it so what's the point of the treaty?

taostyle.net/2017/02/william-coupon-dafa/
>I asked about the photograph of Donald Trump holding the dove.
>“He was 32 years old when I took that photograph, in 1983.” Bill explained. “He was attempting to (independently) negotiate an agreement between the Israelis and Palestinians at the time.”

mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/article122745894.html
>Trump had a plan to work with Russia to cut back nukes in 1987. Might he try it now?

motherjones.com/politics/2016/06/trump-files-donald-trumps-nuclear-negotiating-fantasy/
>The Trump Files: Donald’s Nuclear Negotiating Fantasy

>In the 1980s, Donald Trump became a global symbol of wealth and success who wasplanning to buildthe tallest skyscraper in the world. But the one deal hereallywanted to cut was an arms reduction treaty with the Soviet Union that would take nuclear missiles off the Cold War’s battlefield. It’s now clear that Trump knowsquite literally nothingabout nuclear weapons, but then he fantasized going toe-to-toe with the Russkies at the nuclear bargaining table.

>“It’s something that somebody should do that knows how to negotiate and not the kind of representatives that I have seen in the past,”he toldtheWashington Postin 1984. “It would take an hour-and-a-half to learn everything there is to learn about missiles…I think I know most of it anyway.”

>Three years later, growing even more alarmed about Libya and other rogue nations getting the bomb,he toldauthor Ron Rosenbaum that he was indeed working with the Reagan White House on nukes. “I’m dealing at a very high level on this,” he said.

>Trump was frightened about the spread of nuclear technology—he seemed at one point during the interview to suggest the United States should bomb France to keep it from selling nuclear know-how—and worried about the deal-making skills of American officials. “They have no smiles, no warmth; there’s no sense of them as people,”

Attached: 1530360230568.jpg (1400x1903, 309K)

slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_spectator/2016/03/trump_s_nuclear_experience_advice_for_reagan_in_1987.html
>Trump’s Nuclear Experience: In 1987, he set out to solve the world’s biggest problem.
>Donald Trump with the power to destroy life on earth. At the heart of the near hysterical (and mostly justified) Fear of Trump that escalates as he approaches the Republican nomination is the Fear of Trump With the Trigger. That explosive temperament combined with that explosive capability.

>But it has largely been forgotten that Trump is not new to nuclear matters. He has beenthinking abouthow he’d handle nuclear weaponsand nuclear proliferation for more than a quarter-century, at least since 1987, when heclaimed to me that he was “dealing at a very high level” with people in the White House (that would have been the Reagan White House) on doomsday questions.

>“Those people think that because we have it and the Russians have it, nobody will ever use it because they’re assuming everybody’s not necessarily mad. They don’t see Qaddafi walking into an airplane and slapping his subordinates and screaming like a madman on the airplane to the pilots. The man is a psycho.

>“I mean, what if he’s got the bomb and something happens like the time we shot down two of his planes. And he’s enraged and he can’t see straight and he’s got twenty missiles pointed right at the United States. Washington. I mean, do you think there’s a chance he won’t press the button?”

>“And then there’s the briefcase bomb.”

>“Carry it in your briefcase, right. I’m not even talking about airplanes and missiles. You’ll walk in with your damn tape recorder,” he says, pointing to my innocent Sony, “and you’ll say it’s a tape recorder and nobody will be able to tell the difference. I mean, that’s where it’s going to be in 20 years.”

Attached: 1547538243934.jpg (2158x1907, 1.5M)

A nuke is a nuke in the end though. A low yeald nuke used on say Russian assets will be seen as a nuke. Retaliation would probably be lots of high yeald ICBM nukes launched.
So why make tiny nukes?

So what is the deal Trump thinks can be done? What is the Trump Plan?

>It’s a deal with the Soviets. We approach them on this basis: We both recognize the nonproliferation treaty’s not working, that half a dozen countries are on the brink of getting a bomb. Which can only cause trouble for the two of us. The deterrence of mutual assured destruction that prevents the United States and the USSR from nuking each other won’t work on the level of an India-Pakistan nuclear exchange. Or a madman dictator with a briefcase-bomb team. The only answer is for the Big Two to make a deal now to step in and prevent the next generation of nations about to go nuclear from doing so. By whatever means necessary.

The text below was first published in Manhattan, inc., in 1987, and later collected inManhattan Passion, under the headline “Trump: The Ultimate Deal—In which we see the world through the eyes of Qaddafi’s pilot.”

>“My uncle who just passed away was a great scientist,” Trump is telling me as we make our way out of his office to the elevator. “He was a professor at MIT. Dr. John Trump. In fact, together with Dr. Van de Graaff they did the Van de Graaff generator. He was the earliest pioneer in radiation therapy for cancer. He spent his whole life fighting cancer and he ended up dying of it.”

>It was his uncle, Trump tells me, who got him started thinking about The Subject.

>“He told me something a few years ago,” Trump recalls. “He told me, ‘You don’t realize how simple nuclear technology is becoming.’ That’s scary. He said it used to be that only a few brains in the world understood it and now you have a situation where thousands and thousands of brains can easily understand it, and it’s becoming easier, and someday it’ll be like making a bomb in the basement of your house. And that’s a very frightening statement coming from a man who’s totally versed in it.”

Attached: 1542607241791.jpg (1406x1708, 906K)

Absolutely based

Tactical nuclear weapons maybe, but I got the impression that he was going to refit the entire arsenal with low yield warheads. They are banned by treaty because they are more likely to be used.

Sounds comfy

Attached: 1542108336938.jpg (1255x2300, 1.06M)

Attached: 1485466207231.png (1249x8613, 2.52M)

HOLYSHIT A NUCLEAR TREATY JUST FLEW OVER MY HOUSE

To be sold for recreational purposes

Attached: 1494429145426.jpg (538x445, 62K)

>Trump pulling out if the "Don't Immanentize The Eschaton Treaty"
Sounds fun.

man I'm so God damn hungry why the fuck haven't I gotten up to eat something

Attached: btfo.jpg (763x388, 63K)

>if we repeat this thousand times everyone will believe it

...and all those people went on to get some form of cancer. The end.

Is there anything is US law specifically barring me from obtaining a nuke as long as I pay for the requisite tax stamp in an agreeable state like maybe Alaska?

Looks like 2nd amendment nukes are back on the table boys

>Russian
>Lying
Checks out.

>tfw Venezuela is in intermediate range

Attached: 1546886515452.png (460x613, 497K)

Why pull out of a treaty? If there is sufficient need we would just break the treaty anyways.

Think about cluster bombs.
Bid nukes are very impractical you either need to hit a relatively small area like a dleet group airbase or a military base or glass entire nation like Iran with a carpet of small nukes.

A bigger nuke is less efficient than a bunch of small ones, it kinda makes a big shroom most of which goes to space

It means he's a Zionist/neocon stooge.

>burger
>retarded
Yep.

If other treaty members aren't following the treaty what's the point of the treaty?

Russia is already building missiles that violate the treaty. The reported range for the missiles, novator if I recall correctly, is 298 miles, while 310 miles is the low bound for the INF treaty. If they have any appreciable factor of safety, modifying the propulsion to achieve a 4% increase in range would allow them to travel treaty-violating distances. It's not just us that believe they are already able to do this, NATO echoed the sentiment.
We are also putting aegis ashore on Romania and Turkey, and they are being equipped with the SM-3 missiles we conveniently tested successfully against such an intermediate range balistic missile recently.
The cold war is fully back on imo

Restrictions on sales of hazardous materials and the lack of suppliers willing to sell.

Its not illegal for you to buy one, but it is illegal for everyone to sell it to you.

You are fine. Remain in bed and touch yourself some more.

One of your asshats go summon Oppenheimer from Jow Forums

Yeah, USA never followed it to begin with, they just want to make it look legitimate now that missile sites around Russia more or less ready for those missiles.

others are cheating it and we need to begin developing supersonic icbm
we're already behind

It's because he knows there aren't any real nukes anymore. He's probably been informed that the ayy's disarmed all the nukes on the planet, and that through DARPA and black books projects, the USMIC has created many more, much more destructive, weapons and tools. Some of these include Sonic De-atomizers, Fist Sized Compressed Lazer Cannons, and FTL Knuckledusters. These old treaties will soon be revealed to be completely outdated as secret to becomes revealed during the slow walk disclosure that will begin this summer.

neither did russia. in fact, russia has never followed an arms-control treaty.

blump4drumpf

neither has Canada or Guam

BYE BYE CALIFORNIA!

Attached: 1541112020456.jpg (443x359, 41K)

Too bad facts tell us otherwise. On the other hand, all Murica has is "we think so" and "we have proofs but we won't show it to anyone because it's a secret".

t. wayne

Ivan, you do it all the time. Thing is most Americans completely understand why- we (unrestrained politicians and their handlers) are forcing you into a corner of self defense. Both sides makes sense to me.

>Too bad facts tell us otherwise.

proofs

I have this saved on two computers, two phones and possibly an iPad and I've never actually got round to reading it. I always just go "I should read that some time, it looks interesting"

Smith, it's called "projection". Your politicians think "we're doing it, so that means others doing the same". But when asked to prove it, all they can give is words and more words, nothing else. I bet you didn't even heard in your news about this eng.mil.ru/en/news_page/country/more.htm?id=12213705@egNews

but it scares the absolute shit out of all who behold its might

>invading
>starving children and families applying for asylum is “invasion”
Are you scared of the starving children?
You realize nuking latin america would nevessarily mean more refugees right?

... then...
nuke them again

Attached: hockley.jpg (1385x2048, 252K)

based Paki

Based Ivory Coast with the bantz.

Genocide all of Latin America?

But will he have the balls to actually nuke Russia, Iran, China and Syria?
Or is it just nothing as usual?

This... Chinks rising

Attached: 1548717786268m.jpg (1024x702, 56K)

>W-why?
To nuke something retard? Not every nuke is a ICBM. We have plenty in our arsenal that can easily nuke a small area, with low level radiation afterwards, if there's any at all. Also, define 'nuke'. You could call a MOAB a nuke as well, even though it doesn't use a radioactive element. Guess what Fin-boy. You about to see the real deal. I would stock up on your country and prepare for a long haul.

Nuclear Weapons DO NOT exist

Attached: wish for anything.jpg (640x640, 173K)

Shoot a nuke down a bug hole, you got a whole lot of dead bugs.

>start another nuclear arms race
>Russia bankrupts itself again trying to keep up
based

>Entire domestic agenda
-2 Supreme Court Justices
-Tax reform
-destructive regulations cut
-stock market through the roof
-fucking brown people influx way down
What'd you say?

Attached: IMG-51ece58c3a9700744da3d9ce960b4035-V.jpg (250x166, 8K)

>define 'nuke
Uses nuclear reactions to achieve explosion
A MOAB uses a chemical reaction, and is not a nuke

So we can nuke Venezuela and they get to declare a TPS status for all of shitskin america

Considering they are selling weapons now, that may take a bit longer

CHECKED
SEND ONE OVER TO MEXICO
RE FRIED BEANS

>WHAT DID TRUMP MEAN BY THIS!
Obviously that he's controlled by Russia and that dastardly Putin told him to.

because we need low yield nuke flashbangs to make up for the bumpstock ban
that's why

Nuclear war with Russia confirmed.

No sense being to a treaty such as this, when nukes are still being used regardless. 9/11 disclosure soon. Also, checked.

Attached: 1420672209963.jpg (694x530, 32K)

Consider yield amount. I don't disagree with you and I did word that incorrectly, but I was thinking on terms of yield. Tonnage, etc. Point taken though user.

This. Trump tells Putin to fuck off and the media are now on the Russians side, how liberals fall for this shit is beyond me.

Yes

Attached: 1548953589933m.jpg (512x1024, 104K)

>9/11 disclosure soon.
Pax Americana v2.0

kike harder you ugly discord tranny

Chain reaction dampening fields are already deployed in American metropolitan areas. Strategic nukes dont make sense anymore and the future is tactical nukes.

We'll end up in a new treaty, mind you. It'll just have stricter oversight than this outdated one.

oh yes I did

Attached: 1545249011073.jpg (433x560, 73K)

The difficulty in understanding the Russian is that we do not take cognizance of the fact that he is not a European, but an Asiatic, and therefore thinks deviously. We can no more understand a Russian than a Chinaman or a Japanese, and from what I have seen of them, I have no particular desire to understand them, except to ascertain how much lead or iron it takes to kill them. In addition to his other Asiatic characteristics, the Russian have no regard for human life and is an all out son of bitch, barbarian, and chronic drunk

Aaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh

Fuck you user too close to home

Attached: .animated_1538510538488.gif (220x123, 60K)

Top kekek

>Are you scared of the starving children?
Nope. Tired of them burning up my taxes to raise people who will vote against my nation's sovereignty, create more tax burdens and vote to pilfer more of my money to cover it. Not afraid of the scum that sneak in and out using them as cover either. Looking forward to watching them get buttfucked by actual combat arms meat eaters

The world plays dirty you play dirty as well.
This balances power in regards to all of the money various entities are dumping into new age weapons... and no one is going to use higher yields in response. Smart move. Increase the power of intermediate range weapons on the cheap.

just whip your dick out and fire some silly string errywhere

Attached: 1548205544993.gif (280x438, 49K)