In order to have any hope of bringing back eugenics the population needs to be informed on what eugenics is, where and why it went wrong, and the most promising ways of implementing it. Right now most people seem to be stuck in the ignorant mentality that killed eugenics in the first place.
Why do we need eugenics? Because doing nothing about unhealthy people continuing to breed spirals out of control, and is likely why the vast majority of the US population is so incredibly unhealthy, poorly developed, and poorly functioning.
"It is really extraordinary that our people refuse to apply to human beings such elementary knowledge as every successful farmer is obliged to apply to his own stock breeding" -Theodore Roosevelt
"The scientific reputation of eugenics started to decline in the 1930s, a time when Ernst Rüdin used eugenics as a justification for the racial policies of Nazi Germany. By the end of World War II, many discriminatory eugenics laws were abandoned, having become associated with Nazi Germany"
But prior to that "Eugenics became an academic discipline at many colleges and universities and received funding from many sources".
"In their book published in 2000, From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice, bioethicists Allen Buchanan, Dan Brock, Norman Daniels and Daniel Wikler argued that liberal societies have an obligation to encourage as wide an adoption of eugenic enhancement technologies as possible in order to maximize public health and minimize the inequalities that may result from both natural genetic endowments and unequal access to genetic enhancements"
"Linus Pauling was a scientist and peace advocate who was so widely admired that he’s the only person to win two unshared Nobel Prizes. In all his pursuits, he appeared to have an overriding philosophy to minimize human suffering. He believed that abortion caused less suffering than a hereditary disease. To reduce human suffering, he believed it was necessary to legally intervene to wipe out the factors that caused genetic diseases. The next step would be to restrict marriage and reproduction for carriers of the disease."
It was about whether aristocracy is good or bad I was saying that the reason people are not succeeding is because of lack of eugenics aristocrats people always have high IQ and better genes unfortunately it didn't spread to everyone evenly but if we had laws and regulated the lower class from breeding like apes we would've made everyone aristocratic . Also half of our money is going to people who has genetic disabilities for what exactly? People said off yourself with eugenics yada yada its a pseudoscience Chris Langan accepts that world to better life is eugenics youtube.com/watch?v=Q-HXSHXUtFw
Noah Cruz
I mean the problem is it's a scary topic you know what if you are the undesirable one and have to be sterilized what would happen then?
Lincoln Mitchell
Are you not able to assess how incredibly counter-productive such a statement is?
There's a 0% chance that anyone is going to "sterilize nigger criminals".
Statements like that are why eugenics still has such a bad reputation.
Make sure to read the other links as well!
Ehh, yeah I don't think that's scientifically sound. I'm no historian but I know enough to know that aristocrats were often in poor health.
"Lower class" is also unscientific. There are plenty of very healthy, well developed, and well functioning people born into poverty.
>People said off yourself with eugenics yada yada its a pseudoscience Well I think the type of eugenics you're pushing is indeed inaccurate. Take a read through the OP links.
Video seems good though.
Austin Walker
If you're not going to sterilize nigger criminals then you just lost my full support.
>be scientifically retarded >don't understand basic human reproduction by its very nature is Eugenic >Doesn't understand Intelligence is regressive to a population group >doesn't understand Rockefeller's continued Eugenics in new forms
Modern Eugenics is social and economic.
>Feminism >Full term abortion >imposed economic housing costs to reduce breeding
If you truly want to improve the genetic lot exterminate the minorities. If you want designer children, Rockefellers are rabidly funding Genomics, which is puritanical gene editing
There is one massive problem though >heavy handed breeding creates an extreme regression towards domestication
Kind of like how Asians have intelligence, but are retarded hardcore collectivists at the same time.
>the bug people are the literal template of a weakling, domestication
So Bronze Age Pervert is basically right about everything?
Juan Cox
This is exactly what I'm trying to address here. Your statement shows a misunderstanding of eugenics. No one is getting "forced sterilized". That is but one of many methods of eugenics, and it is one of the most problematic ones.
That's idiocy. Why focus on something that has a 0% chance of ever being done?
>heavy handed breeding creates an extreme regression towards domestication This is my sole concern with a state-imposed eugenics policy, literally every other argument against it has been a bunch of redundant faggotry or a form of cope. But this one is a terrifying thought, especially considering the irreversible nature of these anomalies of observable domestication syndrome in humans.
James Gonzalez
Chinks have been practicing eugenics for a while now.
Eugenics all falls apart with gene editing. In the future, it won't even matter anymore. Black people will chose to be white. Chinks will choose to be white. Mexicans will choose to be white. In the future, 99% of the world will be white, even the niggers in Africa.
Get comfy and expand your almond activators CHN IS COMING BACK SOON Bellagio Sampler's training is almost complete and his power level is rising rapidly.,.. >to my Legion Your General returns >to Our Enemies The crusade begins soon, God's warriors are coming and ALL you shills will bow down and kiss our feet and declare JESUS IS LORD!
abortion is eugenics, it never left, only moved into a more palatable form for the masses.
Grayson Murphy
Yep, and at that point, they'll make sure that everyone with edited genes is pretty much a docile slave that will never be a threat to existing power structures. The future is looking bright.
Evan Johnson
More misunderstanding of eugenics. Why don't you people read before offering uninformed opinions?
I watched that movie a while back. I don't recall it perfectly, but I think it fell under the same problems as why eugenics previously failed - the sole focus on genes, and the type of eugenics they chose to implement.
More misunderstanding of eugenics. Why don't you people read before offering uninformed opinions?
There are some very informative links in the OP. I would like to discuss this with people who actually know how to read.
