>parallel universes
>thing I can see
Cool story
Why yes...
William Stewart
David Garcia
>self-awareness can exist in an artificial reality
Carter Hughes
So it’s a biological simulation? How would that be different from biological reality?
Carson Bell
>brainlet cannot imagine just how advanced this simulation is
Mason Williams
Speaking of self-awareness, it's about time some of you got with the damn program.
Hudson Murphy
I only believe in the multiverse so that I can go to sleep at night, knowing another me is a space marine rn
Mason Sullivan
sim theory is implying that our reality in its simplest form is artificial... essentially just a bunch of computer code (like in the matrix)
but we are of course still biological creatures because.... that is what we are! the fact that on the quantum level everything we are made up of is just 0s and 1s is practically irrelevant until we can begin to slightly understand the true nature of reality and ask questions like "how was it created" "can it be broken" etc etc
Landon Parker
This won't work.
Atheists don't know enough about physics to know what you're talking about OP.
I'm being dead fucking serious.
I've talked to them many times.
Julian Baker
Deism and simulation theory is the same thing because both are creationist.
Tyler Green
Not necessarily, it only implies that there is a creator of the simulated realities, you could not conclude that the base reality has a god because of that. If we were to create a perfect physical simulation of the universe tomorrow would that prove that god exists? It would not, it would only prove that a simulation was created. If you're considering the creators of the simulations to be the god of their simulations, and assume that we are in a simulation, then, by that argument, you could say that it proves "god", and that "god" may be omnipotent with regard to their simulation, but I assume we are talking about the existence of a one true god, which cannot be proven, but definitely exists.