Will homosexuality ever go away?

Not every gay person was abused as a child, my lad.

Whether or not you think gay people are retarded, that doesn’t change the fact that it’s not going anywhere. And neither are retards for that matter.

Sickness, disease, murder, rape and cannibalism is all scientifically natural and found in animals. The word natural or unnatural is used in the context of life affirming or non-life affirming.

Ass sex with incompatible biology and personality disorders is not life affirming, hence not natural.

Attached: 1547569971409.jpg (822x512, 132K)

only if the genes responsible for it (it is more than one) are edited

Perhaps you would prefer the phrase ‘naturally ocurring.’ Arguing semantics doesn’t change anything.

Regardless, homosexuality must have some evolutionary advantage, given that we see it in humans as well as other animals.

>only if the genes responsible for it
fags don't reproduce to pass on their genes. gays spread through pedophilia and hypersexualization of children.

Attached: homos.png (893x531, 31K)

>not even half of homosexuality is explained by abuse

it is not passed by fags, it is passed by a segment of straight people, but in straight people those same genes make them promiscuous that's why it survives

>Regardless, sickness, disease, rape, murder, and cannibalism must have some evolutionary advantage, given that we see it in humans as well as other animals.
The only semantic here is your divorce from preferable states of human life and natural law. Fags are mentally ill and while eradication is impossible, promoting such paths can certainly be and will be done.

Attached: 1547059087206.jpg (528x640, 112K)

>657% more likely to be gay if abused
>2200% more likely to be lesbian if abused
wow, it's nothing, right?

test

no

the real question is - will it ever stop being a political basketball bat to score touchdowns on nazis with

I seriously hope not. At least I hope there will always be some nigger faggots out there for me to hang out with.

Attached: 1544217074822.gif (500x281, 429K)

Who said it’s nothing? It’s clearly a problem. But the point is that there is a genetic component. Gay people will exist in the absence of abuse.

ep70.eventpilot.us/web/page.php?nav=false&page=IntHtml&project=ASHG18&id=180120617

here is the study btw
it was already known that it was more than 1 gene but now we know for sure how it is passed, and they used data from 23andme without people knowing it so it is more reliable as well

Well, you are still posting, so apparently no.

yet statistics and studies, plus speaking to faggots, lesbians and males who larp as females say otherwise. The very large majority of homosexuals are the result of some form of trauma:
>Study: Homosexuality Linked with Childhood Trauma
archive.is/yfjOu (news article)
archive.fo/6D8YE (archive link to study)
>Does Maltreatment in Childhood Affect Sexual Orientation in Adulthood?
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535560/
archive.fo/6D8YE

Also homosexual pedophiles are the leading the pack:
>The proportions of heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles among sex offenders against children: an exploratory study.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1556756/

yes, your vpn worked

it’s natures way of cleansing undesirable genes

Homosexuals can go away.

Attached: 6919876841180.jpg (350x262, 40K)

It's not a genetic thing.

Stop posting this satanic witch jizz hole you romanigger. Lana del fuckedface is an ugly cunt and its no wonder you like her you greasy brown poo in loo cast away.

Polen YES!

I read the article. The way they worded it was tricky, but it doesn’t seem to refute the fact that there is a large percentage of homosexuals who were not mistreated as children.

i live in a toilet that has many people that claim to be homosexuals and they speak frankly about their childhoods, yes this is anecdotal but doesn't refute the fact that homosexuality is trauma based since there is no "gay gene" to speak of.

I will shit on you like the fucking pakinigger that you are.

Attached: 459EFFAB-055D-4B32-8DB5-FE7F28998784.jpg (236x388, 21K)

Never. It has been with us since Ancient Greece, and it will stay with us until death.
This
I've never been abused.

Since we have seen from several posters in this thread that abuse does not account for a large percentage of homosexuality, how would you explain it without genetics? Also, how would you explain the fact that homosexuality is more common in brothers and relatives on the same maternal line? And finally, how would you explain the fact that other animals exhibit homosexual behavior?

I don't think it's only trauma related, I've met many bisexuals and homosexual that didn't talk about any trauma, but clearly had awful parents.

Yes it depends on Moon’s perihelion.

The towelhead durkadurka Ramadan janitor deletes any thread related to gays, btw

When white people stop existing.

>many
Weren’t you supposed to be trad?

They haven't had much confirmed progress with gene editing at all.

>no gay gene
Genetic analysis is still in its infancy due to the size of the datasets. New algorithms will help us to understand more about how traits are inherited, especially something as complex as sexuality. Check out this study above

It happens in places where circumcision is very rare.
He didn't say that it's good just because it's natural.

Epigenetics you slack-jawed marshmallow stuffer.

There's not much evidence that it's caused by abuse, though gay or bisexual youth are more likely to have been abused.

I’m a fag and I this is completely false. Even amongst my fag friends all of us had some sort of trauma or shit show of a childhood. If someone tells you anything other than that they’re either:
A. Straight
B. Lying to cope

>how would you explain the fact that other animals exhibit homosexual behavior?
Animals want to cum, they also engage in interspecies fucking, but that's only when they can't get the real deal. It's just that fucking is about cumming, but the main goal of an orgasm is not to become a genetic dead end. Animals don't think, they just fuck whatever they can when they have a hard time finding a compatible mate.
>Also, how would you explain the fact that homosexuality is more common in brothers and relatives on the same maternal line
People look and mimic each other. If it was really genetic, identical twins would always have the same sexual preferences.
>Since we have seen from several posters in this thread that abuse does not account for a large percentage of homosexuality, how would you explain it without genetics
It's not just the abuse, it can also be bad parenting in general, and other influences. Sometimes, it's just the result of promiscuity.

Oh, I guess you’ve explained homosexuality! Truly an enlightened post.

Ha! Ur gheii.

did you mother have ultrasounds while you were in the womb?
were you injected with multiple vaccines while still in the womb?
are you genitally mutilated?
Because all of those are forms of trauma.
Diet plays another part with xenoestrogenic sources like BP(x) (Bisphenol-(x)), s-o-y products, and estrogen in the water supply from birth control pills.
There is no gay gene and even after decades of males LARPing as females who joined the scientific community to prove it to be true couldn't find any source genetically speaking.
Homosexuality is all nurture based.
S

Thanks for your anecdote. I’ll put it with the others.

Attached: 955ED215-A516-43E1-9180-D68E3E90CDC4.jpg (640x640, 95K)

No.
Homosexuality has been with us since the dawn of time and will continue onwards. I know its hard to imagine that its built into our biology but it is senpai.

Even before I posted I knew you'd reply as such, provide the gene, give me the exact location on the genome that converts people into homosexuals. TWENTY YEARS AFTER THE GENOME MAPPING PROJECT COMPLETED THERE HAS BEEN NO SUCH GENE FOUND, STOP FUCKING PREDTENDING

Homosexuality is a sin. Sins can be forgiven if repent

I'm not a trad, I stick to the values that matter to me and my family members, but I have no problems influencing others, turning them away from degenerate behavior etc.

>size of the datasets
that study is reliable enough for me, they used data from 500.000 people in different countries, the genes they found were heavily linked to hormonal and olfactory processes so to me is clear what is coming into play, but it could certainly benefit from some replication

Confirmed, now you can tell us about your great Government adviser, Musse Hosseini. Is the Svenerinas in charge getting any good advise on public masturbation yet?

Where the fuck do you think you are, Oxford Union? Maybe a symposium with the Dalai Lama? And yeah, I just fucking explained it. Which you’d know if you paid any attention to current research on the subject instead of being a piss-eared banana slammer.

Thanks for this armchair scientist lesson, but I was really looking for a theory with a bit more... I dunno, proof? You can’t just say things that feel right to you and expect people to believe them.

Excellent work hand waving away the fact that animals are gay too, btw. Wouldn’t want you to hurt yourself by actually engaging with an idea.

I was complimenting the study, not criticizing it. The “size” I’m referring to here is the size of a single human genome, which is somewhat large especially when you have 500,000 subjects. This size of data has only been easily available recently, and alroghtms that can run quickly on these datasets are still being developed (by my colleagues, in some cases). There is still a lot to learn from the human genome, we’ve only scratched the surface.

Animals are not gay, they literally are bodies made to put their genes into the next generations. So no, they are not gay, they merely make mistakes common to irrational biological robots. Being "gay" is specifically a human thing. I was asked to explain, so I did, and you can believe whatever bullshit you want.

it's like asking, will the jews ever go away

they go hand in hand

>2 posts by this ID
>the first one insults epigenetics
>the second claims to have explained homosexuality

Attached: 67086371-1364-457C-9325-FEA1C10FDE8C.png (512x512, 19K)

It's not genetic.

It won't, homosexuality is a natural phenomena that can't just be stopped.

I mean “explain using science” not “explain using your feelings about animals.”

How the fuck did you read that as “insulting epigenetics”? Do you have some bizarre form of dyslexia or are you just a cheese faced penis fish?

>psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Pathogenic_theory_of_homosexuality
"Cochran points out that conditions which strongly affect the ability to reproduce fall into two categories - those that are very rare (affecting about 1 in 10,000 births or less), and those that result from genes which actually confer evolutionary advantage in certain situations, and disadvantage in others. (Such as sickle cell anemia.) Homosexuality is reportedly present in more than 1 in 100 people. Assuming it is not caused by a recent mutation, and that it does not fall into the selective advantage category, a reasonable explanation would be that it is caused by a germ or other environmental factor.

Cochran claims that theories of the cause of narcolepsy - that it is an auto-immune disease triggered by a virus - make the mechanism of selective brain modification plausible. He also claims that only humans and sheep exhibit homosexual behavior at population levels near 1% or greater. He says that given their physical proximity, it would be plausible to expect a pathogen that affected both species.

Proponents cite the cases of the bacterium Helicobacter pylori, which was recently discovered to contribute to most peptic ulcers; the bacterium Chlamydia pneumoniae, which may cause atherosclerosis; Nanobacter, which might cause kidney stones; and various viruses linked to cervical cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma (liver cancer). (Crain, 1999) "

Epigenetics is bullshit dude.

Sage this ugly bitch

Oh I misread it lmao.
So by saying epigenetics explains homosexuality, you saying that it has both a genetic and environmental cause?

As long as OP posts there will always be faggotry.

Homosexuality is like dust, you can't just remove it once and for all, you need to keep cleaning your house.

tl;dr Homosexuality strongly reduces fitness and it it was genetic the genes would have been selected out a long time ago. Because of this it's probable that there is an enviromental cause to homosexuality.

*And that the pathogen theory is the most likely sp far.

It’s interesting. I hope they come back with some evidence for this hypothesis. Perhaps they are right.

Careful there, it say in the very article that you link that it is not a theory.

“It is inaccurate to refer to this hypothesis as a theory, as a theory represents a well-tested and verified hypothesis that has withstood all currently possibly scientific scrutiny and inquiry.”

“As of 2005, no experiments or studies have yet been attempted. At present, it is a speculative hypothesis”

temptations are not new, but as Christians we're promised that we can endure and conquer those temptations, in so far as we need not let them drive us to suicide.
homos are suicidal to their drive for orgasm. they're like rats on a dopamine drip.

It appears to be genetic (or epigenetic). So the only ways to get rid of it:

1) Don't allow the gene carriers to reproduce.
2) Edit the genes to remove it.

>committing suicide because gay people exist
Imagine being this weak-willed, lmao

>Will homosexuality ever go away?
about as likely as heterosexuality going away.
the two are joined at the hip

Just find the gay genes, then CRISPR the fuck out of them.

Attached: 0022B-2BwtyX0wy.jpg (1280x851, 192K)

Because nobody dares to look into it. Any researcher who did and found it to be true would raked over coals in the media and lose their job.

Unfortunately, what this means with the left's fetishization of gayness that you're probably more likely to see people editing gayness into genes rather than removing it. You'll have to end the oppression olympics first.

Even if that is true, it doesn’t really change anything. You have to do the science before you can claim it is a theory, and before people should treat it as anything more than a hypothesis.

Just because you are unable to do the science doesn’t mean you get a free pass.

Maybe because it just so happens that the ones who look into it just so happen to be far right nutcases getting money from religious kooks?

There no other reasonable theory or hypothesis.

No, I’m not saying that. That’s what the best current research is saying you shrink wrapped pigeon spinner.

Soon

Gayness was allowed to infest the gene pool because gay people had to hide their orientation, get married and have kids like everyone else. They thus produced another generation of people who carried the gay genes.

Now gays can prance around and marry each other and modern society Means children are not strictly required for survival as in the past. So gay infected people are not passing on their genes and anywhere near the rates they were in the past.

The gay will soon be washed out of the collective gene pool naturally without need to resort to artificial mead.

Attached: 37FDA6BA-7952-43B0-9281-94318A8953F0.jpg (380x285, 25K)

no, committing suicide because you cannot wait to stick your dick in a pile of shit until after it's out of the guy...
you're walking disease vectors, and you burn our limited supply of antibiotic sources (there are only a few molds that produce chemicals that kill bacteria) so you can suck another 30 dicks this week.

Attached: 1547609385283.png (1000x500, 45K)

guess which one will win, the super virus, or the race for homos to breed themselves out of existence.
I am not enthused in either event.

Attached: 1548956523070.png (963x908, 46K)

Except some birds like swans, for example, engage in homosexual behaviours in which same-sex couples take care of orphaned hatchlings, or steal eggs from other swans and raise them as their own, thus contributing to the survival rate of the species.
So no, it's not about fucking only.

and I've always thought you looked like a baboon.

Attached: 1548948489443.jpg (901x922, 187K)

nah those genes strive on straight people as well, and faggots aren't marrying, only a small percentage of them are doing so, ending the stigma surrounding it only made them more degenerate than ever because now their livelihood isn't at stake anymore

>Be in year 2100
>human programming science is now known by everyone
>simple understanding of it promotes quick recovery from most mental illnesses
>everyone rejects the idea that we are different spirits
>the majority of global population has now evolved beyond a need for personality
>nobody has any doubt about their purpose on Earth
>first giant brain outside the body was grown in lab conditions and transplanted into a giant machine unit
>we did not attribute a sex to it, but it is without a doubt a machine

Attached: lasvegasoverlord.jpg (2100x1400, 1.6M)