If no nukes are used, could America single handedly conquer the rest

petrodollar?
still using that meme, tisk tisk
oil doesn't secure loans from the central bank birth certificates do on the other hand which is why Europe is being replaced by low IQ breeders as is North America

Shit tier bait but this is guaranteed to get 100+ replies from cancer.

America's armed forces are pozzed with fatties, diversity, womyn, fags, and transfags. I doubt we could beat Luxembourg right now.

Attached: 1522774453013.jpg (600x400, 54K)

>Vietnam
>Iraq
>Afghanistan
nough said

not even close.
Sure, Usa would beat one or two countries easily, but then the cost would start to feel.
Eventually Gorilla war would kill all the US soldiers.

How long would their will to fight last when they realize we don't want to kill them all?

Why do conservatives love to boast about the US government's power so much? Are they all bootlicking government-loving commie cucks?

You couldn't even conquer Canada
>it's the current year

This. It's all hype. The jew portray we are so powerful only because we are their protector. It's all propaganda

No americans are pussies , they may have the manpower and the technological superiority but they dont have the stomach for war

In total, conventional war? Absolutely.
That's why we have all those bases everywhere.

We could use the nukes to kill all life on the planet. But, that would not be a good idea, because Americans are also included in that group. Unleashing enough nukes to kill the rest of the world would result in the planet being poisoned so badly that EVERYONE would die.

No, of course not. If your question was "Could the US bomb the fuck out of the rest of the world and cause tons of property damage and civilian loss to everyone?" That'd be a yes.

Without any conscience of ethical warfare, no nukes, and high public approval. Most likely.

This is the mind of a typical chauvinist American. The real threat to world peace over the last 100 years has always been America, not the Soviet Union or "Islamic terrorism".

Beat? Yes
Conquer? No

Only way to really conquer a nation is to have their general population support you or to exterminate them. There is no other way.

You couldn't beat rice farmers or desert people.

>inb4 ROE prevent us from winning
Cop out....you tried to false flag your asses to genocide so many fucking times.

Fool

We aren't trying to conquer Iraq or Afghanistan. We aren't Imperial. If our goal was full conquest we would win.

China might be a challenge, but sure. We'd just drone and cruise missle everyone else.

we could hold off the world in a conventional war, but everyone working together to fight us, I don't think we'd win. A nasty and costly stalemate.

What would be the point? Even if we could conquer every inch of clay on the planet, we couldn't hold it for long. Invasion is easy, occupation is difficult.

Not the entire world. Geographic challenges alone require having strategically positioned allies.

We would just need a few friendly countries to allow for FOBs and such and we’d crush easily

Attached: 952D6356-54F9-4A0F-B63B-A60F1B2FD213.jpg (262x325, 23K)

instincively i say no. if we or any nation had that ability it would already have been done. idk how our weaponry ranks compared with all other nations combined.

retards itt don't understand the purpose behind america's liberation campaigns in the middle east and asia.

A motivated America would fucking massacre the world. You faggots should thank your lucky starts that we believe in freedom and we are trying to keep to ourselves