Can Jow Forums explain how homosexuality hinders human life without resorting to morality and appealing to nature?

Can Jow Forums explain how homosexuality hinders human life without resorting to morality and appealing to nature?

Attached: Watch me create a new gender.png (719x691, 595K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_ancient_Rome
archive.is/yfjOu
archive.fo/6D8YE
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535560/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1556756/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Allowing childfuckers-by-another-name to roam around sounds pretty detrimental to me.
>you need to argue on my exact terms
No.

Attached: tyu765edk0k.jpg (1305x864, 119K)

All this gender shit did start when he restarted his abomination of a show. Highly suspect. Hmmmmm?

AIDS

Catastrophic anal prolapse.

Attached: Media Bias.jpg (960x468, 91K)

Can Jow Forums explain this without using correct arguments?

Who is this very scientist looking fellow?

>without resorting to morality
Nope. Homosexuality spreads further degeneracy.

She's very cute but the shape of her ears is a bit strange.

I mean if you want to end your own bloodline that's fine with me just stop pushing it on the youth. Keep it in your private domain.

Can OP stop taking so many cocks up the ass in public?

Attached: dogo.jpg (852x1041, 150K)

Ancient greeks were homos, romans were homos, ancient egyptians were homos. We all agree these civilizations were amazing. Now suddenly gays are a problem. Mmm...

>we wuz homos and shit

Is it?

Attached: TP079_084-085BIfB_smart-2.jpg (2312x2944, 573K)

>Roman men were free to enjoy sex with other males without a perceived loss of masculinity or social status, as long as they took the dominant or penetrative role. Acceptable male partners were slaves and former slaves, prostitutes, and entertainers, whose lifestyle placed them in the nebulous social realm of infamia, excluded from the normal protections accorded a citizen even if they were technically free. Although Roman men in general seem to have preferred youths between the ages of 12 and 20 as sexual partners, freeborn male minors were off limits at certain periods of Rome, though professional prostitutes and entertainers might remain sexually available well into adulthood.[2]
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_ancient_Rome

>without resorting to morality and appealing to nature
Explain the logic behind these restrictions.

Homosexuals tend to have a lot more partners than heterosexuals, so spreading of diseases can be more prevalent.

Homosexuality and feminization tend to weaken a civilization’s culture by reducing the amount of masculinity and all its benefits (competetive drive, aggressiveness, etc.) which can lead to another civilization with a more dominating culture to assert itself and take over.

>appealing to nature
What did he mean by this?

Attached: 74783693563546.jpg (630x800, 208K)

>Can Jow Forums explain how homosexuality hinders human life without resorting to morality and appealing to nature?
Faggots are literally incapable of reproducing except by molesting the spawn of others.
They only corrupt, never produce.

it doesn't but we gave them an inch and they want a mile, figuratively. i don't care if they fuck, but they should not be allowed to marry or be the guardians of children, and they should not be allowed to artificially inseminate a woman and raise the child as their own. children need to grow up with an example of normalcy before they make the choice to pursue their degenerate inner desires.

That the argument "sexual organs are intended to be used for reproduction, not just pleasure" is invalid

How intertwined were those activities with politics?

>Without resorting to morality
There's no other way. Morality is fundamentally how we decide what is good practice.

>Study: Homosexuality Linked with Childhood Trauma
archive.is/yfjOu (news article)
archive.fo/6D8YE (archive link to study)

>Does Maltreatment in Childhood Affect Sexual Orientation in Adulthood?
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535560/
archive.fo/6D8YE

>The proportions of heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles among sex offenders against children: an exploratory study.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1556756/

>appealing to nature
THIS is the IMPORTANT part, the thread should have ENDED right THERE.
If you base your judgement off of an argument excluding morality and nature on a social issue you are missing the major part of how society works.

Attached: lemon sage.jpg (1936x2582, 779K)

>Can Jow Forums explain homosexuality without:
>the supernatural, or
>the natural.

No. KYS.

Attached: 1547078844464.jpg (600x517, 58K)

HIV

Attached: 1541451613533.jpg (573x391, 60K)

If a grown ass man wants to fuck another grown ass man in the butt, so be it. Hes gay.

However, if they start to behave like faggots in public, they there should be repercussions.

This is when I realized things have gotten much worse

Attached: Bill Nye Turning point.jpg (788x501, 90K)

Attached: 1495410930156.png (972x543, 39K)

>...without resorting to morality and appealing to nature
>Can you explain something without using the arguments I don't like?