Who should the flute go to

Child B had the hottest scene it's a no brainer

This is a shitpost thread and I hope you all realize it

and of course it's a german who calls it out first lmao

What kind of flute is it?

It should go to me and I should get to decide on my own who gets it. It’s that simple I have my own list of credentials and a system I’ve created, any interference alters the credentials I judge by, smarter than a computer, better than human logic. The fail safe of all fail safes

link?

B made the flute so it's hers. Not even a question of who I should give it to as I have no power of ownership over it.

skin

Keep the flute and allow whomever wants it more to lease/rent it.

B should be willing to give the flute to A, seeing that monetary gain pales in comparison to the real payoff of a craft. When your people use and excel with the tools you can provide them with, that is the real payoff, to see the glory and quality of your people's lives enhanced is the true value of craftsmanship. Not the selling of your wares.

Child A should get it if in a scenario where one of them temporarily uses it.

Child B should get it in if in a scenario where one of them keeps it permanently.

Child C should be gassed.

Kill C
Fuck A
Marry B

A=White
B=Asian
C=Everyone else

the flute should be destroyed so they all receive the same amount

>child D
>i’ll give you $100 for the flute, then charge $5 a head to watch a livestream of me fucking C’s ass with it

Attached: 3E77A96E-1B9C-4D68-8916-3CC136C0F195.jpg (639x960, 40K)

Child A can build her own damn flute if she wants it. If it wasn't for the hottie child B, there would be no flute. Maybe child A can purchase the flute from B if she thinks she is so damn deserving of it. Why doesn't B get free flute lessons from A?

So what's up with child C here? She can't create or play a flute but wants the damn thing so she can lose it under her dirty clothes? We have to help her though so her lot in life improves. Child A can buy the flute from B. We as the great overseeers of /pol will tax the sale and give the tax money to C. After all, C offers no value to this situation so she needs to be compensated for having no value.

They can all take turns blowing on it. Or maybe one could blow it while the others handle the shaft.

Attached: Bernd Und Der Ratsel auf Unteralterbach annemarie_lesen.png (368x387, 110K)

Just read this bike cuck shit.

those children are off a loli VN called unteralterbach

Spbp

We get to control where the flute goes so...
/pol = Jew

the best option is to not do anything

Child A must already have a flute if she knows how to play one
Child B paid and worked for it so

That almost sounds sexual. Surely just a fluke.

based

Trick question

I’d give my skin flute to all three

child b made the flute
yet i have the flute
because she works in my flute factory
if she wants a flute she can purchase one from me at cost with her employee discount
child a as well as c can also purchase flutes from my factory at a price that generates profit by compensating for child B's employee discount
if child a and child c do not have money they can also work in my flute factory and receive the same employee discounts

Lol

Attached: 1536827415626.gif (250x195, 801K)

Surely.

Attached: Muhammad and Aisha.jpg (519x426, 158K)

A.
Child B got paid for making it
C is just a hand out
A has a mom who will pay for it.

This is literally just
A = Utilitarianism
B = Socialist ethics
C = Humanitarian

B. It is literally their flute.

C is taught by B to make flutes. B sells the flute to A. Now A has her flute to play, and can do so professionally to make her money back. B can now afford to make more, at a profit, and C has improved her lot in life.

I'd stop being a flute thieving nigger and give the flute back to B, OP.

Let child B keep the flute but also tell child A and C they're free to trade her for the it if they think they can provide a good or service of equal value. Act as mediator if needed.

Just a flute, even

Would be the case if A provided the plans and paid for the manufacturing of the flute to B. Also don't forget B stole the blue prints and is making counterfeits on the side with cheaper materials and cutting corners on labor.

Any answer is an answer that affirms that it is okay for the government to take anything and redistribute it how they wish.

It is the underpinnings of the justification for a socialist government.

the white girl

Attached: 1540932823465.png (378x472, 8K)

B is not socialist, B is capitalist. If you are entitled to the fruits of your labor and you own the means of production, that is ANTI socialist. B is capitalist / respect of property rights.

It's so confusing. I hope child C doesn't go to a life of prostitution because or this.

it was clearly made not as part of a flute making job but as a hobby, it is a child.
A already has a flute if she is a flutist, the state has provided her one.
C does not exist under socialism
Therefore there is no reaosn for B not to have the flute she made with her labor.

Depends on who could make my flute the happiest.

Was about to make that same post

>If you are entitled to the fruits of your labor and you own the means of production
No, thats socialism. Capitalism is when someone else owns the means of production and steals some of your fruit for the privledge of using it.

See

Just because you have the flute, it doesn't mean you can't disavow the actions that lead to you taking possession of the flute.

>improved my life immeasurably
Can't make one and can't play it either. How the fuck will this improve her life?
>child a should rent it or sell it to child b, child b can then go busking to pay off the flute and make some money.
Child a = win
child b = win
child c = wants something cuz

This whole Post is cancer and filled with beta men.
Girls shouldn't be doing anything but learning to cook and to take care of thier future husbands, learning how to be good wives and mothers
ffs Jow Forums

I'm pretty sure that even if they worked together, they could not get the flute from me, I could easily overpower those children.

Based Ozzie. All the options are communist. Everyone who chose B be ashamed of being duped.

> Capitalism
> Theft

Completely wrong. Theft is when you take something that is not yours. If you create something, then it is yours. Recognition of that fact is respect of property rights, which socialism does NOT endorse but capitalism does.

Is child C being shy about wanting a penis?

Capitalism is only unique in its overt acceptance of rentseeking and usury. Its literally were it gets its name (i.e. capital gains = capitalism).

Attached: acorngathering.png (1582x491, 221K)

> based tin
> literally who
> best grill Laura
Have to give it to the latter, even though it's gibs.

Not the biggest fan of UAB either, the girls are THOTS. Would much prefer a VN with more chaste females and family values.

Art was great, though.

Who knew it would feel this good to have power over the flute?

Attached: KekAid.jpg (688x800, 134K)

Child A because maja is best girl

So basically because you have possession of the flute and can remain in possession of it through force, you're now the owner. How elf-like.

Attached: flute_thief.jpg (736x1040, 101K)

Economic ideology per child chosen.
>Child A: Fascism
>Child B: Capitalism
>Child C: Communism

Surprisingly few A's in this thread.

Up OP's ass.

Agreed

blonde on flute
brunette vocals + guitar
3rd worlder on drums

dunno but look what I found

Attached: Capture.jpg (853x242, 25K)

What is that?

Attached: iu.png (300x250, 34K)

What fascist state in history have expropriated people's property to give it to leeches? Actually the economic ideology per child chosen is:

>Child A: Communism
>Child B: None
>Child C: Communism

"Giving" the person who owns a thing the thing isn't an ideology per se, that's just common sense every society except gommies have always done.

Gulag for you.

Attached: josef.gif (300x235, 409K)

I wouldn't necessarily agree with that, as in order to have private property, you have to have recognition of property rights. Otherwise what you really have is a kleptocracy or totalitarian system where property is really controlled by the strong.

Just as Marks himself says "real communism" could only happen simultaneously around the world at one time, he makes the admission that a class based hierarchy is not just superior, but fundamentally NECESSARY for it to function. This would in turn mean any communist nation would easily fall prey to any non-communist nation in military conflict, meaning his dream is all but unobtainable.

Just as real communism can't into military, so MUST real capitalism into property rights and the enforcement thereof. You could try it in both cases I suppose, but the fundamental weaknesses without the necessary and sufficient conditions would kinda doom you to fail, thus it's heavily implied if not explicitly stated in each respective political/economic philosophy.

oddly named instagram account..probably Hillary

Give it to A
What reason did B make it for if not to hear it? B should want A to have it
I dont know how it improves C's life. What is she gonna do? Sell it and buy drugs?

* Marx, duh

An user already solved this game the other day, I kind of forgot what he wrote but essentially it ended with the creation of a fiat currency and a bunch of little five year old wageslaves

What right do we, the readers of OPs post, have to dictate who gets the flute? Where did we get this power?

If Child B made it, then why don't they still have it?

Child B can sell it for whatever they want and give it to whoever buys it.

This pretty much

They're all communism, you dunce. Do you not understand how command economies work? The flute goes to whomever the gubmint says. Whatever demographic needs to be swayed is who the gibs are promised to.

Honestly, if somebody deserves the flute, it should be Bernd as compensation for all the troubles

Child A gets the flute and child B gets royalties on every concert that child A performs so she can make more flutes. Child C is a liar. Why would her life improve by her getting a flute that she can't even play?

Good question. I guess it's really more of an autocratic dictator thought experiment than a gommie/gapitaljew problem like people think.

Man I hope LauraB has a good life. I hope she doesn't turn out fucked up

> implying B can't learn to play the flute if she's smart enough to actually make one.

Faggot, A should give B flute lessons. A already had a flute and lost hers. She can't be trusted with a flute. B made the flute because she had the time and materials to do so. What more reason does she need? She could have made a weapon and kill both A and C; which would have been just although not ethical. Obviously B is someone of high character. A and C should clean up the debris created when B made the flute.

Acorns to fiat. Image is posted above.

My point was that property rights are not exclusive to capitalism, and therefore not a defining feature. Only rentseeking and usury are capitalism's defining features as it is the only system that partakes in without reluctance. There is very little unique about capitalism besides this fact.

this works theoretically, but realistically whoever sucks you the best is who gets it

Attached: Shad.jpg (1024x1024, 109K)

So you're going with A, is that what you're saying?

This whole thing is retarded.
Child A represents 'entitlement' - the leftist narrative of superiority = guilt.
Child B represents workers, ie I made this why don't I get to keep it.
Child C represents the Great Other, ie I am from the teeming masses abroad, can I come stay with you and put the flute in your daughter.

This equality/equity/equerry nonsense is not an argument.

They all got the skin flute, gnomeamsayin'?

was child b fairly compensated for the flute?
if not, b
if so, then a
child c has no claim nor creates no value from the flute, and might warrant a sandwich.

based Gottfried Feder

Capitalism is about the transfer of capital as in intrinsic value, smart ass

Literally any trade transaction technically falls under the purview of capitalism

Child B has the only ownership rights to the flute. If someone else wants to buy it, let them offer him a price. Or if he feels like letting Child A borrow it, that's Child B's choice. But you take it from him by force is theft.

B has a job and material, so probably her.