Alright Jow Forums let's settle this

Alright Jow Forums let's settle this

Is climate change real?

Attached: FB_IMG_1536820245506.jpg (700x500, 34K)

Other urls found in this thread:

electroverse.net/professor-valentina-zharkova-breaks-her-silence-and-confirms-super-grand-solar-minimum/
youtu.be/-k8BJkNQf9I
youtu.be/71dAwTS_l1Q
youtu.be/PWilOr8Xk9M
youtu.be/622nXHK_J9E
youtu.be/XLmxkaNMl2A
youtu.be/lIBJFAsYSWQ
youtu.be/-WUvDgJVd6A
youtu.be/-UtILlQOH8Y
youtu.be/R0S7CGLUp44
youtu.be/CgY2N7E0eEs
youtu.be/tMqOppuuJng
youtu.be/vYTbxpSLMUw
climate.nasa.gov/
iceagenow.info/australia-bom-caught-tampering-climate-data/
youtu.be/zOwHT8yS1XI
co2coalition.org/2018/05/05/co2-just-hit-410ppm-and-all-is-well/
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016GL071930
science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6322/276
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

you'd have to be a complete retard to think that adding 2 watts of energy over every square meter of Earth's surface will have no consequences

Essentially every line of evidence there is (climate modelling, paleoclimatology, modern observations and physical reasoning) demonstrate that greenhouse gases are a crucial driver of the planetary climate

Climate change is real, and has been happening since earth had a climate. "Man-made" climate change is complete bullshit.

Greens are going to be btfo again next election

The more ppm CO2 the less the increase in atmospheric temperature. Think logarithmic approaching X-axis. The difference between sub300(pre industrialisatie) and 380ppm(now) is minuscule Source: fuck you i'm a phonefag

Also look up roman and medieval warming, Climate fluctuation is real. The man made portion is laughable. ~1/60 of the atmosphere are greenhouse fases. 3.62% of that is CO2 3.4% of that is man made.

Undeniably humans have an effect though its mostly third worlders and an excuse to tax people especially the middle class even more.The truth is if people don't stop consuming things we will ruin the environment through factories planes and oats but this is mostly corporations.Do you own a factory or a dam?no.Ted Kascinsky was right but people will never stop being consumerist whores who enable no cannot live without their precious luxuries.The left is full of irrationalities like wanting to help the poor while supporting taxing the poor more through things that do nothing like the carbon tax.Or they support the turning 3rd world shitholes into 1st world ones that destroy the environment at an even higher rate. Ironically with how consumerist the average bugman leftist is the cannot live without destroying the environment.

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 25K)

>ice core samples blocks your path

how so?

The people who want to make you believe in man made climate change are the same people that want to erase your borders. Think goy.

I don't know, I'm not a climate scientist am I. Why are they asking me though? The fact that they can't settle this among themselves makes me say it's probably bullshit. They're not asking me if Higgs boson is real are they. So what are they asking me for in this case?

because in France they wanted to use this climte change pretext to fuck us on the price of oil, i literally sold my diesel car because of Macron ( the price was so fuckin high I couldn't afford to drive no more)

Climate change is real, but the cause is not what they tell you. It's out of human control - the sun is getting hotter - but they make trillions of dollars on all their CO2 taxes.

yes but we are fucked even harder than we realise. Once afrika starts deforestation on scales like we did in Amerika/Europe, we are fucked.

It might be, and here's the solution. IMH overpopulation is more of a concern than g̶l̶o̶b̶a̶l̶ c̶o̶o̶l̶i̶n̶g̶ g̶l̶o̶b̶a̶l̶ w̶a̶r̶m̶i̶n̶g̶ Extreme weather.

Attached: 1549061274789m.jpg (793x1024, 113K)

It's called weather.

They can't even get a two week forecast correct, but you should go to jail apparently if you don't pay them money through taxes on a hundred year model.

prominent (((climate scientists))) have promised more ends of the world than prominent figures have promised rapture. No really if the rapturists just cling on to climate change predictions, the day they're actually right religion will have a better ratio than science.

Exactly, Dutchbro!

The total composition of the atmosphere (1 million PPM) has only increased with 0.008% CO2 the past 50 years. (From 330 PPM in 1970 to 410 PPM today) 80/1000000 = 0.008%.

People thinking that CO2 is the problem haven't really been thinking about it. From 330 to 410 might be a big % increase in CO2, but when held up against the total atmospheric composition, it's simply ridiculous.

The sun has its cycluses and currently, we're in a hot period. That's the explanation. When it cools down a bit again in 1-5-10 or 30 years or whenever it decides to do so, the climate will return to "normal".

Another funny thing about the CO2 hoax is that they can't explain how "CO2 trapping heat/greenhouse effect" completely contradicts the fact that clear nights are much colder due to all the heat radiating out into space.

I can't see how modern industrial society can't be destroying the planet.

However, the fact that it is pushed so hard, alongside the proposed solutions (even less white children b/c higher carbon footprint) and consequences (even more brown refugees b/c whatever we deserve it) make me suspicious.

electroverse.net/professor-valentina-zharkova-breaks-her-silence-and-confirms-super-grand-solar-minimum/

I Am the Voice of the Anons REEEEEing out in the wilderness. I Say to you Comped Mods and Shills... LET MY PEOPLE GO!!! if you harm this post or fail to unban the anons , God will send 7 plagues to the entire Shill, Janny and Mod team... LET MY PEOPLE GO GOOKMOOT!

>Philosophy of hating Men Gillette breakdown
youtu.be/-k8BJkNQf9I

>Are you an Anti-establishment Accelerationist, RACISM DEBUNKED
youtu.be/71dAwTS_l1Q

>college educated women ARE THE PROBLEM
youtu.be/PWilOr8Xk9M

>Cyberpunk dystopian future prophecy warning
youtu.be/622nXHK_J9E

>100th monkey effect are you the ONE to change the world
youtu.be/XLmxkaNMl2A

>Jewish rub columbian NXIVM pedo cult first to cover it
youtu.be/lIBJFAsYSWQ

>eternal memetics esoteric meme symbolism
youtu.be/-WUvDgJVd6A

>David IckeWave, music video
youtu.be/-UtILlQOH8Y

>proof of pizzagate history of symbolism
youtu.be/R0S7CGLUp44

>AI and the pedo elite-tech pizza
youtu.be/CgY2N7E0eEs

>JONESWAVE vengeful gestalt
youtu.be/tMqOppuuJng

>Jow Forums and the Nature of CHAOTIC-GOOD
youtu.be/vYTbxpSLMUw

ENJOY THE PLAGUES IF YOU HARM THIS POST,,@.,...

Attached: 1549168771062.jpg (600x688, 116K)

Just look at who's responsible for pushing this climate change agenda. Globalist piece of shit leaders and the UN. That should tell you everything you need to know.

It's just a way to continue to fuck the citizens of the world in the ass and continue to subsidize their own destruction through importation of the third world. While also profiting off it. They don't actually use any of their money from things like Paris Climate Accord or carbon taxes to research any sort of solutions. It all just goes into the pocket of George Soros who uses it to ship refugees to Europe and pay his organizations like Antifa to do his bidding.

Attached: 1548990470187.gif (500x281, 891K)

climate.nasa.gov/
NASA has no reason to lie.

>make me suspicious.
You just add 2+2 together:
>have even less kids because higher carbon footprint
at the same time
>import gorillions of sandniggers, so that they use a way higher carbon footprint
Does not compute.
The climate kikes need to be killed.

Attached: French Frog (real).jpg (1024x872, 107K)

Let's seperate this into sub-questions:
1. Do humans cause CC?
Yes.
2. Should humans work to neutralize the CC they cause?
Maybe- but ask yourself: "What metrics can be used to demonstrate that money spent, by government towards private industry, is combatting CC?" - if none, then is there ANY WAY to know the money is not being wasted?

>They can't even get a two week forecast correct

I'm 26 and I probably can count the number of times on two hands where they got a one week forecast correct.
And honestly even the next day forecast is a 50/50 chance.

Of course climate change is real. Ever heard of the Ice Age? We had an ice age a while back. Now we don't. That's because the climate changed.

Yes, it is real. It ain't cuz we got too many cars, it's because we got too few trees. It's like trying to be a chain-smoker after you had one of your lungs removed.

Nevermind the fact that the ElectroMagnetism of Earth is all over the place. Most climate sudden anomalies are also amplified by the activity of the Sun.
There's also the thing with the north pole moving from the territory of Canada all the way to Siberia and with it, the weather and temperature 'rings' also migrate, changing the weather globally.

Attached: planetary-k-index (3).gif (640x480, 11K)

Historical air/soil quality measures are quite convenient as metrics

Has there been any noticeable climate changes in Israel?
How big of a topic is it there, media etc?

>historical metrics
When considering if moment should be spent, we're not interested in finding out 41,000 years from now.

>Has there been any noticeable climate changes in Israel?
It's something you only 'notice' through the media.

>How big of a topic is it there, media etc?
It's not- we have REAL issues with which to deal

Ok thanks, interesting viewpoint.

You can find out what the atmosphere consisted of thousands years ago through research of soil or ice. Geology has a lot answers in CC matters.

>thank you, Jew
We need more of this!

>we can know, for certain, if we are successfully neutralizing human caused climate change
No

Climate change is real. The climate is always changing. The question you're probably trying to ask is whether climatology is real. Well, in the sense of being a multi-billion dollar industry it's real enough if that's what you mean. If you mean whether it's a real science the answer is no, it's a ridiculous pseudoscience.

climate changes ever year, for fucks sake. it's winter now (summer in ozzy), soon it'll be spring.

>No
>Rejects achievements of geology and scientific methods
Call me surprised. Is it that hard to see further than tip of your own nose?

>I love science
Pathetic. Back to plebbit

The climate changes all the time, but man made climate change is a load of shit even Australia's Bureau of meteorology has been caught tampering climate data iceagenow.info/australia-bom-caught-tampering-climate-data/

see
CO2 is an important factor and control knob up to about 80-100ppm or so. After that, additional CO2, even doubling the amount, adds very little to the overall greenhouse effect. In addition, there IS NO cascading water vapor feedback, which is the lynch pin upon which all of the catastrophic scenarios hinge.

You're either a faggot cuck or a nigger, looking for an excuse to bring more niggers into Europe and you should throw yourself into the sea with an anvil tied to your neck.

yes, and we need to exterminate the chinks and the poojeets to stop it

The simple explanation is this:

Michael Mann and Gavin Schmidt are FUCKING KIKES, and pretty much everyone at the UN is a COMMUNIST NIGGER or also a LYING HEEB.

After a certain threshold, CO2 has less and less influence as "greenhouse gas"

Attached: 1543777980926.jpg (550x338, 136K)

Climate has always changed, and it always will.
What we have been doing, or will be doing with todays emissions, will make no significant difference.
CO2 is at historic low levels, and plants would love some more...
[ youtu.be/zOwHT8yS1XI ]

Attached: NASA_says_increased_CO2_Greening_earth.jpg (1010x848, 108K)

Yes. It started to snow here in Winter and the weather is super hot in Summer. Even old men say they never experienced this level of hot temprature.

t. nearly bankrupt due to the fracking boom

that's just completely false. Doubling the CO2 from 280 to 560ppm imposes a forcing of close to 4 W/m2, which is sufficient to raise temperature by between 3 and 4°C.

The idea that CO2 has no effect beyond 100ppm is unphysical and also completely inconsistent with the paleoclimate record.

>Doubling the CO2 from 280 to 560ppm imposes a forcing of close to 4 W/m2
Provide physical evidence
> completely inconsistent with the paleoclimate record
Glaciations have started when the level of CO2 was higher than it currently is. All of the previous holocene interglacials were also warmer than current, with a lower level of CO2.

CO2 and temperature are loosely correlated at best in the paleoclimate record. Much more loosely than say, dishonesty and Judaism you fucking kike. I wish Hitler would have done his fucking job!

Increased CO2 levels in otherwise identical conditions, supercharges plant growth.

"Of course, we all hoped that the climate movement would collapse when CO2 hit 400ppm – but as the 50th anniversary of futurist Paul Ehrlich’s failure to lose his audience demonstrates, it will likely take a lot more than half a century of being wrong to convince the most committed climate advocates that they might be mistaken."

[ co2coalition.org/2018/05/05/co2-just-hit-410ppm-and-all-is-well/ ]

Attached: PlantFood.jpg (776x751, 59K)

nope, wrong

complete bullshit

Wow, those are some powerful arguments, with some convincing links to corroborating and credible sources...

>Provide physical evidence
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016GL071930

The only interglacial that is thought to be warmer than the pre-industrial Holocene with some confidence was MIS5. This is likely because it was associated with one of the largest orbital forcings of the late Pleistocene, which is also why the temperature was regionally heterogenous (with higher temperature at high latitude and cooler temperature at low latitude).
science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6322/276

>Glaciations have started when the level of CO2 was higher than it currently is
Can you give an example?